Ballesteros v. Lucky Stores Stipulation of Agreement; Consent Decree in Full Settlement of Class Claims

Public Court Documents
November 28, 1986

Ballesteros v. Lucky Stores Stipulation of Agreement; Consent Decree in Full Settlement of Class Claims preview

Cite this item

  • Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Ballesteros v. Lucky Stores Stipulation of Agreement; Consent Decree in Full Settlement of Class Claims, 1986. ca6a2172-be9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3ef3edc9-9854-4496-baba-c4e70edfaf6c/ballesteros-v-lucky-stores-stipulation-of-agreement-consent-decree-in-full-settlement-of-class-claims. Accessed October 09, 2025.

    Copied!

    1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

)

BILL LANN LEE 
STEPHEN M. CUTLER
CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 
10951 West Pico Boulevard, Third Floor 
Los Angeles, CA 90064 
Telephone (213) 470-3000
PEARL LATTAKER 
3550 Wilshire Boulevard 
Los Angeles, CA 90010 
Telephone: (213) 387-6628
ANTONIA HERNANDEZ 
LINDA WONG
THERESA FAY BUSTILLOS 
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE 
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
634 South Spring Street, Eleventh Floor 
Los Angeles, CA 90014 
Telephone: (213) 629-2512
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PATRICK J. MAHONEY 
CASSANDRA M. FLIPPER 
COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO,
HUDDLESON & TATUM 
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2000 
San Francisco, CA 94111 
Telephone: (415) 981-5252
Attorneys for Defendant

CO 1—
ccCO a u.— yl —*-3

cn v O j
CD • UJ

-j~i *~Z c?
PO '£> ̂  - Q <

D —i tn■ •<' oCO d -JC'-i ^ 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

fSENl$£ BALLESTEROS and CHERYL D. 
^CHISLOM, on behalf of themselves 
and others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs.
v.

LUCKY STORES, INC.,
Defendant.

) Case No.
)) STIPULATION OF AGREEMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

STIPULATION OF AGREEMENT



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10

11

12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21

22

23
24
25
26
27
28

)

The parties in the above litigation have entered into the
attached Agreement, with exhibits thereto, that fully resolves 
the controversy pending the approval of this Court, as set.'", 
forth in the Agreement.
DATED: rjf rfjrC BILL LANN LEE

/ r STEPHEN M. CUTLER
CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC
INTEREST
PEARL LATTAKER
ANTONIA HERNANDEZ 
LINDA WONG
THERESA FAY BUSTILLOS 
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE 
AND EDUCATIONAL^FUND /;

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DATED: (*i?C PATRICK J. MAHONEY

1 CASSANDRA M. FLIPPER
COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO, 
HUDDLESON & TATUM

Patrick^". Mahoney 
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION OF AGREEMENT 2.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

>)

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on the date(s) hereinafter 
set forth by and between the class described in Ballesteros and 
Chislom v . Lucky Stores, Inc ̂ (hereinafter the "class") and 
Lucky Stores, Inc. (hereinafter "Lucky").

WHEREAS, as more particularly set forth in a document 
entitled "Consent Decree in Full Settlement of Class Claims" 
(hereinafter "Consent Decree"), a copy of which is attached 
hereto as Exhibit "1," the parties wish to resolve all issues 
in dispute between them with the understanding that this 
Agreement does not constitute any admission by Lucky that it 
has engaged in discriminatory practices proscribed by 
Title VII, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 or otherwise, and in 
fact Lucky disclaims any such violations;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants 
contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows:

1. The parties agree to sign and file a stipulation and 
order requesting that the United States District Court treat 
the certification of the class to be for settlement purposes 
only.

2. The parties agree to sign and to recommend the 
Consent Decree to said Court for approval under Federal Rule of 
Civil Procedure .23(e ).

3. The parties agree to request said Court to direct 
that a Notice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement 
(hereinafter "Notice"), in a form substantially similar to that 
attached as Exhibit A, be sent by mail to class members whose

3.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

)

addresses are readily available, and to be published.
4. The parties agree to request that said Court set a 

fairness hearing for the purpose of hearing objections to 
settlement of the class claims.

5. Members of the class who wish to opt out of this 
action may do so only if they in a timely fashion complete and 
submit written notification pursuant to the Legal Notice. All 
members of the class who do not in a timely fashion submit such 
notification will be entitled to the benefits and otherwise be 
bound by the Consent Decree in the action. If one hundred 
(100) or more persons opt out and exclude themselves from the 
benefits and effects of the proposed Consent Decree, Lucky, at 
its option, by written notice to class counsel, may cancel this 
Agreement. Said notice must be given within ten (10) days of 
notification to Lucky of the persons who opted out.

6. The two (2) named class members who are entitled to 
individual relief pursuant to the Consent Decree will each sign 
a Settlement Agreement and General Release that applies to her 
claim, which settlement agreements are attached hereto as 
Exhibits "2" and "3." If for any reason any of such two (2) 
named class members fails to sign the applicable Settlement 
Agreement and General Release, either party, at its option, by 
written notice to the other, may cancel this Agreement. Said 
notice must be given within ten (10) days of the date the 
cancelling party learns of such failure.

7. If for any reason the Court refuses to certify the 
class for settlement purposes, to direct notice to the class or 
does not approve and enter the proposed Consent Decree, either

4 .



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3)

party, at its option, by written notice to the other, may 
cancel this Agreement. Said notice must be given within ten
(10) days of such court action.
DATED: AZ, M'J i <i ( C

BILL LANN LEE
STEPHEN M. CUTLER
CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC
INTEREST
PEARL LATTAKER
ANTONIA HERNANDEZ 
LINDA WONG
THERESA FAY BUSTILLOS 
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: ^ 7^ /*! <rC PATRICK J. MAHONEY 
CASSANDRA M. FLIPPER 
COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO, 
HUDDLESON & TATUM

Patriic)£̂ J.' Mahoney
Attorneys for Defendant

5 .



