United States v. Texas Education Agency (Austin Independent School District) Record on Appeal of Plaintiffs-Intervenors
Public Court Documents
August 3, 1979
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. United States v. Texas Education Agency (Austin Independent School District) Record on Appeal of Plaintiffs-Intervenors, 1979. 7ab122b2-c79a-ee11-be37-000d3a574715. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/407928d8-1e49-41fd-8b64-6a4ec43be0e0/united-states-v-texas-education-agency-austin-independent-school-district-record-on-appeal-of-plaintiffs-intervenors. Accessed April 28, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE
5 - 5 - n c\
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 79-2833
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
and
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et al..
Plaintiffs/Intervenors-Appe H a n t s ,
v s .
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (AUSTIN INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal From The United States District Court
For The Western District Of Texas
Austin Division
RECORD ON APPEAL OF PLAINTIFFS
INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
SAMUEL T. BISCOE
Tower Building
21st Floor
1907 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
JACK GREENBERG
JAMES M. NABRIT, III
BILL LANN LEE
juite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Attorneys for plaintiff* /T^tervenors-Appellants
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 79-
UNI TED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
and
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et «il. ,
Intervenors-Appellants,
v s .
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (ATTC=TIN INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT), et al.,
Defendants-Appe Llees.
Appeal From The United States District Csurt
For The Western District Of Texas
Austin Division
RECORD ON APPEAL OF BLACK PLAINTIFFS-
INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et al.
SAMUEL T. BISCOE
Tower Building
21st Floor
1907 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
JACK GREENBERG
JAMES M. NABRIT, III
BILL LANN LEE
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
ew York, New York 10019
Attorneys for Black Plaintiffs-Intervenors-
Appellants Dedra Estell Overton, et al.
I N D E X
Page
Certified Docket Sheet ................... ........... 1
Motion for Hearing on Remedy, filed
November 30, 1978 .............................. 21
Order, filed December 8, 1978 ...................... 24
Order, filed April 3, 1979 .......................... 25
Order, Denying Motion, filed July 6, 1979 ......... 27
Desegregation Plan for the Austin Independent
School District of Black Plaintiffs-Inter-
ve .ors Dedra Estell Overton, et al., filed
July 11, 1979 (as later corrected when
submitted as Plaintiffs-Intervenors1 Exhibit
614 on July 25, 1979) ......................... 28
Motion for an Injunction and Memorandum in Support
of Motion for an Injunction, filed July 20,
1979 ............................................. 116
Order, Denying Motion for an Injunction, filed
July 31, 1979 ..................................... 124
Notice of Appeal, filed August 3, 1979 ............ 125
CIVIL DOCKET
IN I TED STATES DISTRICT COURT
k
Jury demand date:
v A p a Q
- V l i f t C? ,y -
A ^ d 7 ~ ~ <?/> 7
i No. 106 Rot.
(Jls/i
TITLE OP CASE ATTORNEYS S /
For plaintiff:
_Joha..li... M itchell,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA At tv . Genera]__o f the II.S.
VS. Sas^iMaraaaaayx__William.D. Sessions___ ___
u .s . Atty , fa/ r., v s r /
■THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY. ET AL
~~ Joseph D. Rich (kustiaiy
tervener allowed bv C ircuit '\ a Deyt. of Justice
myngA gCTVTT. ntnrprnM; ..Ky-hoT- Mother VFTMA h
-Ĉ ERIOM- L
Washington, 0. C,. 2Q5?0 s?
W e: __2Q9j2afcagflQ= -maa_ £ ] ---------------r --------------------
•■■W iw- Te9eer C.Iearhe. Calvert
“s-s-p //<TW-tt
_ ^ c *?-
LaVegaK ___
‘w-.
“ V S "
BASIS OF ACT I ® :
SXATFS OF AMFRTOA
iscrim ination against
Black a n Mexican-American children attending the . • Department o f Jus£Tce:
_ 2 h ^ ^ r .
a lvert / LaV
public .choels in the defendant d is tr ic ts
attorney fo r Infer rvener_____________
* jiack Greenberg (212/586-8397)
PETER ROOS lo Columbus C irc le - Suite 2030
Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund
145 9th Street____________________________
J New York. NY 10019 Attn: Sy ly j-
San Francisco, C a lifo rn ia 94103_
F o r d e f e n d a n t : (H e a r n e I t S c B . , 3G a l v e - t T - S . D . , -
G.G. Grant, Frank Kemble) _______________
Grant Cook, 1340 Tenneco Bldg. ,^toustgn_7700/
(LaVega I .S .D ., Henry L. Cranti.ll J r ./
FOR : PLTFF. . INt:er?enors 'Mexican-American)
(512/224-5476) TaVega TSD:
J. C. Hinsley, O ffice Suite 301,
3001 North Laiaar BlvH \ustin 78 705 I ._______
(.Austin i. a . u . y j/V / fA ciff ESfgjT
FOR INTERVENER: McClintock & Herring
(Jim Heidelberg
(211 E. Commerce SC.
P.0. 3ox 4355
(319 Aatec Bldg.
Waco. 7&Z.&1.
1406 ^dorado", Austin "870F
j r .iT/rr .
(San Antonio fSx—A ustin -An fev -9tm =~ague : Donald S. Thomas, Capital Natl 3ank Bldg.
/ Austin, 78701 C f l l . S Q J //Vf/77rX 78205 . ——W-f Li jam D. -hynctr~
=iai5=ifc=
255 San Antonio Bank A is tin .232)1
(Temple) Jack Prescott. 2nd at Calhoun St.
Temple Texas 76 501 ( P S 6 . ■
AND TRUST BUILDING . 77-i
- f a
(•Texas Education Agency) Eat Du illy//»■/-/ fret'-
711 Navarro Street XSD Asst. At tv Gen. State of Texas, Box R, ;
San Antonio. Texas 782 fMinor L.Helm,Jr.
78205 Sleeper,Williams,Johns ton.■T1 - ■ A J
Gam'tal S ta .. Austi n. 28711 i l l
(T .E .A .) Jim McCrory, Asst. Atty Gen, of Tex
AMES M. HEIDELBERG Helm & Estes ' Box 12548, Capitol Station, Austin 78711
213 1st KdLl
STATISTICAL RECORD
frrug: VWacu m/G/U'l
COSTS DATE
------- ■ ---.■■■■"
SAME OR
RECEIPT NO. REC. DLSB.
J.S. 5 mailed Clerk |
I
1 1973
J.S. 6 mailed . Marshal 8-15-7 3 APPEAL-Pltf Inte vend :s
v v t 1 / / ■ • /.?.•: 49891 5 00
Basis of Action:' / Docket fee | 8-1 7- •3 r .n . 201 II > 5.0(2__
Witness fees
!
Act on arose at: Depositions . 1
1
i
A-70-CA-80
DATE PROCEEDINGS Dmu Ordmr c Judgment Not
8-7-70 1-Comolaint filed________________________II ~2-Apptication for Order Filed_____________________________________II 8 - Application for Order to Show Causa filedII 4-Order GRANTING- Armlication for Order filed & ent'd conies issued with summons
It A-o-der GRANTING Application for Order to Show Cause filed 4 ent'd copies issued
It wit-h summons Hearne & Le Vega schools
II Surrnons and Copv with copv of cotnolai attached The Texas Education Agency iss led
II Summons S. Copy with copy of complaint attached. Dr. J.W. Edgar, issued_________
II Summons S, Cnov with coov of cornlaint attached. Austin Independent School Distr Let
Issued ---- — — ---------------II Summons & Copv with copv of comolaint attached. T.rbv B. Carruth,— issued
It Summons A Copv with copv of complaint attached Calvert Independent School Distr Let
It Summons & Copy with copy of ccmp laint attached . Fr? ,ik G. Kemble._Issued.--------
II Summons A, ftnpv with rnnv of complaint attached. Fetor Countv Independent School
It Summons & Cnnv wi*-h coov of Cnmrlaint attached, Floyd D. ManryIssued .
II Summons 4 Gonv with coov of Comolaint attached. Hearne Independent School Distr let,____
II Summons 8, Conv with coov of Complaint Attached. Garland G. Gra:U.. Issued
II Summons A. flonv with coov of Complaint attached. La Vega Independent School •
II Summons & Cnnv with coov of Complaint attached. Henrv L. Cranf: 11, Jr., Issued
II Summons & Coov with coov of Complaint attached. Midland Independent School
II Summons A Cnnv with coov of Comolaint Attached, Dr. James H. Msilev, Issued
II Summons S, Coov with Conv of Complaint Attached, Temple Independent School Distr Let.
II Summons & Conv with coov of COmolaint Attached, Ace Alsup, Issted
II Summons & Coov with coov of Comolaint Attached, Crawford Marti)., Atty. Gen.
of Texas Issued -- ________________
8-14-70 A—Summons ret'd S. filed Ex., Ace a isuo ,8-10-70, Temple, Keller Dip., $Jb.8 S
II 7-Summons ret'd Sc filed Ex., Calvert Independent School District, by serving
Frank G. Kemble, 8-10-70, Keller Dep, S3.00
II
“ LaVeaa. Texas S3.00II 9-Summons ret'd Sc filed Ex., Frank G. Kemble, 8-10-70, Keller De,)., Calvert, i'ex
~ S3.00II 1 n-Summons Ret'd & filed Ex., Temple Independent School District, by serving
Ace Aisuo. Temple.Texas 8-10-70, Keller Deo., $3.00
II n-Summons Ret'd Sc filed Ex., La Vega Independent School District, by serving
- Henrv T.. Cranf ill. Jr., (8-10-70), La Vega , Texas, Keller Dep., $3.00
It 17-Summons Ret’d & filed Ex., 8-10-70, Garland G. Grant, Hearne.Texas, Keller De
S3.00 .II 13-Summons “et'd & filed Ex., 8-10-70. Hearne Independent School District, by
Service Garland G. Grant, Hearne, Texas,=Keller Dep., $3.00
II 14-Summons Ret'd H filed Ex., 8-10-70, Irbv B. Carruth, Austin, Texas Keller Dep y
S3.00 .... -II 1S-Summons Ret'd Sc filed Ex.. 8-10-70, ‘ustin Independent School District, by
servine Irbv B. Carruth. Austin. Keller Dep., $3.00
II lA —Commons Ret'd Sc filed Ex.. 8-10-70, Dr. J.S. Edgar, Austin, Texas Keller Dep.
si on -------------------
II n-c.mmnnn Ret' 8 A filed Ex. . 8-10-70, Texas State Attorney eneral by serving
Alfred Walker. Austin. Texas Keller Dep., $3.00_______ _______________________II 18-Summons Ret'd Sc filed Ex.. Texas Education Agencv bv serving J.W. Edgar, 8-10 •70
Keller Dep, $3.00 (Austin, Texas) 1
A-70-CA-80
D. C. 110 Rer. Civil Docket Continuation
DATS PROCSSDING3 Jl
8-14-70 19-Motion to Intervene as Party Plaintiffs filed
R-70-70 20-Defts* Original Answer (Clavert independent School District and Frank G.
Kemble) filed
a - 2 0 - 7 0 21-Defts' Original Answer (Hearne .Independent SchooL_Distri.Ct and G,_G,_Grant)____
Filed 1
8-20-70 22-Ravised Plan of Desegregation for Clavert IndeDendent School District,
Robertson Countv. Texas filed '
8-20-70 28-Motion to Sever Claims ("Fetor County Indeoendent School District and Floyd D. I
____ Manrv) filed _ ___ :____________ H)-0 - 7 G - C /} (f
8-20-70 24-Plea of Formun Non Conveniens bv Extor County Independent School District and
Fiovd D. Manrv. Superintendent. Filed
8-20-70 25-Order Sustainine Motion to Sever and Plea of Forum Non Conveniens" II Copies above order-matiasLAttys both sides
II tLKC.eifiiad-tcldpieaidfedfft Bperrtaihfdjs-to Estor County I.S.D. and Floyd D. Manry
mailed to Pecos office
8-21-70 26-^otion to Sever Claims filed (Midland I.S.D. AND Dr. James H. Mailey)II 27-Plea of Forum Non Conve. ;ens by Midland I.S.D. and Dr. James H. Mailey,
Superintendent filedII 28-Order SUSTAINING Motion to Sever and Plea of Forum Non Conveniens filed 6c ent1i
Copies above order mailed attys both sides
Certified copies of fil ..stainting to Midland I.S.D. and Dr. James H. Mailey
mailed to Pecos Divisic
8-21-70 29-Reoort to Court and Desegregation Plan Temple I.S.D. Filed
8-24-70 30-Answer of Defts La Vega Independent School District and Henry L. Cranfull, Jr.
Fjled
8-24-70 IN-OPEN COURT: Court orders school Districts & H.E.W./Dept. of Justice complete
plans and file same with the Court along with order implementing same.
Question concerning lack of Jurisdiction raised by the Calvert & Hearne School
Districts in their answer---- OVERRULED
Motion to Intervine--- OVERRULED
Hearne I.S.D. matter settled by adoption of 1968 School Board Plan. Order to
‘to be prepared by Dept, of Justice and submitted to Counsel & Court.
LaVega I.S.D. Matter settled by adoption of Plan submitted by School Distri--
on their' answer to the Complaint.
Case of Calvert School District--dearing on Merits-- both sides rested.
_ _3&=Z5-7Q 31-Deft!s Answer (Texas Education Agency) filed 1
825-70 92. Answer of Defendant Temole Independent School District, filed. Copy to
_ Judge.
8-26-70 TN OPEN COURT: Court orders plan prooosedwbv dent, of Justice to be Implemented
Into the Temole IndeDendent School District
8-27-70 TN OPEN COURT: Court orders plan proposed by Dept, of Justice to be Implemented
into the Austin Independent Sciool District
9-1-70 33-Motion for Intervention (bv David T. Lamme, et al) filedII 34-Petition in Intervention tiled lII 35-Order DENEYlNG Motion tor intervention (by David T T _ „n fl-led & etlt'd
9-4-70 IN OPEN COURT; Order concerning T&terim School Desegregation Plan (Austin I.S.D.V
If 36-Order Concerning Interim School Desgeation Plan (Austin T.S.D.) filed
A ent'd, Copies sent attvs both sides
" 9-14-70 37-Motion in "intervention (with Petition 6e affidavits attached) (St. Johns) file
9-17-70 38-Order DESEGRATING Schools (LaVega 1SD) filed notice sent attys loth sidesII 39-Findines of F, ct and Conalusions of Law (LaVega) filed.r_._--- -- . ___ t-- l. _.-jII 400rHer DFSFCRATT0NG Schools (Calvert I.S.D.) filed notice sent attys both sides
" 41-Findings of Iact and Conslusions of Law (Calvert) filed Notice snet attys bothsLII 42-Order DESEGRATING Schools (Hearne I.S.D.) filed notice sent attys both sides i
A-70-CA-80 CONTINUED
DATE PROCEEDINGS Data Orda Judgment
<1-17-70 A3-Findings of Fact (Hearne I.S.D.) filed notice sent attys both sides
9-21-70 44-Subpoena ret'd & filed Ex.. 8-26-70 Irbv B. Carruth. Austin. Keller Deo-,_$2—QQ.
9-23-70 45-Order DESEGREGATING Schools (Temple I.S.D.) filed notice sent attvs both sides .
46-Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Temole I.S.D.) filed Notice sent attys both s
Q-7R - 7 0 A7 -Suhnoena ret'd & filed Ex. - 8-31-70. Guv West, Austin, Keller Pep. S3_.00------- L
" 4a-<?.,hnnena ret'd & filed Ex., '8-31-70. Richard M. Cummings, Keller Deo $2.00,Austin-----
" 40-Suhpnena ret'd & filed Ex.. 8-31-70. Leon Graham. Keller Dep, $2.00. Austin--- 1
" 60-Subpoena ret'd & filed Ex.. 8-31-70, Vernon D. Bint, Keller Dep., |2.._00 Austirt
" -Subpoena rat'd & filed Ex.. 8-31-70. Richard B. Bennett, Kel&er Dep, $2.00 Austln
9-19-70 ^2-Order D8 NEYING Motion to Intervene (St. Johns) filed '’ooies sent atvs both sides
10-15-7054-Rerft of Creation of a Tri-Racial Desegregation Committee (Temple 1.3.D) filad
" B5-Reoort of Meetinz of Bi-Raei'al Committee CT.a Veea T.S-D..) •£a1£4l.-- ----- ,--.,, or7 of Ethnic Composition and Prof essiolffl :S t a l ^ s t i n I.S.D.'i
1 Fil.d
10-22-7057-Sur olementa.1 Order filpci eonies spnt: ^rrvs hn<-h s i m s — (He .a.ns— y ---— -----
ti SQ-C„rriamenta1 Order Filed (Calvert I.S.D.) filed c .pies sent attys botn sieas
12-4-70 S9-Rpporf nf M-Rac’pl Onmmittpp. nf La Vpoa Tnripppndp.nr Srhnnl— Pi F itri r.f— C l?- 1.—7TL1—
12-J.--70 0-Order GRANTING El tension of time to renort deseerezati nn plans (until— 3--1-LI)---
filed copies sti.t attvs both sides ... ....— ----- ---
12-23-70 61 -Ord'-r APPROVING constructions plans for North East nigh school (Austin i.o.d .;
filed
1-26-71 ■"*62. Motion to Extend Reporting Date (Temple I.S.D.) tiled
-----n------ 53. Order Extending Reporting Date (Temple i.S.D. to R-tp /i) m ed cupica l»
attys both sides
2-1-71 64 Feb.1.1971 Report of Temple Independent Scnool Distric'nfTTeiT
2-3-71 65. Renort of Temtle Desezrezation Committee filed
2-16-71 6 6 - Report of Temtle Desezrezation Commiftee(of 10-1-71) filed
2-26-71 67- Order Extendite Time to ReDort on Desezrezation Plan (Austin-Until April lfi.li22JJ__
filed copies sent to attornevs both sides ---------------
4-6-71 6 8 Report or the Calvert Independent Scnool District tiled
It 69 Report of Bi-Racial Committee La Vega Independent Softool District Hied
4-14-71 70. Order Granting Extension or Time to iiiePian tiled (Austin i.S.D,) l̂iutil j
5-6-71 71 Addendum to Iitra-District Transfer Policy (Temple i.S.D.) rued
5-7-71 72- Order granting HEW extension of time 5-14-7Ito report to Court as ,-,o. recommendfed____
mmorehensive Dlans for the desezrezation f i l e d -------------------------
5-12-71 Conies of above order mailed to attvs for both sides ... .
5-14-71 75- Pamw»<5f fnr PTnHneffnn of nonimpnts hv. Plaintiff tiled-------- ---------------
5-20-71 76- Order ^ranting removal due to La Veza Independent School District to remove .
the following Marvin H. Donnell, Newton L. Harris, W.C. David & Don Reed
Four vacancies filled by follwoingi Benny L. Cepak,John N. oonnor,Billy
Devorsky, La Dell Thomas filed Copies mailed to atty3 for both sides
5-24-71 77- Motion of J.C. Hinslev for leave to Withdraw as Attorney of Record filed
5-77-71 7S- Order 5-70-71. is withdrawn pending reconsideration of membership of
fti-racial committee for La Vega Independent School District tiled
5-27-71 Copies of above order mailed to attys for both sides-----------------------
6-1-71 79- Notice fo Take Deposition'Arthur Cunningham Irbv Carruth_£iled------------
6-4-71 R0- Ordpr zrantinz La Veza Ind. School Diot. J.C. Hinsle^— ,attorney.permitted----
“To withdraw as counsel and V. H. McClintoo'- S. Tommy P. Herring... Waco, pei.mitted
counsel for La Vega School Dist. Also granting Motion to _ ...
Ci.-7o,C^d?r the Order of this Court „ teren in this cause on 8-24-/0 6. U.S.
ordered to answer such motion witnm zu days fruai uaut= 0£ t^is order filed
6-4-1). | Copies of above order mailed to attys for both sides
I
• I
D. C. 110 Rbt. Civil Doclcet Continuation (continued) A-70-CA-80
DATE FROC'EfcDTWGS Ju
6-4-71 8 1- Request of Defendant for Leave to File Motion filed (La Vega)
__6-4-71 ' 82- Motion of Defendant La Vega Independent School District to Reconsider Order
of August 24th. 1970 and to Adiust Boundary Lines filed
6-4-71 Summons & conv (with c o d v of Motionof Deft. T-a Veea Tndeoendent School
District to Reconsider Order of Aieust 24th.1970 and to Adjust
Boundary Lines & certified copy of Order granting above motion attached! - 1
issued
6-4-71 83- Certirication from Roard of Trustees of l.i Vega Tn^pp^nHenf Srhnnl nistrinr
for parsons to fill vacancies row exisring in the memhership r»f_«^id
Ri-racial oommittaa filad
6-8-71 84- Summons ret'd & filed Ex. 6-4-A Gcrdon Rountree. Jr..(son! Waco, McNamara
SDUSM 3.24
6-9-71 85- Austin Independent School District First Amend ,.ent of the School Plan
with attachments of Exhibits 44 thru 61 filed6-10-71 8 6 - Motion to Intervene as Party Defendant filed
6-11-71 Haaring on Motion to Intervene as Party Deft, in open court (OVFRRI.TT.F.D)
6-11-71 87- Order denying Motion to Intervene as Austin An.i-Busing League filed
6-11-71 Copies of above order mailed to attvs for both"sides
6 1176-21-71 ' 89- Subooena D/T ret'd & filed Ex. 6-l1-71 Arthur Cunningham,Jr. Austin Priddy
Deo. 2.00
6-21-71 90- Subooena ret'd & filed Ex. 6-11-71 R.chard A. Moya, Austin. Itiddy. Deo. 2.C10
6-21-71 91- Citizen's of Austin School Desegration Plan as Proposed bv he Austin
Anti-Busing League filed
6-21-71 92- Stipulation filed . _ _
6-21-7 Witness List & Trial before Court completed; began 6-11-71 completed 6-21-7i
Case taken under advisement.
6-24-71 93- Answer Waco Independent School to 3rd party netitinn nf La Tnd Echo*]
District filed
6-24-71 94- Response to Defts ’ Motion to Reconsider the Aiisust 24, 1970 O.-dor nf this
Court filed
6-28-7 . 95- Memorandum Opinion and Order filed Austin Ind. School igstem
7-15-71 96- Report and Submission Austin I.iJeoendent School District bv Plaintiff at
& Defendant filed
7-16-71 07- Order Granting Leave to File Amended Pleading (La Vega Indepei dent) filed
( Attv. for deft, served order on all council)
7-16-71 98- Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion (La Vega Independent School) filed
^ 7-16-71 99- Amended Motion, to Modify Order of Court Entered August 24, 1970, and to
Adjust Common Boundary Line with Waco Independent School District filed
7-16-71 100- Stipulation (La Vega Independent School District) filed
7-19-71 TOT- Memorandum Opinion and Order Austin Independent SchooL District filed
Copies given to attys for both sides 1 “
7-19-71 102- Certified copy of order denying motion for stay of trial rmirt'a
denied in appeal of Eastern District nf Texas 71-1061 TTEA v« State
The Texas Education Agency filed. ('See papers of ahnve order in earh
school case)
7-22-71 103- Order correction on last line par* s nf Memorandum Op ini nn A. Or H,r i
^ 7-27-' 1 104- Order authorizing court reDortei to be "aid for transcript filed
(copies of above order mailed to attys for bothsides)
101- Order granting mndifiratinn of order en :ered 8-24-70 La Vega Independent j
' School District filed 1
Conies mailed to attvs for both sides !
i
0
A-70-CA-80 (continued) --------------- — —
DATE PROCEEDINGS
Data Order udjment N
7-28-71 1
i bi-racial committe to be formed filed_^copies mailad— fo aLLys— for----- -
-------------- r both sides) ------------------
7-28-71 1107 Transcript of Proceedings and of the Evidence Trial Commencing 11»L27.I— __
1 Vols 1 & 2 filed ----.---.--------------
a.7-71 1na- Notice of Anneal bv ■! S filed r.onv mailed to..U_£.— Court...of---------
A^opals Fifth Circuit. New Orleans ----------------------- — ----
a-A-71 109- Transcript of nroceedines and of the Evidence of Aug— — 1970— fllfcd— !̂ --- L
Q - LArU--L Cause (Waco 4 LaVeea T.S.D.'). filed. Codv to Judge 5pears. .Sth-------------e
if 111. Memorandum in SuDDort of Aoolication for Temporary Restraining Qrder.fr----- -
--- Motion for Order to Show Cause, filed. Codv to Judge SeearS. Sth. (La Vega)
3-13-71 1 12- Drier dpnvinz Motion for TemDorarv Restraining-Orrier, hearing .sp.t, Sept. I,--
“ T-- 1971 in Austin filed fcooies marked to attys for hnth sides.’) Ve8 ^ -----
3_-ja_7i
3-7S-71 I1ZL Niticp t_ Tate Deposition Averv R - Downing filed- (T,a Vega)------------------
a-9^-71 —Tl S- f'loti re to Take Denosition Hrnrv . Cranfill . .Tr. .filed-- (Tj Vega)-----------
8-27-71 11X5"- Resoonsp of Deft T.a Vega T 9 n . tn pitf's Annl icacion for Temporary-------
i— " Oost-raininv (VHpr and Motion fnr Order to Show Cause 4 Memorandum fried----
8-30-71 i117- Response of Waco Independent School District to.Pitt 3 Motion tQ StiQtf-------
Cause & 3rief filed ------------------------- —
9-7-71 faring on Order to Show Causa m open .court--(DENIED)-------------------
Order to be submitted bv attvs for defendants-------------------------
Pltf's Exhibits 1 thru 6 and Deft'„S__ l x . A...----- ----------------------- —
g - Z t l l___9-7-71
n s - Stipulations nf Fact..Ne. T filed-----— ------------------ ---- ;-----— — —rrn- Snhnnen:-. rpt'd & filed Ex. 9-7-71 Averv Dawning. Warn, ffantiv■ ASSt. U.S. Atty
9-13-7X J
9-13-71 ~T?1- Order granting Ri-Raoial Committee of six white, mpmhers 4 six black---------
rnemhers. filed Copies mailed to attvs fnr hnth sides--------------------
9-16-71 122- Snhnnena rat'd 4 filed Ex. 9-3-71 M D . Ri chard snn. Re LI emearl--Tax— McManaia--
9-16-71 123- Subnoena ret'd & filed Ex. 9-3-71 nr. John E— Vinson, Timherrrpst, ...Tex.-----
9-16-71 124- Subooena ret'd 4 filed Ex. 9-3-71 .Toe Terra 1 r Timhercrest— Tex MrNamara---
9-16-71 125- Subooena ret'd & filed Ex. 9-9-71 Conrad Robinson. Tfmhwrcra&t— le x ---------
9-16-71 126- Subooena ret'd & filed Ex. 9-4-71 Willie Scctt. Waco. MrNamara— Den— 4-OOCLa-J. --
9-16-71 127- Subpoena ret'd 4 filed Ex. 9-4-71 Roeer Williams. Warn.McNamara.Den. 700 (T.a Vf ---
9-16-71 1 2 8 - Subooena ret'd 4 filed Ex. 9-4-71 O.P. Adams, Bellmead MrNamara. npn.2.00--
9-16-71 129- Subooena ret'd 4 filed Ex. 9-4-71 Newton Tarris .Wood 1 awn .Tex .McNamara .Pep---
~ 2u00 (La Vega) ----------------------------
9-16-71 30- Subpoena ret’d & filed Ex. 9-4-71 Marvin Donnell. Bel lap; ad. Mr.Namara, Pep.— 6 .8 C
(La Vega) __ _____________________________
9-16-71 131.- Subpoena ret'd & filed Ex. 9-4-71 Gradv Railsback.Waco., McNamara .Pep ■ 2.QQ-
(La Vega) ----------- —------------------
9-16-71“ 132- Subpoena D/T ret'd 4 filed Ex. 9-3-71 Henrv L. Cranfill. Bellmead. McNamara...
