Certified Index
Public Court Documents
September 16, 1981 - August 26, 1985

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Application of the United States for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae; Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, 1987. 2bd9aa2b-f211-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d7b5d335-ee1e-4ea2-a20b-4726920fd623/plaintiffs-memorandum-in-opposition-to-defendants-motion-to-dismiss-application-of-the-united-states-for-leave-to-file-brief-as-amicus-curiae-brief-for-the-united-states-as-amicus-curiae. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
U.S. Departrit of Justice Civil Rights Division JRD:MLG:pad DJ 166-32-63 Mr. Robert G. Pugh, Sr. Pugh, Pugh & Pugh Commercial National Tower Suite 2100 333 Texas Street Shreveport, Louisiana 71101-5302 Appellate Section P.O. Box 66078 Washington, D.C. 20035-6078 February 13, 1991 Re: Ronald Chisom, et al. V. Charles E. Roemer, et al. No. 90-757 and United States of America V. Charles E. Roemer, et al., No. 90-1032 Dear Mr. Pugh: As we discussed, the contents of the Joint Appendix in Chisom v. Roemer, No. 90-757 and United States V. Roemer, No. 90- 1032, will consist of the following documents: 1. Docket Entries 2. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, filed Sept. 30, 1986 3. District Court decision of May 1, 1987, as amended, dismissing the complaint. 4. Court of Appeals decision of February 29, 1988 5. Complaint in Intervention of United States, filed August 8, 1988. 6. Answer of defendants, filed August 15, 1988. 7. Answer of defendants to United States Complaint filed April 4, 1989. If there is anything missing from this list, please let me know as soon as possible. Sincerely, John R. Dunne Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division By: Mark L. Gross Attorney Appellate Section CC: Sherrilyn A. If ill