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2)

BILL LANN LEE 
STEPHEN M. CUTLER
CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 
10951 W. Pico Boulevard, Third Floor 
Los Angeles, CA 90064 
Telephone: (213) 470-3000
PEARL LATTAKER 
3550 Wilshire Boulevard 
Los Angeles, CA 90010 
Telephone: (213) 387-6628
ANTONIA HERNANDEZ 
LINDA WONG
THERESA FAY BUSTILLOS 
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE 

AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
634 S. Spring Street, Eleventh Floor 
Los Angeles, CA 90014 
Telephone: (213) 629-2512
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PATRICK J. MAHONEY 
CASSANDRA M. FLIPPER 
COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO,

HUDDLESON & TATUM 
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2000 
San Francisco, CA 94111 
Telephone: (415) 981-5252
Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE BALLESTEROS and CHERYL D. 
CHISLOM, on behalf of themselves 
and others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,
v.

LUCKY STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

) CASE NO.
)
) CONSENT DECREE IN FULL
) SETTLEMENT OF CLASS
) CLAIMS
) --------
)
)
)
)
)
)

EXHIBIT ]6.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2)

COURT PROCEEDINGS
!• Plaintiffs filed their complaint in this action 

alleging that the Defendant, Lucky Stores, Inc. ("Defendant" or 
"Lucky"), had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seg. ("Title VII"), and 
the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ("§ 1981"), by 
discriminating against blacks and Hispanics in recruitment, 
hiring, job assignment, and promotion on the basis of race, 
color and national origin. The complaint alleged as well that 
Lucky has violated Title VII by discriminating against women in 
recruitment, job assignment, and promotion on the basis of 
sex. The complaint limited the scope of the lawsuit to 
employment opportunities in Lucky retail grocery stores, 
including Lucky stores and Food Basket stores in Los Angeles, 
San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties in 
the State of California.

2. By separate order, this Court has certified under 
Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 a class composed of:

(a) All blacks, Hispanics,^ and women who are
past, present or future applicants for employment with Lucky in 
its retail grocery stores in the above-noted counties in the 
State of California;

(b) All blacks, Hispanics, and women who would have 
been or would be such applicants for employment with Lucky in

The term "Hispanic" denotes persons of Mexican, Puerto 
Rican, Cuban or Latin American origin or ancestry.

7.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16
17
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12

its retail grocery stores in the above-noted counties in the 
State of California but for allegedly illegal recruitment 
and/or hiring practices by Lucky; and

(c) All blacks, Hispanics, and women who.are past, 
present and future employees of Lucky in its retail grocery 
stores located in the above-noted counties in the State of 
California.

3. Through the examination of EEOC investigative files, 
additional investigation and information supplied by Lucky, 
Plaintiffs are familiar with the facts which pertain to Lucky 
employment practices.

4. Because of the continuing desire and efforts of Lucky 
to provide equal employment opportunities for all employees and 
potential employees, the expenditure of time and money to which 
both sides would be put, and the prospect of delay and 
uncertainty, the parties have formulated an affirmative action 
plan which is embodied in this Consent Decree, which will 
promote and effectuate the purposes of Title VII and § 1981.

5. Notice of the proposed settlement set forth in this 
Consent Decree has been given to members of the represented 
class by methods and procedures previously approved in writing 
and ordered by this Court.

6. This notice stated that each member of the class 
described in paragraph 2 will be included in and bound by this 
Consent Decree unless any such member of the class 
affirmatively elects in writing .to "opt out" of this case, 
forego the benefits of this Consent Decree, and, if desired,

8.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28

12

pursue any legal remedies which the individual might possess 
against Defendant. The persons listed in Attachment A hereto 
have elected to opt out of the class, and are hereby excluded 
from the class and the benefits of this Consent Decree.

7. The aforementioned notice set forth procedures by 
which any member of the class described in paragraph 2 could 
object to the fairness of this Consent Decree, either in person 
or in writing.

8. Pursuant to said notice, a fairness hearing was held 
before this Court at which all members of the class were given 
the opportunity to object to the settlement set forth herein. 
The Court has reviewed all objections to this Consent Decree, 
and has determined that the settlement set forth herein is fair 
and reasonable.

9. The parties have waived hearing and the entry of 
findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the parties have 
agreed to the entry of this Consent Decree without admission by 
Defendant of a violation of Title VII or § 1981.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED
that:

JURISDICTION
10. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the 

subject matter of the action.

9.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12 )

GENERAL PROVISIONS
11. The negotiation and entry of this Consent Decree and 

the undertakings made by Lucky hereunder are in settlement 'and 
compromise of disputed allegations of discrimination in 
employment. Neither the negotiation nor entry of this Consent 
Decree shall constitute an admission by Lucky that it or its 
officials or employees have violated Title VII, § 1981, or any 
other federal, state or municipal fair employment law, 
ordinance, order, or regulation, and Lucky specifically denies 
the commission of any such violation. The parties hereto 
approve and agree to the entry of this Consent Decree solely on 
the condition that this Consent Decree does not constitute any 
finding or adjudication by the Court, any evidence on any issue 
of fact or law herein, or any admission by the Defendant, as to 
the truth or merit of Plaintiffs' allegations. The parties 
have consented to the entry of this Consent Decree to avoid the 
burdens of further litigation. This Consent Decree is final 
and binding on all parties as to the issues raised by this case 
as well as upon their successors and assigns.

