Letter from Dimond to Flannery RE Drafts
Correspondence
January 11, 1973

1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Letter from Dimond to Flannery RE Drafts, 1973. a53b3632-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3c0ba87d-e967-4cf7-ac5e-404193934adc/letter-from-dimond-to-flannery-re-drafts. Accessed October 10, 2025.
Copied!
CENTER FOR LAW AND EDUCATION 61 K IR K L A N D S T R E E T C A M B R I D G E , M A S S A C H U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 8 P a u l R. D im o n d January 11, 1973 © 0 6 R O S E A V E N U E A N N A R B O R , M I C H I G A N 4 8 1 0 4 T E L E P H O N E 3 1 3 - 7 6 9 - 7 4 4 1 Mr, William E, Caldwell Ratner, Sugermon & Lucas 525 Commerce Title Bldg. Memphis, Tennessee J. Harold Flannery Center for Law & Education 6l Kirkland St. Cambridge, Massachusetts Norman J. Chachkin 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York Gentlemen: Enclosed please find drafts of a letter to thr- Clerk and various pleadings to get the proceedings started again in the event the 6th Circuit denies the re-hearing en banc. I have researched the Rule 19 issue and have come to no conclusions. The pleadings, therefore, are designed for maximum feasible flexibility consistent, hopefully, with getting the job done. Your comments will be appreciated. Re: Bradley v. Milliken Sincerely, Paul R. D: iond PHD;jm Enclosures