Affidavit of Service; Defendants Second Set of Interrogatories

Public Court Documents
December 15, 1977

Affidavit of Service; Defendants Second Set of Interrogatories preview

4 pages

  • Case Files, Hatcher v. Methodist Hospital - Hardbacks. Affidavit of Service; Defendants Second Set of Interrogatories, 1977. 81ece0ed-5484-f111-ab0f-7c1e527d528a. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3d7fd9bd-feaf-4b82-a5ea-1d344311b37a/affidavit-of-service-defendants-second-set-of-interrogatories. Accessed October 10, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||d0b81683-8417-4990-81ea-954e095935da||] IN THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

BERNICE TERRY, et al., 

Plaintiffs 

VS. No. H 76-373 

METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC., 
et al., 

N
a
r
?
 

N
a
t
?
 

N
s
”
 

a
s
?
 

a
s
”
 

u
i
?
 

w
n
 

r
t
 

“
w
t
?
 

“
w
a
?
 

Defendants 

RICHARD GORDON HATCHER, et al., 

Plaintiffs 

VS. No. H 77-154 

METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC., 

et .al., 

Defendants 

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE 
  

Edward J. Hussey, first being duly sworn upon his oath, 
alleges and says: 

1. That he is one of the attorneys for the defendant, 
Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc. 

2 ; 
2+ That on the a day of December, 1977, he served 

copies of the following, to-wit: 
  

Defendants', Methodist Hospital of Gary, Inc. and 
Denis E. Ribordy, Second Set of Interrogatories 

upon the following named attorneys of record in this matter, 
to-wit: 

Julian B. Allen 
Attorney at Law 
2009 Broadway 

Gary, Indiana 

Beth J. Lief 

Attorney at Law 

Suite 2030 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019 

 



® e 

  

Rebecca L. Ross, Esq. 
Department of Justice 
10th and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, D. C. 

Marvin G. Garvin and Edward L. Koven 
Regional Attorney and General Attorney 
Department of Health, Education and Welfare 
300 South Wacker Drive, 18th Floor 
Chicago, Illinois 

Fred W. Grady 
Assistant United States Attorney 
United States District Court 
Northern District of Indiana 
Federal Building, 507 State Street 
Hammond, Indiana 46325 

Marilyn G. Rose 
Christine B. Hickman 
1751 N Street, N.W. 

Washington, D. C. 20036 

Theodore Sendak 
Attorney General 
State House 
Indianapolis, Indiana 46320 

Anthony DeBonis 

720 West Chicago Avenue 
East Chicago, Indiana 

by depositing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, 
and addressed to each of the above-named individuals. 

3. Further affiant sayeth not. 

  

EDWARD J. BUSS 

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, 
this / day of December, 1977. cA 

ID AT 4 
IH, recs 

#SHirloy PRY; Notary Public 

  

  

My Commission Expires: 

March 2, 1981 

 



  

| ® » 

IN THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

HAMMOND DIVISION 

BERNICE TERRY, et al., 

Plaintiffs 

VS. No. H 76-373 

METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC., 

et al., 

C
a
”
 

N
a
t
”
 

N
a
 

g
e
 

C
n
t
”
 

a
m
 

a
n
?
 

w
t
?
 

“
w
t
?
 

a
u
’
 

Defendants 

RICHARD GORDON HATCHER, et al., 

Plaintiffs 

VS. No. H 77-154 

METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC., 

et al., 

T
n
 

N
n
?
 

w
w
”
 

N
g
?
 

“
w
t
?
 

w
s
 

m
t
 

w
a
t
?
 

“
w
n
t
 

“
w
w
e
?
 

Defendants 

DEFENDANTS', METHODIST HOSPITAL OF GARY, INC. 
AND DENIS E. RIBORDY, SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES 
  

Come now the defendants, Methodist Hospital of Gary, 

Inc. and Denis E. Ribordy, by and through their attorneys, 

and pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

file their Second Set of Interrogatories to be answered 

by plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases. 

1. Identify each person whom plaintiffs expect to 

call as an expert witness at trial, stating with regard 

to each expert witness the following information: 

Be The full name, address and occupation of 

each expert witness; 

 



  

b. The subject matter on which each expert is 

expected to testify, clearly distinguishing 

which experts, if any, are to testify with 

regard only to alleged violations or only 

to alleged remedies; 

Cc. The substance of the facts and opinions to 

which each expert is expected to testify; 

a. A summary of the grounds for each opinion 

of each expert. 

Answer : 

Respectfully submitted, 

HODGES, DAVIS, GRUENBERG, COMPTON & SAYERS 
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, METHODIST HOSPITAL 

  

OF GARY, INC. AND DENI E. RIBORDY 

GA) 1h [7 BY: ZAI E) Kpdd tif 
EDWARD J. HUSSEY // 
5525 Broadway 4 
Gary, Indiana 46410 
Ph, 981-2557 [||d0b81683-8417-4990-81ea-954e095935da||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.