12. This Consent Decree resolves all issues between all 
members of the plaintiff class and the Defendant relating to 
asserted practices, acts, and omissions of the Defendant which 
are raised by the complaint herein, as well as any future 
effects of such asserted practices, acts, and omissions, and, 
with respect to such practices, acts, and omissions, compliance 
w^th this Consent Decree shall be deemed to be compliance with 
•̂it-le VII, § 1981, and all other laws regulating employment
disciimination, and shall be deemed to satisfy any and all

10.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 2 )

requirements for affirmative action by Defendant. The 
doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel shall apply 
to all members of the plaintiff class with respect to all 
issues of law and fact and matters of relief within_the scope 
of the complaint filed herein. No class members bound by this 
Consent Decree shall seek or obtain, in a separate action or 
proceeding, relief for claims within the scope of the complaint 
filed herein which would add to or be inconsistent with the 
relief incorporated in this Consent Decree. The entry of this 
Consent Decree and the undertakings of the Defendant set forth 
herein shall extinguish all claims for relief within the scope 
of the complaint filed herein, except actions taken to enforce 
the provisions of this Consent Decree.

13. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained 
elsewhere in this Consent Decree, the persons who have opted 
out of this Consent Decree, as described in paragraph 6, shall 
not be entitled to any of the rights or benefits hereinafter 
set forth.

14. 29 C.F.R. § 1608, the EEOC's guidelines on 
affirmative action, and particularly § 1608.8 (adherence to 
court order), state in relevant part, among other things, that 
"parties are entitled to rely on orders of courts of competent 
J^^~isdiction, that such orders can include consent decrees 
and that "the Commission interprets Title VII to mean that 
actions taken pursuant to the direction of a Court Order cannot 
give rise to liability under Title VII." All actions taken 
pursuant to the requirements of this Consent Decree are taken

11.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10
11
12
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20
21
22
23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

pursuant to the direction of a Court Order" within the meaning 
of § 1608.8, and the parties to this Consent Decree are 
entitled to the protections of the EEOC's guidelines on 
affirmative action in general and § 1608.8 in particular. 
Moreover, the parties hereto, with respect to any actions taken 
pursuant to this Consent Decree, are entitled to the 
protections of § 713(b)(1) of Title VII, which provides in 
relevant part as follows:

"In any action or proceeding based on any alleged 
unlawful employment practice, no person shall be 
subject to any liability or punishment for or on 
account of . . . the commission by such person of an
unlawful employment practice if he pleads and proves 
that the act or omission complained of was in good 
faith, in conformity with, and in reliance on any 
written interpretation or opinion of the [Equal 
Employment Opportunity] Commission . . . ."

Should any actions taken by any party pursuant to this Consent 
Decree later be held to be unlawful, by reason of the EEOC's 
guidelines on affirmative action, 29 C.F.R. § 1608, such 
actions will have been taken, within the meaning of 
§ 713(b)(1) of Title VII, in good faith reliance upon written 
interpretations and opinions of the Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission.

15. Lucky shall be entitled to utilize any selection 
standard, practice, or procedure, whatsoever in hiring or 
promotion in relation to the job groups covered by this Consent

12.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10
11
12
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20
21
22
23

24

25

26

27

28

12]

Decree; provided, however, if Lucky is not in substantial 
compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree, the Court 
may, in its discretion, issue such orders as it deems necessary 
to assure compliance with the Consent Decree.

16. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed in 
any way to require Lucky to hire, assign, or promote persons 
unqualified under then current standards or criteria. All 
provisions in this Consent Decree are subject to the 
availability of qualified black, Hispanic, and women 
candidates. Lucky, however, shall in good faith engage in 
selective recruitment efforts, and in good faith conduct such 
hiring, job assignment, training and promotion programs as are 
necessary to satisfy the hiring, job assignment, and 
promotional requirements of this Consent Decree. Nothing in 
this Consent Decree shall require Lucky to grant a preference 
to any particular individual who is black or Hispanic, or any 
individual woman for hire or promotion.

17. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to 
require Lucky to violate the terms of any existing bona fide 
seniority system in collective bargaining agreements.

18. The relief set forth in this Consent Decree 
represents the parties' best efforts to formulate relief for 
victims of the discrimination alleged in the complaint in light 
of various factors, including the complex nature of personnel 
selection procedures, limited records, and the great time and 
expense required to identify specific victims of alleged 
discrimination.

13.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10
11
12
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20
21
22
23

24

25

26

27

28

2)

COVERAGE
19. Coverage of this Consent Decree shall be limited to 

employment opportunities for regular full and part-time . '
employees in the job groups defined below in retail .grocery 
stores bearing the Lucky or Food Basket name and operated by 
Lucky in the Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino, 
and Riverside Counties in the State of California.

JOB GROUPS
20- The job groups referred to in this Consent Decree are 

defined as follows:
(a) Entry-Level. All employees employed in the 

following job classifications: clerk helper and apprentice 
general merchandise clerk.

(b) Journeyman. All employees employed in the 
following job classifications: apprentice food clerk; 
apprentice meat personnel; journeyman food clerk; journeyman 
meat personnel; journeyman general merchandise clerk; and 
service delicatessen employees.

(c) Entry Management. All employees employed in the 
following job classifications: fourth assistant store manager 
and all of the store department heads.

(d) Store Management. All employees employed in the 
following job classifications: store manager, assistant store 
manager, and third assistant store manager.

14.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10
11
12
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21
22
23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

ULTIMATE GOALS
21. The ultimate goals for each of the job groups are as 

follows:
(a) Entry-Level

Black 8%Hi spanic 31%
(b) Journeyman

Black 8%Hispanic 31%
(c) Entry Management

Black 7%Hi spanic 30%Female 29%
(d) Store Management

Black 7%Hi spanic 26%Female 33%

ANNUAL GOALS
22• Entry-Level. In each calendar year during the period 

that this Consent Decree is in effect, Lucky shall engage in 
vigorous good faith efforts to hire blacks and Hispanics into 
job openings in the entry-level job group at or above the 
annual hiring goals set forth in Attachment B.

