Correspondence from Chambers to Williams

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
- Unknown Firm
Matter
- Chishom v. Edwards (Chisom v. Roemer) (Perschall v. State of Louisiana)
Case
- Chisom v. Edwards
U.S. state
- Louisiana, Georgia
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f0a0ba24-f211-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Chambers to Williams, 1981. 1bc5aee7-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/cc39233f-b5f4-4125-b52e-22cbc0c663f5/correspondence-from-chambers-to-williams. Accessed July 02, 2025.

Copied!

    JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS
JAMES E FERGUSON. II
MELVIN L WATT

JONATHAN WALLAS

KARL ADKINS

JAMES C FULLER. JR.

C YVONNE MIMS

JOHN W GRESHAM

RONALD L. GIBSON

CHAMBERS.

FERGUSON. WATT. WALLAS. ADKINS 8: FULLER. RA.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 730 EAST INDEPENDENCE PLAZA

951 SOUTH INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD

CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28202
TELEPHONE (704) 375-8461

March 5, 1981

Mr. Napoleon B. Williams, Jr.

NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc.

10 Columbus Circle — Suite 2030

New York, New York 10019

Re: North Carolina Reapportionment

 

Dear Napoleon:

Thank you for your letter of February 20, 1981. You indicate in
your letter that the Fund may be able to assist us in our re-
apportionment efforts ”if it turns out that we have the basis for
a substantial claim.” I trust that you appreciate that all our
claims are Hsubstantial."

During theTESt three or four months, I have been meeting with

Steve Suitts of the Southern Regional Council, Dr. Raymond Wheeler,
also of the Council, and Richard Klein and Leslie Winner of Legal
Services of North Carolina, exploring the possibility of some liti-
gation which would encourage affirmative drawings of representative
districts in order to improve the opportunity of minorities for
election to the State House or Senate or"to Congress. We have been
focusing on the congressional districts and the House and Senate
districts of North Carolina.

With respect to the congressional districts, we get no new repre-
sentatives with the 1980 Census. A bill has been submitted to the
Legislature (see Item 1 attached hereto) which basically re-establishes
the same districts. There is a move afoot, however, to redraw the
congressional districts, particularly for Mecklenburg County, the

Ninth District, Guilford County, the Sixth District and Durham County,
the Fourth District. The changes being proposed, particularly for

the Fourth District, will improve minority opportunities.

Mr. Napoleon B. Williams, Jr.
March 5, 1981
Page Two

Reapportionment of the House and Senate districts poses a problem
because of Article l, 51 and Article 2, §5 of the North Carolina
Constitution. The Constitution prohibits dividing a county for
the purpose of establishing a House or Senate district (see Items
2A and 2B, memoranda of Leslie Winner, attached hereto).

Steve Suitts' memorandum of September 2, 1980 (Item 3) shows that
minority election possibilities can be improved if separate
districts could be established within counties or by combining
two or more counties.

The present population and racial composition of the House and
Senate districts are shown on Items A and 5.

Since several North Carolina counties are now subject to §5 of the
Voting Rights Act, see Items 6 and 7, we have been trying to determine
if we could use §5 or §2 in trying to impose an affirmative obligation
on the State in redrawing the districts. We have also looked briefly
at some other possibilities (see Item 8 dealing with the Revenue
Sharing Act).

I am also enclosing some miscellaneous news articles and material.

It now appears that the Legislature will have to come back in a
special session. We are interested in instituting a proceeding

as soon as possible challenging the State constitutional provisions
which prohibit setting up separate districts within counties or
from establishing a district across county lines and in trying to
establish an affirmative obligation on the State in re-districting
to establish districts which improve minority opportunities for
participating in or in being elected to State House and Senate
districts and to Congress.

Our next meeting has been scheduled for March 9 at 12:30 at this
office. If possible, we would very much like for you to attend.

Sincerely yours,

e nne Chambers

JLC:md
Enclosures
cc: Steve Suitts
Raymond Wheeler
Richard Klein, Leslie Winner

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion for Extension of Time

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in