Pep■ 6.20 (La Vega) _________________ — ---------
9-16-71“ 153- Transcript of Proceedings and of the Evidence (La Vega) 9r.7.r_ZJ— filed-------
f - ------ l - P (with exhibits VII 4 VIII)
--------9=2SV /tl 135- Order denying relief sought by U.S. filed c o d Ir s mailed— tn iftys fnr----
— both sides (La Vega) _______________________
\ -------------------------------------------------— ------------------- --------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------1-------
6
D. C. llv Rev. C vil Docket Continuation A-70-CA-80 (continued')
DATE PROCEEDINGS Ju
9-29-71 135i Order making corrections on Order entered 7-19-71 filed i'atsti'i10-1-71 *137- Oct. 1, i S T t ^ u r t r ™ — 7 7 T”
10-4=171 138- October 1. 1971 Reoort of Temple Desegregation Committee Temole ISO filft'
(with exhibits A.3.C attached)
10-13-71 139- Notice of Appeal by United States from order entered 9-28-71 filed
Conv of Notice of Aopeal and docket sheets mailed to U.S. Court of Aooeals 1
Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, La.
___10-27-7- Onmnlete original record T.a Ve^a School District alona with certified clerk's
certificate and docket entries and'erhibits^mailed to U.S Court of Anpeals.
Fifth Circuit. New Orleans,La___________________________________
11-1- 71 140- Report 11-1-71 in compliance with order filed 7-19 71 as amended 9-79-71
Austin Independent School District filed
" — 1 1 :2 2 = 2 L 141- '̂.port of Calvert Independent School n<afHet as orderpd. hy Court Q-17-71
filed
11-29-71 142- Report Dec. 1. 1971 Austin Independent School District filed
12-2-711 147- Li-Racial Committee La Vega Independent School District Repnrr 17-1-71 fil
1-17-; 2 144- La Vega Independent School District's Proposer' Findi~ip= „f= nT-r ,n^
________Conclusions of Lawfiled___________________ L _
1-19-7.! 145- Motion to Fxi end Reporting Date CTemnle Tndependenr School niei-rieci Pf1 , 1
1-20-7 7 145- Order extending reporting date Feb. 21, 1972 Temple Independent
School District filed Conies mailed to attys for Loth sides
1-20-72 147- TnH >)Ptiflpnf School District report in compl >pticp zri th r.nnrr
Order dated Sept. 17, 1970 filed
1-71-7* 1 AS— Motion for Appointment to Bi-Racial Committee (La Veaa Ind. School
___________TH strict) filed_______________________________
1-25-72
__________Copies mailed to attvs for both sides U.S. Court of Anneals Mo,., irl
1-?fl_79
1-78-7? Corr-1 fipd cop »■ of Docket pntrips suppl pmpntal record mailed to Clerk
TT.S. roiiTt- if Appeala Fifth Circuit New Orleans
24 2-1-77
1-22-72 152- Feb. 1, 1972 Report of(Temple Independent School Districtlfil od
2-22-72 153- Feb. 1, 1972 Report of (Temple Desegregation (Irnirmi creel f i 1 ed
7-1-7?
7-1 5- 12__155- Order sranting'Mr. T.M. Parsons appointed on bi-racial committee
— T.a Veea Tnderendent School District, to replace William T. Robertson filed
7-1£-7? ISA- Report Weame independent School nistrict in compliance with order
9—1 7—70 hy Court fsubmitted Novpmhpr llf 19701 filed
7-29-72 1S7- Addendum to Intra-District Transfer Policy recently adopted hy Board of
Trustees of Temple Independent School District filed
3-31-72 158- Reoort Austin Independent School District as of March 15. 1972 no
substantial change has heen made and report of March 1. 1972 continues
as same for April 1, 1972 report, filed
d
/, 17 7 2
7—1—77 1 Ai— Repnrr for Mav in cnmnliance with Court Order dated 9-17-70 for AID filed
5-8-77 Ifi?- Bflpnrf Cal77Prt Independent School District as ordered bv Court
1 “* 1 -'l
RF.VFRSFD A RFMANT1FD WTTH DTRF.CTTONS filed (La' Vega)
S-1 ?— 7 9 Complete file along with all exhihir- L-, ,rega School district retd frrrx
fi m U.S. Court of Appeals
‘
7
A—70—CA—80 (continued)
DATE PROCEEDINGS
— — Fuspori 3jrel972 by AuslIit Imlnû iiilaui. Scliuol DisLui-t's---pursuant to------
Data Ord- Judgment
A-S-7?
6-7-72 l165- Certified coov of Order U.S. Court of Appeals, motion filed by U.S.
nltf-aopellant to supplement record on appeal by the inclusion of reports
to court reauired to be filed bv Austin Independent School District on 1st day
Nov..Dec..Feb..March.April & May of 1971 1972 sctool year GRANTED
2^^- Mnt-fnn for Appointment to Bi-Racial Comnittee(V/m. X. Robertson,— }— filed-----
( In Tsoal ------------------------
6-28-72 167- Order allowing Wm.T. Robertson to be appointee to said bi-racial committee
upon resignation Wilburn E. Kirkland La Vega School Did trice filed
Copies mailed to attvs for both sides
7-18-72 168 Consent Decree and Order entered with Attachments re LeVega School District.
Coov to Defendant and U.S. Attorney, Washington, D. C.
7-17-7? 169 Motion to Change Boundaries filed bv TEMPLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
with exhibits A & B attached. ---------
8-3-72 170 Motion to Extend Time for United State's Response to Defendant's Propos id
Boundary Changes and to Shorten Time for Defe f-ut's Response to
interrogatories and Request for Production of documents. (TEMPLE ISD)
8-3-72 171 Interrogatories propounded to Defendants, filed. (TEMPLE ISI))
8-3-72
Of nfyi..anfq filed 7TPMPT.V TSD) (Certificate of Service of Pleadings ittaohed.
8-3-72 173 Order Extending Time to respond to Def'ts Motion to Change Boundaries;
Shortening time for response bv Defendant to interrog. and requent for
Production of Documents granted. Copies to all Attorneys in TEMPLE IS]) portion
8-3-72 ' 174-ORDER ENTERED complying with direction from Circuit Court wherein lower)__ ___________
Court was remanriUd and reversed with directons that "all discriminatory )AUSTIN IS
segregation/ * be V ‘eliminated 'at once". See order for points set*forti)_ — |----i—
8-4-72 175 - Mandate returned from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (Corpus Christi. lid. Sch. D.
8-5-72 176 - Mandate returned from Fifth Circuit Court of Apeals (Austin Ind. Sch. 3ist
8-14-72 177 - Response of United States to District court Order of August 3, iy/Z, tiled . (Aust;
8-14-72 > 178 - Intervenor's Desegregation Plan for Austin, Texas (Dr. Finger Jr. Prcf. of Educ
Rhode Isl. Coll., Providence, R. I. preoared plan) Austin ISD
8-14-72 179 - Austin Ind. School Dist. " Report and Planning" plan filed by Order ot the
Court dated Aug. 3, 1972. Austin ISD
8/15/72 180. Answer of Temple Independent School District to Interrogatories by Pit; fi ed
8/75/7? 181 The Paoponao of the United States to Defendant's Motion to Change---------
8/25/72 182 - Notice letter from Judge Jack Roberts to all attorneys of record setting
.....~ • - meeting* -for- d-iscuss-ion- (Austin -Ind. Sch. Dist. ^Notices to Heidelberg,...
Greenberg; Rich, Patterson, Jr, Thomas, & Denius, McLrdry,}
8/28/72 183 - MANDATE FROM U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Denying motion of AID for stay, filed.
8/28 Add'l copy mailed to Mr. Patterson per his phone call -(dange of address)
8/28 Orieinal Record and all exhibits received from Fifth Circuit CwcC.qf Apftgali.___
» 9/5/72 184 - Exhibits #92 through 99 filed as referred m Report and Planning plan riled
bv Austin ISD August 14, 1972. (Austin ISD)
9/5/72 185 - One box of Original Exhibits received from U.S. Court of Appeals*__Letter,.return-
9/19/72 186 - Morion to Extend ReDorting Date filed by Temple Desegregation Committee (Tdmole.
9/21/72 187 - Order entered Extending Reporting Date for Temple Independent...Srh. .hiar. .(Jennie,. 11
9/22/72 188 - Transcript of Proceedings and of the Evidence of September 5, 1972 (AISD)
10-12-72 189 - Motion to Sever Motion for Boundary Change rrom n c . m T O ill
Bnildinv Program, filed ~ /Temple Independent |S. D.)
m-12-72 190 - Defendant Temple Indeoendent Sch. Dist. Amended Motion for Approval ot prop
R „ i l H i n v P r o g r a m , filed. , , - r [ . (Temple Ipd' actl~ U:.st.)
10-16-72 191— October “l, 1971 Report or l'emple md. bch. Disc-. , -lied.
C 4 ** / / Sts u
8
Docket Sheet #5
A - 70 CA 80 - (Continued)
D. C. 110 Rev. Civil Docket Continuation
iy/ 2
DATE PROCEEDINGS Ju
( 10-18 192 - Motion to Extend Reporting Date of TISD from Oct. 15 to Nov. 6 , fifed (Tempi!
V 10-24 193 - Order Extending Reporting Date from uct. ID to incv. o, rnea. »̂opy to
Attornevs of record. . ('l'EMFLi.
10-26n22. 194- The Response of the U.S.to Dert's Motionzzo Sever Motion fur Wilder U m u 6=
from Motion for Approval of 3dldingProgram and Motion ot theUnitea states |
for an Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Amended Motion i
for Approval of Proposed Building Program filed.
11-2-72 195 - Supplemental Report and Planning with Explanation attached tiied. (.a i d;
11-3-72 196 - Motion to Extend Reporting Date, filed. (TEMPLE ISD)
11-8-72 197- Order extending reporting date (TEMPLE ISD) filed Copies mailed to attv s
for both sides
j — 17, - m _ 7
f 11-10-7 2 799- Order cranting U.S. Motion for Extension of Time filed Copies mailed
to attvs for both sides /Tempi a srhnnT)
200 - Mntinn fnr Extension of T-fr-e to File Response to Defendant's Amended
Mnt-inn 'or Aooroval of Proposed Building Program, filed.
11-20-72 201 " o der allowing U.S. Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Deft's
Vnr-inn for Approval of Proposed Bldg. Prog. (10 days after completion of
current pupil locator maps'). Copy to Attorneys in Temple part of case) TEM
11-29-72 202 - Exhibits v 1 and #2 filed by Plaintiff-Intervenors pursuant to Order or
Sept. 5, 1972, filed. (AISD)!
12-1-72 203 - October 1, 1972 Report on the Work ex the Committee and on the maintenance i
of a Unitary School System in the izuiyie Independent School District of tempi
Texas, fziled. ( TEMPLE ISD)
12-7-72 204 - Order entered setting forth proceedings schedule toward trial if settlement
prior to May 7, 1973 is not accomplished. Copy to all attorneys of record.
12-7-72 205 - Order Preliminary to Final Pre-Trial Conference Between Attorneys, filed.
Coov to all attorneys of record
12-7-72 206 - Report of Bi-Racial Committee~-rOr LaVega lnd. Sch. Disc. for oec i, j.y/z .L
12-12-72 207 - Report of Hearne ISD fixed in accordance with Court Order dated 9/1///U- (.He;
12-13-72 208 - The Resoonse of the United States to defendants’ Amended Motion tor Approva IT
of Proposed Building Program, filed. (TEMPLE ISD)
1-5-73 209 - Letter dated Jan. 3, 1973 and Mandate DENT INC request or incervenors
Overton, et al for clarification of Circuit, court's Order of Remand dated
august 2, 19TT~, filed.
- 2-14-73 210 - February 1. 1973 Report of Temple Independt School District, filed. (.i'ttirus u
( 2-20-73 211- Motion to Extend Repurting Date, filed, (to M;.rch 15, 1973) /-£r>
4-6-73 213- April lil973. reoo rt .of_LeVega ISD.iilecL________________ (T,F VEDA TSDf___
4-16-73 214 - Notice of depositionS""of Terry Bishop, Dr Mattr-Snapp & Arthur--Cunninghams:
. 4-26-73 215 - Plan filed by Austin lnd. School District, with Exhibit attfAIsD)
. 6 ^ Mav 7-73 2 7ft- MTTM7ITES OF CTVTT. PROCEEDINGS. FILED.-All parties present with attornevs &
annnnnrp r-paHinpss for trial to besin. Opening statements made - Govt, presesn-.
> # 7 7 rpsrimnnpy. Rpcpss'd until May 8 f 1973 at 9:30 a.m.10 l/1 2 7 7- Gnvor't- (•P«Hmnm>v resumes MINUTES OF PROCEED H ’GS-f iled. Government rests 1
wirh exrenrien nf Calling. Opanine statements made bv Intervenors Mexican-
Americans and NAACP Tntervenors. Black Intervenors Testimony begins-
( rprppgpH nnff1 9;30 a.mt May 9f 1973.
"• Mav 9-73 218- Black Incervenors Testimony resumes-MINUTES GE' PROCEEDINGS-31ack Intrvs.
re?t. Mexican-American Intervenors begin Testimony. Recessed until 5-10-73.,
May 10-71 27 9- MTNTTTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS. FILED. Mex-Amer. Intervenors Testimony resumes
.
imunnirrc nF ptvtt RROCEEn T2TGS FTT.F.D. Mexican-Amer ican Intervenors Testimony
resumed. Recessed at 11:30 a.m. uncil 9:30 a.m., Monday May 14, 1973
9
UNITES STATES V. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, ef al
A-70-CA-80
Docket Sheet #5.(
DATE PROCEEDINGS
Date Ord«
5-14-73 221- MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS. FILED. Govt Calls Mr Cunningham as a witness
(out of Order) Govt, testimony resumes.
Mexican-Amer. Intervenors Te.xtimony resumes after Mr. Cunningham concluded
his testimony. Recessed until 9:30 a.m. 5-15-1973.
5-15-73 i 222- MINUTES OF CIVIL'PROCEEDINGS, FILD. Mexican-Amer. Intervenor's testimony
resumes. Recessed until 5-16-73-9:30 a.m.
5-16-73 223-MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, FILED. Mex-Amer. Intervenor's testimony
-“sumes. Mexican-Amer. intervenors rest subiect to filing further stips.
Recessed until 9:30 a.m.-5 -17-73.
5-23-73 224-MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, FILED. Defts. waive opening statements .Defts
testimony begins. Mr Idar excused from further attendance ac this tiiai-
iecessed until 9.00 a.m. 5-24-73.
5-24-73 225- Defts' test.anonv resumes. Rec essed until 9:00 a.m. 5/25/73 MINUTES FILED.
5-25-73 226- Deft's testimony resumes. MINUTES FILED. Recessed until 9:00 a.m.5-29-73
5-29-73 227- MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, FILED. Deft. AISD Testimony resumes.
Mr. Echols testimony stipulated. Deft. Submits testimony of Defts witness
of 1st trial-Deft.. rest. Intervenor's close. Deft Close. Pltf,USA
to file proposed Findings of Fact by June 15. Pltf. Closer UNDER ADVISEMI.NTS.
5929-73 228- Witnesses Sworn list filed. (Pltfs & intervenors)
3-29-73 229- 'ernment exhit list filed.
5-29-73 230- Intervenor's Exhibits list filed.
5-29-73 231- Deft's Exhibits, filed.
5-29-73 232- Defts Witness list, filed. .
OUT OF ORDER DOCKET ENTRIES FOR MAY 7 - (filed in Courtroom) ________________________
5-7-1973 216-a Deposition of Arthur Cunningham, Jr., filed (April 18, 1973-taken)
5-7-1973 716-b Continuation of Depositiot of Arthur Cunningham, Jr. (Apr 24, 1973-taken)
5-7-1973 216-c Continued Deposition of Arthur Cunningham, Jr.(April 24, 1973-taken),filed
5-7-1973 216-d Deposition of Mathew Snap) filed.
5-7-1973 216-e Deposition of Terry Bishop, filed.
5-7-1973 216-F FINAL Pre-Trial Order with Attcns. A through J, filed.
5-29-73 233- Civil Subpoena Duces Tecu't(Charles L. Jones) filed May 7,1973
5-29-73 IJu- Civil Subpoena Duces Tecu’i(Alex Martinez) filed May 7, 19/3
5 29-73 235- Civil Subpoena duces tecu i(Naftalie Garcia) filed May 7, 1973
5-29-73 236- Civil Subpoena duces tecui(Arthur Cunningham, Jr. filed May 7, 19/3
5-29-73 237- Civil Subpoena dueces tec'im(Teresa Cermeno) filed May 7, 1973
5-29-73 238- Civil Subpoena duces tecu l (Joe Carmona) filed May 7, 19>3
5-29-73 239- Civil Subpoena duces tecu i (Mary Grace Herrera) filed May 7, 197362.UU 61).34
6-13-73 240- Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Amicus Curiae filed by American
Civil Liberties Union, with Memorandum attached.
6-13-73 Vi V- Memorandum of Amicus Curiao,iilod i»r cans idarar ion-uu Itha Court hy Amer-ir.
Civil Liber6.ie.s-Una.oo,
6-15-73 241- Trial Brief and Suggested Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law filed
by Austin Ind. Sch. Dist.
6-15-73 24 2- Proposed Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Proposed Order of the
United States, filed.
6-15-73 243- Plaintiff-Intervenors' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
filed.
6-15-73 Piaintiff-Intervenors Exhibit 1-35 received-to Judge tor consideration.
6-18-73 244- Intervenors' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law .with Respect
to Black Students, filed.
' 7 -7 6 - 7 1 246- Additional Suggested Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law (AISD) tiled
*7-20-73 247- Supplementary Information on Plans for Sixth Grade Learning Centers and
Related Matters filed by AISD AISD 1
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V )
THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, ET AL . A-70-CA-80 - Docket Sheet
A-70-CA-80
D. C. 110 Rev. Civil Docket Continuation
DATE PROCEEDINGS
7-10-78 248- Application to Aoorova Kindergarten Plan, filed (Temple Ind. Sch)
7-30-73- - > Prooosed Consent Order pending for Temple Ind. Sch.(0rig. to Judge)
8-1-73 ^249- MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FILED, WITH ATTACHMENTS USI'AILINU ins oj.a_LH
-------- 7 GRADE CENTER PLAN ORDERED BY JUDGE ROBERTS. ( AISD)
7-31-7y 250- Consent Order Approving Application for Kindergarten Plan for TEMPLE iSD .
n Copy to attorneys.
8-15-73 251- NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Plaintiff-Intervenors. Dedra Estell Overton, et A i.
al. filed._____________________________________
8-15-73 252- Cost Bond on Appeal filed by Plaintiff-Interveners AISD)
8-16-73 253- Letter to U.S. Court of Appeals with Certified copy of docket entries, filei.
Coov* of letter to Heidelberg. Donald S. Thomas, Sal Levatino, Sylvia Drewc — JoseDh D. Rich.
8-16-73 254- Notice of APPEAL filed by Plaintiff, United States. Certified copy
to attorneys and Fifth Circuit. (AISD)
8-24-73 755- Order from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals extending time frr tiling
record on appeal(including Court Reporter's Transcript to OCTOBER 1, 19/-)..;
(Wisdom, Judge, Circuit) ( A / 3 A ) 1
9-19-73 256- Order fixing charge of court reporters for expediting the preparation o.
-record in accord, with standards provided bv '"^icial Conf, Sect. 1948,
filed. Copy to attorneys and Court Reporter, Harry Wear._______AISD _ "
_
r
Q-71-77 757- Tr^nsrripf of Proceedings and of the Evidence presented at trial beginning
May 7, 1973, filed. (SIX VOLUMES)--------------------------------------
"-5g-28-73 Frit ire record to U.S. Court of Appeals, except Exhibits.
~^lf)-l-73 Exhibits to U.S. Court of Aooeals - 1 box & 1 large flat (1-21) with lette
of transmittal
r
if
10-5-73 258- October 1. 1973 Report of Temple Ind. Sch. Dist.. filed. (TemPLE ISD)
10-19-73 259- February 1, 1973 Report on the ,vork of the Committee and on the Maintenan
of a Unitary School System in the Temple Ind. Sch. District ot Temple, l'x̂ :
-------- m i d : (TEMPLE ISD)
10-25-73 260- Report of CALVERT ISD for year 1973, filed. (CALVERT ISD)
11-29-73 761- Motion for Court Approval of Proposed Construction of Josephine Houston
and Harvev Williams Elementary Schools, il^ed. (AISD) i
11-29-73 762- Motion for Court Approval of Proposed Construction of George I. Sanchez
Elementary School, filed. (AEBD)
. 12-4-73 768- Report .)f Bi-Racial Committee LaVega Ind. Sch. Dist., filed (LAVEGA)
\ ' 12-12-73 264- Report of Temple Desegregation Committee filed pursuant to August. _19.70._
rsOrder of Court (Oct. 1. 1973 Report) (TEMPLE)
12-13-7: 265- Order Enlarging Time for Reply to AISD Proposed Constr., tild -Copy to atti
*12-10-73 265a- Mexican-American Interveners* Motion to Enlarge Time for Reply to Austin
Tnd. Sch. District's Prooosed Construction of George I. Sanchez Elemenary
Sch. (see doc. 1)265 Granting Order).
12-13-73 266- Report of Hearne Ind. Sch. District for 1973-74, filed (HEARNE ISD) I
Together with letter correcting Apr. 12 teacher report. !12-17-73"267- Mexican-American Intervenors1 Response to Defendants’ Motions for Court
Approval of Proposed Construction of George I. Sanchez, Josephine Houston,
and Harvey Williams Elementary Schools, filed.
768- Response of the United States to Defts' Motion:. for Approval of Proposed
1974
1-17-74 769- Motion for More Time to File Mid-Year Report to the Court on status or
Desegregation in the AlSchool Dist., filed.(requests to Jan. 31, 74IA1BD)
? - ] -7̂ 770- 81-at-ns Report of Desegregation in Austin Ind. Sch. Dist., tried. (.Alsu;
2-5-74 271- MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, FILED. Hearing for Approval of Proposed
truetion of Josephine Houston; Harvey Williams and George I. Sanchez
Elementary School locations(motions filed 11/29/1973). All sides announce
Ready for Court at 9:30 a.m. Debt's Testimony begar 4 concluded. Parties c.
11
A-70-CA-80
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, ET AL
DATE PROCEEDINGS Date-0 rde:
Judgment >
Continued------
2-5-74 Hearing on motions. . .
announce settlement_reached on Palm School. Court Will not Order any new construction
— ant il 1ua.1Ja.Le i r u m J L h Circuit on Appeal from Memorandum up in ion tried August 1, 1973.
Order for Approval Denied as to Houston 6c Williams Schools. All parties to enter
' Stipulation on Sanchez School 6c ruling will be made as to that schpol when stipule
|tion is entered.
7-S-1974; 272-Order entered Denying AISD Motion for Court Approval of Proposed Construction
o f Joseohine Houston Sc Harvey Williams Elem. Schools, Copy to attorneys.
2-5-74 273-Witness List, filed.
2-5-74 274-Deft1s Exhit List, filed.k
2-12-74 275 February 1. 1974 Report cf Temple. Independent School District filed
2-14-74 276- Supplemental Report for January 1974 Exhibit B alSD'Vattached t n £770i
3-8-74 277- TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS AND OF THE EVIDENCE regarding proposed construe-
tion sites heard FEB. b 1974, filed. A / O
4-76-74 ! 278- C o d v of letter from Pltff. Maldec to Attorney L ™ AISD re proposed attendans e
Zone for Lvndon B. Johnson Hiah School, filed. (AISD)
5-11=74 279-Coov of letter of 4-22-74 transmitting boundary attendance zones to attorney!
for Pltffs and Interv’nors byAISD attorney Sal Levatino/KxxxxamfcmspiKsx
6-11-74 280-Motion for hearing re order Aug. 1, 1973 entert ’ L y this Court for approval
of boundary attendance zones for Lyndon Baines Johnson H.S. and consequent
changes to Lanier and Reagan High School, filed by ? X t Deft.w/proposed boundary
map attached.
6-13-74 281-MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS (AISD), FILED.
Hnaring on Boundary Line for LBJ High School. AISD testimony begun &
concluded. AISD Rests.-Pltffs r..,̂ w/o having put on any testimony.
AISD argues- Pltff USA - no objection
Pltff Intervenors-no objection.
Motion for Boundary lines to be fixed by the
School Board ordered approved by Che Court.
6-13-74 282-Witness List Sworn (Deft.) filed.
6-13-74 283-Deft‘s Exhibits List, filed, (only one, Ex. A)Mapa^o«=3orndaE^-Line3-.attd)
Placed, in-case—S-ile
6-13-74 284-ORDER ENTERED Granting Motion and approving proposed attendance zones for (AL9D) -------
"Lyndon Baines Johnson, Lanier and Re-gaa High Schools. Copies to attorneys. (AISD)
6-20-74 285- Boundary change for Katherine Cook Elementary School with map attached
filed (AISD)
6-28-74 286- February 1. 1974 Report on Work of Committee and on Maintenance of a Uni-
tarv School System in the Temple ISD of Temple, Texas, filed. TEMPLE
7-25-74 287. July 1, 1974 report AISD per order dtd. 8-1-73 filed
7-26-74 288. Boundary change between Cunningham and Sunset Valley F.lem. Schools proposi-
tion, filed. ' AISD.
8-1-74 289- Letter to Sal Levatino, 8-1-74 from Sylvia Drew stating no objection to
mandatory proposed changes in Cook Elementary School boundary.tiled
8-13-74 290- Copy of letter from Maldef re Proposed Sch. Boundary Ch;.nge Between
Cunningham and Sunset Valley Elem. Sch.-no objection- , tiled ^AlSu)
*7-3-74 2 9 1 - Copy of Boundary changes for Katherine Cootc Eiemencary School. filed.
9-26-74 292-Stipulation withdrawing objections to 3 elem. schools , tiled, (.replacements
for Palm Elem. Sch: George I. Sanchez, Houston Elem. and Williams Elem.)
1 0-15-74 293-Oct-P«r 1, 1974 report of TE M PLE ISD, FILED. (IemPLE)
17-10-74 794- T.aVeea ISD Bi-Racial Committee Report, filed (LEVEGA ISD.) 1
19-19-7£ 7 0 S - HVA9MV T.9n H.pnrf filed (n compliance with Court order of 9/17/70. CHEARNE ISD)
1-15-7S f
1-99-7 S 797-T.aVeCTa TSD Motion for ADOointment to 3I-Racial C ommittee,filed (LAVEGA SSD)
2-18-75 298-TEMPLE ISD Report for February 1, 1975, filed (Temole ISD!