23• Journeyman. In each calendar year during the period 
that this Consent Decree is in effect, Lucky shall engage in 
vigorous good faith efforts to hire or promote blacks and 
Hispanics into job openings in the journeyman job group at or 
above the annual goals set forth in Attachment C.

24. Entry Management. In each calendar year during the

15.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20
21
22
23

24

25

26

27

28

12'

period that this Consent Decree is in effect, Lucky shall 
engage in vigorous good faith efforts to hire or promote 
blacks, Hispanics, and women into job openings in the entry 
management job group at or above the annual goals set forth in 
Attachment D.

25. Store Management. In each calendar year during the 
period this Consent Decree is in effect, Lucky shall engage in 
vigorous good faith efforts to hire or promote blacks, 
Hispanics, and women into job openings in the store management 
job group at or above the annual goals set forth in Attach­
ment E .

25. With respect to the annual goals set forth in this 
Consent Decree for the entry management and store management 
job groups the following modification shall be made:

(a) If as of January 1 of the year in question the 
percentage of blacks, Hispanics, or women in the journeyman or 
entry management job group, respectively, is less than the 
applicable percentage goal set forth in this Consent Decree, 
the annual goal for the same group in the entry management job 
group or store management job group, respectively, for the 
calendar year following said January 1 shall be at the lower 
percentage composition of said group in the journeyman or entry 
management job group, respectively. For example, if as of 
January 1, 1988, blacks comprised 3.2% of the journeyman job 
group, the annual goal for blacks for the entry management job 
group for 1988 would be 3.2% and not the percentage set forth 
in paragraph 24.

16.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

(b) However, no modification pursuant to (a) above 
shall be made in any year following a year Lucky has failed to 
meet the goals set forth above in paragraphs 23 or 24 for the 
journeyman or entry management positions.

(c) If any modification pursuant to (a) above 
results in a lowering of annual goals, the number of positions 
by which such goals are lowered shall be added to subsequent 
annual goals, as soon as this can be done without conflicting 
with any modification required pursuant to (a) above.

27. With respect to the annual goals set forth in this 
Consent Decree, the parties understand and acknowledge the 
difficulty of selecting annual goals for future years that are 
fsir, realistic and reasonably achievable. Accordingly, in 
light of the ten (10) year period of this Consent Decree, the 
parties agree that at the end of the first five (5) years of 
the Consent Decree, counsel for the parties will meet to review 
the annual goals currently set for the final five (5) years of 
this Consent Decree to determine if they are fair, realistic 
and reasonably achievable with a view toward a revision of such 
goals if and as necessary.

28. The parties recognize that groups of employees may be 
added to the Lucky work force by transactions such as, for 
example, a merger, a purchase of stores from another 
organization, and/or hiring of employees of another company in 
conjunction with such a merger or purchase. Such new employees 
shall be excluded in determining compliance with the goals 
herein.

1 7 .



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

29. In determining compliance with annual goals, persons 
who enter a job group by way of demotion (for example, a 
department manager demoted to a journeyman) or by way of recall 
from layoff (for example, a laid-off food clerk who. is 
recalled) shall not be counted. Such persons shall be counted 
with respect to determining whether or not an ultimate goal has 
been met.

30. In determining compliance with goals, transfers or 
promotions of employees between jobs within the journeyman job 
group, entry management or store management job groups shall 
not be counted.

31. The performance of black, Hispanic, or female 
applicants or employees on any written examination shall not 
excuse noncompliance with goals.

32. The parties agree that compliance by Lucky with the 
annual goals set forth in this Consent Decree will be measured 
by vigorous good faith efforts by Lucky to meet those annual 
goals. Moreover, in determining whether Lucky has failed to 
meet the annual goals for a particular job group for any year, 
Lucky shall be entitled to be credited with blacks, Hispanics, 
and women who entered the job group in question in excess of 
such goals, if any, for prior years (i.e., if for a particular 
year Lucky should have added five additional blacks into the 
journeyman job group, but in the prior year it added six blacks 
above and beyond the number necessary to meet its annual goals 
for the journeyman job group, Lucky would not be deemed to have 
failed to have met its annual goal for the journeyman job group

18.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

with respect to blacks for the year in question). Should Lucky 
fail to meet the annual goal for a particular job group in any 
one year, such failure shall not be a violation of or be deemed 
contempt of this Consent Decree. However, in the year 
following such failure, Lucky shall be expected to attain the 
prior year's annual goal in addition to the present year's 
annual goal (after credit, as aforementioned, for any overage 
in prior years). If in the calendar year following such 
failure Lucky achieves the remainder of the prior annual goal 
plus the annual goal for the year in question, the failure of 
Lucky to have achieved the prior annual goal shall be deemed 
remedied, and shall have no legal effect whatsoever.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
33. For all purposes in this Consent Decree, the first 

calendar year shall be defined as beginning with the effective 
date of this Consent Decree, and ending December 31, 1987. 
Thereafter, the annual goal and reporting requirements will be 
on the basis of calendar years.

