Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Second Set of Interrogatories with Certificate of Service
Public Court Documents
October 14, 1992
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Second Set of Interrogatories with Certificate of Service, 1992. 45bf5aca-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3de5f262-9df0-4498-8fd0-debe10fbc3e4/motion-for-extension-of-time-to-file-plaintiffs-responses-to-defendants-second-set-of-interrogatories-with-certificate-of-service. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs
Vv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD -
Defendants October 14, 1992
e
e
o
e
e
e
o
e
o
e
o
e
LL
]
[1
]
[1
]
[1
]
e
e
A
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’
RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS’ SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
The Plaintiffs move for an extension of time of four business
days to Monday, October 24, 1992, to file Plaintiffs’ Responses to
Defendants’ Second Set of Interrogatories. The reason for this Motion
is that undersigned plaintiffs’ counsel has been unable to complete
the answers because of depositions scheduled in this case and because
of emergencies in the Juan F. v. O’Neill, DCYS consent decree
litigation.
Respectfully Submitted,
\ nla: Sthna
Martha Stone
Philip D. Tegeler
Connecticut Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORDER
For good cause shown, the foregoing Motion is hereby ordered
GRANTED/DENIED.
Hammer, J.
DATE:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed
postage prepaid to John R. Whelan and Martha M. Watts, Assistant
Attorney Generals, MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman Street, Hartford, CT
06105 this/3 day of October, 1992
JM ao Fhe Sie.
Martha Stone