•Q.&™ 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V
THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGFNCY, ET AL
A-70-CA-80
D. C. 11QA Rev. Civil Docket Co&tlnu»tloi»
A-70-CA-80 Docket Shet
c
PROCEEDINGS
Da
Judt
C
3-24-75
3- 27-75
4- 8-75
5- 6-75
5-7-75
5-23-75
5-28-75
5- 29-75
6- 2-75
7- 1-75
2-1-75
7- 18-75
8- 13-75
10-15-75
12-19-75
12919-75
1-15-76
Is
3.
c
1-20-76
1-21-76
1-21-76
1-27-76
1-28-76
C
299 - Letter RE: Boundary Change Involving Travis High School and Crockett High
School in the Austin Independent School District, filed.
300 - Order entered accepting Jerry Petty and George Gillen resignations to bi-
racia.l committee-Cash Bradshaw appointed, copy to attys. ^ VEGA I S D
301- Motion and Application To Change Boundaries of Middle Schools, Filed
Temple Independent School District.
302- Letter frcm the Mexican-American Intervenors with respect to proposed con-
stru.tion of a new high school in the southwest portion of the AISD, Filed.
303- Letter addressed to attorney Bingham(for AISD) from Atty Heidelberg (Mexican-
American Intervefcrs, formulating objection to proposed construction of New
High School and suggesting new location at IH 35 and Ben White Blvd. (AISD)
304- ORDEf Approving Motion and Application To Change Boundaries of Kiddle Schools P i U d. (TEMPLL ISD)
305- Lett ir from NCAAP Intervenors to Atty for Austin I.S.D-
objccting to new high school location, filed (AISD)
Hearing set for ULY 7, 1975 at 9:30 for hearing on location of ”ew AIST H.S
Notices mailed.
306 Response of U.S. to Applicatioi of Defts to Change Boundaries of Middle Schoc
filed (TEMPLE ISD)
307- Motion for Continuance of hearing on objections filed by AISD.
308- Order granting continuance of nearing until the Court shall reset during
Sept. , 1975.- copy to attorneys.
309- The Austin Independent School District files its report for July, 1975, File
(Report Pursuant To Order of j.ugust 1, 1973.) (AUSTIN ISD).
Letter from James M. Heidelbe: g to William H. Bingham,RE: Proposed Northeas^
Jr., High School, Filed.
October 1, 1975 report of Temple Ind. Sch. District, filed (TEMPLE)
Motion For Approval Of Proposed Southwest High School, Filed.
Motion For Approval Of Proposed Northeast Junior High School Facility, Filed
Report Of Austin Independent ichool Dist. Pursuant To The Court's Order Of
August 1, 1973, Filed.
Motion To Withdraw As Counsel or Intervenors,Filed(By James M. Heidelberg)
Order that Heidelberg be allowed to withdraw as counsel with right to present
a request for Attorney's Fees; USA vs Texas Education Agency, et al (AISD).
Notice Of Substitution Of Counsel that Drew S. Days,III,staff atty.,NAACP Legal
Defense & Educational Bund, Inc. ,New YorkN. f . 10019 is substituted for Jim Grlay
and Norman J. Chachkin, Filed.
Response Of U.S. To AISD Motions.'For Approval Of The Proposed Southwest High
School And The Proposed Northeast Junior High School, Filed. (With Exhibits).
MINUTES OF CIVIL RR0CEEDINGS_ FILED HEARING ON PROPOSED LOCATION OF SWST H.S.
and for Approval of Proposed Location of Northeast Junior High School.
9:30 a.All parties announce ready.
Joel Cantreras admitted for this case only as attorney for Intervenors
Mr. Bingham, attorney for AISD, makes openeing statement.
AISD Testimony begun on N.E. Jr. High.
ll:45am-Recessed until 2:00 p.m.
2:00pm-Testimony rsm;d on N.E. Jr. High
Testimony cnncljded on N.E. Jr. High.
by Mr. Jingham-Pltff reserved right to statement until close of testimonvo
bpth Mo cions.
Mr. Birgham made opening statement on Southwest High be. *ol.
AISD testimony on S.W. H.S. concluded.
Pltffs put on no testimony.
Mr. Rich mr’.es closing statement for Justice Dept.
Mr. Bxscce makes closing statement on behalf of Blacklnterveno—s.
Mr. Contreras makes closing --------r_~vJ>ehalf_of_ MALDEF INTERVENORS -cont
310-
311-
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
13
PROCEEDINGS
320
321
322
1-29-76 323
1-29-76 324
1-29-76 325
1-30-76 326
- y !
1-30-76 399
2-18-76 398-
3-29-76 7329
4-2-76 330
4-1-7 o 331
4-12-76
4- 12-76
5- 13-76
5-13 -76
5-14-76
5-14-76
5- 26-76
6-2-76
6- 4-76
6-11-76
6-14-76
6-17-76
6-17-76
Mr. Bingham makes closing statement for AISD
“'OTIONS TAKEN UNDER ADVSEMENT BY COURT.
Deft’s Exhibits list, filed. (attached)
Pltff’s Exhibits, list, filed, (exhs. attached.)
Witnesses Sworn list, filed.
Copy of Review of AISD in accordance with Sect F(9)
Action No. 5281. Eastern Dist. of Texas Tyler Div.
Copy of Review of Temple Independent School Dist., ,
F(9) of Order entered in Civil Action No. 5281, Eastern Dist. of Texas,Tyler
Div-., Filed.Copy of Review of Calvert Independent School Dist.. ,
Fv.9) of order entered in civil action No. 5281, Eastern Dint, of Texas, Tvleir
Div., Filed.
of Order entered in civil
Filed.
in accordance with Sectioki
Data Or
Judgmec
in accrrdance with ;ion
l-D'O RANDOM OPINION AND ORDER, FILED. Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that
the motion of Austin Independt, School Dist. for approval to build the
proposed Southwest High School and Northeast Junior High School be, and
hereby is, DENIED. COPY TO ATTYS. (AISD)
JUDGMENT ON DECISION BY THE COURT, FILED, copy to attys.
rEBruary 1, 1976 REPORT of TEMPLE Independent School District, Filed.
Motion For Appointment To Bi-Racial Committee, Filed (La Vega ISD)
Report of the La Vega Independent School District Bi-Racial Committee for
April 1, 1976, Filed. (La Vega ISD
Order appointing Mrs. Glenn Pick to replace Jerry Petty on Bi-racial committee
of LaVega ISD., filed, copy to attorneys.
Response Of The United States To Motion For Appointment To 3i-Racial Committs
Biled (LaVega ISD)
REPORT in compliance with Court Order, Filed. (LaVega ISD)
MEMORANDUM OPINION FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, FILED. AFFIRMED, IN
PARI(Order of 1973), REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDnu for further
proceedings consistent with this opinion, filed- Desegregation plan sub
mitted by AISD is found to be constituonally insurricient.
355- WISDOM, COLEMAN AND SIMPSON
335- Certified copy of per curiam order entered May 14 denying suggestion for an
expedited hearing re opinion entered May 13, 1976.(5th Circuit)
REOPENED
JS-5 CARD Made
332
333
334
335 ̂ Appellants Bill of Costs in the Court of Appeals, filed. (749.20).
336 Motion of Interveners for the Setting of a Schedule for Submission of Pro
posed Changes to Finger Plan and Appointment of Master, fried.
(atty Gutierrez)
!37 Motion and Application to Change Boundaries of Elementary Schools of Temple
Independent School District, filed, with Exh. A, a map.
338 Deft. AISD Responde to Mot-on of Intervenors for the Setting of a Schedule
for Submission of Proposed Changes to Finger Plan and A—pointme.it of a
338a Master, Filed. , (AISD
Motion for Addition of Counsel filed by Maldef (Peter D. Roos;
339 Original Exhibits (2 boxes and 1 flat package )returned from fifth Circuit
340 P.esolution^oreTh! ’Temp?e"Desegregation Committee Opposing planregarding ^
proposed elementary school boundary changes, filed. ( TEMPTE TSD)
a,
-continued!, .shee
14
•I
c
c
c
c
PL< INTIFF ,Tn
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
c i v i l DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEET
DEFENDANT
TEXAS EDUC- AGENCY
DOCKET NO. 70-80
8
DATE NR.
6-23-76 340
6-24-76 . 341
6-23-76 342
6-24-76 343
7-2-76 344
PROCEEDINGS
7/3/76 3457
7/12/76(346
7/13/76
7-20-76
7-26-76
7-26-76
7-27-76 350
9-23-76 351
10/12/7
11-22-71
>352
i 353
12-1-76 354
12-2-76
12/16/7
01-17-7
355
5 356
7 357
Motion for Extension of Time to respond to Motion and App. to Change
Boundaries of Elementary Schools, filed. (TEMPIE IS.
Bill of Costs certified by Fifth Circuit filed for Pltff($1,795.36). (AIBD)
Order extending time to respond to defts Motion & App to Change Boundaries of
Temple Elementary Schools, filed.TO JULY 10, 1976. Copy to attorneys(TEMPLE IS
Letter dated June 23, 1976 to attorneys in the Austin School case announcing
that Judge Roberts is going to appoint a tri-ethnic committee and that sugges
names are invited for presentation to the Court for consideration. (AISD)
Letter signed by Judge Roberts announcing the appointees to the tri-ethnic
committee for consideration of a plan for segregation of schools in accordant
with Order from Fifth Circuit, Court of Appeals, filed. (21 names: Mrs. Zelda
Blanchette; Mr. Ken Burke; Mrs. Lupe Carrizales; Mrs. Billie Chambers; Mrs.
Carolyn Collins; Mr.,. Rene Fitzgerald; Mrs. Anie Fit -as; Mr. Les Gage; Mr. Artu:
Gil; Mr. Julius W. Gordon; Mr. Wayne Holtzman; Mr. Robert Marion; Mr. Manuel
Navarro, Jr.; Mrs. Hazel Obey; Mrs. Ellie Schneider; Mr. Walter Shuler; Mr.
Sylvester Velasquez; Mr. George Villalva; Mr. Louis White; Mr. Horace Willis ani
Ms. Diane Zuniga) (AIBD)
Second Tri-Ethnic Comm, list w/substitute iiames for those unable
to serve (20 only), filed.
Response of United States to Defendants1 Motion and Application to
Change Boundaries of Elementary Schools, filed. (TEMPLE ISP)
Robert D (Bob) Duke appointed chairman ^ Tri-Ethnic Committee by Judge Roberts
Supplemental Motion And Application To Change Boundaries of Elementary Schools,
Filed. (TEMPLE ISP)
Resolution of the Temple Desegration Committee, Filed. (TEMPLE ISD)
MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS - TEMPLE ISD
Both Sides announce ready
All Exhibits attached to Temple ISD Motion admitted into evidence
Mr. Prescott argued on behalf of Temple ISD
Ms Marshall argues on behalf of Pltff
Mr Yeakel argued on behalf of Te"-?1«. Citizens for Better Schools
Dane Everton spoke on behalf of Temple Desegration Committee
Butch Brashear argued on behalf of Temple Citizens for better schools.
Henery Castillo argued on behalf of minorities
Mr. Prescott responded to arguments
Exhibits admitted into evidence
Taken under advisement
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, FILED. Ordered that the Itotion to Change
Boundaries of Elementary Schools of the Temple ISD be DENTED.. COPY TO
ATTORNEYS.
Order Granting Motion of MALDEF, Intervunor, to add Mr. Pete’- D. Roos as add 1
counsel in this case only, Filed.
October 1, 1976, Report of Temple Independent School District fil
Motion For Appointment To BI-Racial Committee, Filed.(l e VAGA ISD
Order enlisted replacing J.A. Price (deceased) with Authur Tamer as member of
cial cv-mmitte of LaVega ISD, filed, copy to parties (LA VEGA IS!
Supplement to Oct. 1, 1976 Retort of Temole ISD, filed. (TEMPLE ISC,December 13, 1976, Report of Hearhe Independent School District i
357( Report To The Court For The Period Ending January 15, 1977, File.
DC-111A (Rtv. l
15
CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEET
PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT
USA TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, et al n n c K F T N n . A 7 0 CA 8 0
PAGE . OF PAGES |
DATE NR.
>2-18-77 351
>2-22-77 359
9-01-77 36C
>3-27-77 361
04-22-77 362
34-29-77
07-19-77 362
10-12-77 363
10-19-77 364
11-21-77 365•kirk★
12-1-77 366
12-f5-77 367
***
11/12/7 J
12-20-7 ’ 363
01-16-78 36902-22-'[8 370
04-04-7p 3731
04-28-7S1 3 7 k
07-18-78 372
11-06-78 374
11-17-78 375
11-17-78 37j6
11-17-78 377
11-17-78 378
11-30-78 379
8 38033
02-26-79 381
02-28-79 382
03-12-79 383
03-22-79 384
03-27-79 385
03-27-79 386
PROCEEDINGS
Order entered appointing Titus Mayhom to replace Frank Bums and Mrs. Clenmie
Sll&yied*n<il tfESS^Sfr&Sier entered
Sept. 23, 1970, filed. , . , . ..(TEMPLE ISO.)Supplement Record on Appeal(73-3301 Circuit No.) returned and filed.
Report filed in canpliance with Court order of Sept. 17, 1970, filed (HEAHNE ISD)
- Si'PE’P -ORIGINAL CASE FILE (10 pieces) transmitted to Court of appeals, per their
requ65ic~flr7atter~srapgir ~i8, 1377.— ~
REPORT TO THE COURT PURSUANT TO COURT OEDER OF MG. 1, 1973 for period ended
June 30, 19’.7 w/ attachments. (AISD)
Report of Temple Desegregation Camittee for periods Oct. 1, 1974; Feb.l, 1975;
Oct. 1, 1975 and Feb. 1, 1976, filed. (TEMP 2 ISD)
October 1, 1977 reoort of TEMPLE ISD., FIT TO___ t, _ _ ,,„l3!3^e_ESD)M E'ORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER-FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS-REVEPSfiD REF^
AFFIRMING REVERSAL OF DIST. COURT JUDGMENT of JAN. 30, 1976,filed.
LaVega ISD report of Bi-Racial Camittif! for Dec. 1, 1977, filed (IA VEGA)
Bill of Cost U.S. Court of Appeals, New Orleans on USA vs. Dears Estell Overton
in the amount $54.73 filed
ORIGINAL RECORD ON APPEAL(7 vol. ; Original Exhibits (2 boxes, 2 flat pkgs
and Supp. record on appeal received fnxn 5th Circuit.
Report of Board of Trustees of HEARNE ."SD., filed.
Import to the Court for the Period Ending January 15, 1978, filed.
February 1, 1978 Report of TEM PIE ISD. , FILED. W/ ATTACHMENTS
1973,filed.
(Heame)
(AISD)
(TEMPLE ISD.
- (LaVega ISD)
(Tem pie I£
3F AUG. 1,
(AUSTIN AIS:
OCTCBER 1, 1978 Report of Temple Ind. School Dist., filed.
OCTOBER 1, 1976 report Tem pie Deseg. Cam., filed.
EEBHIAEY 1, 1977 Report of Ttemple Deseg. Cam, filed.
OCTOBER 1, 1977 Report of Temple Deseg. C a m . , filed.
FEBRUARY 1, 1978 Report of Temple Desig. Cam., filed.
(TEMPLE IS".
(TEMPLE IS:
(TEMPIE IS:
(TEMPLE IS
(TEMPLE IS!
;.pnai FOR HEARING CN REMEDY filed by Pltff's Intervenors- (Request Early (A3SD)
March, 1979.)
JANUARY 15, 1979 Report to the District Court, filed.
380-a FILED, February 1, 1979 Report of TEMPLE ISD.
(AISD)
(TEM PLE)
(AISD)Filed, Black Interveners' First Interrogs on Pemedy to Defendants.
Filed, Black Intervenors' First Request for the Production of Documents (AISD)
Interrogs Propounried by Plaintiff U.S. (AISD)
Plaintiff United States' Request for Production of Documents Purs’-nt to
Rules 34 of the Fed. R. of Civ. Procedure.
Filed Motion for Appointment to Bi-Racial Camittee,
Filed, Order pursa it to Paragraph (7)G of the Court filed 9/17/70;Cha]jn^ Adams i
^ ____________ ___________ — — --- >0. ̂ ‘
(AISD)
(LA VEGA
16
DC 111A
(Rev. 1/75)
c
c
C IV IL DOCKET C O N T IN U A T IO N SHEET
P L A IN T IF F
Filed, Motion for Pre-Hearing Order filed by Plaintiff and P1 aintiffs-Xntar-
venors.
Filed, Order entered setting discovery dates: discovery shall be depleted b
May 1, 1979(2), pre-hearing conference shall be held by all parties c
May 7(a) witnesses to be identified (b) all docunentar' and demenstrat
evidence to be introduced. (3) hearing on remedy _et f ir MONDAY, JUNE
79 at 9:30 a.m.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
and Dedra Estell Overtcin,etal
D E F E N D A N T
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
(Austin Independent Sch. Dist.)
d o c k e t n o . A-7C
P A G E 9__ O F______ P
P R O C E E D IN G S
06-0
06-U-7S
06-12-79 399 Filed,
36-13-79 400 Filed,
06-13-79 4o:. Filed,
06-11-79 4o;: Filed,
06-19-79 403 Filed,
06-22-79 404 Filed,
06-25-79 405 Filed,
06-25-79 406 Filed,
to Reschedule Hearing filed by William H- Bingf am, Atty for De-
Order rescheduling hearing previously set for June 11 to pre-heart lg
shall be held June 18, 1979 and hearing set for Monday, Only 9, T79 ;•
Filed, Deft Austin Independent School District's Response to Interrcgs Propt
by Plaintiff United States of America.
Filed, Deft Austin Independent School District’s Response to -adra Estell Cr
et al First Request for Production of Documents.
Filed, Deft. Austin Independent School District's Response to Intervener Dec
Estell Overton's et al, First Interrogs on Remedy.
Filed, Deft Austin Independent School District's Repsonse to Plaintiff's Q l
States Request for Production of Documents.
Filed, M otion far Order Catpelling Discovery and far Extension of Discover
Deadline filed by U.S. (AISD)
Filed, Response to Plaintiff's Motion far Order' Catpelling Discovery and fo:
Extension of Discovery Date. (AISD)
Filed, Second Set of Interrogs Propounded by Pltiffs- (Interveners Overtm,
(AISD
Filed, Pltffs-Intervenors' Overtcn, et al. Seccmd Request for Production of
Documents Pursuant to Rules 34 of the Fed. R. of Civil Procedure.
39^-a FILED: Plaintiffs-Intervenors' Motion to Add Additional Plaintiffs-Interve
newal of Motion for Order Cancelling Discovery. (AISD)
deadline to July 6, 1979.
Order that Pltff's Motion
by June 18.
Plain tiffs-Intervenors.
Deft AISD's Reply to Motion of Pltff-Inte
al, to Add ADditional Pltff-Interv enors. (AISD)
Additional Plaintiffs-In fervenors w/attachments of Order end M oticn
filed with 5th Circuit by Dedra Estell Overton, et al. (AISD)
Order DENYING Motion of Plaintiffs-In tervenors. (AISD)
Mr. Schneider by atty for Pltff. (AISD)
ccr , inued---
17
I
DC 111A
(R«y. 1/75)
C IV IL D O C K E T C O N T IN U A T IO N S H E E T
P L A IN T IF F
UNITED STATES V TEXAS EDUC. AGENC
D E F E N D A N T
r(AISD)
D O C K E T NO. ^
PAGE!___ O F______ PAGES
D A TE NR. P R O C E E D IN G S
/FT____ 40-7
06-27-73 407 Filed, Dep. Subpcena addressed to Mrs. Sally Shipman, office of Wn. H. Bingham,
06-27-76 408
06-27-7? 409
06-27-7) 410
06- 29-79 411
07HJ5-7? 412
07- 06-7? 413
07-06-7) 414
07-06-'. ? 415
Filed, Deo. Subpcena addressed to Dr. Terry Kahn, c/o Atty Bingham-Hoffman, DUSM
6/25/79-$2.00. AISD
Filed, Dep. Subpoena addressee, to Charles H. Wurtzebach; Hoffman, DUSM 6/25/79-AX
$2.00.
Filed, Dep. Subpoena addressed to Bill Schneider-Hoffinan DUSM 6/25/79-52.00 A
Filed, Order Rescheduling Hearing Da.a from July 9 to July 11, 1979. AISD
Filed, m otian for Continuance filed requesting additional 10 or more days from
July 11, 1979. AISD
Filed, Response of U.S. to deft's motion for continuance from July 11. AISD
Filed, Response of Plaintiff-Intervenor's to deft's motion *— continuance fron 7,
Filed, Order Denying Mstian of Deft to Reschedule hearing set far 7/11/79 (AISD)
07-09-79 415(-aFiled. U.S. Opposition to Motion for a Continuance (from July 11).
Filed, Stipulations Proposed by Deft Austin Ind. School District07-10-79 416
07-10-1/9 417
07-10-J79 417
07-10-79 41S Filed.
07-11-791
07-11-71
07-11-79
(AISD)
Filed, Witness List Submitted .by Deft. Austin Independent School District (AISD)
Filed, Deseqration Plan for Austin ISP by Black Pltffs Xnt ervenors (PROPOSED)
(authored by Andrew A. Robinson, Ed.D. rjniv.
07-11-79
07-11-79
07-11-79
07-11-79
07-12-791
07-12-77
.07-12-77
07-12-7C
419-a Filed, S
42C
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
of N. Fla., Jacksonville, FI
letter dated July 9, 1979 fran Bill Lain Lee, Atty for Black Pltffs-
In tervenors to William H. Bingham Esq re discovery of List of Elan K-5
orade students..dns proposed oy Deft Austin Ind. Sch. Dist.
Filed, ORAL DEPOSITCN OF VOIMA ROBERT OVERTON .
FILED: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: HEARING CN REMEDY—
All parties announced read. Mr. Bingham, made defts opening statement,
Mr. Rich made pltff, U.S.A's opening statement. Mr. Lee made Black-Inter
venors opening statement; Mexican-American Intervenors deferred opening
statement until putting on their testimony. AISD testimony began and
continued throughout the morning. 12:00-noan recess-recessed until 2:00
p.m.
AISD testimony resumed and continued throughout the afternoon.
5:15 p.m. recessed until 9:30 a.m., July 12, 1979.
Filed, Motion Pro Hac Vice bbo Bill Iann Lae, atty for Dedbra Overton, et al
Filed, Order granting Motion pro hac vice obo Bill L a m Lee.
Filed, Motion pro hac vice cbo Napoleon Williams, atty for Justiae Dept,
Filed, Order granting motion pro hac vice obo Napoleon Williams.
Filed, MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: HEARING CN REMEDY CONTINUED FROM 7/11/79
9:30 a.m. Deft ATSD testimony resumed & continued throughout the morning
12:00 noon re .ass-recessed to 2:00 p.m.*
2:00 p.m. Deft AISD testimony resumed and continued thrmghout the aftemc
5:00 p.m. rv-essed until 7/13/79-11:00 a.m.
Filed, Deposition of E. Gay land Walker.
Filed, Deposition of William A. i-bllendorf.
Filed, Deposition of Terry Bishop.
CONTINUED.........
IS
DC 111A
(R«v. 1/75)
C
c
C IV IL DOCKET C O N TIN U ATIO N SH EET
P L A IN T IF F D E F E N D A N T A-
UNITED STATES TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, (AISD)
D O C K E T NO . _______
P A G E 11 O F______P
□ A T E j NR . | , P R O C E E D IN G S
07-13-79 430
07-13-79 431
FILED: MINUTES OF Civil PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remady continued
11:00 a.m., Deft AISD Testimony resumed and continued throughout the
morning. 12:00 recessed until 9:30 a.m., July 16, 1979.
Filed: Letter dated July 10, 1979 advising denial of certiorari by Supreme (
to Defts.
07-16-79
07-16-79
07-16-79
07-16-79
432
433
434
435
Filed:
Filed:
Filed:
Filed:
Oral Deposition of Hugh Eckols. -
Oral Deposition of Charles H. Wurtzebach.
Oral a .position of Terry D. Kahni
MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing an Remedy continued ---------
9:30 a.m. Deft AISj testimony resumed and continued throughout the .x
12:00 noon recess, recessed until 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m.: Defts testimony reseed and continued throughout the aft
5:20 p ™ recessed until 7-17-79 9:30 a.m.
c
l
07-17-79
07-17-79
436
437
Filed: Oral Deposition of Dr. Jack Davidson.
Filed: Oral Deposition of Sally Shipman.
07-17-79
07-17-79
438
439
Filed:
Filed:
MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy continued---------
9:30 a.m. Deft AISD testimony resumed and continued throughout the m
12:00 noon recess, recessed until 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. deft AISD testimon y rtsumed and continued throughout the .
nocn.
5:15 p.m. recessed until 7-18-79.9:30 a.m.
July 15, 1979 report to the Court, per order of Aug;. 1, 1973.
07-18-79 440 Filed: J uly 18, 1979 Oral Deposition cf Andres A. Tijerina.
07-18-79 441 Filed: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, Hearing on Remedy continued ---------
Deft AISD testimony resumed and continued throughout the morning 12:
recessed until 2:00 p.m.-2:00 p;n-- Deft AISD testimony resumed and c:
tinued throughout the afternoon
5:00 p.m. recessed until 7/19/79-9:30 a.m.
07-19-79 442 Filed:
07-20-79
07-20-79
443 Filed:
444 Filed:
07-20-79 445 Filed:
MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy continud ----------
Deft AISD testimony resumed and continued throught the morning 12:00
recess; recessed until 2:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Deft AISD testimony resum
continued throughout the afternoon 5:10 p.m., recessed until 7/20/79-
STTPULATION OF PARTIES proposed by AISD, w/ map indicating covenants
locations 1891 - 1950.
MINUTES.OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy continued ---------
Deft AISD testimon y resumed and continued throughout the morning-12
noon recess; until 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. Deft AISD testimony resumed, portions of deposit'on r I Vol
Overton read into record.
Mr. Lee presented Black School childrens motion for injure;. jon-overr
at this time.
Recessed until R;30 a.m.-Monday, July 23, 1979.
Motion for an Injunction presented by black-pltff-intervenors (overru
open court- 7.20/79.) continued
13
DC 11IA
(R«v. 1/75)
C IV IL DOCKET C O N T IN U A T IO N SHEET
D A TE NR.
07-23-79 446
07-23-79 447
07 -24-79 448
07-25-79 449
07-25-79
07-26-79
450
451
07-27-79 452
07-27-79 453
17-27-79
17-27-79
17-27-79
17-27-79
454
455
456
457
17-27-79 458
08-03-79 459
P L A IN T IF F D E F E N D A N T
D O C K E T N C . rt-70-CA-3
UNITED STATES, ET AL TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (AISD) P A G E ____ O F__ ____PAG ES
P R O C E E D IN G S
FILED:
Filed:
MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy, continued ---------
9:30 a.m., Deft AISD announced that it rests on the issue of incremental
segretative effect.
Mr. Rich made Pltff U.S.A's opening statement
Pltff U.S.A's testimony began and continued throughout the morning,12:00
nocn recess-until 2:30 p.m.
2:30 p.m. Pltff U.S. A's testimony resumed and continued through Xit the
afternoon. 5:15 p.m. recessed until 7/24/79-9:30 a.m.
Order Denying Moiton for an Injunction, filed.
