Pre-trial Docket
Public Court Documents
February 4, 1976

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Pre-trial Docket, 1976. 360b1289-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e87dfe3-eb39-4ecc-a28b-9061ad02751e/pre-trial-docket. Accessed April 19, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION PRE-TRIAL DOCKET You are hereby notified that a pre-trial conference, in each of the actions listed on the sheet(s) attached hereto, will be held in JUDGE PITTMAN'S CHAMBERS, ROOM 247, Second Floor, Federal Building, Mobile, Alabama, on the date and at the time indicated with each case, It is requested that each party be represented by the attorney who expects to conduct the actual trial; that said attorney famil- iarize himself with the pre-trial rule (Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), and come with full authority to make disclosure of facts, admit and stipulate undisputed facts, and to waive require- ments of formal proof of documents, etc.; to submit documentary proof, photographs, x-rays, etc., so that they maybe marked as evidence in advance of trial, and to discuss points of law which will arise in the trail of the cause. Experience has taught that when litigants are represented by counsel, presence of the actual litigants contributes little, if anything, to the success of the pre-trial conference. Litigants not represented by counsel are required to attend the pre-trial con- ference, BY DIRECTION OF THE COURT: WILLIAM J. O'CONNOR CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CIVIL CASES SET FOR PRE-TRIAL AT MOBILE, ALABAMA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1976 10:00 A, M, WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL Jd. U., Blacksher, Edward Still, Gregory B. Stein, Jack Greenberg James Nabrit & Charles Williams VS. CIVIL 75-297 NON - JURY CITY OF MOBILE, AL., ET AL David A. Bagwell Charles B. Arendall, Jr. & S. R. Sheppard Actlon attacking the present "at-large" election system and for dec- laratory judgment and injunctive relief. 10:30 A. HM, LEILA G. BROWN, ET AL J. U. Blacksher & Edward Still VS. CIVIL 75-298 NON-JURY JOHN L. MOORE, ET AL James C. Wood Alleged class action -- reapportionment of the Mobile County Commis- sion and the Board of School Commissioners. 11:00 A, M,. | R. R. PATTERSON, JR., ET AL Bert S. Nettles & Maury D. Smith VS. CIVIL 75-496 JURY J. W. URQUHART, JR., ET AL Edwin J. Curran, Jr. Breach of contract action whereby plaintiffs were to acquire 40% limited interest in the Jay & Getty oil fields.