Written Memo from Lee to Counsel Re: Matthews Depositions
Correspondence
1991
6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Written Memo from Lee to Counsel Re: Matthews Depositions, 1991. 8ebb1941-5e40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3cc977a2-98bc-48a4-a017-1877b2ed69fb/written-memo-from-lee-to-counsel-re-matthews-depositions. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
|
|
a
i
3
vy
3
/
1
;
p
a
~
>
-
A
)
|
|
|
\
\
)
.
4
C
{
i
N
\
|
n
A
S
a
S
e
R
Q
-
\)
~
,
oS
|
|
|
2
%
e
r
”
\
:
\
\
2
\
|
Sy
+
y
"
a
y
e
[
a,
~
~
i
?
| |
—
X
| |
i)
»
”
.
%
S
y
R
K
¢
~
:
«
\
¢
—
_
—
3
|
|
|
—~
5
A
Vv
R
-
;
|
\
BEY
A
|
|
:
!
|
—
—
o
e
:
|
t
e
~N
No
q
:
\
;
)
p
o
e
|
©
|
|
|
:
—
\
\
-
<
N
§
J
a
X
P
™
Nn
)
;
\
a
g
—
|
:
~
1
-
—
g
\
i
—
:
|
~
—
\
|
\:
}
\
|
Ty
C
X
|
3
3
-
J
/
S
e
J
RE
/
N
>
}
onde
Fy
J
¥
-
|
:
;
-
i
m
—
—
;
Ng
—
\
\
s
a
_
A
S
:
oo)
2
¥
|
i
|
|
3
_
-
}
H
3
{
-
a
d
=
;
1
5
S
\
3
\
~
<
r
-
|
|
—
J
=
3
>
(
—
¢
B
S
pon,
3
&
~
c
*
y
:
|
\
|
5
y
-
4
:
\
{
<
|
3
:
>
ine
~
~
/
:
|
;
3
;
:
4
w
i
p
.
ui
—
\
~
}
:
\
:
|
T
N
—
g
—
A
p
u
”
\/
~
~
)
-Y
]
—
—
|
|
|
x
;
\
)
\
IAN
¢
“
g
t
=
>
>
xy
X
|
:
|
|
|
>
A
\
P
J
|
~
>
y
_
—
d
w
e
\
1]
\
\
t
p
ht
\
|
:
g
\’
“J
I
.
:
“dl
p
|
|
S
—
van
|
N
R
>
hs
|
\
S
E
s
AW,
|
:
I
!
y
T
e
F
a
s
p
n
[|
—
-
\
’
a
ji!
I;
;
;
of
:
+
\
|
1
\
—
J
a
)
e
S
:
|
|
/
!
|
|
|
1
}
:
:
5
i
B
R
I
T
i.
:
.
\
-
~
“~~
Ss
1}
A
S
—
]
7
\
=
a
|
\
™
|
.
|
—~
oF
4
f
F
>
[)
J
,
=
=
|
~
N
WRAL
S
:
=
4
7
x
ae
\
:
|
|
|
—\y
\
E
Y
?
5
|
Lo.
J
a
A
A
||
g
2
:
C
;
y
y
>
Jie
4
v
=
;
|
N
=
u
y
5
)
a
om
3
:
©
>
~~,
3
|]
p
o
—
\er
\
:
L
=
3
S
o
m
?
£
E
o
n
L
A
>
;
|
<
—
|
2
5
)
ge
X
’
it
-
:
5
)
\
p
e
&"
J)
|
F
a
~
~
—
.
3
\
\
_
—
i
:
|
-
p
o
)
>
i
~
(
;
|
-
¥
L
9
\
A
-t
}
po-
3
+
3
|
“
\
1
a
i
y
—
|
>
|
|
;
]
\
\
<
©
0)
-
~
/
y
|
;
|
-
h
—
{
3
\
8
%
:
—
3
1A
>
=
-
c
:
;
|
|
|
-
44
|
f
3
{1}
3
os
pe]
3
’
No
de
<
a
i
N
=
J
~
—
|
.
7
N
/
~
>
—
—
~
—
-
.
5
|
|
Bb
S
;
=
\
{
©
~
\]
"
C
—
J
\
X
$
|
\
i
\
A
G
E
»”
~
r
n
{
2
nT
»
3
|
:
-
r
R
%
>
7
{
N
~
AY
-
\
(
L 1
\
a
4
i
A
\
-
—
,
\
a
.
jo
;
%.
\
.
/
A
1
PJ
5
i
pi
_
—
!
_
—
—
}
[
N
Y
:
|
:
h
\
y
-
J
x;
S)
3
:
;
3
X
p
p
—
—
#
r
—
W
—
—
:
}
wd
Ss
B
R
¥
\
=
—
=
q
N
g
-
:
a
~
0
;
~
~
4
D
e
)
:
:
|
|
:
a
|
|
|
:
t
e
R
L
.
in
:
:
K
|
/
—
N
o
F.
_
|
|
|
Dae
—
A
J
x
}
Et
he
J
#
\
\
t
r
(
\
4
|
N
N
H
i
3
g
|
|
4
a
—
C
I
N
|
|
1
7
\
J
a
n
t
J
\
\
\ |
/
3
i
.