Filed: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy, continued --- --------
Pltff's USA testimony resumed and continued throughout the morning
12:00 .-Tin-recess, to 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. Pltff USA testimon y resumed and concluded;Pltff-Intervenor
NAACP testimony began.
Filed: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Remedy, continued------------
Pltff- L.torvenor NAACP testimony resumed and continued throughout the
morning, 12:00 noon recess, to 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. Pltff intervenor NAACP testimony resumed.
Filed: Oral Deposition of David Alvirez.
Filed: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, Hearing an Remedy, continued -----------
Pltff-Intervener's NAACP testimony resumed and continued throughout the
m oming. 12:00 noon recess, recessed until 2:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m. plff intervenor NAACP testimony resumed and concluded
Pltff-Intervenor NAACP rests.
Mexican American Pltff-In tervenor's testimony began & concluded
Mexican American Intervenors rests.
AISD rebuttal testimony began and continued throught the afternoon- .
recessed until 9:30 a.m. 7/27/79.
Filed: MEXICAN - AMERICAN PLTFF'S EXHIBITS .
M otion Denied at this
Filed: MINUTES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: Hearing cn Remedy, continued
Deft AISD rebuttal testimony resumed and concluded.
All parties rest: 4 close.
Attys allowed to file any further pleadings.
Black intervenor:s reurged moiton for injunction,
time.
TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.
Filed: Deft's Exhibits list ---- AISD.
Filed: Pltff's Exhibits list ---- NAACP.
Filed: Pltff's Exhibits list ---- USA
Filed: Witnesses Sworn list.
Filed: ORDER DENYING MOTION for Injunction (ruled in open court).
Filed: Notice of AppeaL of denying injunction filed by black plaintiffs-inter-
verrorc:— uupy uj parties, filth uHcult(aM"~ta appellant attorney w/ cop-/
of appeal form, to be completed) APPEAL INFORMATION SHEET
20
V l H
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Intervenors,
v.
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTPICT,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. A-70-CA-80
MOTION FOR HEARING ON REMEDY
Plaintiffs-intervenors Dedra Estell Overton, et al.,
respectfully request that the Court hold a hearing on remedy in
early March 1979 as required by the Fifth Circuit opinion order
ing remand of November 21, 1977, 564 F.2d 162, 176, in order to
consider (a) the adequacy of any joint desegregation plan of the
parties or, in the alternative, if the parties are unable to
agree, (b) the adequacy of desegregation plans the parties may
present and to otherwise hold the evidentiary hearing contemplated
by the Fifth Circuit. The motion should be granted for the fol-
| lowing reasons:
i. On November 21, 19”7?, in the last appeal, the Fifth
|SCircuit reversed this Court's finding that the school board had
jjnot subjected Mexican-American students to intentional discrimina-
I
il tion, and ordered that the case be remanded for an expeditiousl!;l
|
i! 2 i
| hearing an remedy.
"The district court should give the
hearing on remedy a high docket priority.
All parties snould be free to introduce
such additional testimony and other evidence
as the district court may consider appro
priate. All remedial measures currently in
effect shall remain in affect pending the
district court's decision on remedy."
564 F .2d 162, 176. Rehearing en banc was denied September 7,
1978.
2. In the interim, the parties have attempted to agree to
a desegregation plan that could be jointly presented to the court.
These efforts are continuing. Recently the Tri-Ethnic Committee
has made available its good offices in aid of this effort.
3. During these i ^ r m a l efforts, the Court has not held any
hearing on remedy. However, it would be desirable to all the
parties to put a time limit on informal resolution in light of
! the passage of time, and to establish a hearing date for thei
Court to consider a joint desegregation plan o r to hold an evi-
]j dentiary hearing on such plan as the parties nay present.
4. Plaintiffs-intervenors believe that a hearing date in
!
\ early March 1979 would be appropriate because it would put the
I
I parties on notice in sufficient time in advance, and would permit !
o IJ the Court to resolve the remedy issue in enough time to implement I
| a plan for the 1979-1980 school year.
I
CONCLUSIONj !
For the above reasons, the motion for a hearing on remedy in !
Ij early March 1979 should ba granted.
Respectfully submitted.
SAMUEL T. BISCOE
Tower Building - 21st Floor
1907 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
2 2 - 2 -
JACK GREENBERG
JAMES M. NABRIT, III
3 ILL LANN LEE
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Attorneys for Black
Plaintiffs-Intervenors
GABRIEL GUTIERREZ, JR.
Austin National Bank - 15th PI.
Austin, Texas 78701
VILMA S. MARTINEZ
PETER D. ROOS
Mexican-American Legal Defense
and Educational Fund
28 Geary Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94103
Attorneys for Mexican-American
Plaintiffs-Intervenors
CERTIFICATE. OF SERVICE
Undersigned counsel certifies that copies of the foregoing
motion for hearing on remedy and the following memorandum in
support were served on counsel for the parties by prepaid first
class United States mail, this 30th day of November, 1978,.
addressed to:
Joseph Rich, Esq.
Steven Clark, Esq.
Civil Rights Division
U. S. Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
William H. Bingham,. Esq.
McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore
Texas State Bank Building
900 Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas 78701
2 3
3
NOTICE OF
MOTION IOR HEARI ] ON REMEDY
ORAL ARGUMENT - ’“"LED BY PLTFF-I EHVENOR form No. 13 (Rev. Sept. 1353)
M ra iz h S t a t e s QLmxvi
FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OR TEXAS - AUSTIN DIVISION
UNITED STATES Cl’ AMERICA
v.
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, et al
No. A-70-CA-80
TAKE NOTICE that the above-entitled case has been set for Oral Argument at
9:30 a.m.---------- , ca Monday, March 1 9 ----- , 1979 , ’-t u.S. Courthouse,
2C0 West 8th Street, Austin, Texas.
Date December 8, , 19 78
To Mr. Joe Rich
Staff Attorn ey
Civil Rights Division
Department of Justice
550 11th Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20530
Mr. Bill Lee '
10 Colurrbus Circle
Suite 2030
New York, New York 10019
Mr. Peter Roos
Director Education Litigation
MALDEF
145 Ninth Street
k ’ San Francisco,Califomia 94103
Mr. Samuel T. Biscce
Attorney at Lav
Tower Building-21st Floor
1907 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
Mr. Gabriel Gutierrez, Jr.
Attorney at Law
1010 East 7th Street
Austin, Texas 78722
Mr. William H. Bin yham
McGinnis, Lochridgc & Kilgore
Attorneys at Law
5th Floor, Texas State Bank Building
Austin, Texas 78701
24
tT^TED STATES DIS ulICT C O U R T -
.ESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS,
V,
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT
DEFENDANT.
*
*
★
★
★
*
*
*
★
★
★
*
★
★
★
★
CIVIL ACTION NO. A-70-CA-80
ORDER
Came on this day for consideration by the Court Plaintiff
and Plaintiff-Intervenors' Motion for a pre-hearing schedule and
a hearing on remedy in the above styled causa.
It appearing to the Court that this cause v;as returned to
this Court for a hearing on remedy by the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals, that subsequent to the remand of this cause the attorneys
have met on numerous occasions, including November 30, 3978, in
an attempt to agree on a school desegregation plan to piesent to
the Court; that during these attempts at settlement the Tri-Ethnic
Committee has assisted the parties; that on November 30, 1978,
after noting that past meetingo between the parties had yet to
produce a joint desegregation plan, the Plaintiffs-Inteivenors
moved for a hearing on remedy; that the attorneys for the parties met
with the Court in chambers on January 25, 1979, to discuss a
schedule for completion of discovery and hearing; that at said
meeting attorneys for the parties indicated that they would
attempt to agree on such a schedule and present such schedule
to the Court; that according to the motion filed on April 2, 1979,
the attorneys have been unable to agree on such a schedule and
Plaintiff and Plaintiffs-Interver.ors seek a Court established
schedule for completion of discovery and hearing;
Therefore,the Court hereby establishes the rollowing schedule
for completion of discovery, holding a pre-hearing conference, and
for hearing on remedy:
2 5 , W
- 2 -
1) All discovery by all parties shall be completed by May 1,
1979.
2) A pre-hearing conference shall be held by all parties to
this action on May 7, 1979. At this conference, the parties shall
exchange (a) the identity of all witnesses to be called by the
patties; and (b) all documentary and demonstrative evidence to be
introduced by any party at the hearing.
3) A hearing on remedy in this matter shall be, and hereby •
is, set for Monday June 11, 1979, at 9:30 a.m. in the United
States District Court, Austin, Texas.
Entered this ^ day of April, 1979, at Austin, Texas.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION ■
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
(Austin Independent School
District)
CIVIL ACTION NO. A-70-CA-80
ORDER DENYING MOTION
Came on this day for consideration by the Court ____________
Defendant's Motion to Reschedule the Hearing s f c for July 11, 1979
and the Court being of the opinion that the motion is without merit, it
is accordingly
ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
Reschedule Hearing
Entered this
and DECREED that Defendant's Motion to
______ be, and hereby is, DENIED.
day of _____ July_____________ lpT v ,
at Austin, Texas.
2 7
BLACE PLAINTIFFS— LNTERVENORS
Dedra Estelle Overton, et. a l .
D E S E G R E G A T I O N P L A N F O R
TEEL A U S T I N I N D E P E N D E N T S C E O u L D I S T R I C T
Austin, Texas
Prepared byr
Andrew A. Robinson, Ed.D.
Professor, Educational Administration
and
Dean, College o f Education
Oniversity of North Florida
Jacksonville, Florida
July 8, 1979
28 A ' I
The purpose of this plan is -•> propose a method of desegregating
the schools of the Austin Independent School District (AISD) for pupils/
students in grades one through twelve. The AISD is a triethnjc oasorrct
with approximately fifty-eight (53) percent Anglo, twenty—frv»s (2:5) per
cent Mexican—American and seventeen (17) percent Negro. Sinc<= 19/0 when
this case was originally filed, many plans have been drawn yet most
schools in the AISD are still racially isolated. In Dr. John A. Finger's
1972 AISD desegregation plan, he proposed the standard for individual
school desegregation that each school should have at least fifty (50)
percent Anglo enrollment and at least twenty-five (25) percent, minority
enrollment— the 50% to 75% Anglo enrollment standard- There should be a
clear and compelling reason for allowing a school to deviate from the 50%
to 75% Anglo star^’rd. However, in 1973-79 only twenty-eight 2̂8) of
0 Othe AISD eighty—two (at) schools met the standard— slightly more than one
third of the schools. Only fifteen (15) of the fifty-four (54) elementary
schools-met the standard. Only three (3) of the six (6) sixth grade
centers met the standard, although most pupils attending these schools
N
were transported to the centers. Only six (6) of the eleven (11) junior
5
high schools met the standard, and only four (4) of the *ke#en (14) high
schools met the standard. (See Attachment A.)
Due to the increased percentage of minority enrollment since 1972,
I cropose a standard for individual school desegregation that would in
effect be a range created by + 10% of the percentage of Anglo enrollment
in the district. Since the Anglo enrollment at this time is fifty-eight
(58) percent, the minimum point (58% minus 10%) would be rorty—eight (48)
percent and the maximum point (58% plus 10%) would be sixty—eight (63)
percent. The standard upon which this plan is built us that ea. h indivi
dual school should have an Anglo enrollment of forty-eight (43) percent
A-2
29
2
to sixty-eight (68) percent or there should be a clear and compelling
reason for not having that enrollment. In short, this standard is a
self-correcting range based on a deviation of +_10% of the district per
centage of Anglo enrollment. With this change in standard (from the.
ger 50% to 75%) I propose that the plan^preparaC. by me on November 22,
1976, is the best possible remedy for all of the students in the AISD
(See Attachment b ) V _ -- -
This is a. partial plan dealing with the nn gf hlacks
p— — y —j
in the AISD. It permits a plan to be developed for the Mexican-American
pupils/students in the AISD. Using the aforementioned broad standard for
the pupil assignment phase of the many- pconged task to create a unitary
school system in the AISDr^fchis plan is designed to merely demonstrate
portunity, several different plans could be developed using this standard.
The most effective plans could probably be drawr* by AISD staff and adminis
trative ipersonnel who know best the terrain, the roads, and the whereabouts
of pupil: in the AISD. In the end the school svstem staff must be given
the responsibility of refining and adjusting the various elements of this
feasibility study.
Presently, the AISD is mainly comprised of K-5 elementary schools,
sixth grade centers, grades seven and eight junior high schools, and
grades nine through twelve high schools. There are a few variations in
that there are a few K-3 and X, 4-6 schools and two 6-8 junior high schools.
But, basically, the AISD is organized under the 5-1-2-4 plan. This dese •
gregation plan does not seek to do harm to the present organizational plan.
It does appear, however, that there is adequate space in the elementary
schools to house the sixth grade with the other five elementary grades,
eliminating the massive use ĴT sixth grade centers- If this is done, the
r\
o U A - i
3
organizational plan for the district would be 6-2-4 or seme variation should
the district resort to pairing and clustering elementary schools, and in
so doing, resort to primary (1-3) and intermediate (4-6) schools. In any
event such an action would rot do harm to a 6-2-4 basic organizational
plan. The naturally desegrnyat^d schools, i.e., those with forty-eight
(48) percent to sixty-eight (68) percent Anglo enrollments, would be un
touched by this plan.
For an idea of the geographical dispersion of the AISD schools by
organizational level, see ̂ Attachment C- ;
r
A. primary enrollment data source used in this plan is the ”1978-73
Enrollment Breakdown School--By Grade Ethnic Percentage— By School First
Six-Weeks Report^ published by and reported to the Courts by the AISD (see
Attachment d )/. The school building capacity source used in this plan is'
the "School Building Capacities— Austin Independent School District" pub— ̂
lished by the (AISD) Department of Planning and Programming, August 17,
1978)and reported to the Courts by the AISD- (sea Attachment S) - This plan
is sensitive to (1) race (adhering to the forty-eight (48) percent to sixty-
eight (68) percent Anglo majority standard) ; (2) size of school (adjusting
boundaries or transferring pupils when necessarf); (3)^eguity_ (attempting
to balance the burden of implementing the plan imeng black and white pupils)
(4) simplicity (conforming with the- organizational structure that the AISD
is currently operating); and (5) economy (transferring, pairing, and clus
tering pupils in the most cost-effective manner)
THE ELuElENTAHY SCHOOLS
Identification of Elementary Scnools. The first step in this feasinility
study was the identification of the AISD schools that would be involved in
this plan. For reasons explained in detail later in the study, it was de
cided to refrain from involving <11 of the elementary schools south of the
4
Colorado River and the seven, elementary school districts forming a west-
east Corridor immediately north of the Colorado River— Mathews, Pe<-se,
Sanchez, Zavala, Metz, Brooke, and Gcvalle— the latter group being over
whelmingly Mexican-American. Therefore, this study involves the t.’irty-
one elementary schools in north Austin and one of these— Summitt— was
elected out because it is a suburban school already isolated from most of
the pupils living in the Summitt' Elementary School District. It (tummitt)
is eliminated with the understanding that there should be no further class
room. construction or placement of portables on this site. If 'Lhe olemen—
tary school grows to the extent that the school is overcrowded, thun (1)
district, boundaries must be redrawn to place excess pupils in another al
ready existing (as of 1979) elementary school district south of Summitt
or (2) the grade structure may be changed to K—3 or to K, 4-6 with the
pupils in one of the levels remaining at Summitt and the pupils in the
other level b°i_g transferred to now existing elementary school (s) south
of the present Summitt School District..
Determination of Grades to be Assigned to Each School. For purposes
of developing this plan., elementary pupils are treated as though
they will be attending the elementary school in the district they live.
The pupils living in the central corridor elementary school districts will
attend elementary schools in their respective districts in grades K-6.
The pupils living in East Austin and the north and west fringes of Austin
will be attending K-3 or K, 4-6 schools in their respective districts,
th.Six grade schools will not be used in this plan. The grades assigned to A
each school are as follows:
K-3 Schools K, 4-6 Schools K-6 Schools
Casis/Dill
Doss
Gullett
Highland Park
Barrington
Blackshear
Campbell
Graham
Andrews
Brentwood
Brown
Bryker Woods
5
K-3 Schools K, 4-6 Schools K-6 Schools
Hill Maplewood CookNorman Oak Springs/Posewood HarrisOrtega Pillow LeePecan Springs
Sims Walnut Creek
Winn Reilly
Ridgetop
Rosedale
Summitt
Wooldridge
Wooten
The major thrust of this proprosal in the desegregation of elementary
schools in the AISD is that certain black schools in East Austin be paired
and clustered with certain white schools in North and West Austin to result
in desegregating most such schools in the district. Also, several transfers
are mada between adjoining- or nearby elementary school districts in order
to 'jalance school capacity'. The kinder martens would remain un inched in
this pran. Certain elementary school districts would become grades 1-3
elementary school districts and others woula become grades 4-6 elementary
school districts. The principle of equity is sought by setting up one set
of such districts in both the black and the white elementary school districts.
In this, way no single group can validly claim that it is carrying the burden
of the school district's compliance with the law. Both Anglo and Negro
pupils would be bussed at the same ages. For example, seme Negro pupils
residing- in East Austin would be bussed ao some North Austin schools for
grades 4-6; some Anglo pupils living un West Austin would be bussed to some
East Austin schools for grades 4-6; seme Negro pupils in East Austin would
be bussed to some West Ausair. schools for grades 1-3; and some Anglo pupils
residing in North Austin, vculd be bussed to East Austin for grades 1-3.
Much care is given to meeting aie principle of equity in bearing the bur
den of desegregation.
33 o
6
Elementary Schools in East Austin
East Austin is aptly referred to as brown East Austin (close to the
Northern banks of the Colorado River where many Mexican-Americans reside)
and black East Austin (East—Centra/, of the city) . Black East Austin is
the core of emphasis for this plan Tiese ten (10) black elementary
schools are in this area of East Austin:
NAME OF SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 1978-79 AND ETHNIC PERCENTAGE
Total #N #M/A #A
(%) (%) (%)
Blackshear 374 337 30 7
(90) (8) (2)
Campbell 476 452 14 10
(95) (3) (2)
Maplewood 335 255 47 33
(76) (14) (10)
Norman 271 252 16 3
(93) (6) *(1)
Oak Springs 286 266 17 3
(93) (5) (1)
Ortega 317 181 127 9
(57) (40) ' (3)
Rosewood 90 83 ' 7 0
(92) (3)
Sims 430 400 26 4
(93) (6) (1)
Pecan Springs 498 294 44 160
(59) (9) (32)
Winn 704 380 63 261
(54) (9) (37)
TOTAL 3781 2900 391 490
(77) (10) (13)
In the west and north sections of the AISD, certain elementary
school districts are selected that (1) are over sixty-eight (68) percent
Anglo, and (2) appear not to be attracting minorities in significant num-
34 A -7
7
bers. These districts would be restructured into (K-3) and (K, 4-6) dis
tricts as would be the ten (10) district: in black East Austii:
The following districts would be paired to ccnpris
cluster:
Each school would keep its kindergarten pupils and the pupils pre
sently assigned, to that school under this plan. In addition, each school
would receive pupils from its paired school (s) in the other cluster. For
example, Norman, a black East Austin school, is designated in this plan as
a K-3 school to be paired with Walnut Creek, a North Austin school- Norman
would keep its kindergarten pupils and most of its pupils in grades 1-3.
Because of space problems, thirteen (13) Norman pupils in grades 1-3 would
be assigned to walk to adjoining Sims Elementary School. Norman's Negro
The following districts would be pa red to comprise ti
cluster:
EAST Austin NORTH Austin
Norman (K-3)
Ortega (K-3)
Sims (K-3)
.Barrington (K, 4-6)
Graham (K, 4-6)
Walnut Creek (K, 4
EAST Austin ■JEST Austin
*Oak Springs (K, 4-6)
♦Rosewood (K, 4-6)
Blackshear (K, 4-6)
Campbell (K, 4-6)
Maplewood (K, 4-6)
Oasis/Dill (K-3)
Doss (K-3)
Gullett vK—3)
Highland Park (K-3)
following districts would be paired to comprise
(EAST) NORTH Austin NORTHWEST Austin
Pecan Springs (K-3)
Winn (K, 4-6)
Hill (K-3)
Pillow (Kr 4-6)
Oak Springs and Rosewood are referred to as Oak Springs only in
this plan.
35 A-3
a
pupils in grades 4 and 5 and the sixth graders living in the Norman district
who are now attending another school would be transferred to Walnut Creek-
Walnut Creek, of course, would keep the pupils in grades 4-6 in its school
district. In East Austin Anglo and Mexican-American pupils presently
assigned to Noman and the nine other elementary schools affected by this
plan would attend an adjoining East Austin school rather than being trans
ferred to a North or a West Austin School. An Anglo or Mexican-American
fourth, grader in the Norman district would be assigned to Pecan Springs.
He/she may opt to attend Walnut Creek or another school on the majority-
minority transfer plan. Cn the other hand, a Negro or Mexican-American
third grade pupil living in the Walnut Creek district would be assigned to
Cook Elementary School. These options should be available to the extent
that they do no harm to meeting the desegregation standard.
Enrollment data on elementary schools in North and West Austin are
shown below.
__ ...___ NAME .OE SCHOOL.. ENROLLMENT 1978-79 AND ETHNIC PERCENTAGE
Total #N #M/A #A
(%) (%) (%)
North Austin
Barrington 554 22 89 443
(4) (16) (80)
Graham 376 15 53 308
(4) (14) (82)
Walnut Creek 300 6 51 243
(2) (17) (81)
West Austin
Casis/Dill 515 21
(4)
31
(6)
463
(90)
Doss 501 15
(3)
5
(1).
481
(96)
Gullett 324 0 3
(1)
321
(99)
Highland Park
i
528
1 0 . _
11
(2)
16
(3)
501
(95)
A-5'36
9
NAME OF SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 1978-79 AND ETHNIC PERCENTAGE
Total ffN #M/A #A
(%) (%) (%)
Northwest Austin
Bill 570 11 17 542
(2) (3) (95)
Billow 527 16 26 485
(3) (5) (92)
4195 117 291 3787
(3) (7) (90)
elementary school desegregation plan is pairing and clustering
(10) last.A u stin schools with a to ta l enrollment o f 3791 and an ethnic com
position o f 2900 Negroes (77%), 391 Mexican-Americans (10%), and 490
Anglos (13%) with cen (10) ^orth and West Austin schools with a to ta l en
rollment o f 4195 and an ethnic composition o f 117 Negroes (3%) , 291 Mexi-
can-Americans (7%), and 3737 Anglos (90%). Graphically', these'data" may be
made more clear:
ENROLLMENT 1978-79 AND ETHNIC PERCENTAGE
Total #N
(%)
#M/A
(%)
#A
(%)
Black. East Austin Schools 3781 2900
(77)
391
(10)
490
(13)
North £ West Austin Schools 4195 117
(3)
291
(7)
3787
(90)
Ten (10) districts with a total enrollment that is seventy-seven (77) per
cent Negro are being paired and clustered with ten (10) distracts with a
total enrollment that is ninety (90) percent Anglo.
The fo llow ing charts show some data on the pupil capacity o f re
ceiving schools; the whereabouts pupils w i l l be transferred to and from;
distance between the two schools; the time (in iruiutes) i t should take to
drive between the nwo schools; and the ethnic d istribution o f the en ro ll
ments o f the receiving school.
EAST-NORTH CLUSTER
K-3 Schools
1 Traveling
Receiving School Plstance Time In
and Capacity Pupils 7rom From Minutes #Negro #Mex/Am if Anglo Total
Norman (p)Norman (1-3)
i
i 100 8 2 110
30Q Walnut Creek (1-3) 111.8 21 128 128
1 100 6 130 238
\1
(42%) (3%) (55%)
Norman (K) 1 • 46
1 284
Ortega Ortega (1-3) 99 69 5 173
528 Graham (1-3) 9 . 4 16 171 171
Campbell (1-3) i 8 5 13
Maplewood (1-3) 26 19 45
Oak Springs (1-3) 13 21 34
99 116 221 436
(23%) (26%) (51%)
Ortega (K) 51
487
Sims Sima (1-3) 224 14 3 241
638 Harrington (1-3) 0.3 21 217 217* 224 14 220 458
(49%) (3%) (48%)
65Sima (K)
523
I
•
Receiving School
and Capacity Pupils From
i
EAST-NORTH CLUSTER
K f 4-6 Schools
. Traveling
Distance Tima In
From Minutes #Negro #Mex/AM flAnglo
•
Total
Barrington Barrington (4-6)
i
i 11 45 227 283
624 Sims (4-6) , 8.5 21 139 139
Wooldridge (4-6) I 78 78
150 45 305 500
\ (26%) (9%) (65%)
Barrington (K) 72
1 572
Graham Graham (4-6) 7 27 156 190
416/468 Ortega (4-6) 9 , 4 16 89 89
Cook (4-6) 66 66
96 27 222 345
(28%) (8%) (64%)
Graham (K) 35
380
Walnut Creek Walnut Creek (4-6) 3 23 113 139
520 Norman (4-6) 11,7 20 118 118
Cook (4-6) 154 154
% 121 23 267 411
(29%) (6%) (65%)
Walnut Creek (K) 45
456
H
Receiving School
and Capacity Pupils From
Casis
858/832
Casis (1-3)
Oak Springs (1-3)
Bryker Woods (1-3)
Doss
624
Casis (K)
Doss (1-3)
Maplewood (1-3)
Gullett
520/624
Doss (K)
Gullett (1-3)
(p)Campbell (1-3)
Highland Park
572/624
Gullett (K)
Highland Park (1-3)
Blackshear (1-3)
Highland Park (K)
ii
EAST-WEST CLUSTER
K-3 Schoqls
, Traveling
Distance Time In
Miles Minutes #Negro (fMex/Am #Anglo Total
i 11 17 252 280
, 6.2 21 201 201
i 1 2 22 25
213 19 274 506
i
I
(42%) (4%) (54*)
54
560
8 2 238 248
7.0 IB 100 100
108 2 238 348
(31%) (1%) (68%)
56
404
2 163 165
7.2 17 160 160
160 2 163 325
(49%) (1%) (50%)
38
363
6 9 280 295
8,6 24 185 185
191 9 280 480
(40%) (2%) (58%)
84
564
EAST-WEST CLUSTER
K,| 4-6 Schools '
j Traveling
Receiving School Distance Time In
and Capacity Pupils From Miles Minutes #Negro #Mex/Am #Anglo Total
Blackshear Blackshear (4-6)
j
1 ;50 14 3 167
396/572 Highland Park (4~6) 8.5 22 213 213
1 150 14 216 3801
( (39%) (4%) (57%)
Blackshear (K) j 61
|
441
Campbell Campbell (4-6) 129 6 3 188
528/638 Gullett (4-6) 7,3 17 192 192
(p)0oss (4-6) t 62 62
(p)Lee (4-6) 5 5 40 50
134 11 297 442
(30%) (3%) (67%)
Campbell (K) 71
513
Maplewood Maplewood (4-6) 102 20 14 136
352/440 (p)Poss (4-6) 6.9 16 240 240
102 20 254 376
% (27%) (5%) (68%)
Maplewood (K) 1
56
( 432
Oak Springs Oak Springs (4-6) 142 12 154
880 Casis/Diss (4-6) 6,2 21 252 252
Norman (4-6) 7 1 8
Ortega (4-6) 62 5 67
Sims (4-6) 12 2 14
Bryker Woods 1 2 22 25
143 95 282 520
(28%) (18%) 154%)
70Oak Springs (K) 590
•
Receiving School
and Capacity Pupils From
NORTH-NORTHWEST CLUSTER
K-3 Schools
Traveling
Distance Time In
Miles Minutes #Negro #Mex/Am #Anglo
•
Total
Hill Hill (1-3) 5 8 249 262
624 (p)Winn (1-3) 9.2 19 135 135
140 8 249 397
(35%) (2%) (63%)
Hill (K) 50
447
Pecan springs Pecan Springs (1-3) 154 23 84 261
624 Pillow (1-3) 7,8 15 245 245
(p)Norman (1-3) 2,5 5 39 39
193 23 329 545
(35%) (5%) (60%)
Pecan Springs (K) • 69
614
•
Receiving School
and Capacity Pupils From
iiii
WORTH-NORTHWEST CLUSTER
K| 4-6 Schools
i Traveling
Distance Time In
Miles Minutes flNegro #Mex/Am #Anglo
•
Total
Pillow Pillow (4-6)
i
1 8 13 245 261
598 Pecan Springs (4-6) | 7.8 15 140 140
| 148 13 245 401
t (37%) (3%) (60%)
Pillow (K) 1 83
| 464
W*nn Winn (4-6) 179 30 123 332
884 Hill (4-6) 9.2 , 19 293 293
Andrews (4-6) 1,7 4 13 3 14 30
192 33 430 655
(29%) (5%) (66%)
Winn (K) 97
>
752
Ul
16
Assignments of Mexican-American and Anglo 4-5 pupils living in Nor-
m n f Sims, and Ortega school districts. Mexican-American and Anglo pupils
living in these East Austin school districts would be assigned to the
following schools. They, of course, would have the additional options of
requesting transfer to their district's paired school or applying for
minority-majority transfer.