34. On or about April 1, 1988, and on or about each 
April 1 thereafter while this Consent Decree is in effect,
Lucky shall submit a status report for the prior calendar year 
to counsel for the plaintiff class. The status report shall 
consist of a summary that sets forth for each job classifica­
tion the ultimate goal, the annual goal, the total number of 
persons entering the job classification for the first time, the 
number and percentage of blacks appointed, the number and

19.



percentage of Hispanics appointed, the number and percentage of 
women appointed, the total number and percentage of blacks in 
the job classification, the total number and percentage of' 
Hispanics in the job classification, and the total-number and 
percentage of women in the job classification. Each status 
report shall also list for each job classification for the 
period in question the number and percentage of black,
Hispanic, and female employees hired or promoted pursuant to 
this Consent Decree who have been demoted, terminated or 
converted to part-time status, and the number and percentage of 
other employees receiving the same job actions. In addition to 
such status report, Lucky agrees to provide upon request 
information to counsel for the plaintiff class as such counsel 
may reasonably request, including the following information to 
counsel for plaintiff class relating to either newly hired or 
promoted persons, such information to be used only in further­
ance of this Consent Decree: name; sex; race or national 
origin; date of first achieving a position in the job group; 
position title of each such person; immediately prior position 
title with Lucky, if any; whether hired or promoted; and 
whether full-time or part-time status.

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
35. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this 

Decree.

20.



1

2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

MONITORING THE DECREE
36. If lead counsel for plaintiff class has reason to 

believe that Lucky has not complied with this Consent Decree, 
he shall so notify counsel for Lucky in writing. Lucky shall 
have sixty (60) days from its counsel's receipt of such notice 
to investigate and attempt to correct or refute the claimed 
violation. The parties will attempt in good faith to resolve 
the matter through informal conciliation.

37. In the event counsel for the plaintiff class continue 
to believe that Lucky has not complied with this Consent 
Decree, the plaintiff class may institute proceedings with the 
Court to enforce the Consent Decree.

38. As is set forth below, Plaintiffs are entitled to an 
award of costs, including attorney's fees, for the work which 
led to this Consent Decree and its approval. Plaintiffs also 
may apply to the Court for awards of costs, including 
attorney's fees, for work reasonable and necessary to the 
effectuation of this Consent Decree.

DISSOLUTION OF THE DECREE
39. At any point in time that Lucky believes that it has 

attained one or more of the ultimate goals for a period of at 
least two years for any job group set forth herein, Lucky may 
so notify counsel for plaintiff class in writing. If plaintiff 
class disputes the contention of Lucky, plaintiff class shall 
petition this Court, within sixty (60) days (which, upon 
written request from counsel for Plaintiffs, submitted to Lucky

said sixty (60) days, shall be extended an additional

21.



1
2
3

4

5

6
7

8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2)

sixty (60) days) after receipt by counsel for plaintiff class 
of Defendant's written notification, for a hearing to determine 
whether the ultimate goal for any job group as set forth in 
this Consent Decree has been met. If the Court finds that such 
ultimate goal has been met, the Court shall dissolve that 
portion of the Consent Decree and adjudge that Lucky has 
satisfied all of its obligations with respect to the goal in 
question for the particular job group. If plaintiff class 
fails to petition this Court within sixty (60) days after 
receipt by their counsel of written notification by Lucky, that 
portion of the Consent Decree shall no longer have any force 
and effect (for example, if Lucky meets the ultimate goal with 
respect to blacks in the journeyman position, and so notifies 
counsel for the plaintiff class, upon the failure of counsel 
for plaintiff class to petition for hearing, Lucky shall be 
under no further obligations pursuant to this Consent Decree 
with respect to blacks in the journeyman job group).

40. When each and all of the ultimate goals set forth in 
this Consent Decree have been met, the Court shall make an 
order terminating its jurisdiction of this matter for all 
purposes, and dissolving this Consent Decree. If not already 
dissolved, the Court shall in all circumstances dissolve this 
Consent Decree and make an order terminating its jurisdiction 
of this matter for all purposes on or about January 1, 1997.

RELIEF FOR NAMED PLAINTIFFS
41. Named plaintiff Cheryl D. Chislom, who accepted an

22 .



1
2
3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 2 )

offer of employment from Lucky as a part-time journeyman 
cashier and has been so employed by Lucky since June, 1986, 
shall be deemed to have been employed as of May, 1982 solely 
for the purpose of calculating prospective vacation.and health 
benefits from the date of her actual employment in June, 1986, 
and Lucky shall seek waivers of any waiting period normally 
required of new employees for eligibility for employment 
benefits. In addition, Chislom shall receive the sum of thirty- 
two thousand five hundred dollars ($32,500.00). Such relief 
shall be in full satisfaction of any and all claims within the 
scope of the complaint.

42. Named plaintiff Denise Ballesteros shall receive the 
sum of twenty-seven thousand five hundred dollars ($27,500.00) 
in full satisfaction of any and all claims within the scope of 
the complaint.

43. Defendant Lucky shall remove any reference in the 
personnel files of the named plaintiffs concerning their 
involvement in this lawsuit or any derogatory information and 
opinion which falls within the scope of matters raised in the 
complaint. Lucky shall insert in each such personnel file a 
memorandum stating its desire that its officials, agents and 
employees shall limit any information given to any prospective 
employees of any of the named plaintiffs to dates of employment 
and positions held, if any, and any other information that 
Lucky is requested in writing by the named plaintiff to release.

23 .



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 )

ATTORNEY1S FEES
44. Plaintiff class shall be considered the prevailing 

party only for purposes of an award of costs, including 
attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)._ After 
entry of this Consent Decree, the parties shall attempt to 
negotiate a settlement of Plaintiffs' claims for an award of 
costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. If those 
negotiations are unsuccessful, the matter shall be submitted to 
a practicing attorney of recognized reputation specializing in 
litigation and familiar with current billing rates and 
practices in the Los Angeles area, serving as Special Master. 
The parties shall attempt to agree on the person to serve as a 
Special Master. If the parties are unable to agree on a 
Special Master, the Court shall appoint a practicing attorney 
of recognized reputation specializing in litigation and 
familiar with current billing rates and practices in the Los 
Angeles area to serve as Special Master.