\
ye
,
—
|
|
|
—
-
—
d
q
"
A
3
h
o
h
g
N
u
J
{
»
wo
~~
p 2
a!
&
WA
~
\
v i
g
-
o
Pp
\
>
r
e
l
y
{
a
X
|
3
i
H
=
S
AS
)
+
>
>
~
>
J
¥
i
C
=~
a
3
|
|
|
/
~
~
z
ot
>
L
<
ut
.
J
S
’
"
—
-
v
\
)
oe
LG
>
3
5
:
|
\
)
/
—
»
”
\
3
~
w
=
]
~
\
PV
dg
.
>
—
—
3
—?
)
-~
\
\
>
a
A
(
£
”
=
;
“,
—
_
Va
™
\
4
;
Q
:
=
¥
:
—
|]
(
Id
~
Y
—
\!
4
0
:
§
-
i
A
~
}
~
_
—
~
|
>
i
—
—
—
y
C
o
a
\
J
3
p
S
=
0
<
|
v4
{
”
Q
:
)
0
XA
—
|
’
=
-
bE
on
HR
2
:
b
4
;
»
By
;
:
Constance L. Rice
Bll pf
+L - A
{ #,
UN oh EL whi fof
[| 2d { 0 Cr J A¢ A, ye a
~\ AVI “ave J A NL [ “4 y
J
C
i
1
Pp manus
NY A LL —
2\ 2d sa)
A [ : \ A “VY \ A/ AA
S
0 og
S LAC AL ANN
5
con
d
Ls
NAN ogi (
A ”
Ln —
Physicians should consider possi
/ ble lead toxicity, and test accordingly,
GE pl = particularly in children who are 25e
gl } mic, have learning or behavioral prob-
a Xa Jems, and who reside in older homes
] possibly containing lead-based paint or
| who live near environmental sources of
a, Declare that the defendant's acts, omissions, policies,
practices, and procedures in failing to provide eligible persons
with the lead screening, diagnosis and treatment required by 42
U.S.C. §§ 1396a(a)(43), 1396d(a) (4) (B), and 1396d(r) violate the
Social Security Act.
5. Retain jurisdiction over this action to ensure the
defendant's compliance with the mandates of the federal Medicaid
Act.
6. Award plaintiffs their costs of suit, including out of
pocket expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees.
74 Award such other and further relief as this Court deems
just 25d proper.
Dated: December 20, 1990
Respectfully submitted,
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
el R Ug
By \ The TF aia,
Jane Perkins
F
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14.
COMPLAINT
plants or lead smelters.. Although
, symptomatic lead poisoning in children
K | is very uncommon, children having
Ww : clinical signs or symptoms suggesuve
¥ of lead poisoning (e.g. abdominal colic,
RT
irritability, lethargy, or encephalopathy)
5
must be appropriately tested.
——- i Information about lead exposure
: in California is rapidly evolving, so
recommendations about lead testing
may change in the future, especially
insofar as children with elevated
blood lead levels typically are asymp-
tomatic or have nonspecific symp- —
toms. Indeed, at this time, it would 4 I
|
pi
\ DY Pg AS ’
| appear that the most prudent course \. ntl § 2
A is for physicians to obtain blood lead l
it
| tests whenever there is any suspicion
— LL ppp——————————E
| or concern about a child's possible
\
% . | lead exposure. CP
\
i a Ah) | L
\
\ (ed 2D AAAS :
\
a and °H
e—
SE
\
. :
~~) J
ESET ASTI ; A of ~~) A oe 1= oer
#7 VT ey 1 | es 2 Loot Le ol S$ ns J = =u oT
. | Th
Vasa nF
: 7% 1 QV W U
NV
Co ———
a - —
if ; { 1 3 | {i L 46 Gs
h (
\
\ p AN 5» ~ LA» hs ” if
ANT A L LE FT A C1 SI ww fil eel a 1 Gogh 3 \
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Declaratory Relief)
38. Paragraphs 1 through 37 are realleged and incorporated
herein by reference. |
39. There is a dispute between plaintiffs and defendant
regarding the legal duties and responsibilities of defendant under
the aforesaid provisions of law, in that:
(a) Plaintiffs claim and contend that the defendant's
actions described above violate the aforesaid provisions of
law.
(pb) Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereupon
allege that the defendant contends in all respects to the
contrary.
40. A declaration of the correct interpretation of the
federal requirements set forth above is necessary and appropriate
to determine the respective rights and duties hereto.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, plaintiffs pray that this Court:
l. Order that this action be maintained as a class action
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 with respect to the class
identified herein.
2. Preliminarily and permanently enjoin defendant, his
agents, successors, and employees from failing or refusing to
comply with the federal statutes and guidelines outlined above.
3. Preliminarily and permanently enjoin defendant, his
agents, successors, and employees from failing or refusing to make
needed EPSDT/CHDP lead blood screening and treatment immediately
available to plaintiffs and the class they represent.
13.
COMPLAINT