Pupils Attending: Would be Assigned to:
Norman
Mex/Am
7
Anglo
1 Oak Springs
Ortega 62 5 Oak Springs
12 2 Oak Springs
Assignments of Mexican-American and Anglo 1—3 pi nils living in
Blackshea-r, Campbell, Maplewood, and Oak Springs school districts. Mexi
can-American. =>”d Anglo pupils living in these East Austin school districts
would be assigned to the following schools. They, of course, would have
the additional options of requesting transfer to their school district's
paired schocl-or applying-for minority-majority transfer.
Pupils Attending: Would be Assigned to:
Mex/Am Anglo #-
Blackshear 16 4 Pease;
Campbell 3 5 Ortega
Maplewood 26 19 Ortega
Oak Springs 13 21 Ortega
Assignments of Mexican-American and Negro 1-3 pupils living in
Casis, Doss, Gullett and Highland Park school districts. Maxican-American
and Negro pupils living in these West Austin school districts would be
assigned to the following schools. They, of course, would have the addi
tional options of requesting transfer to their district s paired school or
applying for majority-minority transfer.
A - i 744
17
Pupils Attending Would be Assigned to
Mex/Am Negro
Casis 17 11 Bryker Woods
Doss 2 8 Brentwood
Gullett 2 Brentwood
Highland Park 9 6 Rosedale
Assignments of Mexican-American and Negro 193 pupils living in
Barrington, Graham, and Walnut Creek school districts. Mexican-American
and Negro pupils living in these North Austin school districts would be
assigned to the following schools. They, of course, would have the addi
tional options of requesting transfer to their district1s paired school or
applying for majority-minority transfer.
Pupils Attending Wouj-f be Assigned to
Mex/Am Negro
Barrington. 45 11 Wooj.uj.idge
Graham 27 7 Cook
Walnut Creek 23 7 Cook
Assignments of Negro and Mexican-American 1-3 pupils living in
gjjlow school district and 4-6 pupils living in. Hill school district.
Nei?ro and Mexican-American pupils living in these Northwest Austin school
districts would be assigned to the following schools. They of course
would have the option of requesting transfer to their district's paired
school or applying for minority-majority transfer.
Pupils Attending Would be Assigned to
Negro Mex/Am
Pillow (1-3) 3 13 Hill
Hill (4-6) 6 9 Pillow
Assignments of Mexican-American and Anglo 1-3 pupils living in Winn
school district and 4-6 pupils living in Pecan Springs school district.
A - ' 445
la
Mexican-American and Anglo pupils living in these Northeast Austin school
districts would be assigned to the following schools. They, of course,
would have the option (spu.ce permitting) of requesting transfer to their
district's paired schoo-i. or applying for minority-majority transfer.
Pupils Attending Would be Assigned to
Mex/Am Anglo
Winn (1-3) 33 138 Pecan Springs (49)
Andrews (154)
Pecan Springs (4-6) 21 76 Winn (27)
Harris (70)
The chart calo* is a summarization of the impact this plan would
have on certain elementary schools North of the Colorado River. The char
shows the name of the school, its rated capacity, the number of pupils
assigned., and the percentages of Negroes, Mexican-Americans and Anglos
assigned to the school.
SUMMARY OF
Selected AISD Elementary Schools Nor:h of the Colorado River,
----- -- -Their Capacities, Number Pupils Assigned and
Percentages of Enrollment by Ethnic Groups
As a Result of Thi;» Plan
SCHOOL CAPACITY
NUMBER
PUPILS
ASSIGNED %N %M/A %A
Andrews 624 600 42 9 49
Barrington 624 572 26 9 65
Blacfcshear 572 441 39 4 57
Brentwood 332 624 17 19 64
Brown 624 618 25 57
Bryker Wdods 358 316 20 12 68
Campbell 638 513 30 67
4 8 A - *
NUMBER
PUPILS
SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSIGNED %N %M/A_ %A
Casis/Dill 853 560 42 4 54
Cook 832 728 16 J.6 68
Doss 624 404 31 1 68
Graham 463 380 28 3 64
Gullett 624 363 49 . 1 50
Harris 624 614 34 30 51
Highland Park 624 564 40 2 58
EilL 624 447 35 2 63
Lee 364 327 24 3 68
Maplewood. 440 432 27 5 68
Norman 308 284 42 3 55
Oak Spr^ngs/Bosewood 88Q 590 28 18 54
Ortega 528 487 23 26 51
Pecan Springs 624 614 35 5 60
Pillow 598 484 37 3 60
Reilly 520 318 10 31 59
Ridgetop
o
364 322 4 47 49
Rosedale 442 274 7 24 69
Sims 638 536 49 3 43
Summitt 338 278 7 6 87
Walnut Creek 520 456 29 6 65
Winn 884 752 29 5 66
A - z
2 0
SCHOOL CAPACITY
NUMBER
PUPILS
ASSIGNED %N %M/A %A
Wooldridge 723 576 17 27 56
Wooten 624 580 14 18 67
Elementary Schools South of the Colorado River
The geographical area south of the Colorado River has just over
five hundred (500) Negro pupils in fifteen elementary schools. Though
most (12 of 15) of these: schools are majority Anglo, the remaining three
(of 15) are majority Mexican-American, and most (9 of 15) have heavy
Ilexican-American pupil populations. This plan leaves the fifteen elemen
tary schools south of the Colorado River as they are presently populated
with the observation that, except in a few fast-growing elementary school
districts, it appears that the sixth graders now residing in each such
district, could well.be assigned to the K-5 elementary school nearest their
residence. Should more space be required, the AISD could use the present
sixth giade centers as K-6 elementary schools by redrawing districts.
SIXTH GRADE CENTERS
As stated in the foregoing section, sixth grade centers should be
abolished in the AISD because (1) they are not reducing racial isolation;
(2) there is ample space in the elementary schools housing K-5 programs
in each sixth grader* s home elementary school district to seat sixth
graders; (3) transportation resources would be freed for use in implementing
this plan in East, NorLh and West Austin; and (5) placing the sixth grade
with other grades (in this instance grades 4 and 5) should enhance the
quality of the educational ptogram.
A'T-I
48
21
JTJNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
There are eleven junior high schools in. the AISD of which four
are majority-minority— three jMexican-American and one Negro. When the
sixth grade enrollments are eliminated from the two junior high schools
comprising grades 608 (All r and Martin) , the junior high school enroll
ments for 1978-79 are as follows:
NAME OF SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 1978-79 AMD ETHNIC PERCENTAGE
Total #N #M/A #A
(%) (%) (%)
Allan 436 157 266 13
(36) (61) (3)
Bedichek. u ? 8 80 285 774
_ (7) (25) (68)
Burnet 804 121 80 603
(IS) (10) (75)
Dobie 972 214 165 593
(22) (17) (61)
Fulmore 861 95 430 336
(11) (50) (39)
-Lamar-— - - 691 48 152 491
(7) (22) (71)
Martin 546 60 . 480 6
(11) (88) (1)
u.Murchison 702 140 14 548
(20) (2) (78)
0. Henry 704 77 162 465
(ID (23) (66)
Pearce 1130 531 124 475
(47) (11) (42)
Porter 345 85 152 608
(10) (18) (72)
TOTAL 8829 1608 2309 4912
(18) (26) (56)
Assignments should be made to ensure that at least 100 Negro stu
dents are in each junior high school. This works to be at least eight (8)
A'2.1
percent of the enrollment in each junior high school. This critical mass
should, guarantee a feeling of identity for .each Negro student and should
provide black, students with the leverage to "make a difference” in school
affairs. For example, such numbers should make it probable that bLack /
representation would be in school organizations, extra curricular -j.fairs
and other school related activities. For all students enrolled in each
junior high school, such black presence should provide them with a micro
cosm of the Austin community in which citizenship can be learned through
day-to-day activities and interactions.
Sealing Junior High School should be rebuilt and utilized is a
regular- junior high ̂ school. The AISD should assess the feasibility of
opeh2hg"Kealing as. a magnet junior high school for parents who want their
children to attend a fundamental strongly academic junior high school
where discipline, grooming (including dress codes), good manners, and grade
promotion based on skills mastery are the critical goals stressed. Such
a- school- should meet the racial standard set for all other schools in the
AISD.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
There are nine high schools in the AISD of which two are majority-
minority— Johnston and Travis. Though no high school is at the rated total
capacity, only Hast Austin's Johnston High School is as low as 60% of rated
total capacity. It would appear that more students would opt to attend
school in East Austin if one of these unprioritized alternatives is followed
(1) Clone Johnston and build a new high school in East
Austin?
(2) Close Johnston and renovate old Anderson High School
to be used as a high school in East Austin; or
(3) Renovate Johnston.
A - 1 3
23
T h e p l a n t
Johnston does not enjoy a good image as a high, school. is viewed as a
is viewed as undesirable by many.
Any high, school in East Austin must not only have an upgraded phy
sical facility,, it must also have an upgraded educational program with a
faculty recognized as strong and effective. Such an improved facility may
well become a magnet school to provide special programs for any U S D stu
dents.
As in junior high schools there shouJ d. be a minimum population, of
Hegro students in high schools to ensure leverage and to enhance educational
quality in the schools. In high schools the size of the nine in the AISD
there should be at least. 200 Negroes in each school. This figure (200)
works out to. .'represent a range of from eight (8) percent to fourteen (14)
percent black students in each high school.
second-class minority school and the location
51
•- ' • : i
A -2.552
AUHTTM HIDEl-EIIDKUT {SCHOOL DISTRICT - TOTAt. F.imOl.IMKNT AND ETHNIC COHI’HSITION OF STUDENTS OF EACH SCIIOOI.
197 7-71 19?3-7A 197A-75 1975-76 1976-77____ 1977-76 1978-79 _1979-no
T o I n l 9 1 6 2 2 1 A 2 3 0 9 2 A 32 2 2 6 3 2 3 7 6 2 3 2 5
l l c y r o 9 1 6 ( 9 0 ) 1 9 6 ( 9 ) 1 6 6 ( 7 ) 2 1 9 ( 9 . 2 0 2 ( 9 ) ■ 2 3 0 ( 1 0 ) 2 0 1 ( 9 )
7 ( . 5 ) 3 9 ( 2 ) 3 6 ( 2 ) 5 7 ( 2 ) 8 0 ( 3 ) 5 6 ( 2 ) 5 2 ( 2 )
A n g l o 1 5 ( 1 . 5 ) 1 9 7 9 ( 0 9 ) 2 1 0 5 ( 9 1 ) 2 1 5 6 ( 0 9 ) 2 0 0 1 ( 0 8 ) . 2 0 9 0 ( 8 6 ) 2 0 7 2 ( 0 9 )
T o 1: n 1 1 3 7 6 1 1 7 6 1 1 0 2 1 5 7 6 1 5 9 6 1 0 A 2 1 9 2 0 2 0 6 2 2 0 5 3
Hcgt 'O 2 0 1 ( 1 5 ) 2 2 6 ( 1 9 ) 2 A 0 ( 2 1 ) 2 7 3 ( 1 7 ) 2 0 6 ( 1 3 ) 2 1 0 ( 1 2 ) 2 2 0 ( 1 2 ) 22A ( I D 1 6 0 ( 0 )
I lex . Am, 2 6 0 0 9 ) l i t ( 2 0 ) 2 6 0 ( 2 3 ) 3 0 0 ( 2 A ) 3 9 7 ( 2 5 ) 5 0 2 ( 2 7 ) 52A ( 2 7 ) 5 7 9 ( 2 0 ) 5 0 6 ( 2 6 )
A n g l o 9 1 5 ( 6 6 ) 7 1 9 ( 6 1 ) 6 6 6 ( 5 6 ) 9 2 3 ( 5 9 ) 9 9 3 ( 6 2 ) 1 1 3 0 ( 6 1 ) 1 1 7 6 ( 6 1 ) 1 2 5 9 ( 6 1 ) 1 3 0 7 ( 6 A )
C r o c k e t t T o t n 1 2 3 1 3 2 5A1 2 9 A 9 3 ) 1 9 3 1 6 9 3 0 9 5 3 1 7 0 3 2 9 1 3 3 1 9
He; j* r o 2 A ( D 1 0 1 ( A) 1 0 A ( A) 1 5 6 ( 5 ) 2 0 5 ( 6 ) 2 3 9 ( 0 ) 22A ( 7 ) 2 A 0 ( 7 ) 1 9 2 ( 6 )
H e x . Am. 1 3 3 ( 6 ) 1 6 5 ( 6 ) 2 A 0 ( 8 ) 2 7 6 ( . 9 ) 3 0 6 ( 1 0 ) 2 9 9 ( 1 0 ) 3 6 1 ( I D A1A 0 3 ) A l l ( 1 3 )
A n g l o 2 1 5 6 ( 9 3 ) 2 2 7 5 ( 9 0 ) 2 6 0 5 ( 0 0 ) 2 6 6 7 ( 0 6 ) 2 6 7 0 ( O A ) 2 5 5 7 ( 8 2 ) 2 5 6 5 ( 8 2 ) 2 6 3 7 ( 6 0 ) 2 6 9 6 ( 0 1 )
T o t it 1 1 5 9 0 1 6 5 6 1 7 0 6 1 7 3 0 1 6 9 0
H c g i o 3 2 0 ( 2 0 ) 3 0 8 ( 2 3 ) A 8 3 ( 2 8 ) 5 8 0 ( 3 3 ) 6 3 5 ( 3 7 )
H e x . Ami. 6 2 ( 5 ) 1 2 7 ( 0 ) 1A7 ( 9 ) 1 5 7 ( 9 ) 1 6 2 ( 1 0 )
An |' 1 <> 1 1 6 6 ( 7 5 ) 1 1 A 1 ( 6 9 ) 1 0 7 6 ( 6 3 ) 1 0 0 1 ( 5 8 ) 8 9 3 ( 5 3 )
. l o l u i n t o n 1 9 1 9 1 6 1 2 1 7 3 6 1 6 9 9 1 5 0 5 1AA1 1 3 6 3 1 3 3 7 1 2 5 2
He 11 t o 6 1 9 ( 3 2 ) 5 3 7 ( 3 3 ) 5 0 0 ( 2 9 ) A 7 6 ( 2 6 ) 3 6 2 ( 2 5 ) A 2 3 ( 2 9 ) A 0 9 ( 3 0 ) 3 9 7 ( 3 0 ) 3 9 2 ( 3 1 )
H e x . Am. 1 1 9 5 ( 6 2 ) 1.01A ( 6 1 ) 1 1 AA ( 6 6 ) 1 1 A 0 ( 6 7 ) 1 0 6 3 ( 7 1 ) 1 0 0 3 ( 7 0 ) 9 A 3 ( 6 8 ) 9 1 6 ( 6 0 ) 8 A 5 ( 6 7 )
A n g l o 1 0 5 ( f) 6 1 ( A) 9 A ( 5 ) 61 ( 5 ) 6 0 ( A) 1 5 ( 1 ) 3 1 ( 2 ) 2A ( 2) 15 ( 2 )
l . n n l c r T o t n l 2 3 0 0 7 6 5 7 ' 2 9 2 9 2 6 1 A 2 5 1 5 2 2 8 5 2 2 3 0 2 0 3 3 1 9 7 9
l l o g r o 1 6 ( 1 ) 1A2 ( 5 ) 1 3A ( 5 ) 2 7 0 ( 1 0 ) 2 0 5 ( 1 1 ) 2 9 1 ( 1 3 ) 3 2 1 ( I A ) 3 1 5 ( 1 6 ) 2 9 7 ( 1 5 )
H e x . A m . 72 ( 1) 9 A ( A) 1 0 5 ( A) J 4 A ( 6 ) 1 3 8 ( 6 ) 1 5 1 ( 6 ) 1 7 0 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 9 ) 1 6 6 ( 9 )
A n g l o 2 2 1 2 ( 9 6 ) 2 A2 1 ( 9 1 ) 2 6 9 0 ( 9 1 ) 2 c 2 0 ( 0 A ) 2 0 9 2 ( 0 3 ) 1 8 A 3 ( 8 1 ) 1 7 3 9 ( 7 8 ) 1 5 3 2 ( 7 5 ) 1 A 9 6 ( 7 6 )
Me Cm 1 1 tint T o t n 1 1 91A 1 9 3 A 2 0 3 2 1 A A5 1 3 6 7 1 A 0 7 1 A 0 2 * 1 5 0 1 1 5 7 0
l l o Rr o 3 1 6 0 ( 9 ) 2 0 1 ( 1 0 ) 1 0 6 ( 0 ) 7 6 ( 5 ) 9 A ( 7 ) 9 1 ( 6 ) 0 6 ( 5 ) 9 2 ( 6 )
H e x . Am. 6 2 ( A) 57 ( 3 ) 9 5 - ( 5 ) 1 6 1 ( I D 1 6 0 ( I A ) 2 0 3 ( I A ) 2 3 0 ( 1 6 ) 2 3 3 ( 1 5 ) 2 6 5 ( 1 7 )
Ang t o H A 9 ( 9 6 ) 1 6 9 7 ( 6 6 ) 1 7 3 6 ( 0 5 ) 1 1 7 6 ( 0 1 ) 1 1 0 3 ( 6 1 ) 11 l o ( 7 9 ) 1 1 6 1 ( 7 0 ) 1 2 6 0 ( 8 0 ) 1 2 1 3 ( 7 7 )
H e n g n u Ti> I n 1 2 6 0 ! i 2 7 A0 2 0 A 6 2 6 0 A 1 7 0 9 1 6 6 8 1 0 0 1 1 7 5 1 IMA 8
l l c g r o 2 6 5 ( 1 1 ) A 22 ( 1 6 ) 6 0 0 ( 2 1 ) 6 1 7 ( 2 2 ) 5 0 2 ( 2 9 ) 5 0 2 ( 3 0 ) AB5 ( 2 7 ) A 0 5 ( 2 0 ) 5 3 1 ( 2 9 )
H e x . A m . 5 2 ( 2 ) 91 ( 3 ) 1 2 0 ij>) I A 2 ( 5 ) 1 A 5 ( 9 ) 1 7 1 ( 1 0 ) 1 9 0 ( I D 1 8 0 ( U ) 2 5 0 ( 1 1 )
A n g l o 2 2 6 6 ( 6 7 ) 2 2 2 7 ( 6 1 ) 2 1 1 2 w A ) 2 0 A 5 ( 7 3 ) 1 0 6 2 ( 6 2 ) 1 0 1 5 ( 6 0 ) 1 1 2 6 ( 6 2 ) 1 0 7 6 ( 6 1 ) 1 0 6 7 ( 5 0 )
19HD-U
<
r o
t o
-2
6
m
MISTIU !MI>FI'FHI1FNT SCHOOL DISTRICT - TOTAL F.IIROL1MKNT AND F.TMMIC COM-OSITIOH OF STODEIITS OF EACH SCHOOL
Si
school 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-76 1976-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-70 1970-79 1979-00
ii.n tin To til 1 nin (155 900 777 006 957 1000 939 023
Negro 9(1 (II) 175 (20) 172 (19) 67 ( 9) 57 ( 6) 76 ( 0) 97 (10) ■ 70 ( 0) RO (11)
Ilex. Ahi. 70 2 (116) f,r,r, (70) 717 (79) 701 (90) 797 (90) 051 (09) 076 (07) 065 (90) 725 (00)
Anglo 26 ( 3) If- ( 2) 19 (’ 2) 9 ( t) 32 ( 6) 32 ( 3) 27 ( 3) 16 ( 2) 10 ( 1)
Mnrcli loon lot III OKI 9113 969 050 096 073 017 762 730
Negro 103 (10) 97 (10) 103 (12) 131 (15) 109 (13) 126 (15) 166 (19) 169 (20)
Mex.Am. A ( 1) 12 ( 2) 21 ( 2) 13 ( 2) 13 ( 1) ,10 ( 2) 17 ( 2) 20 ( 3) 12 ( 2)
Anglo 036 (99) nr.ii (oo) 031 (OH) <•’•2 [ t y , <52 tub/ /'lb 105) o/6 (03) 590 (711) 5(>9 (7n)
0.Henry Tola 1 nr. 2 795 770 661 523 696 770 790 721
Negro 66 ( r.) 107 (13) 109 (16) 65 (16) 55 (11) 57 ( 0) 70 ( 9) 79 (10) 76 (11)
Mex. Am. nr. (io) 77 (10) 73 (10) 66 (10) 63 ( 0) OO (12) 133 (17) 170 (23) 160 (2 3)
Anglo 732 (115) 611 (77) '0.3 (76) 350 (76) 625 (01) 557 (RO) 575 (76) 513 (67) 6 77 (66)
I’enrce Tot it l 12/7 1256 1306 1370 1372 1300 1270 1257 1160
Htigio 161 (13) 235 (19) 200 (21) 365 (25) 395 (29) 635 (33) 670 (37) 530 (63) 566 (67)
Me x.Am. 95 ( 7) 60 ( 5) 72 ( 6) 91 ( 7) 99 ( 7) 106 ( 0) 129 (10) 132 (10) 136 (11)
Anglo 1021 (11(1) 959 (76) 952 (73) 936 (60) 070 (66) 769 (59) 679 (53) 507 (6 7) Aflf> (A 7)
I’orlcr T< Ini 1303 1663 1005 1033 1053 936 050 932 060
Negro ir. ( 2) 70 v y , ( •) 99 (10) 120 (12) 105 (11) 90 (11) 93 (10) 90 (10)
Mex.Am. 109 ( II) 165 (12) tin (12) 96 ( 9) 161 (13) 167 (16) 150 (17) 161 (17) 152 (10)
Anglo 11711 (90) 1200 (03) 016 (01) 030 (Ot) 792 (75) on : (73) 610 (72) 670 (73) 626 (72)
llolili To tut 960 1009 1260 |Hogm 71 ( 7) 172 (16) 226 (10)
Mex.Am. tin (13) 1311 (12) 159 (12)
Anglo 751 (1)0) 779 (72) 005 (70)
A 1 t 1 HOII To til 1 711 069 963 - 759 767 716 602 672 636
llogio I r> 3 ( 21) 155 (10) 166 (17) 133 (17) 121 (16) 106 (15) 96 (16) 97 (16) 101 (16)
Ilex. Am. 5r,r, (7i) 66(1 (77) 750 i(IIO) 601 (00) 612 (00) 500 (01) 563 (02) 563 (01) 501 (79)
Anglo 52 ( 11) 66 ( 5) 29 ( 3) 25 ( 3) 36 ( 6) 28 ( 6) 25 ( 6) 32 ( 5) 36 ( 5)
AimI town Tol u I 507 5110 533 607 510 515 501 512 550
Negro 6 ( 1) 117 (20) 110 (22) 116 (19) 116 (22) 129 (25) 160 (29) 161 (32) 217 (62)
Mex.Am. 22 ( 6) 30 ( 5) 26 ( 5) 39 ( 6) 36 ( 7) 36 ( 7) 33 ( 7) 60 ( 9) 69 ( 9)
Anglo 1,1') (95) 661 (75) 39l (73) 652 (75) 360 (71) 350 (60) 320 (66) 303 (59) 272 (69)
lboo-u
<
1-0
i n
-
Z
8
1 I
I
AUSTIN , sniiVH, OTSTIUCT - TOTAI. 5MHOLIHEHT AM; ETIillIC COMPOSITION OF STUDENTS OF EACH SCIIOOI.
<CIIOOI. 1970-71. 1971 72 1972-73 1973-7A 197A-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977- 70 1978-79
link To till 190 160 1A2 51A A 77 A 09 A 23 A09 A2A
Negro 2 ( 1) 63 (12) A 9 (10) A 7 (10) 30 ( 9) . A1 (10) 2fl ( 6)
50 (30) 6A (AO) 59 (A 2) 60 (13) 07 (10) 102 (21) ItA (27) 107 (26) 113 (27)
Anglo 132 (70) 96 (60) 01 (57) 303 (75) 3A1 (72) 3A0 (69) 271 (6A) 261 (6A) 203 (67)
i 1 nglnn To I n l ABA 6A3 6A9 635 620 65A 6A1 562 556
Negro 12 ( 2) A ( 1) 7 ( 1) 7 ( 1) 13 ( 2) 13 ( 2) 16 ( 2) 20 ( 3) 23 ( A)
Hex.Am. 39 ( ») 60 (10) 72 (ID 70 (12) 72 (12) 00 (12) 106 (17) 100 (10) 90 (16)
Anglo A33 (90) 571 (09) 570 (00) 550 (07) . 535 (06) 561 (06) 519 (81) AA2 (79) A A 3 (80)
Hut ton III 1 Id To till 357 250 262 270 265
( 1)
317 325
( 1)
330 310
2 2 ( 1) 3 ( 1) 2 ( D 2 A ( 1) 3 1
( 9)10 ( 3) 2 ( 1) A ( 2) 2 ( 1) 5 ( 2) 11 ( A) 5 ( 1) 23 ( 7) 29
Anglo 3A5 (97) 25A (90) 255 (97) 266 (90) 250 (97) 302 (95) 317 (90) 306 (93) 201 (91)
llt-c 016 Oil 775 026 767
(12)
711 661 632 670
(13)Negro 50 ( 7) 01 (10) 7A (10) 00 (10) 91 68 (10) 73 (11) 75 (12) R 6
556 (60) 539 (66) 537 (69) 536 (65) 526 (69) 521 (73) A57 (69) A 30 (68) A45 (66)
Anglo 202 (25) 191 (2A) 16A (21) 210 (25) 150 (19) 122 (17) 131 (20) 127 (20) 139 (21)
To! n 1 66A 726 712 573 510 A50 300 375 305
(90)Nf(jro 653 (90) 712 (90) 700 (99) 550 ‘(97) A 99 (96) A36 (97) 362 (95) 3A5 (92) 3A5
Mux.Am. 11 ( 2) 13 ( 2) A ( 1) 1A ( 3) 19 ( A) 1A ( 3) 17 ( 5) 28 ( 7) 31 ( 0)
Anglo 1 1 1 2 ( 1) 9 ( 7)
II lintoii To tn 1 533 A A0 A2A 611 560 616 555 A03 52A
(AA)Negro 22 ( A) 21 ( 5) 27 ( 6) 1A2 (23) 160 (30) 207 (3A) 219 (39) 200 (A 3) 229
Hex.Am. 19 ( A) 3A ( 7) 36 ( 9) 55 ( 9) 63 (ID 63 (10) A0 ( 9) A1 ( 9) 68 (13)
Anglo A 92 (92) 393 (00) 361 (05) A1A (60) 337 (59) 3A6 (56) 280 (52) 23A (A0) 227 (A3)
1lr<Ilf wood To tnl 056 791 69A 535 AftJ 5A7 392 370
( 1)
35A
( -)3 1 1 22 ( A) 5 l
Hex.Am. 05 (10) 7 A ( 9) 06. (12) 05 (16) 7A (15) 99 (10) 71 (10) 01 (22) 02 (23)
Anglo 760 (90) 716 (91) 600 (00) AA9 (OA) A09 (05) A 26 (78) 321 (02) 20A (77) 271 (77)
5116 553 535 393 37A 309
( 1) (97)
A 06
( 1)(96)
A3 A
( 3) (9A)
A 3A
( 1)
(9A)Hegro 10
559
( 2)
(95)
7
536
( D
(97)
7
512 ( 1)
(96)
3
377
( D(96)
1
360 (98)
3
377
A
391
,12A07
5
A 06
Anglo 17 ( 3) 10 ( 2) 16 ( 3) 11 ( 3) 5 ( 2) 9 ( 2) 1 l ( 3) 15 ( 3) 23 ( 5)
1979-BO
Ausmi iiidei’khdknt scnooi, district - totai. ehuoi.uiknt and ethnic cotirosmoN of students of each sciiooi.
