Order: Motion of Appellants for Stay of Issuance of Mandate Denied; Bill of Costs

    United States Court of Appeals 
FIFTH CIRCUIT 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 

April 25, 1978 TELEPHONE 504-589-6514 
CLERK 

Mr, William J, O'Connor, Clerk 
U. 8. District Court 
P.O. Box 2625 
Mobile, AL 36601 

Nos. 76-4210 & 77-2042 - Wiley L. Bolden, ET AL. v. City 
of Mobile, Alabama, ET AL, 
(D.C, No. CA-75-297-P) 

  

Dear Sir: 

(X) Enclosed is a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above case 

issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the Rule 21 Decision in the above case issued as 

and for the mandate. 

( ) Having received from the Clerk of the Supreme Court a copy of the order of 
that court denying certiorari, I enclose a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in 

the above case, issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) We have received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court denying 

certiorari in the above cause. This court’s judgment as mandate having already been 

issued to your office, no further order will be forthcoming. 

Enclosed herewith are the following additional documents: 

Copy of the Court’s opinion. 

Original record on appeal or review. ) 
) TO BE RETURNED LATER 

Original exhibits. ) 

Bill of Costs approved by this Court. 

Very truly yours, 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk 

By A En —- Za Fe 

Deputy Clerk 

enc. (BILL OF COSTS ONLY) 
cc: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD  



oy, 
4 

EprcE (TD el 
UNITED STA > x COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE @ = CIRCUIT     

  

  

  

  

  

\ il BILL OF COSTS & 
Slew ones ZF 2 : 

BOLDEN, et al. = 2 
one 
WEE 

Versus No. 76-4210 ~~ ay. - 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, et al. te = 
=, e 

The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against defendants-appellants 

COURT COSTS TAXABLE UNDER RULE 39, FRAP REQUESTED ALLOWED 

Docketing Fee T—5O+-0-e .. 

Cost of Printing Record or Appendix 

Cost of Printi Appellant’s Brief ” ost of Printing Appellant’s Brie 1/6 00 AL 0D 
  

Cost of Printing Appellee’s Brief 

  

Cost of Printing Appellant’s Reply Brief 

  

              I RR Jebloo| //600   
  

  

State of Alabama SS: 
County of Mobile 

I, J. U. Blacksher do hereby swear that the foregoing costs are cor- 
rect and were necessarily incurred in this action and that the services for which fees have been 

charged were actually and necessarily performed. The printer’s itemized statement showing the ac- 

tual costs per page for the appendix and briefs is attached. A copy hereof was this day mailed to op- 

posing counsel, with postage fully prepaid thereon. ] 

J [Bla chaliot NEAR 
I ep el Plevidzgp CEE pO ik 2a 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5) 5 vr of Vlg et A A.D, 19 25 

   

  

at 

___Njglnre rs ee AAC 
Notary Public 

* * * * * 

Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $116.00 this 25th day 
of April , 1978, 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH 

CLERK 

  

’ ‘Deputy Clerk 
£ £ 

@ 

NOTE: SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTION AND RULE 39 ON TAXING COSTS. 

 



  

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  
NOS. 76-4210 

  

  

77-2042 m = 

= : 
= EF ne 

Gx = Ea 
fet Ji od 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL., Ht a % 
kT TEE, ed ar od 

(rr x ts 

a: m 
© »- = @ 

Plaintiffs-Appellees,* 

versus 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, ET AL., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

Appealsfrom the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Alabama 

ORDER: 

(x1 he motion of APPELLANTS 

for stay of the issuance of the mandate pending petition for writ 

of certiorari is DENIED. 

{. ) The motion of 

for stay of the issuance of the mandate pending petition for writ 

of certiorari is GRANTED to and including 

the stay to continue in force until the final disposition of the 

case by the Supreme Court, provided that within the period above 

mentioned there shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court the 

certificate of the Clerk of the Supreme Court that the certiorari 

petition has been filed. The Clerk shall issue the mandate upon 

the filing of a copy of an order of the Supreme Court denying the 

writ, or upon the expiration of the stay granted herein, unless 

the above mentioned certificate shall be filed with the Clerk of 

this Court within that time. 

  
  

’ 

The motion for a further stay of the issuance of the mandate is 

GRANTED to and including , under the same 

conditions as set forth in the preceding paragraph.   

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for a further stay of the issuance 

of the mandate is DENIED. 

     
~ 

UNITED STATES