Correspondence from Kellogg to Kutcher
Correspondence
February 10, 1984
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Kellogg to Kutcher, 1984. c72712b8-c903-ef11-a1fd-6045bddbf119. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3c32af34-31da-4973-9155-ddb76c3679ba/correspondence-from-kellogg-to-kutcher. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES OF
QUIGLEY & SCHECKMAN
631 ST. CHARLES AVENUE
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130
TELEPHONE: 504-524-0016
WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY IN ASSOCIATION WITH:
STEVEN SCHECKMAN R. JAMES KELLOGG
MARK S. GOLDSTEIN
RONALD ). PURSELL
January 10, 1984
Mr. Robert Kutcher
Bronfin, Heller
624 Whitney Bank Bldg.
New Orleans, LA 70130
Major v. Treen
Dear Bob:
I have spoken with my co-counsel relative to your request that the parties
jointly submit Act 2 of the 1983 First Extraordinary Session as a remedy in
this case.
Because we represent a statewide class we don't feel we should jointly submit
the plan with you and perhaps foreclose a classmember's attempts to intervene
and challenge the plan. We know of no intentions by anyone to do so: our
position is one taken out of an abundance of caution.
We will have no opposition to adoption of the plan by the Court, however.
The difference is a subtle one, but one we feel is important in discharge
of our ethical obligations to absent classmenbers.
I'm sure you appreciate our position, but if there is any question, please
do not hesitate to get in touch with me.
Sincerely,
ro ely
cc:
Lani Guinier
Stan Halpin
Ken DeaJean
Bill Quigley
Steven Scheckman