___SCIMIOE
fir own
llrykur Woudn
Cnmpliet 1
Ons la
Cook
Conn! ngtuim
Dilution
Dili
1 9 7 0 - 7 1 ______197 1 - 7 2 1 9 7 1 -7 3
" - ,
T o tn l 563 509 542
Negro 37 ( 7) 90 (15) 94 (17 )
Mux.Am. 116 (1 5 ) 102 (1 7 ) 95 (1 0 )
Anglo 7.40 (711) 397 (6 0 ) 353 (6 5 )
Totnl 304 246 216
Negro 4 ( 1) 6 ( 2) 6 ( 3)
flex. Am. 21 ( 7) 24 (10) 15 ( 7)
Anglo 279 ( 9 2 ) 216 (0 0 ) 195 (9 0 )
Totnl 595 64 7 675
Negro 563 (95) 600 (94) 633 (9 4 )
Mux. Am. 30 ( 5) 36 ( 5) 3? r 6)
Anglo 2 3 ( 1) 3
To I n 1 702 600 571
Negro 5 ( . 5 ) 7 ( 1) 8 ( 1)
lien ■ Am. 11 ( 1 . 5 ) 11 ( 2) 14 ( 3)
Anglo 606 (90 ) 590 (9 7 ) 549 (9 6 )
T o tn l
Negro
Hex. Am.
Anglo
To 1 n 1 651 700 ' 920
Hog to 23 ( 4) 4 ( 1) 0 ( 1)
Mnx. Am. 27 ( 4) 51 ( 7) 79 ( 9)
AiirIo 601 (92 ) 645 (92) 833 (9 0 )
Totnl 025 017 859
Negro in ( 2 ) 14 ( 2) 15 ( 2)
Mcx. Am. 395 (411) 456 (55) 495. (5 7 )
Anglo 412 (50 ) 347 (4 3 ) 349 (4 1 )
T o tn l 141 141 126
Negro 1
Hex. Am. 7 ( 5) 4 ( 3) 4 ( 3)
Anglo 134 (95) 136 (9 7 ) 122 (97)
»
1 9 7 3 -7 4 ! 1 1 9 7 4 -7 5 1 9 7 5 -7 6 1 9 7 6 -7 7
534 524 540 460 .
105 (20 ) 114 (2 2 ) 119 (2 2 ) 125 (27 )
119 (22 ) 119 (2 3 ) 151 ( 2 ? ) 122 (26 )
310 (5 0 ) 291 (5 5 , 278 (5 1 ) 221 (47 )
209 215 244 240
1 ( D 2 ( 1) 2 ( 1) 4 ( 2)
13 ( 6) 15 ( 7) 20 ( 8) 17 ( 7)
195 (9 3 ) 190 (9 2 ) 222 (91) 227 (9 1 )
554 534 460 470
524 (9 4 ) 513 (9 6 ) 460 (90 ) 460 ( 9 0 )
26 ( 5) 10 ( 3) 6 ( 1) 10 ( 2)
4 ( 1) 3 ( 1) 2 ( 1)
579 637 591 499
10 ( 2) 14 ( 2) 20 ( 3) 17 ( 3)
30 ( 5) 39 ( 6) 32 ( 6) 38 ( 0)
539 (93 ) 504 (92 ) 539 (9 1 ) 444 (0 9 )
540 668 724
12 ( 2) 26 ( 4) 39 ( 5)
42 ( 8) 85 (13) 84 (12 )
406 (90 ) 557 (0 3 ) 601 (8 3 )
939 811 806 744
7 ( 1) 5 10 ( 1) 6 ( 1)
90 (10) 06 (11 ) 90 (1 1 ) 92 (1 2 )
834 (09 ) 720 (0 9 ) 706 (RO) 646 (8 7 )
707 743 693 640
31 ( V/ O t D n i { o) v / )
403 (61 ) 461 (62 ) 442 (64) 427 (67 )
273 (35 ) 247 (3 3 ) 210 (30) 169 (2 6 )
93 99 114 82
1 ( 3)
0 ( 9) 7 ( D 7 ( 6) 2 ( 2)
85 (91 ) 92 (9 3 ) 104 (91) 80 (9 8 )
9 7 7 -7 0 1 9 7 0 -7 9 1 9 7 9 -0 0 1900-81
479 461
130 (29) 140 ( 3 0 )
124 (26) 107 (2 3 )
217 (45) 214 (4 7 )
266 279
7 ( 3) 13 ( 5)
11 ( 4 ) 22 ( 0)
248 (93) 244 (07 )
4 91 404
479 (90) 463 (95 )
11 ( 2) 13 ( 3)
1 0 ( 2) OCO
464 533 ’
10 ( 2) 19 ( 4 ) <
39 ( 0) 35 ( 6)
415 (90) 479 ( 9 0 )
712 000
33 ( 5) 54 ( 7)
75 (10) 110 (13 )
604 (05) 644 (00 )
793 020
11 ( 1) 14 ( 2)
112 (14) 110 (14)
670 (05) 608 (0 4 )
613 596
24 ( 4) 26 ( 4)
427 (70) 410 (6 9 )
162 (26) 160 (2 7 )
76
3 ( 4)
73 (96)
L Q
AUSTIN (NnKt'KNDKNT SCIIOOI, DISTRICT - TOTAL KliltOl.I.HK.NT AND KTIIHIC COMPOSITION OK STUDENTS OK liACII SCIIOOI.
SCHOOL______ ___________________1 9 7 0 - 71_________197L72___ 1 9 7 2 -7 3 ___ 19 7 3 -7 6
1)0 .‘If! To l n 1 606 665 660 570
Negro 5 ( l ) 5 ( 1)
Me it. Asm. 6 ( 1) 6 ( 1) 3 3
Ann to 600 (99) 661 (9 9 ) 652 ( 99) 570 (9 9 )
Govm 1 1 1* To l n 1 923 965 733 790
Negro 1116 (2 0 ) 222 (2 3 ) 106 ( 25) 197 (26)
Mux. Am. 662 (72) 660 (6 9 ) 693 ( 67) 569 (69)
Anglo 77 ( H) 75 ( II) 56 ( 0) 52 ( 7)
Ct ntiniu To t n 1 35? 618
Negro 7 ( 1) 3 ( 1)
Hex.Am. 15 ( 6) 32 ( 8)
Anglo 336 ( 9 5 ) 383 (91)
Gill 1 r 1 To 1 n 1 656 612 321 593
Negro 1 2 ( 1) 2 ( 1) 1
Hex Am. 13 ( 3) 10 ( 2) 6 ( 1) 16 ( 1)
- ■ 662 (9 7 ) A00 ( '. t )
•Me /(tq\ 576 ( ' / )
IIn i r 1 u To 1 a 1 6110 669 505 683
Ncigl'O 7 ( 1) 13 ( 2) 12 ( 2) 66 (10)
Mux.Am. 39 ( 6) 69 ( 8) 66 ( 0) 77 ( I t )
Anglo 636 (93 ) 507 (90 ) 529 (9 0 ) 560 (7 9 )
III i'll 1 mid I’flflt To to 1 623 610 570 660
Negro 2
Mc»x. Am. 8 ( 1 ) 9 ( 1) 1 ( l ) 6 ( 1)
Anglo 615 (99 ) 609 (99) 563 (99) 662 (99)
in ii Totnl 522 636 663 561
Negro 6 ( 1)
Ilex. Am. 6 ( 1 ) 0 ( 1 ) M l > 6 ( 1 )
Anglo 516 (9 9 ) 626 (9 9 ) 636 (99) 553 (90 )
llnuii 1 on To t n 1
Negro
Mux. Am.
Anglo
1 9 7 4 -7 5 1 9 7 5 -7 6 1 9 7 6 -7 7 1 9 7 7 -7 0 1 97n -79 1 9 7 9 - 8 0
596 626 536 530 503
6 ( 1 ) 10 ( 2) 1 2 ( 2) 16 ( 3) 16 ( 3)
7 ( 1) 7 ( 1) 7 ( 1) ' 6 ( D 6 ( 1)
503 (9 0 ) 609 (97) 515 (97 ) 516 (96) 605 ( ° 6 )
739 oVtt 7 j 9 739 766
(30)172 (2 3 ) 167 (2 6 ) 106 (2 5 ) 195 (26) 221
527 (ID 501 (1 2 ) 510 (6 9 ) 510 (69) A 96 (66)
60 ( 6) 30 ( 6) 63 ( 6) 36 ( 5) 27 ( 6 )
610 600 391 609 306
5 ( t) 11 ( 3) 7 ( 2) 13 ( 3) 15 ( 6)
28 ( D 29 ( 1) 60 ( 1 0 ) 62 (10) 56 (1 6 )
377 (92) 360 (90 ) 366 ( 0 0 ) 356 (07) 317 (02)
699 601 608 360 312
8 ( 2) 7 ( D 6 ( 2) 3 ( 1) 2 ( 1)
691 (9 8 ) 676 (99 ) 601 ( 9 0 ) 356 (99) 310 (99 )
627 590 552 571 527
03 (1 3 ) 120 (2.1) 167 ( 2 6 ) 100 (32) 177 (36 )
76 (1 2 ) 72 (12 ) 01 ( 1 5 ) 76 (13) 79 (15 )
668 (15) 398 (68 ) 326 ( 5 9 ) 315 (55) 271 (51)
638 608 397 650 531
2 6 ( 1) 2 6 ( D 6 ( 2)
3 ( 1) 13 ( 3) 10 ( 3) 15 ( 3) 10 ( 3)
633 (99 ) 391 (96 ) 305 (9 7 ) 631 (96) 507 (95 )
560 551 539 523 506
6 ( " D 5 ( D 9 ( 2) 7 ( 1) 13 ( 2)
16 ( 2) 6 ( D 5 ( D 9 ( 2) 10 ( 3)
562 (9 1 ) 560 (9 0 ) 525 (9 7 ) 507 (97) 603 (95 )
686 030 960
25
199 ( » «
57
239 ( 2 9 )
90
261
( 9)
(2 0 )
662 (6 7 ) 536 (66) 597 (6 3 )
1900 ID
f'O
\
■ C
AUSTIN I Mill'PENDENT BCIIOOI. DISTRICT - TOTAI. WIROMWENT AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF STIIDEtlTS OF
i.'Ar'ii o r im n i
1 9 7 0 - 7 1 ________ 1 9 7 1 - 72 1 9 7 2 -7 3 1 9 7 3 -7 4.'ll .1MIU1,______
t 1 It Tol nl 093 000 700 866
Negro 4 10 ( l) 3 91 (11)
Hex.Am. 76 ( 9) 06 (11) 95 (12) 90 (10)
Anglo 013 (91) 704 (00) 602 (00) 605 (79)
Tot n 1 225 227 224 230
Negro 9 ( 4) 21 ( 9) 19 ( 0) 20 ( 9)
Mnx. Am. 25 (11) 24 (11) 26 (1 2 ) 31 (13)
Anglo 191 (0 5 ) 102 (00) 179 (00) 179 (70)
l.liiilc r To ti ll 302 570
Negro 9 ( 3) 16 ( 3)
Mex. Am. 30 (1 0 ) 97 (17)
Any 1 o 263 (07) 457 (00)
M.»|» 1 ewotxl 'total 522 462 474 421
Negro 302 750) 290 (65) • 342 (72) 295 (70)
Mu x . Am. 65 (12 ) 71 (15) 74 (16) 77 (10)
Anglo 155 (30) 93 (20) 50 ( 12) 49 (12)
Mill liet/n Tol n t 434 304 374 293
Negro 76 (17) 70 (10) 56 (15 ) 41 (14)
Mux. Am. 150 (3 5 ) 122 (32) 123 (33) 95 (32 )
Anglo 200 (40) 192 (50) 195 (52) 157 (54)
M«:iu:li(lcil Tot n 1 176 250 165 249
Nog t o 7 ( 4) 0 ( 3) 2 ( 1) 6 ( 2)
flux. Am. 30 (17) 29 (12) 27 (16) 35 (14)
Anglo 139 (79) 211 (0 5 ) 136 (83) 200 (04)
tint 2 Tot nl 797 763 1 2 3 592
No gro 4 5 4 f 1) 4 ( 1)
Mux. Am. 772 (97) 726 (96) 696; (9 6 ) 502 (90)
Anglo 21 ( 3) 32 ( 4) 2 ! ( 3) "■ C D
tin rin a ii T o ln l 329 344 384 328
Negro 325 (99) 342 (99) 377 (9 8 ) 323 (90 )
Mu x . Am. 2 ( . 5 ) 1 ( - 5 ) 1 ( 2) 5 ( 2)
Anglo 2 ( . 5 ) 1 (>5)
1 9 7 4 -7 5 1 9 7 5 -7 6 1 9 7 6 -7 7 ____1 9 7 7 -7 0 _ _ 1 9 7B -79_____ 1 9 7 9 - 00
910 947 949 837 011
94 (10) 94 (10) 96 (1 0 ) . 77 ( 9) 73 ( 9)
116 (13) 130 (14) 159 (1 7 ) 130 (17) 146 (1 0 )
700 (7 7 ) 723 (76) 694 (73 ) 622 (74) 594 (71)
234 260 260 265 294
25 O') 36 (14) 30 (ID 32 (12) 20 (10)
38 (1 6 ) 47 (10) 29 (H) 33 (12) 30 (1 0 )
171 ( 7 3 ) 177 (60) 209 (70) 200 (76) 236 (OO)
570 624 636 649 620
22 ( 4 ) 47 ( 7) 74 (1 2 ) 74 (H) 06 (14 )
on (1 4 ) 99 (16) 113 (10 ) 110 (10) 157 (25)
460 ( 0 2 ) 478 (77) 449 (70 ) 457 (71) 305 (61 )
390 353 339 359 337
305 (7 7 ) 200 (79) 261 (7 7 ) H 9 (78) 256 (7 6 )
61 (15) 40 (11) 47 (1 4 ) 40 (13) 47 (1 4 )
32 ( 0) 33 (10) 31 ( 9) 32 ( 9) 34 (1 0 )
261 257 325 346 361
26 (10) 31 (12) 34 (10) 37 (11) 33 ( 9)
59 (23 ) 69 (27) 65 (2 0 ) 73 (21) 76 ( 2 1 )
176 (6 7 ) 157 (61) 226 (7 0 ) 2 36 (60) 252 (7n)
201 301 301 415 445
9 l 3) 12 ( 3) It ( 3) 0 ( n 0 ( 2)
30 (U) 42 (ID 37 (10) 44 (ID 62 (1 4 )
242 (86 ) 327 (06) 333 (87) 363 (07) 375 (04 )
589 495 440 426 436
( 1)3 ( 1) 4 ( 1) 3 ( 1) 1 6
570 (9 8 ) 407 (9 0 ) 430 (9 0 ) 423 (99) 428 (90 )
8 ( 1) 4 ( D 7 ( 1) 2 ( 1) 2 ( 1)
316 316 299 263 274
(9 3 )315 (9 9 ) 309 (98) 291 (9 7 ) 252 (96) 256
l ( 1) 7 ( 2) 7 ( 3) 11 ( 4) 16 ( 6)
1 2 ( 1)
AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCIIOOI. DISTRICT - TOTAI. ENROIJsiKhT AND ETHNIC COMPOS IT TON OF STUDENTS OF EACH SCIIOOI.
\
SCIIOOI. 1.970-71 1 9 / 1 - 7 2 1 9 7 2 -7 3 1 9 7 3 -7 6
O.'ik II1 II T o tn l 253 327 311 309
llugro
Mux. Ain. 10 ( 6 ) 21 ( 6) 21 ( 7) 11 ( 6 )
Anglo 263 (96) 306 (96 ) 290 (9 3 ) 29R (9 6 )
0 :il< SprlngH T o t a l 6 57 610 6 13 A 26
Negro 665 (97) 395 (96 ) 602 (9 6 ) 3 >9 196)
Mex;Am. 11 ( 3) 16 ( 6) 26 ( 6) 26 ( 6)
Anglo 1 1 1
(Mom T o tn l 619 619 691 06 o
Negro 1 1 ( 3 ) 1 0 ( 2 ) 7 ( l ) 11 ( 1)
Mex. Ani. 27 ( 6) 76 (12 ) 109 (1 6 ) 167 (2 0 )
Anglo 301 (91) 535 (06) 575 (0 3 ) 660 (79)
Ortega Totn t 617 6 70 601 657
Negro 363 (59) 613 (62 ) 360 ( 6 1 ) 270 (5 9 )
Mex.Am. 235 (30) 266 (36 ) 217 ( 3 6 ) 171 (3 7 )
Aug lo 19 ( 3) 13 ( 2) 16 ( 3) 16 ( 6)
1’ :j 1 m T otn l 755 676 606 660
(Sue Simdifiz- Negro 3 6 ( l )
7 5 -7 6 ) Mex.Am. 726 (96) 656 (97) 503 (9 7 ) 657 (90)
Anglo 20 ( 6) 20 ( 3) 21 ( 3) 7 ( 1)
Tol ul 312 261 265 235
Negro 60 (15) 56 (21 ) 53 ( 2 1 ) 60 (1 7 )
Mex.Am. 67 (15) 51 (20 ) 51 ( 2 1 ) 67 (2 0 )
Anglo 217 (70 ) 156 (59) 161 (5 8 ) 160 (63)
Pecan Kprlnga T o tn l 797 7112 733 562
Negro 172 (22 ) 207 (27 ) 267 (3 6 ) 167 (2 6 )
Mex.Am. 20 ( 3) 60 ( 5) 36- { 5) 36 ( 6)
Anglo 597 (75 ) 535 (60 ) 650 (6 ) 31)1 (6 0 )
1 9 7 6 -7 5 1 9 7 5 -7 6 1 9 7 6 -7 7 1977-711 1 9 7 0 -7 9 1 9 7 9 -0 0
570 502 637
—
609 735
2 3 ( 1 ) 2 ■ 5 ( 1 ) i ( - )
27 ( 5) 10 ( 3) 22 ( 6) 26 ( 3) 26 ( 3)
569 (9 5 ) 561 (96 ) 613 (96 ) 660 (96) 710 (9 7 )
300 321 206 265 206
365 (0 9 ) 303 (96 ) 255 (90) 236 (00) 265 (93 )
61 (1 1 ) 18 ( 6) 27 ( 9) 23 ( 9) 16 ( 6)
2 2 ( 1) 0 ( 3) 3 ( 1)
967 1032 906 912 931
17 ( 2) 25 ( 3) 25 ( 3) 33 ( 6) 36 ( 6)
217 (2 3 ) 260 (23 ) 279 (31) 309 (36) 330 ( 3 5 ) |
713 (7 5 ) 767 (76 ) 600 (66 ) 570 (62) 565 (6 1 ) 1
610 399 300 355 366
235 (5 7 ) 263 (6 1 ) 209 (5 5 ) 190 (56 ) 197 ( 5 7 )
150 (3 9 ) 165 (36 ) 161 (62 ) 150 (66) 110 ( 6 0 )
17 ( 6 ) 11 ( 3) 10 ( 3) 7 ( 2) 9 ( 3)
609
3 ( 1)
397 (9 7 )
9 ( 2)
269 256 256 262 277
65 (10) 67 (18) 56 (22) 59 (23) 67 (26 )
39 (26> 51 t 213 AR ( ! 9 * 62 (16) 60 (15 )
165 (50 ) 156 (6 1 ) 152 (5 9 ) 161 (61) 170 ( 6 1 )
555 537 550 532 507
160 (30 ) 205 (3 0 ) 260 ( 6 5 ) 261 (69) 100 (5 9 )
52 < 9) 53 (1 0 ) 61 ( 0) 60 ( 0) 63 ( 9)
335 (61 )
1
279 (52) 261 ( 6 7 ) 231 (6 3 ) 166 (32 )
1900-IU
, n
roI
-n:
O
CO
AUSTIN milll'F.NOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT - TOTAL ENROI.UIENT AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF STUDENTS OF EACH SCIIOOt.
SCHOOL 19/0- 71. 1971- 72 1972--73 1973 -7A
rillow
|---------
ToI ill ATT A 30 AA8 ASA
No B vo 2 5 ( 1) 6 ( t) 3 ( 1)
Hi?x. Am. 12 ( J) 10 ( A) 23 ( 5) 25 ( 5)
Anglo 619 (97) All (95) A19 (9A) A 36 (9A)
1* 11* IIM1111 til 1 1 1 Tot n 1 29T 36 A A31 55 A
Nogro 2 ( 1) 0 ( 2) 6 ( 1)
Me x. Am. 59 (20) 56 (15) ' 0 (10. 109 (20)
Anglo 236 (110) 306 (BA) 3A3 (80) A39 (79)
llon«l Total A7A A AO AOt 652
Negro 2 2 ( 1) 1 A 7 ( 7)
Men.Am. 12 ( 3) 1 1 ( 2) 11 ( 3) 23 ( A)
Ai*. -> 1o /if.O (9/) A 27 (97) 309 (97) 502 09)
lie? Illy Totrll 520 A75 A57
( 1)
3A5
Ho gin 2 3 7 6 ( 2)
Me.x. Ain. 03 (16) HO (19) 95 (21) BA (2A)
Aug 1 o A 31 (BA) 30A ( n i ) 355 (78) 255 (7A)
11 l<lgolo|> Total 317 295 277 260
llogro 0 ( 2) 2 2 ( 1) 6 ( 2)
lie x. Am. 100 (32) 112 (30) 117 ('.2) 09 (3A)
Anglo 209 (66) 101 (62) 150 (57) 165 (6A)
KoucmIii 1 L* Tot nt 1911 350 358 3A3
Nogin 5 ( n 6 ( 1) 9 ( 2) 11 ( 3)
Mux.Am 112 (21) 09 (25) 00 (25) 75 (22)
Anglo 311 (70) 263 (7A) 261 (73) 257 (75)
lloaewoml Tol a 1 292 259 2A0 IA7
Negro 270 (95) 2A7 (95) 2A0 (97) 1A1 (96)
Hex.Am. 12 ( A) 11 ( 5) 0 ( 3) 6 ( A)
Anglo 2 ( 1) 1
SI. Elmo Total 027 926 915 1012
ling to 10 ( 1) 12 ( l ) 12 ( 1) 2A ( 2)
Me x. Am 152 (10) 217 (2A) 23A (26) 257 (26)
Anglo 665 (01) 697 (75) 669 (73) 731 (72)
197A-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-70 1970-79 1979-00
516 538 ABI 536 520
6 ( 1) 8 ( 1) 3 ( 1) , 7 ( 1) 1A ( 3)
27 ( 5) 30 ( 6) 26 ( 5) 31 ( 6) 26 ( 5)
A03 (9A) 500 (93) A52 (9A) A90 (93) A80 (92)
633 821 399 397 555
12 ( 2) 22 ( 3) 21 ( 5) 23 ( 6) 35 ( 6)
120 (19) 172 (21) 107 (27) 125 (31) 162 (29)
501 (79) 627 (76) 271 (68) 2A9 (63) 350 (65)
6AI 601 610 517 623
A 6 ( 7) 70 (10) 66 (ID 56 (11) 7/i (12)
23 ( 6) 37 ( 6) 33 ( 5) 3 A ( 6) 52 ( 0)
572 (89) 57A (8A) 511 (BA) A27 (03) A97 (80)
29A 278 201 201 296
6 ( 2) A ( 1) 9 ( 3) 19 ( 7) 30 (10)
01 (20) 70 (20) BA (30) 03 (29) 92 (31)
207 (70) 196 (71) 100 (67) 179 (6A) 17A (59)
217 220 230 223 217
0 ( 6) 2 ( 1) 9 ( A) 11 ( 5) 9 ( A)
loo (66) lit (A9) 92 (A0) 86 (39) 102 (A 7)
109 (50) •115 (50) 129 (56) 126 (56) 106 (A9)
330 266 262 231 2A5
12 ( 6) 7 ( 3) 10 ( A) 7 ( 3) 11 ( 5)
75 (22) 52 (19) A7 (10) 60 (26) 52 (21)
251 (7A) 207 (70) 205 (70) 16A (71) 102 (7A)
130 160 156 110 90
123 (9A) 156 (90) 150 (96) 110 (93) 90 (92)
6 ( 5) A ( 2) 6 ( A) 7 ( 6) 0 ( 8)
1 ( t) l ( 1)
997 975 776 , 772 71A
29 ( 3) 32 ( 3) 27 ( 3) . 38 ( 5) 19 ( 5)
306 (31) 321 (33) 270 (35) 259 (3A) 277 (30)
662 (66) 622 (6A) A7 7 (62) A 75 (61) A18 (57)
1900-U
- V
r i
AUSTIN INHKI'ENDEIIT SCHOOL DISTRICT - TOTAL KHROLIIH NT ANIl ETHNIC COHPOSITION OK STUDENTS OE EACH SCHOOL
1 9 7 2 - 7 3 1 9 7 3 - 7 /,___ 197A-7S_________ 19 7 5 - 7 6 1 9 7 6 - 77 1 9 7 7 - 7 8 1978 - 7 9 ____ 1979-110________ 1980-01__ SCMOHL___
St. Julius Total
i v / u - / l
162 «
Hifiro 151 (96) ( *
Hex.Am. 6 ( 6)
Anglo 3 ( 2) :
Snnclicz To t n t 619 687 600 521
(l*u Im-1976-,75 ) Negro , 3 0 ( 1)
Mux.Am. 396 (96) 666 (96) 667 (96)
Anglo 25 ( 6) 10 ( 6) 1 3 ( 3 ) 7 ( 1)
Total 5/6 586 587 683 691 696 531 678 662
Negro 563 (98) 555 (95) 551 (96) 669 (93) 655 (93) 655 (92) 699 (96) 669 (96) 611 (93)
Mcx.Am. 1 1 ( 2 ) 28 ( 5) 36 ( 6) 31 ( 6) 36 ( 7) 36 ( 7) 25 ( 5) 2B ( 6) 78 ( 6) toAnglo 1 3 ( 1) S ( 1) 7 ( 1) ' 1 1 ( 1)
<rO
To t n 1 163 165 109 182 195 201 261 222 235 <c
llugro 1 ( 1) 1 1 ( 1) 7 ( 3) 9 ( 6) 16 ( 7)
Hex. Ain. 3 ( 2) 5 ( 3/ 5 ( 3) 1 7 ( 3) 0 ( 6) 15 ( 6)
Anglo 163(100) 161 (97) 183 (97) 181 (99) 190 (97) 200(100) 227 (96) 205 (92) 206 (87)
Sunset Viilt cy Totnl 322 379 667 656 611 600 611 589
Negro 26 ( 8) 23 ( 6) 16 ( *2) 10 ( 3) 20 ( 3) 20 ( 3) 16 ( 3) 9 ( 1)
Hex.Am. 17 ( 5) 10 ( 5) 36 ( 5) 53 ( 8) 61 (10) 56 ( 9) 76 (12) 86 (15)
Ang 1 o 279 (87) 330 (89) 619 (91) 585 (89) 530 (07) 536 (80) 519 (85) 696 (86)
'l l nv 1 ii llgl ri. To 1 u 1 96/ 096 606 659 712 762 732 716 67 3 1
Negro 10 ( 1) 11 ( 1) 6 ( i ) 89 (13) 77 (11) 93 (12) 01 (11) 110 (11) 80 (12)
Mcx.Am. 162 (17) 161 (16) 112 (10) 269 (30) 291 (61) 301 (60) 305 (62) 292 (61) 276 (61)
Anglo 795 (82) 766 (83) 690 (81) 321 (69) 366 (60) 360 (68) 366 (67) 316 (66) 319 (67)
Mu 1 nut Crock Total 760 762 650 388 367 308 332 320 305
Negro 2 3 ( 1) 2 3 ( 1) 2 ( 1) 6 ( 1) 5 ( 2)
Mux. Ain. 66 ( 6) 67 ( 6) 60 (11) 55 (16) 60 (16) 62 (16) 50 (15) 56 (18) 53 (17)
Anglo 706 (96) 695 (96) 600 (83) 130 (85) 297 (06) 263 (85) 280 (06) 260 (81) 267 (81)
(Mil, Totnl 960 096 097 068 760 752
Negro 186 (20) 100 (20) 169 (19) 191 (22) •196 (26) 172 (211 1
Mux.Am. 81 ( 0) 109 (12) 122 (16) 150 (17) 126 (16) 113 (15, 1
Anglo 681 (72) 607 (60) 606 (67) 527 (61)
1
630 (58) 667 (62) 1
1
CM
CO
I
Ails Tin independent scnooi. district - totai, eniiolimeht add f.tiihic composition of students of f.acii sciiooi.
