Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Request for Attorneys' Fees from Travis County Defendant-Intervenors; Order for Extension
Public Court Documents
May 15, 1989
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Request for Attorneys' Fees from Travis County Defendant-Intervenors; Order for Extension, 1989. 3fa43390-1f7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3cae96b6-455d-4a4a-82c6-d35d99379160/plaintiffs-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-file-request-for-attorneys-fees-from-travis-county-defendant-intervenors-order-for-extension. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES OF
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID. INC.
201 NORTH ST. MARY'S ST.. SUITE 600
SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78205
(512) 222-2478
May 15, 1989
John Neil
Deputy United States District Clerk
200 East Wall Street
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: LULAC et al v Mattox et al
Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
Dear Mr. Neil:
I am enclosing an original and two copies of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Request for Fees from Travis County. District Judges and an accompanying proposed Order. Could you kindly file them at your convenience?
Also, could you please Stamp one of the copies with your filemark and return it to me in the enclosed return envelope?
By copy of this letter, I am serving all counsel of record with a copy of these documents.
In advance, thank you for your help.
Sipcerely yours, _
ori
usan Finkelstein
Staff Attorney
federal express delivery
xc: all counsel of record
(certified mail, return receipt
requested)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NO. MO-88-CA-154
MATTOX, et al.,
*
%k
*
%
*
%
*
*
*
Defendants.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
FROM THE TRAVIS COUNTY DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
1. On May 5, 1989, this Court entered an Order that struck
the intervention in this case of the Travis County District Judges.
Plaintiffs now seek an extension of the deadline for their filing
of a request for attorneys’ fees from these Defendant-Intervenors.
2 Local Rule 300-10 requires Plaintiffs to file their
request for fees within twenty (20) days of the entry of a final
judgment.! Plaintiffs request permission to file their request for
fees, if any, against the Travis County Defendant-Intervenors when
the Court finally resolves the merits and remedy in this case.
They make this request in order to avoid unnecessarily complicating
the Court’s docket by introducing the complex issue of a fee
request in the mere eight weeks now remaining before trial begins
‘Plaintiffs assume that the Court’s Order of May 5 is final for attorneys’ fee purposes.
on July 11, 1989.
3. In the event that the Court denied this Motion,
Plaintiffs request that the Court grant them twenty (20) days from
the issuance of the denial to file their request for fees from the
Travis County District Judges.
4. I |certify that I discussed this matter in a telephone
conversation today with David Richards, counsel for the Travis
County District Judges. He did not agree to this Motion.
Respectfully submitted:
GARRETT, THOMPSON & CHANG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Partnership of Professional
Corporations
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
8300 Douglas #800
Dallas, Texas 75225
(214)369-1952
LEAD COUNSEL
ROLANDO L. RIOS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
201 N. St. Mary's #521
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(512)222-2102
SUSAN FINKELSTEIN
STAFF ATTORNEY
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID, INC.
201 N. St. Mary's #600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(512)222-2478
BY: dlrs
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Susan Finkelstein, do hereby certify that a true and
correct copy of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File
Request for Attorneys’ Fees from the Travis County Defendant-
Intervenors hnd proposed Order has been mailed via certified mail
with correct postage to:
ATTORNEY
Plaintiff - Intervenors
Edward B. Cloutman, III
MULLINAX, WELLS, BAAB &
CLOUTMAN, P. C.
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
214/939-9222 FAX: 214/939-9229
E. Brice Cunningham
Attorney at Law
777 S. R. L. Thornton Fwy, Suite 121
Dallas, TX 75203
214/428-3793
Julius Levonne Chambers
Sherrilyn A. Ifill
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational
Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson St., 16th floor
New York, NY 10013
212/219-1900
Gabrielle K. McDonald
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
301 Congress Ave., Suite 2050
Austin, TX 78701
512/320-5055
Defendants
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
REPRESENTING
Jesse Oliver
Joan Winn White
Fred Tinsley
Jesse Oliver
Joan Winn White
Fred Tinsley
Houston Lawyers Assn.
Francis Williams
Rev. William Lawson
Houston Lawyers Assn.
Francis Williams
Rev. William Lawson
Texas Legislative
Black Caucus
All Defendants
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General's Office
P. O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
512/463-2085
Defendant-Intervenors
J. Eugene Clements
E. O'Neill
Evelyn V. Kels
PORTER & CLEMENTS
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
713/226-0600
Darrell Smith
Attorney at Law
10999 Interstate Highway 10,
Suite 905
San Antonio, TX 78230
512/641-9944
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
713/228-5105
Mark H. Dettman
County Attorney
P. O. Box 2559
Midland, TX 79702
915/688-1084
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P. O. Box 1748
Austin, TX 78767
512/473-9415
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
600 W. 7th St.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main St.
Dallas, TX 75201
214/939-5500
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Midland County &
District Judges
Travis County District
Judges
Travis County District
Judges
Judge Harold Entz
of Dallas County
each at the correct address on this 15th day of May, 1989.
TTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC, et al.,
plaintiffs,
vs. NO. MO-88-CA-154
MATTOX, et al.,
¥
¥
%*
*
*
¥
*
*
*
Defendants.
ORDER OF EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’
TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGES
Upon consideration of all matters of records, the Court has
determined that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File
Request for Attorneys’ Fees from Travis County District Judges has
merit. The extension will avoid unnecessarily complicating the
preparation of this case in the short time remaining before trial
begins on July 11, 1989. THEREFORE, the Motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs need not file their Motion for Attorneys’ Fees from the
Travis County District Judges, if any, in compliance with Local
Rule 300-10. Instead, if they choose to file a Motion, they may
file it at the same time that they make other timely Motions for
fees after the Court has resolved the merits and remedy of this
case.
Done this day of » 1989 at Midland, Texas.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE