Pre-trial Docket
Public Court Documents
February 4, 1976
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Pre-trial Docket, 1976. 360b1289-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e87dfe3-eb39-4ecc-a28b-9061ad02751e/pre-trial-docket. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
PRE-TRIAL DOCKET
You are hereby notified that a pre-trial conference, in each
of the actions listed on the sheet(s) attached hereto, will be held
in JUDGE PITTMAN'S CHAMBERS, ROOM 247, Second Floor, Federal Building,
Mobile, Alabama, on the date and at the time indicated with each
case,
It is requested that each party be represented by the attorney
who expects to conduct the actual trial; that said attorney famil-
iarize himself with the pre-trial rule (Rule 16 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure), and come with full authority to make disclosure
of facts, admit and stipulate undisputed facts, and to waive require-
ments of formal proof of documents, etc.; to submit documentary proof,
photographs, x-rays, etc., so that they maybe marked as evidence in
advance of trial, and to discuss points of law which will arise in
the trail of the cause.
Experience has taught that when litigants are represented by
counsel, presence of the actual litigants contributes little, if
anything, to the success of the pre-trial conference. Litigants
not represented by counsel are required to attend the pre-trial con-
ference,
BY DIRECTION OF THE COURT:
WILLIAM J. O'CONNOR
CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CIVIL CASES SET FOR PRE-TRIAL AT MOBILE, ALABAMA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1976
10:00 A, M,
WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL Jd. U., Blacksher,
Edward Still,
Gregory B. Stein,
Jack Greenberg
James Nabrit &
Charles Williams
VS. CIVIL 75-297
NON - JURY
CITY OF MOBILE, AL., ET AL David A. Bagwell
Charles B. Arendall, Jr. &
S. R. Sheppard
Actlon attacking the present "at-large" election system and for dec-
laratory judgment and injunctive relief.
10:30 A. HM,
LEILA G. BROWN, ET AL J. U. Blacksher &
Edward Still
VS. CIVIL 75-298
NON-JURY
JOHN L. MOORE, ET AL James C. Wood
Alleged class action -- reapportionment of the Mobile County Commis-
sion and the Board of School Commissioners.
11:00 A, M,. |
R. R. PATTERSON, JR., ET AL Bert S. Nettles &
Maury D. Smith
VS. CIVIL 75-496
JURY
J. W. URQUHART, JR., ET AL Edwin J. Curran, Jr.
Breach of contract action whereby plaintiffs were to acquire 40%
limited interest in the Jay & Getty oil fields.