1 9 7 2 - 7 3 1 9 7 3 - 76 1.976-15____ ____ 1 9 7 5 - 76 1 9 7 6 - 7 7________1977-70 19711-79 __ 1979-00___ 19110-III__s<2!LH1L___
To to 1
I V / U - / 1 I V f L“ / L
506 702 725
10 ( 2) •15 ( 2) 17 ( 2)
96 (16) ' 122 (17) 116 (16)
Aiiylo
* 600 (02) 565 (Bl) 592 (02)
V/1 iih 650 5)0 520 666 506 566 620 665 696
3 ( 1) 15 ( 3) 30 ( 6) 01 (10) 135 (27) 100 (33) 262 (39) 317 (60) 376 (56)
22 ( 5) 17 ( 3) 21 ( 6) 21 ( 5) 25 ( 5) 36 ( 6) 63 ( 7) 66 ( 7) 63 ( 9)
A»»f* 1 o 625 (96) 69B (96) 669 (90) 366 (77) 366 (6B) 330 (61) 335 (56) 302 (65) 257 (17)
Uool«lrl(J|)i» To!, n 1 512 659 720 loon 792 767 773 776 606
Mourn 6 ( 2) 6 ( 1) 9 ( 1) 27 ( 2) 23 ( 3) 32 ( 6) 66 ( 0) 70 ( 9) 7(1 (10)
31 ( 6) 62 ( 6) 65 ( 6) 96 ( 9) 71 ( 9) 00 (11) 06 (11) 05 ( I I ) 95 (16)
An|*lo 671 (92) 613 (93) 679 (93) 965 (09) 696 (00) 615 (B5) 623 (fll) 621 (00) 521 (76)
Tot u 1 HB / noo 723 697 655 635 600 600 507 r ' l
6 12 ( 1) 9 ( I) 6 ( 1) 17 ( 3) 10 ( 3) 21 ( 3) 23 ( 6) 26 ( 6)
50 ( 6) 53 ( 7) 5U ( 0) 52 ( 7) 69 (10) B5 (13) 96 (16) 107 (17) 115 (20) < c
Anp 1 o 031 (96) 766 (92) 656 (91) 639 (92) 569 (07) 532 (B6) 693 (01) 67B (79) 660 (76)
5BI 562 561 655 635 615 602 397 621
17 ( 1) 16 ( 3) 27 ( 5) 35 ( B) 31 ( 7) 23 ( 6) 27 ( 7) 20 ( 7) 26 ( 6)
Mux. A m i. 557 (96) 520 (96) 500 (92) 613 (91) 393 (90) 306 (92) 369 (92) 366 (92) 392 (93)
Any in 7 ( 1) 6 ( 1) 16 ( 3) 7 ( 1) 11 ( 3) 8 ( 2) 6 ( 1) 5 ( 1) 3 ( 1)
Toln 1 5110 552 516 573 579 561 516 600 603
Ncpro 9 ( 2) 2 ( 0 9 ( 2) 10 ( 3) 10 ( 3) 23 ( 6) 11 ( 2) 26 ( 5) 16 ( 3)
Mux.Am. 71 (12) 91) (IB) 90 (17) 110 (21) 126 (22) 100 (19) 122 (26) 107 (22) 119 (25)
Auplo 500 (Br>) 667 (01) 617 (01)
*
637 (76) 635 (75) 610 (77) 301 (76) 357 (73)
»
160 (72)
CO
CO
o cHo o l .
SECONDARY
elementary
ciiaim)
T0TAI5
AUSTIN INnKPENOKNT SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL ENROLLMENT Ann ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF STUDENTS OF EACH SCHOOL
1970-71 1 9 / 1 - 7 2 1 9 7 2 - 7 3 1 9 7 3- 76 1 9 7 6- 75 1 97 5- 76 1 9 7 6 - 77 1 97 7- 70 1970 -79
Tot nl 25,7.1.3 2 6 , 651 2 6 , 6 0 5 2 7 , 6 0 0 2 7 , 9 9 7 2 0 , 3 5 3 2 0 , 3 0 9 2 0 , 6 6 1 2 7 , 5 9 5
Negro 3 , 6 7 0 ( 1 / . ) 3 , 1 7 0 ( 1 3 ) 3 , 6 6 6 ( 1 3 ) 3 , 7 6 9 ( 1 3 ) 3 , 0 6 6 ( 1 6 ) 6 , 1 2 1 ( 1 5 ) 6 , 2 6 7 ( 1 5 ) 6 , 6 0 1 ( 1 6 ) 4 , 4 4 4 (16 i
Mo x . Am. / . , 206 ( 1 7) 6 , 2 5 7 ( 1 7 ) 5 . 0 0 7 ( 1 9 ) 5 , 6 6 0 ( 2 0 ) ' 5 , 6 2 0 ( 2 0 ) 6 , 0 2 6 ( 2 1 ) 6 , 6 7 2 ( 2 3 ) 6 , 6 0 3 ( 2 3 ) r»,3 f»7 ( 23 i
Anglo 17 ,507(1. 9) 1 7 , 2 2 6 ( 7 0 ) 1 0 , 1 5 6 ( 6 0 ) 1 0 , 3 0 3 ( 6 7 ) • 1 0 , 5 3 1 ( 6 6 ) 1 8 , 2 0 0 ( 6 6 ) 1 7 , 6 5 0 ( 6 2 ) 1 7 , 6 7 7 ( 6 1 ) If*, 7H4 ( ( ) ] )
T ot al 29 , 511 2 9 , 0 2 9 2 9 , 2 5 6 3 0 , 7 3 2 3 0 , 6 6 0 3 0 , 5 6 7 1 3 0 , 2 7 5 2 9 , 9 7 6 3 0 , 3 66
Negro /. , 6 1 6 ( 1 6 ) 6 , 0 2 0 ( 1 6 ) 6 , 9 1 5 ( 1 7 ) 6 , 0 0 1 ( 1 6 ) 6 , 0 3 9 ( 1 6 ) 6 , 9 0 9 ( 1 6 ) 5 , 1 2 2 ( 1 7 ) 5 , 2 2 2 ( 1 0 ) 5 , 6 7 1 (1 r.)
Mor.Aitt. 6 , 9 0 0 ( 2 3 ) 7 , 1 6 7 ( 2 6 ) 7 , 1 0 0 ( 2 6 ) 7 , 0 6 0 ( 2 3 ) 7 , 1 0 0 ( 2 6 ) 7 , 2 6 2 ( 2 6 ) 7 , 6 6 1 ( 2 5 ) 7 , 5 6 3 ( 2 5 ) f , 8 4 3 f 7f>)
Anglo 1 7 , 9 0 7 / 6 1 ) 1 7 , 0 3 6 ( 6 0 ) 1 7 , 2 3 3 ( 5 9 ) 1 0 , 7 9 1 ( 6 1 ) 1 0 , 6 3 3 ( 6 0 ) 1 0 , 3 3 6 ( 6 0 ) 1 7 , 6 9 2 ( 5 0 ) 1 7 ,1 0 9 ( 5 7 ) 1 7 , 0 5 0 (561
T o t n l 56 ,97 / . 5 6 , 6 0 0 5 0 , 0 6 1 5 0 , 3 3 2
1
5 0 , 4 5 7 5 0 , 9 2 0 5 8 , 6 6 6 5 8 , 6 15 5 7 , 9 5 9
Nog ro 0 , 2 0 6 ( 1 5 ) 7 , 9 9 0 ( 1 5 ) 0 , 3 5 9 ( 1 5 ) 0 , 6 3 0 ( 1 5 ) 0 , 6 0 5 ( 1 5 ) 9 , 1 1 0 ( 1 5 ) 9 , 3 7 8 ( 1 6 ) 9 , 7 0 3 ( 1 7 ) 9 , 9 1 5 (17)
Mox. Ain. 1 1 , 1 9 6 ( 2 0 ) 1 1 , 6 2 6 ( 2 1 ) 1 2 , 1 1 5 ( 2 2 ) 1 2 , 5 2 0 ( 2 1 ) 1 2 , 0 0 0 ( 2 2 ) 1 3 , 2 6 6 ( 2 3 ) 1 3 , 9 3 3 ( 2 6 ) 1 6 , 0 6 6 ( 2 6 ) 1 6 , 2 1 0 (251
Anglo 3 5 , 6 9 6 ( 6 5 ) 3 5 , 0 5 0 ( 6 6 ) 3 0 , 3 0 7 ( 6 3 ) 3 7 , 1 7 4 ( 6 6 )
•
3 6 , 9 6 6 ( 6 3 ) 3 6 , 5 6 6 ( 6 2 ) 3 5 , 3 6 2 ( 6 0 )
O
3 6 , 6 6 6 ( 5 9 ) 3 3 , 0 3 6 (50)
ATTACHMENT' B
65 A- 'bo
Il-TERVENOR'S DESEGREGATION PIAN FOR
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Freparjd by:
Andrev A* Rolinsan, Ed.D.
Professor, Educational Administration
and
Dean, College of Education
University of North Florida
Jacksonville, Florida
November 22, 1976
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this plan is to provide some broad recommendations
for the pupil assignment phase of a multi-phased effort i e create a uni
tary school system in Austin, Texas. To demonstrate thac these broad
recommendations are feasible and can be effective, specific methods of
implementation are shown. However, the school system staff must be given
the responsibility of refining and adjusting the various elements of the
recommendations. A cursory attempt is made to deal with such vital phases
in the disestablishment of segregated school systems as (1) curricular
emphases (mainly bilingual programs), (2) staff assignments, (3) other
administrative staff and board policies, and (4) a study of certaxn
school buildings and sites. However, a more thorough study and resolu
tion must be made of all of the foregoing phases.
Careful attention was given to the instructions of the Order of the
Firth Circuit Court of Appeals (May, 1976), the Desegregation Plan and
guidelines proposed by Dr. John A. Finger, Jr. (August, 1972), and the
Tentative Consolidated Desegregation Plan prepared by the Austin Indepen
dent School District (August, 1976). The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
directed that a unitary desegregation plan be developed along the guide
lines proposed by Dr. Finger. Dr. Finger proposed that the Austin schools
should be desegregated from grade one through grade twelve. The Tenta
tive Consolidated Desegregation Plan, proposed by the AI3D would leave the
majority of the primary pupils in racial isolation (see Attachment I).
It is felt to concur with the AISD's tentative plan on the decision to
leave the primary schools in racial isolation would be unacceptable.
The AISD plan for junior high schools should include Martin and Healing
and the plan for senior high schools should provide for Austin's next new
senior high school to be constructed in southeast Austin.
There is no doubt about the educational soundness of beginning the
desegregation process at the earliest possible grade level. Any desegre
gation plan which considers the quality of educational opportunity as
the raison d'etre of the integration process must provide for the desegre
gation process to begin as early in children's lives as possible. The
literature abounds with recommendations based upon imperical evidence
that childrens' educational development, and even the development of
their capacity for educational growth, begin at an early age. Although
children do not usually learn to read, write, or compute much before five
or six years of age, they do jtart or fail to start to learn in more
fundamental areas that seem to determine directly how well they will
later learn to read, write, and cipher.
If one has learned anything from the well-do cut:_..ted increases in
secondary school student disruptions, it should be that racial integra
tion should begin earlier, definitely not after pupils have experienced
racial isolation in the early school years. Socially as well as academi
cally, it is important to desegregate at as early an age as possible.
Since the kindergarten programs are not uniformly offered throughout
Austin's elementary schools, it is advisable that kindergarten pupils
not be transported at public expense to desegregate the schools. There
fore, it is proposed that all kindergarten pupils would remain in their
present schools. When computations are made to indicate the extent of
desegregation in a school, kindergarten enrollments are treated sepa
rately.
The AISD's tentative desegregation plan stresses the need for equity
and economy. This is fully agreeable. It is agreeable for the AISD plan
to exempt K-o schools that meet the 50% to 75% Anglo enrollment test;
- 2 -
6 a A - 4 t
however, it appears other schools must meet the same test. The AISD
proposed grade organization— K-3 and 4-6— is clearly workable, except
kindergarten programs should be added to the 4-6 schools allowing kinder
garten pupils to continue to attend their present schools.
THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-6)
We propose that the school district be divided into three geographic
clusters and within these clusters elementary schools be paired— one
being K-3, the other K, 4-6. Because of building capacities, many paired
schools will involve adjoining schools with partial enrollments assigned
to other schools. The three clusters should be (1) South Cluster, in
cluding all of the elementary schools south of the Colorado River, (2)
the East-West Cluster, '' ncluding selected minority schools on the East and
selected Anglo schools on the west, and (3) the East-North Cluster,
including selected.minority schools on the East and selected Anglo schools
on the North. Utilizing clusters decreases the length of the bus rides
and clearly identifies the "other" area that children and parents will be
required to identity.
The South Cluster
In the area south of the Colorado River with the Allison Elementary
School District on the east and the Oak Hill Elementary School District
on the west, there are sixteen elementary districts and the sixth grade
center, Joslin. Under the rationale for excluding schools already dese
gregated, six schools— Linder, Travis Heights, Pleasant Hills Houston,
St. Elmo, and Odom— meet the criteria and their districts are exempt from
further consideration for desegregation. The other ten elementary schools
have enrollments as follows:
Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6
Minority Anglo Total Minority Anglo Total
1081 1668 2749 1209 1880 3089
This amounts to a 61% Anglo and a 39% minority distribution. Though
Joslin should be used as an elementary school, it is not included in this
specific example for housing the south cluster pupils. A more detailed
study of buildings and sites in the south cluster may result in a deci
sion to close Barton Hills Elementary School because of its small size or
to close some other immediately adjoining school because of building or
site deficiencies. When this is done, the pupil population assigned to
Joslin must meet the tests of this plan. Allan Elementary School in the
East-North Cluster may be utilized to alleviate the overcrowded condition
as specified by this plan at Allison Elementary School. Thes*3 ten
elementary school pupil populations may be desegregated in this manner.
A. Five schools may house K-3 programs (kindergarten and grades
1. 2, and 3).
1.. Allison K-3
2. Dawson K-3
3. Manchaca K-3
4. Sunset Valley K-3
5. Zilker K-3
Five schools may house K, 4-6 programs (kindergarten and grades
4, 5, and 6). Williams will be a 4-6 school.
1. Barton Hills K, 4-6
2. Becker K, 4-6
3. Cunningham K, 4-6
4. Oak Hill K, 4-6
5. Williams K, 4-6
-4-
A-4-y
SOUTH CLUSTER
K-3 Schools
Receiving School Students
and Caoacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Allison Allison (1-3) 329 12 341
825/924 (p)Cunningham (1-3) 24 176 200
Williams (1-3) 49 242 291
402 ' 430 832(48%) (52%)
Allison (K) 103 4 107
939
Dawson Cunningham (1-3) 12 52 64
924 Dawson (1-3) 224 111 335
Oak Hill (1-3) 9
245(37%)
256
419(63%)
265
664
Dawson (K) 65 34 99
763
Manchaca Becker (1-3) 100 16 116*
504 Manchaca (1-3) 29 148 177
129 164 293(44%) (56%)
Manchaca (K) 5 48 53
346
Sunset Valley
700
(p)Becker(1-3)
Sunset Valley (1-3)
100
45
145(35%)
16
259
275(65%)
116
304
420
Sunset Valley (K) 17 73 90
510
Zilker
588
3arton
(p)Becker
Zilker
Hills
(1-3)
5
78
65
148
(32%)
149
16
153
318
(68%)
154
94
213
466
Zilker (K) 11 69 80
546
^Students to be bused
(p)Partial
7i A-W-
SOUTH CLUSTER
K, 4-6 Schools
Receiving School Students
and Capacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Barton Hills Barton Hills (4-6) 9 169 178
364 (p)Becker (4-6) 83 17 100
92 186 278
• (33%) (67%)
Barton Hills (K) 4 45 49
327
Becker (p)Becker (4-6) 206 30 236
775/868 Manchaca (4-6) 31 201 232
Zilker (4-6) 76
313
C41%)
222
453
(59%)
298
766
Becker (K) 80 11 91
857
Cunningham (p)Allison (4-6) 196 8 204
1008 Cunningham (4-6) 46 306 352
(p)Dawson (4-6) 50 20 70
(p)Sunset Valley (4-6) 26 174 200
318 508 826
(38%) (62%)
Cunningham (K) 12 110 122
948
Oak Hill (p)Dawson (4-6) 238 86 324
784 Oak Hill (4-6) 11 313 324
249 399 648
(38%) (62%)
Oak Hill (K) 6 105 111
759
Williams (p)Allison (4-6) 191 7 198
672 (p)Sunset Valley (4-6) 10 138 148
Williams (4-6) 38 187 225
239 332 571
(42%) (58%)
(p)Partial
- 6-
71 45
The East-West Cluster
Most of the elementary schools in the north central part of the city
meet the test of desegregation. For the East-West Cluster, selectee, ele
mentary schools with predominant minority enrollments are matched w\th
westside schools with predominant Anglo enrollments. Fifteen elementary
schools have enrollments as follows:
Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6
Minority Anglo Total Minority Anglo Total
1375 1780 3155 1591 ' 1915 3506
This amounts to a 56% Anglo and a 44% minority distribution. Martir. Ele
mentary School should be used as an K, 4-6 elementary school to relieve
crowded conditions this plan specifies at Metz, Sanchez, and Zavallu Ele
mentary Schools. 3aker Elementary School may be used as an elementary
school as long as the punil population assigned meets the tests of cue
plan. Allan Elementary School in the East-North Cluster may be utilized
to alleviate the overcrowded conditions as specified by this 'plan at Brooke
Elementary School. These fifteen elementary school pupil populations
may be desegregated in this manner:
A. Six schools from the East were selected. Three should be K-3
and three K, 4-6.
1. Blackshear K-3
2. Brooke K-3
3. Campbell K-3
4. Metz K, 4-6
5. Sanchez K, 4-6
6. Zavalla K, 4-6
B. Nine schools from the West were selected. Three should be K-3
and six K, 4-6. Casis and Dill would be viewed as one school in
the pairings. Many of these students would not be bused but
would walk to the school in the adjoining district.
1. Brentwood K-3 6. Dill K, 4-6
2. Doss K-3 7. Gullett K, 4-6
3. Hill K-3 8. Highland Park K, 4-6
4.
5.
Bryker Woods
Casis
K, 4-6
K, 4-6 9. Rosedale K, 4-6
73 A -4 4
EAST-WEST CLUSTER
K-3 Schools
Receiving School
and Caoacity
Students
From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Blackshear Blackshear (1-3) 214 0 214
/uO Ca.sis (1-3) 12 240 252*
Dill (1-3) __2
223
(42%)
76
315
(58%)
78*
544
Blackshear (K) 72 0 72
616
Brentwood Brentwood (1-3) 58 137 245
868 (p)Gullett (1-3) w 4 161 165
Pillow (1-3) w 6 62 68
Sanchez (1-3) 185 16 201*
253 426 679
(27%) (63%)
Brentwood (K) 8 51 59
738
Brooke Brooke (1-3) 182 5 187
450/504 Rryker Wood (1-3) 11 115 126*
Highland Park (1-3) 3
196
(47%)
97
217
(53%)
100*
413
Brooke (K) 66 3 69
482
Campbell Campbell. (1-3) 223 2 225
700/784 (p)Gullett (1-3) 1 86 87*
Highland Park (1-3) 3 112 115*
Rosedale (1-3) 33
260
(45%)
113
313
(55%)
146*
573
Campbell (K) 68 0 68
641
Doss Doss (1-3) 6 246 252
672 Zavalla (1-3) 137
193
(43%)
5
251
(57%)
192*
. 444
Doss (K)
*Students to be bused
(p)Partial
(w)Walkers -8-74
6
A - A - - 1
88 94
538
Receiving School
and Caoacitv
Students
From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Hill Hill (1-3) 4 255 259
672 Metz 241 2 243*
245 257 502
(49%) (51%)
Hill (X) 2 69 71
573
*Students to be bused
-9-
73 A- 4-8
EAST-WEST CLUSTER
K, 4-6 Schools
Receiving School Students
and Caoacitv From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Bryker Wood '(p)Blackshear 29 0 29*
252 (p)Brooke (4-6) 59 1 60*
Bryker Wood (4-6) 8 103 111
96 104 200
(43%) (52%)
Bryker Wood (K) 5 37 42
242
Casis/Dill (p)Blackshear 225 0 225*
532/140 Casis (4-6) 22 280 302
672 247
(47%)
280
(53%)
527
Casis (K) 13 101 114
Dill (K) 4 26 30
671
Assign these 671 pupils to Casis and Dill with grades 4-6
meeting desegregation criteria.
Gullett (p)Campbell 200 1 201*
532 Gullett (4-6) 3 222 225
203 - 223 426
(43%) (57%)
Gullett (K) 0 69 69
495
Highland Park
644
(p)Brooke (4-6)
(p)Highland Park (4-6)
149
11
160
(45%)
2
196
198
(55%)
151*
207
353
Highland Park (K) 3 39 42
400
Metz Hill (4-6) 8 343 351*
756 Metz (4-6) 264 2 266
272 345 617
(44%) (56%)
Metz (K) 74 1 75
♦Students to be bused
(p)Partial
A
- 1 0 -
Receiving School Students
and Capacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Rosedaie (p)Campbell (4-6) ' 66 0 '66*
364 (p)Gullett (4-6) w 0 20 20
(p)Highland Park (4-6) w 0 20 20
Rosedaie (4-6) 26
92
(42%)
85
125
(58%)
111
217
Rosedaie (K) 3 37 45
262
Sanchez Brentwood (4-6) 49 192 241*
532 (p)Doss (4-6) 3 122 125*
Sanchez (4,-6) 245 11 256
207
(48%)
325
(52%)
622
Sanchez (K) 5 88 94
716
Zavalla (p)Doss 4-6) 7 314 321*
575/644 Zavalla (4-6) 217 1 ' 218
224 315 539
(42%) (58%)
ZavalJ a (K) 72 3 75
614
♦Students to be bused
(p)Partial
(w)Walkers
77
-ii- ,4-50
The East-North Cluster
Excluding the elementary' schools in the north-central and eastern
section of the city that meet the 50%-ho 75% Anglo enrollment test for
desegregation, the East-North Cluster :.s composed of selected eastside
elementary schools with predominant minority enrollments and selected
northside elementary schools with predominant Anglo enrollments.
Fifteen East-North elementary schools have enrollments as follows:
Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6
Minority Anglo Total Minority Anglo Total
1651 1952 3576 16fl 1841 3522
This amounts to a 54% Anglo and a 46% minority distribution. Allan Ele
mentary School should be used as a K-3 school relieving the overcrowding
at Govalle and Ortega Elementary Schools as well as the o\ercrowding
at Allison (South Cluster) and Brooke (East-West Cluster)-- Elementary
Schools. Read and Webb Elementary Schools may be used as replacements
for or to relieve immediately adjoining elementary schools. Allan, Read
and Webb's new pupil assignments must meet the tests for desegregated
schools. These fifteen elementary o_hools pupil populations may be de
segregated in this manner:
A. Seven schools from the East were selected. Three should be
K—3, one 4-6, and three K, 4-6. Rosewood should not house
kindergarten children.
1. Govalle K-3
2. Maplewood K-3
3. Ortega K-3
4. Rosewood 4-6
5. Oak Springs K, 4-6
6. Norman K, 4-6
7. Sims K, 4-6
B. Eight schools from the North were selected. Three should be
K-3 and five K, 4-6.