The determination of any Special Master shall be final, 
binding and nonappealable. Defendant shall pay the costs and 
fees of any Special Master.

Plaintiffs shall apply for no more than $95,000 in costs, 
including attorneys' fees, for all work done through approval 
of the Consent Decree, except that plaintiffs shall not be 
subject to any limitation if the Consent Decree is not finally 
approved in a form agreeable to both parties and further 
proceedings are required.

The determination and award of costs, including 
attorneys' fees, and the payment of said costs, including

2 4 .



1
2

3

4

5

6
7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 )

attorneys fees, shall not be delayed by reasons of any 
appeal. If for any reason after the payment of costs, 
including attorneys' fees, the Consent Decree is disapproved 
a final matter by a federal court and the Consent Decree is 
vacated to the extent that the plaintiffs no longer would be 
considered the prevailing party, plaintiffs' counsel will be 
obligated to repay all costs, including attorneys' fees, to 
Defendant.

NOTICE
45. Notice under this Consent Decree shall be given by 

certified mail, return receipt requested. Notice to counsel 
the plaintiff class shall be given as follows:

Bill Lann Lee, Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 
10951 West Pico Boulevard, Third Floor 
Los Angeles, California 90064

Notice to Lucky shall be given as follows:
Lucky Stores, Inc.
P.O. Box BB
Dublin, California 94568 
Attn: Secretary

as

25.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12)

Copy to: Cassandra M. Flipper, Esq.
Cooley, Godward, Castro, Huddleson & Tatum 
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2000 
San Franciso, California 94111

DATED:

United States District Judge

CONSENTED TO:
BILL LANN LEE 
STEPHEN M. CUTLER
Center for Law in the Public Interest
PEARL LATTAKER
ANTONIA HERNANDEZ 
LINDA WONG
THERESA FAY BUSTILLOS

Attorneys for Plaintiff Class

PATRICK J. MAHONEY 
CASSANDRA M. FLIPPER 
COOLEY, GODWARD, CASTRO, 
HUDDLESON & TATUM

’atrick 
Attorneys f nc.

2 6 .



ATTACHMENT A

Case No.

(Names to be Added)

KXA673
100186

27.



KXA673
100186

Case No.

ATTACHMENT B

ENTRY LEVEL
ANNUAL FILL RATE GOALS 

(1987 - 1996)

YEAR BLACK HISPANIC
1987 6.0% 25.0%1988 6.5 26.51989 7.0 28.01990 7.5 29.51991 8.0 31.01992 8.0 31.01993 8.0 31.01994 8.0 31.01995 8.0 31.01996 8.0 31.0

28.



ATTACHMENT C

KXA673
100186

Case No.

JOURNEYMAN
ANNUAL FILL RATE GOALS 

(1987 - 1996)

YEAR BLACKS HISPANICS
1987 5-0% 20.0%1988 6.0 22.01989 7.0 23.01990 7.5 24.01991 8.0 25.01992 8.0 26.01993 8.0 27.01994 8.0 28.01995 8.0 29.01996 8.0 31.0

2 9 .



Case No.

ATTACHMENT D

ENTRY MANAGEMENT 
ANNUAL FILL RATE GOALS 

(1987 - 1996)

YEAR BLACKS
1987 3.0%
1988 3.5
1989 4.0
1990 4.5
1991 5.0
1992 5.5
1993 6.01994 6.51995 7.01996 7.0

HISPANICS WOMEN
16.0% 19.0%17.0 20.018.0 21.019.0 22.020.0 23.022.0 24.024.0 25.026.0 26.028.0 27.030.0 29.0

3 0 .

KXA673
100186



ATTACHMENT E

STORE MANAGEMENT 
ANNUAL FILE RATE GOALS 

(1987 - 1996)

YEAR BLACKS
1987 3-0%1988 3.5
1989 4.01990 4.51991 5.01992 5.5
1993 6.01994 6.51995 7.01996 7.0

HISPANICS WOMEN
14.0% 7.0%15.0 9.016.0 12.017.0 14.018.0 16.019.0 19.020.0 22.022.0 25.024.0 29.026.0 33.0

KXA673
100186 31



SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE 
("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between DENISE 
BALLESTEROS ("Ballesteros") and LUCKY STORES, INC. and the 
agents, employees, and related companies of Lucky Stores, 
Inc., including Lucky and Food Basket Stores (collectively 
"Lucky").

WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Ballesteros has filed a charge against Lucky 

with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") in 
Case No. 092851268 ("Charge") and

WHEREAS, Ballesteros has filed suit under the name of
Ballesteros, et al v. Lucky Stores, Inc., No. _______ , in
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, 
alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq., and the Civil 
Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 ("Complaint"); 
and

WHEREAS, Ballesteros and Lucky desire to settle fully 
and finally all differences between them concerning claims 
of discrimination;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and 
mutual promises herein contained, it is agreed as follows:

EXHIBIT 2
CMF071(12) 
100686 32.



FIRST: This Agreement shall not be construed as an
admission by Lucky of any act of discrimination whatsoever 
against Ballesteros or any other persons, and Lucky 
specifically disclaims any discrimination against
Ballesteros or any other persons, on the part of itself, its 
agents or its employees.

SECOND: Ballesteros agrees to withdraw with prejudice
any pending charges alleging discrimination in employment
filed by her against Lucky with any agency and with the 
EEOC.

THIRD; Lucky agrees that when the steps set forth in 
Paragraph SECOND above have been completed, and when counsel 
of record for Lucky receives the original of this Agreement 
executed by Ballesteros and her attorney, Theresa Fay 
Bustillos, Esq. ("Bustillos"), Lucky, within ten (10) days, 
will do the following:

(1) Lucky will cause to be delivered to Bustillos, on 
behalf of Ballesteros, a check in the amount of $27,500 in 
settlement for all claims, including damages.

