Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Discovery Request
Public Court Documents
February 25, 1986

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Discovery Request, 1986. 29b373c1-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e45bca8-b7ed-4b1d-98de-8e06d3d6665f/answer-to-plaintiffs-second-discovery-request. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
RE fF 7 (= ~ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOBN DILLARD, et al.. * PLAINTIFFS, * V. 3 CTVTL ACTION NO, 85-T-1332-N CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc +] ev. OF HL. DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND DISCOVERY REQUEST Comes now all of the Defendants of Coffee County, Alabama, and in answer to Plaintiffs' Second Discovery Request, say as follows: 1. That pursuant to Rule 33 and 36(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Defendants cannot answer this Second Discovery Request as this is not within the realm of their knowledge. ROWE, ROWE & SAWYER ? SW, / BY: (Jen Neato -— AKAMA. LD) wht Warren Rowe \ P. O. Box 150 Enterprise, Alabama 36331] (205) 347-340) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Warren Rowe, of Counsel for the Defendants of Coffee County, Alabama, hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the foregoing Answer to all counsel of record, properly addressed and postage prepaid this the 25th day of February, 1986. EN 7 { fi” { i ra) / 14 i LA JA WL Ao A ) f Counsel (