Motion for Extension of Time

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Chishom v. Edwards (Chisom v. Roemer) (Perschall v. State of Louisiana)
Case
- Chisom v. Edwards
U.S. state
- Louisiana
- Georgia
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f0a0ba24-f211-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547

Cite this item

Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time, 1987. f0a0ba24-f211-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e2e1f63-6558-4b47-9bbd-95dbb885a435/motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

    • 
IN THE 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

NO. 87-3463 

RONALD CHISOM, ET AL, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Versus 

EDWIN EDWARDS, ET AL, 

•Defendants-Appellees, 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME  

Pursuant to Rule 26(h) of the Federal Rules of 

Appellate Procedures, undersigned counsel moves for an 

enlargement of time in order to file a brief for Appellee for 

the following reasons: 

1. 

The current budgetary crisis in Louisiana has caused a 

reduction in force by two-thirds in the Department of Justice. 

As a result, the demands on the existing staff are such that 

priorities are constantly being shifted to meet emergency 

demands such as Death Row Writs, Injunction Proceedings, etc. 

2. 

Further, we have been informed that the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio has rendered 

an opinion in Mallory v. Eyrich, U.S.D.C. #C-1-86-1056 



• 
(S.D. Ohio, Western Division, 1987) which has a bearing on the 

Appellee's brief in that, the District Judge held that Section 

2 of the Voting Rights Act does not apply to judges. However, 

we understand that his reasoning differs from the opinion 

rendered by Judge Schwartz in the captioned case though we have 

not had an opportunity to review the Reasons for Judgment. 

Therefore, Appellees, for good cause shown, move this 

court for an enlargement of time from September 8, 1987 when 

the brief is currently due. 

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAM J. GUSTE, JR. 
ATTORNEY GENERAL 

KENDALL L. VICK 
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

EAVELYN T. BROOKS 
.ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  

I certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading has Deer: 

served upon counsel for all parties by mailing the same 

to each, properly ad, ressed and postage prepaid 

  Yof  1 

BY: 
LL L. 

AS ISTANT A Y GENERAL 
LO ISIANA D ARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
234 LOYOLA AVENUE, 7TH FLOOR 
NEW •RLEANS, LOUISIANA 70112 
TELEPHONE: (504) 568-5575 

2

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion for Extension of Time

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in