(2) Lucky shall remove any reference in any personnel 
or records files concerning Ballesteros' involvement in the 
Charge or action herein or any derogatory information
and opinion falling within the scope of, arising out of, or
relating to the matters raised in the Charge or Complaint 
herein.

CMF071(12) 
100686 33.



FOURTH: Ballesteros accepts the items set forth in
subparagraphs (1) through (2) of Paragraph THIRD in full and 
complete settlement of any and all claims related to 
discrimination between Ballesteros and Lucky.

FjyrTH: Ballesteros represents that she has not filed
any other complaints or charges other than the above 
referenced Complaint and Charge, against Lucky involving 
claims of discrimination in employment with the State of 
California Fair Employment and Housing Commission, the EEOC, 
or any other local, state or federal agency or court, and 
that if any such agency assumes jurisdiction of any 
complaint or charge against Lucky on behalf of Ballesteros, 
she will request that agency to withdraw from the matter.

SIXTH: Ballesteros hereby irrevocably and
unconditionally releases, acquits and forever discharges 
Lucky and each of Lucky's owners, stockholders, 
predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, 
officers, employees, representatives, attorneys, 
subsidiaries, affiliates (and agents, directors, officers, 
employees, representatives and attorneys of such 
subsidiaries and affiliates), and all persons acting by, 
through, under or in concert with any of them (collectively 
"Releasees"), or any of them, from any and all charges, 
complaints, claims, liabilities, obligations, promises, 
agreements, controversies, damages, actions, causes of

CMF071(12) 
100686 34.



action, suits, rights, demands, costs, losses, debts and
expenses (including attorneys' fees and costs actually
incurred), of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown,
suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent ("claim" or
"claims") which Ballesteros now has, owns, holds, or claims
to have, claims to own, or claims to hold, or which
Ballesteros at any time heretofore had, owned, held or
claimed to have, claimed to own, or claimed to hold, or
which Ballesteros at any time hereafter may have, own, hold
or claim to have, claim to own, or claim to hold, against
each other or any of the Releasees, related or in any manner
incidental to a claim of discrimination.

SEVENTH; Ballesteros expressly waives and relinquishes
all rights and benefits afforded by Section 1542 of the
Civil Code of the State of California concerning the
claims related to discrimination embodied in the aforesaid
charge and lawsuit, and does so understanding and
acknowledging the significance and consequence of such
specific waiver of Section 1542. Section 1542 of the Civil
Code of the State of California states as follows:

A general release does not extend to claims which 
the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in 
his favor at the time of executing the release, 
which if known by him must have materially 
affected his settlement with the debtor.
Thus, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1542,

and for the purpose of implementing a full and complete

CMF071(12 ) 
100686 35.



release and discharge of the Releasees, Ballesteros 
expressly acknowledges that this Agreement is intended to 
include in its effect, without limitation, all claims 
related to discrimination which Ballesteros does not know or 
suspect to exist in her favor at the time of execution 
hereof, and that this Agreement contemplates the 
extinguishment of any such claim or claims.

EIGHTH: Ballesteros represents and agrees that she
has thoroughly discussed all aspects of this Agreement with 
her attorney, Bustillos, that she, Ballesteros, has 
^^^^tully read and fully understands all of the provisions 

this Agreement, and that she is voluntarily entering into 
this Agreement

NINTH: This Agreement is made and entered into in
the State of California, and shall in all respects be 
interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of said 
State.

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY; THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDES A 
RELEASE OF ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CLAIMS.

Executed at Los Angeles, California, this ____  day of
__________________, 1986.

LUCKY STORES, INC.

---------------- ----------- - By ________________Denise Ballesteros

CMF071(12 ) 
100686 36.



STATEMENT OF COUNSEL

The undersigned, who has represented Ballesteros 
herein, represents that the undersigned has fully advised 
Ballesteros of the scope, meaning, and legal effect of each 
provision contained in this Agreement, and that Ballesteros 
has acknowledged to the undersigned that Ballesteros has 
carefully read and fully understands each of said 
provisions, including that this Agreement releases all of 
Ballesteros claims of discrimination, both known and 
unknown, against each and all of the Releasees.

Dated: ____________- 1986 MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND

By ___________________ _____
Theresa Fay Bustillos

Attorney for Ballesteros

CMF071(12) 
100686 37.



SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE ("Agreement") 
is made and entered into by and between CHERYL D. CHISLOM 
("Chislom") and LUCKY STORES, INC. and the agents, employees, 
and related companies of Lucky Stores, Inc., including Lucky and 
Food Basket Stores (collectively "Lucky").

W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS, Chislom has filed a charge against Lucky with 

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") in Case 
No. 092851764 (the "Charge"); and

WHEREAS, Chislom has filed suit under name of 
Balleteros, et al. v . Lucky Stores, Inc., No. t in
Federal District Court, Central District of California, 
alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. Section■2000e et seq., and the Civil
Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 (the "Complaint"); 
and

WHEREAS, Chislom has accepted Lucky's offer of employ­
ment, and has been employed as of June, 1986 as a regular 
part-time journeyman cashier; and

WHEREAS, Chislom and Lucky desire to settle fully and 
finally all differences between them concerning claims of 
di scrimination;

CMF075(6) 
100686

EXHIBIT 3
3 8 .



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and 
mutual promises herein contained, it is agreed as follows:

FIRST: This Agreement shall not be construed as an
admission by Lucky of any act of discrimination whatsoever 
against Chislom or any other persons, and Lucky specifically 
disclaims any discrimination against Chislom or any other 
persons, on the part of itself, its agents or its 
employees.

SECOND: Chislom agrees to withdraw the Charge with
prejudice and requests dismissal of the Complaint.

THIRD: Lucky agrees that when the steps set forth in
Paragraph SECOND above have been completed, and when counsel 
of record for Lucky receives the original of this agreement 
executed by Chislom and her attorney, Bill Lann Lee, Esq. 
("Lee"), Lucky, within ten (10) days,, will do the 
following:

(1) Lucky will appoint Chislom to a regular position 
as a journeyman cashier.

(2) Lucky will consider Chislom employed as of May 
1982 for purposes of calculating prospective vacation and 
health benefits. Lucky will seek waiver of any waiting 
period normally required for any employee benefits; however, 
Chislom s actual hire date for purposes of pension benefits 
shall be May 1986.

(3) Lucky will assign Chislom as many hours of work as 
possible as permitted by relevant collective bargaining

CMF075(6) 
100686 39.



r t

agreements. Should employees in Chislom's classification be 
laid off, Lucky will assure that Chislom will be protected 
from layoff and/or recalled to work as expeditiously as 
possible, and as permitted by relevant collective bargaining 
agreements.

(4) Lucky will cause to be delivered to Lee, on behalf 
of Chislom, a check in the amount of $32,500 in settlement 
of all claims, including damages.

(5) Lucky will remove any reference in any personal 
files or records concerning Chislom's involvement in the 
Charge or Complaint herein or any derogatory information and 
opinion falling within the scope of, arising out of, or 
relating to the matters raised in the Charge or Complaint 
herein.

(6) Lucky shall insert in Chislom's personnel file a 
memorandum stating its desire that its officials, agents and 
employees shall limit any information given to any prospec­
tive employers of Chislom to dates of employment, positions 
held and any other information that Lucky is requested in 
writing by Chislom to release.

FOURTH: Chislom accepts the items set forth in sub-
paragraphs (1) through (5) of Paragraph THIRD in full and 
complete settlement of any and all claims related to 
discrimination between Chislom and Lucky.

FIFTH: Chislom represents that she has not filed any
other complaints or charges other than the above referenced

CMF075(5) 
100686 4 0 .



Complaint and Charge against Lucky involving claims of 
discrimination in employment with the State of California 
Fair Employment and Housing Commission, the EEOC, or any 
other local, state or federal agency or court, and that if 
any such agency assumes jurisdiction of any complaint or 
charge against Lucky on behalf of Chislom, she will request 
that agency to withdraw from the matter.

SIXTH: Chislom hereby irrevocably and uncondition­
ally releases, acquits and forever discharges Lucky and each 
of Lucky' owners, stockholders, predecessors, successors, 
assigns, agents, directors, officers, employees, representa­
tives, attorneys, subsidiaries, affiliates (and agents, 
directors, officers, employees, representatives and 
attorneys of such subsidiaries and affiliates), and all 
persons acting by, through, under or in concert with any of 
them (collectively "Releases"), or any of them, from any and 
all charges, complaints, claims, liabilities, obligations, 
promises, agreements, controversies, damages, actions, 
causes of action, suits, rights, demands, costs, losses, 
debts and expenses (including attorneys' fees and costs 
actually incurred), of any nature whatsoever, known or 
unknown, suspected or unsuspected, fixed or contingent 
( claim' or "claims") which Chislom now has, owns, holds, or 
claims to have, claims to own, or claims to hold, or which 
Chislom at any time heretofore had, owned, held or claimed

CMF075(6) 
100686 41.



r
i

- r

to have, claimed to own, or claimed to hold, or which 
Chislom at any time hereafter may have, own, hold or claim 
to have, claim to own, or claim to hold, against each or any 
of the Releases, related or in any manner incidental to a 
claim of discrimination.

SEVENTH: Chislom expressly waives and relinquishes all
rights and benefits afforded by Section 1542 of the Civil
Code of the State of California concerning the claims
related to discrimination embodied in the aforesaid charge
and lawsuit, and does so understanding and acknowledging the
significance and consequence of such specific waiver of
Section 1542. Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State
of California states as follows:

A general release does not extend to claims which 
the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in 
his favor at the time of executing the release, 
which if known by him must have materially 
affected his settlement with the debtor.
Thus, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1542,

and for the purposes of implementing a full and complete
release and discharge of the Releases, Chislom expressly
acknowledges that this Agreement is intended to include in
its effect, without limitation, all claims related to
discrimination which Chislom does not know or suspect to
exist in her favor at the time of execution hereof, and that
this Agreement contemplates the extinguishment of any such
claim or claims.

CMF075(6) 
100686 4 2 .



EIGHTH: Chislom represents and agrees that she has
thoroughly discussed all aspects of this Agreement with her 
attorney, Lee, that she, Chislom, has carefully read and 
fully understands all of the provisions of this Agreement, 
and that she is voluntarily entering into this Agreement.

NINTH: This Agreement is made and entered into in
the State of California, and shall in all respects be 
interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of said 
State.

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY; THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDES 
A RELEASE OF ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CLAIMS.

Executed at Los Angeles, California, this __ day of
___________  1986.

LUCKY STORES, INC.

Cheryl D. Chislom By

CMF075(6) 
100686 43.



STATEMENT OF COUNSEL

The undersigned, who has represented Chislom herein, 
represents that the undersigned has fully advised Chislom of 
the scope, meaning, and legal effect of each provision 
contained in this Agreement, and that Chislom has 
acknowledged to the undersigned that Chislom has carefully 
read and fully understands each of said provisions, 
including that this Agreement releases all of Chislom's 
claims of discrimination, both known and unknown, against 
each and all of the Releases.

Dated: 1986

CENTER FOR LAW IN THE 
PUBLIC INTEREST

B y ________
Bill Lann Lee

Attorney for Chislom

CMF075(6) 
100686

44.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.