1. Summitt K-3
2. Wooldridge K-3
3. Wooten K-3
4. Barrington K, 4-6
i/'* vO
Cook X, 4-6
Graham X, 4-6
Pillow X, 1-3
Walnut Creek X, 4-6
-x3-
79
EAST-NORTH CLUSTER
K-3 Schools
Receiving School Students
and Capacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Govalle Barrington (1-3) 14 36 100*
368 Govalle (1-3) 330 12 3^2
Graham (1-3) 14 201 215*
Walnut Creek (1-3) 24
382
(48%)
123
422
(52%)
147*
804
Govalle (K) 93 5 98
902
Maplewood
475/532 (p)Cook (1-3) 50 25i 305*
Maplewood (1-3) 156 15 171
206
(43%)
270
'57%)
476
Maplewood (0 42 11 53
529
Ortega
475/532 Barrington (1-3) 34 214 248*
Cook (1-3) 0 50 50*
Ortega (1-3 181
215
(44%)
5
269
(56%)
136
484
Orgega (K) 59 1 60
544
Pillow (p)Oak Springs (1-3) 195 0 195*
560 Pillow (1-3) 18
213
(45%)
262
262
(55%)
280
475
Pillow (K) 8 77 85
560
Summitt (p)Norman (1-3) 90 0 ?0*
280 Summit- (1-3) 1
91
(49%)
96
96
(51%)
97
187
Summitt (K)
*Students to be bused
(?) Partial
-14-
O lJ
0
A - 5 3
33 33
220
/
Receiving School Students
and Capacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
Wooldridge (p)Norman ; 6 0 56*
396 (p)Oak Springs (1-3) 62 0 62*
(p)Sims (1-3) 1)0 0 100*
Wooldridge (1-3) 56 332 388
274 332 506
<'47%) (53%)
Wooldridge (K) 13 93 111
717
Wooten (p)Sims (1-3) 217 3 220*
644 Wooten (1-3) 53 271 324
270 274 544
' (49%) (51%)
Wooten (1-3) 21 32 103
647
♦Students to be bused
(p) Partial-
8i A-st-15-
Receiving School Students
EAST-NORTH CLUSTER
K, 4-6 Schools
and Capacity From Minority Anglo TOTAL
3arrington Barrington (4-6) 57 265 322
672 Ortega (4-6) 193
250
(43%)
7
27 2
(52%)
200*
522
Barrington (K) 12 34 96
618
Cook Cook (4-6) 59 243 302
672 Maplewood (4-6) 193
252
(49%)
15
258
(51%)
208*
510
Co k (K) 19 94 113
623
Graham (p)Govalle (4-6) 160 10 170*
448 Graham (4-6) 30
190
(48%)
197
207
(52%)
227
397
Graham (K) 4 32 36
433
Norman Norman (4-6) 174 0 174
375/420 Summitt (4-6) 0 115 115*
(p)Wooldridge (4-6) 7
181
(49%)
70
185
(51%)
77*
366
Norman (K) 52 0 52
418
Oak Springs (p)Govalle (4-6) w 70 3 78
500/560 Ortega (4-6) w 25 0 25
Pillow (4-6) 19 248 267*
(p)Sims (4-6) w 60 0 60
(p)Rosewood (4-6) w 57 0 57
(p)Wooten (4-6)
Oak Springs (X)
*Sindents to be bused
(p)Partial
(w)Walkers sr
31
262
(44%)
64
A-55
77
333
(56%)
108*
595
64
659
Receiving School
and Capacity ___ TOTAL
Rosewood
350/392
Sims
525/538
Walnut Creek
504
S tudents
From Minority Angle
(p)Rosewood (4-6)
(p)Wooten (4-6)
(p)Sims (4-6)
(p)Wooldridge (4-6)
Sims (K)
(p)Govalle (4-6)
Walnut Creek (4-6)
Walnut Creek (K)
175 0 175
17 200 217*
182 200 392
(49%) (51%)
192 3 195
52 258 310*
244 261 505
(48%) (52%)
86 1 87
592
100 0 100*
20 12b 145
120 125 245
(49%) (51%)
8 - 56 64
309
*Students to be uused
(p)Partial
-17-
S 3
A-56
Impact on Transportation
During 1976-77, AISD will transport 6172 elementary school pupils.
The intervenor's desegregation plan requires that 9b',0 pupils be trans
ported. It is not possible to. determine the extent of duplications in
these two figures or the extent to which the exempt school enrollments
require transportation. It is possible, however, to estimate that this
plan may call for transporting an additional 3200 pupils. A careful
study of the plan would indicate that equity and 'economy were observed
factors. Though minorities are bused at a rate higher than Anglos, this
is arithmetically the only way to desegregate these schools.
No one race carries the burden of transportation by grade or by dis
tance. Pairing and clustering help to ensure that students who were
transported in grades 1-3 (for example, students from Williams to Alli
son) were in school.in grades 4-6 with students who were transported
from their 1-3 schools» For example,, some Allison 4-6 pupils were trans
ported to Williams.
The chart on page 19 shows the number and percentage by race,
cluster, and grade level of pupils to be bused.
3ilingual Education
A desegregation plan which is designed to work must treat certain
curriculum emphases, for teaching and learning are the premier goals of
an educational system. The expansion of kindergarten programs, the up
grading of remedial reading programs, the building of a broad program
of studies in each school to include college preparatory as well as
terminal programs are all among the curricula considerations that must
be treated and resolved in a new way to effectuate a desegregation plan.
IS
84
NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE 3Y RACE, CLUSTER
and grade level of pupils to be bused
EAST-NORTH CLUSTER
Grades
Minority
Number Percentage
Anglo
Number Percentage TOTAL
1-3 856 48 932 52 1788
4-6 772 44 1000 56 1772
Total 1628 46 1932 54 3560
EAST-WEST CLUSTER
Grades
Minority
Number Percentage
Anglo
Number Percentage TOTAL
1-3 678 44 862 56 1540
4-6 792 48 853 52 1645
Total 1470 46 1715 54 3185
SOUTH CLUSTER
Grades
Minority
Number Percentage
■ Anglo
mber Percentage TOTAL
1-3
4-6
Total
366
854
1220
25
74
46
1107
298
1405
75
26
54
1473
1152
2625
TOTALS Minority Percentage Anglo P.er cent age TOTAL
1-3
4-6
Total
1900
2418
4318
40
53
46
2901
2151
5052
60
47
54
4801
4569
9370
This preliminary plan will only treat bilingual education, a cur
riculum emphasis that must be given strong support in Austin, a school
system with a heavy Mexican-American constituency. There is at present
a recognized bilingual education program in certain Austin schools.
This program must be continued, expanded, and improved upon so that each
child in need of such experiences will have that opportunity.
The pupil assignment plan allows for groups of pupils for one school,
e.g., Allison, fo be transferred to other schools, e.g., Williams,
Houston, and Cunningham, in such numbers that a bilingual program at
the new schools would be cost-effective.
During the 1976-77 school year, the AISD should work with bilingual
education expert, Dr. Jose Cardenas, to resolve the problems of (1) how
to assign bilingual students to asst re the enhancement of the present
program, (2) how to design a. plan to ensure that all students with
English language deficiencies will be identified and provided an appro
priate program.
20'
THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS (7-8)
The Consolidated Desegregation Plan prepared by the AISD provided
for the ur.e of the following ten junior high schools (grades 7-8).
1. Bedichek
2. Burnet
3. Dobie
4. Fulmore
5. Lamar
6. Martin
7. Murchison
8. 0. Henry
9. Pearce
10. Porter
This plan eliminates Allan as a junior high school leaving only
Martin in East Austin. With only one junior high school in this area, an
overwhelming transportation burden is placed upon the junior high school
students there— most of whom are minority. A partial answer to this
would be the inclusion of Healing Junior High School in the Plan and the
utilization of Healing as a junior high school facility
Healing would receive minority students from the immediate geogra
phical area and would receive Anglo students from noncontiguous zones
within the present Burnet, Murchison, and 0. Henry junior high school
districts. Ehe optimum capacity of Healing must be determined and appro
priate work must be accomplished in order to prepare it for student
occupancy by August, 1977.
- 21-
87
THE HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12')
The AISD Consolidated Desegregation Plan for high schools satis
fies the tests that Plaintiffs would apply tr it. The plan is practi
cal and it utilizes well the present facilities of the AISD. Yet the
transportation burden of minority students, especially those in East
Austin, is much greater than the burden of Austin Anglos. Except for
the comparatively small number of minorities who will be able to walk
to Martin in grades 7-8 (about 600) and the undetermined number who will
be able to walk to Kealing in grades 7-8 (estimate 400), most East
Austin students will be transported to school five years of the f:.rst
eight years of their schooling. In high school, approximately 1,000
East Austin minorities will be able to walk to L. B. Johnston. There
fore, the typical East Austin minority student will be transportec from
approximately trine years of the twelve years he is in school while the
typical Austin Anglo will be transported at least two to four yeais
less than the t>tical East Austin studer*..
Because of this violation of equity, economy, and because of the
deliterious effect on neighborhood integrity, it is recommended that
the next high school constructed in the AISD be situated in the area
bounded approximately by south of Manor Road, north of 7th Street, East
of Interstate 35, and west of Webberville Road.
- 22 -
85
STAFF ASSIGNMENTS
Faculty and staff must be distributed so tnat no school is identifi
able by race. Austin should strive t' wards increasinq the number of minority
faculty and staff, especially Mexican-Americin. In 1977-78 the needs of
the bilingual program would require an imbalance of Mexican-American
teachers in the schools where the bilingual programs are instituted. How
ever, a strong-recruitment program must be initiated for the employment of
enough Mexican-American faculty and staff so that each school will have
an equitable number of staff members.
In addition to balance m race, there should be balance in experience
and educational level at each school. New teachers cannot be assigned to
certain schools with the understanding that when they acquire tenure they
will be allowed to transfer zo other schools.
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF AND BOARD POLICIES
During the 1976-77 school year, a review of administrative staff and
boa-.d'policies must be made to ensure that such policies effectuate- the
desegregation plan. Some of these policies wou]d include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
3.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Affirmative Action
Attendance
Curriculum Development
Expulsion
Grading
Professional Development
Promotion
Special Education Student Staffing
Student Rights and Responsibilities
Student Transfer
Suspension
Teacher Recruitment
Teacher Transfer
Tenure
-23-
£9
SCHOOL BUILDINGS AND SITES
To implement the foregoing student assignment recommendations, cer
tain schools are overloaded and others are under-utilized. Wnen the final
assignments are made, a decision must be made to either (1) utilize schools
that have been abandoned (as in the Sanchez district, it might be feasible
to use Palm), or (2) add portables.
Kealing Junior High School must be given massive rehabilitation in
the next several months to house seventh and eighth grades.
The next high school constructed in Austin should be in East Austin
in the area bounded approximately by south of Manor Road, north of 7th
Street, east of Interstate 35, and west of Webberville Road.
-24-
J U
A- is
ATTACHMENT I
EXTENT Or RACIAL ISOLATION IN X-3 SCHOOLS
The AISD'S tentative desegregation plan leaves the K-3 schools in
racial isolation.' Of the 7398 white pupils a’.tending the 32 K-3 schools
listed on page 5 of tiie Plan, 89%, or 6593, of these white pupils attend
schools that are 76% white and 41%, or 3042, of these white pupils attend
schools that are over 90% white.
♦w h i t e k-3 p up ils a t t e n d i n g sch ools
THAT ARE:
0-50%
White
51%-75%
White
76%-90%
White
Over
90%
White TOTAL
239 566 3551 3042 7398
3% 8% 48% 41% 100%
*See ATTACHMENT A for detailed figures
Minority pupils, too, are as racially isolated with 77%, or 4265,
of these minority pupils in schools that are over 76% minority and an
astounding 6-°", or 3762, minority pupils attending K-3 schools, that are
over 90% minority.
♦♦MINORITY K-3 PUPILS ATTENDING SCHOOLS
THAT ARE:
0-50% 51%-75-i 76%-90%
Over
90%
Min. Min. Min. Min. TOTAL
1259 0 503 3762 5524
23% 0 9% 68% 100%
♦♦See ATTACHMENT B for detailed figures
Expressed in another way, 84% of Austin's K-3 pupils attending 32
schools would be attending schools that are over 75% of theii race—
white or minority.
-25-
91
A- £4
K-3 PUPILS ATTENDING SCHOOLS THAT
ARE COMPOSED OF TUSIR RACE
Extent of Isolation 0-50% ■51-75% 76-90%
Over
90% TOTAL
White 239 566 3551 3042 7398
Minority 1259 0 503 3762 5524
Total 1498 566 4054 6804 12922
- % 12 4 31 53 100
A desegregation plan built on this foundation would delay the dese
gregation process until the deleterious effects of desegregation have
set in and would make a mockery of the positive educational values of
integration.
- 26-
9 c
ATTACHMENT A
WHITE K-3 PUPILS ATTENDING SCHOOLS THAT ARE:
0-50%
White
51-75%
White
76-90%
White
Over 90%
White
Allison 16
2. Barrington 384
3. Barton Hills 268
4. Becker 131
5. Blackshear 2
6. Bryker Woods 152
7. Casis 341
8. Cook 399
9. Dill 102
10. Doss 334
11. Govalle 17
12. Graham 233
13. Gullatt 47Q
14. Highland Park 248
15. Hill 328
16. Houston 313
17. Menchaca 396
18. Metz 22
19. Oak Hill 361
20. Oak Springs 26
21. ■ ;rtega 6
22. Pillow 339
23. Pleasant Hill 253
24.
1
Rosedale 150
-27-
83 A "
ATTACHMENT A-Continued
1 0-50%
White
51-75%
White
76-90%
White
Over 90%
White
25. Rosewood 3
26. Summitt 129
27.1 Sunset Valley 430 li
| 28. Walnut Creek 179 1
i
j 29. Williams 442
i
!
30.i Wooldridge 425 *
31. Wobten 428
32. Zavala 16
\
TOTAL 239 566 3551 3042
% 3 8 48 I—1
- 2 8 -
94
ATTACHMENT B
MINORITY K-3 PUPILS ATTENDING SCHOOLS THAT ARE:
'
0-50%
Minority
51-75%
Minority
76-90%
Minority
Over 90%
Minority
!
i. Allison 432
2. Barrington 60
3. Barton Hills 34
4. Becker 503
5. Blackshear 577
6* Bryker Woods 16
7. Casis 25
8. Cook 69
9. Dill 6
10. Doss 121 — —
11. Govalle 423
12. Graham 18
13. Gullett 46
14. Highland Park 9
15. Hill 6
16. Houston 220
17. Menchaca 64
18. Metz 549
19. Oak Hill 15
20. Oak Springs 519
21. Ortega 438
22. Pillow 26
23. Pleasant Hill 85
24. Rosedale 41
9o2y- A- 66
ATTACHMENT B-Continuea
0-50%
Minority
51-75%
Minority
76-90%
Minority
Over 90% 1
Minority
2 5 . Rosewood 317
26. Summitt 1 !
27. Sunset Valley 113
28. Walnut Creek 32
29. Williams 79
30. Wooldridge 74
31. Wooten 99
32. Zavala 507
TOTAL 1259 0 503 3762
% 23 0 9 68
-30-
96 A- Pi
ATTACHMENT C
97 A-76
V- -
C\l
r -
\
<
CD
C D
I
I
I
A
U
S
TI
N
,
TE
X
A
S
ATTACHMENT D
102
I
Senior Hi.it: Schools
9 10 ii * *> i.- Ileal :»N ,;>!/ A 7 A
A nddr 3cz , 513 505 cud iô r -2-j - -i 1 709
(9)
17 • u67
CS9)
Auiwia ; 576 5 SI -2c ; y n 1*69 <t- loo
(3) U S )
'.rww&e -1 91o ail / *»L 617 15c
Co;
^45
ichaioa wl-'; 2l u nlvj ju • 233 1247 2 : ■ • 609
(37)
155
(10)
C / >
(22)
Jounseen • 509 159 220 336 11 6 -T * . * 370
' (31)
500
(67) V L ;
L3.nl dr * 633 162 1C1 426 1355 j. * , 1 234
(15)
171
(9) (757
M c C a U »~i 2a- 410 ■♦ ji 306 1666 < j J* 91
(6)
255
(17)
l 2u 0
(77)
i = " ,24 391 350 1767 .:■• • i 513
(2S)
* ! 7
(12)
1037
(5 S )
Irnvli v 737 513 12c 232 2C09 - '' ' 161
(9)
OwT
i ~ )
9--
V** ' /
i
I
A ' / r
105
I 1̂
\
I
junior Siah Schools
School 5 7 s T oca *w* 1 ;!1
1 All-in ISO 219 217 55c . i J ^ 257 13
(25) Col) (2)
Eatllchdiw 522 QUO 222 2 / l (- qu -i-* / / -
171 25) (6c)
Suraec 275 129 22-* i '■ 1 111 -0 602
(1-) .10) V. / i }
Dob is tOO nOC 972 ;• i:i 51-* -55 595■» o'V.-/ ) •.cl>
Fuisors -.00 425 cci • * i i. 95 iiO 236
(11/ v5C) (39}
T,-,^ 223 252 691 /,- i ' 1 ->« 152 491
(7) (22) (71)
liircin 216 271 275 792 ! ■ i 1/ 57 597 5
(21) O )
ilurciiiauu 229 272 702 i ! v - l-o 54o
(20) (2 > (76)
0. BAZS-J 225 276 7C-» /«i. (11;
io2 -rC5
v6c>
563 567 12. j 2 i
■ ' 1 551 124 4 7 i
(121(4, ;
Purcac -15 4*2 C 6*45 i y iy 35 15 2 60S
( 1 0 ) (15) (72)
I
i
-/
£d.e:rer.C£rv Schcols Conilr.ugc
1 2 5 c_ 6_ To ;^1 4 i,T jM/A 22
i n 104 68 73 73 i f 512 15 4*2 5
13) (So) u)
SIsa \ i - 65 67 38 cc 57 s J /‘J tjU - I J O
v92)
- 3
(6;
-
1 1 ' i? 2t ' '> 50 -6 4 J 227 ' -7
(6)
Sunset V A . - . - S */ ) / ai 112 95 -05 55 103 556 6
U)
S3
(12) :34)
! 45 - »9 57 52 51 ’6 42 500
(2) (17) (31)
_ W11 n 1 SStS • . . , .t t '
76 107 ii5 134 134 122 123 713
(2)
115
(lei
5S5
(327
ir.7ian y i / S’ 101 141 127 101 m 120 o 51 363
(54)
61
(9)
T " 2
(27 >
< t w C . M — 95 103 126 121 112 107 159 550 66
U0)
53
*■» »>
t - - * ;
517
. 7 6 ;
n a J w e t ‘ . c * - }3 107 106 30 79 79 555 21
i.l)
107
C0)
*TV» /
' J /
' 1 ' ^ 73 60 95 70 -6 Z'sJ 5r; 116 T 5
(o)
337
(S3)
7
C Zllk*= , 50
S L j
'•> 32
;th H e ad
76 32
t Schools
57 65 .-.7 15
(3)
" 1 *)
(25) '70)
cad-er
•
117 417 25
(6)
11.5
(27/ (37)
-56 156 is:
(44)
5 7
(12)
1g /
(-2)
Jus lac. 75 g 756 72
C9) (1-)
5f0
l e a d
607 c 07 / j
112) (3)
-55
tSC)
.ZaVli c s co- 661 SO 272
(* 1)
Veab 729 ;2S 163
122)
109
(15)
-i-
*Sixtli grade student* at present attend chase a i x scnooia and Allan and .*inLin |u u l c :
highs as indicated. The miu.becs in the grade 6 column above are c-stitr-ates of the
number or sixth graders in -acn eJeuiancary district assisting the redistribution ot
students currently attending sixth erode schools.
A - i i105
!
*
ZL^<=.r.Z2.z’ r Schools Ccacir.usc
1 2 5 6 Tcc*;.l ■ tfM/A ••A
— ~
di^hlaa- ’-rU.,4 '! .< 34 39 103 93 3i 65 523 11
(2)
16
(3)
Z vjI
(95)
Hill .' , 50 76 35 103 39 10, 1.LD 505 10
7 2)
15
(2) (55)
HcusiOU n I/O I65_ 177 150 132 LlC. 525 54
(9)
260
(22) (63)
i > . - iu 53 -- -6 -3 iJ 094 30
(10)
29
(10)
225
‘,50)
lizdar. » 1G0 126 117 113 55 77 31 527 5o
(ID (25;
352
(51)
iU? i-i'-cai i • iV 56 73 5 7 56 ;o 53 A3 325 255
(76)
47
(2.4)
v:_
(10)
Hachews r. I •
a '*■ 61 72 71 69 51 36 37 360 32
(9)
76
(21)
2 5 2
(70)
y-achaaa ,'A > 1 57 66 32 73 95 64 5- ,01 9
(2)
60
(14)
252
(54)
■U : - l| ,| i i 67 35 35 62 52 67 ■ o2 h LS
(1)
411
(95) (1)
Uwssaa A; , i 46 16 45 51 41 37 43 271. 252
(93)
16
(o> a)
, Oss. axil .j -| / 6c 115 <*■*• - 153 105 130 95 721 0
(0)
22
(2)
695
s57)
uau SOTlCî S 1.' »j, 70 77 73 51 » 226 2ss
(92)
17
\.6)
•)
V-*-)
J<i»- (i t
i U 1 • 173 160 lo3 x T“* 131 >02 >6 216
(35)
552
v o Li
0r;£=S / 51. o5 cl 53 45 4- M 317 -61
•.57)
• 17
(40)
c
> c j
_ ... /. kdiic Ai* // _ 0 5* 70 -- 43 43 273 =7
(24)
42
(15)
-65
(61)
?ccsr* 5c - — V/ 61 2- * ! 55 93 75 on . 5 Ji 296
(39) (5)
160
’22
p i 7 ;,-t 61 71 55 -:= 51 7 6 iu 513 15
»i3)
33
(5) , *i'
. ?Ui;ia: Hill i! 30 iu*; 50 105 / ■* 71 53 (c) v29) , *3 - t
3x5.11 y 'i. 11 41 56 -■ -»7 35 — 33
(10) ̂-4 /
.-.ij-ecop . r: *- 21 J c 2- 2 “ -25 5 0?
_ ( 225 12 43 ---
• ’ '( W-7
mv3CW‘«J<I , r>n
'.52/ -j)
» - - ■ - _ . - ~
106
I
I
j 973-7-
Entcllroanc breukd-v/u
So'r.ool - 3y C r ic . ;
--------- ";- 6 - . . . » •.: V / :
22 1 i ' — — — —
1 1 1 79 j i j 627 L1C 395 --
11-a. * -3 CLC7 C79) V i /
' S.-2 - . “J 71 1C1 35 31 95 79 53 — 231
11)
50
(9)
270
•' - 9 j
7: 92 95 34 109 101 83 35*- 22
(4)
59
(15) (507 ’
•. / ' 47 16 49 61 52 51 o'* 010 0 23
CS)
•>■« ■
(91;
. . . . . . . 111 152 107 37 1C5 9: 107 659 56
«-3 ;
125
(56; :r f
61 75 61 - 65 44 6- - 59 207
cs.'O
20
(3)
7
V » /
61 55 60 6 9 47 61 C c5l u 31
U3', (7 “ *
co 65 31 52 65 51 ■ i. •;!/
( i) (94) v;
53 ICS 75 52 51 60 n l / ' c •n *♦-/
(20)
102
xOO) V • ' »
•
27 2o4 10 T 7 221
1 i - 29 51 51 -6 (5) (3) ‘* 3 / y
1—?**•• » - . 71 £5 91 75 75 66 5e -»7o s *7
J H ■:o)
.7~
97
C *1 4. 21 01 -c l
r*' ! r 5-* 72 95 UC 5- 95
(1) (6) i 70‘.
157 143 140 126 12c UK) 795
(7)
-u-
(10) A » - >
Cukw>lr<6 r*—ii >.' i 7 a2 H - 159 15- 11s 1- : 116 757 16
(2) vl^ 7 (0- ,
JiVS-i. ■• > ■■ * / i? 101 105 92 52 5w 90 570 25
(47
292
(C* 7 (-•/
•«wii f • • , 57 105 90 107 118 501 15
(2 ■
5
(> •.
si iV A ——ti ; 1 :. 109 109 • n *i 1:1 9z 722 220
(00)
-3 2
>
- ■
77 72 60 56 275 15 i f
Gl ar-s.. /• ■ : j 5 (-*-** ' x
1 7 7 0 22-
•*---=-- i - f i ; j - V *' w • - \ vu , V-/
* 2 1» . 211 2 r
j , 0 ̂< --- c~r ~ — v- ~ 61 -vl-
SC
107
ATTACHMENT E
IQS A'2l
7 . S b - \ / c’ O T
̂ ‘ *T ^ p ̂ 5 ̂ v
iJ-c " i C r '
*r ' ' : * v * ? T r t ‘ • 7 n » w? jr 7 f f » r r i * r ^ c - n v*— • -*-— — w i w w * - : 4 . i : w u t : u : u
rti
no A-^3
'U')
in
H 2
6
HIGH SCEOOI CAPACITIES
Pertaner.t Portable Total Special Ptoztezi Razular Prozrat: 1973-79
Canacitv Buildizss — Catacirr loot Utilisation CaoecitT Pcrataa:
Anderson 2562 0 2662 0 2396 * 2279
Austin. 2378 0 2373 2 2086 2052
Crockett 2844 16 3684 8 3100 3382
Johnson (LBJ) 2518 0 2518 0 2266 1686
Johnston. 1983 1 2018 4- 1708 1275
Lanier- 1890 6 2250 1 1998 1956
vfcCallira 1588 4 1328 4 1537 1558
j-aagan 2374 '2 2464 3 2157 1749
'cavis 2242 2 2332 3 2018 21X2
A-S5
113
5
juries, s i g h : s c h o o l c a p a c h i z s
Pemanent Portable Total Soecial Protrar P.aeular Prozrazi 1973-7?
CaDacitv Buildinzs Casacirv loon Utilization Caoacitv Forscasw
1103 0 uos 1 970 552
^edicaeck 1136 7 1576 2 1364 1139
Suroec. 1304 0 1304 3 1093 773
Jabie 1126 3 1306 1 ’ 114S 946
Fnlmnre 794 5 1094 2 931 841
T.-amar 1234 0 1234 4 1048 654
JIartiii 1160 2 1280 4 1044 310
Murohisnrr 1140 0 1140 2 972 658
0*. Henry 946 0 946 2 797 ^12
Pearce 1194 4 1434 2 1237 1124
Porter 1102 .2 _ . 1312 3 1100 867
11*
115
I N I K E
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
F O R T H E
W E S T E R N D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S
A U S T I N D I V I S I O N
T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S e t a l . ,
)
D B D R A E S T E L L . O V E R T C NI R T C N , e t a l . , J
P l a i n t i f f s - I n t e r v e n o r s , ) C i v i l A c t i o n N o .
A - 7 0 - C A - 8 0
T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y ( A u s t i n I n d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t ) , e t a l . ,
)
)D e f e n d a n t s .
M O T I O N F O R A N I N J U N C T I O N
P u r s u a n t t o R u l e 6 5 , F e d . R . C i v . P r o . , b l a c k p l a i n t i f f s -
i n t e r v e n o r s D e d r a E s t e l l O v e r t o n , e t a l . r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t
t h a t t h e C o u r t g r a n t a n i n j u n c t i o n r e q u i r i n g d e f e n d a n t A u s t i n
I n d e p e n d a n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t ( a ) t o d e s e g r e g a t e b l a c k e l e m e n t a r y
s t u d e n t s i n g r a d e s o t h e r t h a n t h e s i x t h g r a d e a n d ( b ) t o p r o v i d e
a p p r o p r i a t e r e l i e f f o r t h e i l l e g a l c l o s i n g o f t h e t w o a l l - b l a c k
s e c o n d a r y s c h o o l s , A n d e r s o n H i g h S c h o o l a n d H e a l i n g U u n i o r H i g h
S c h o o l , i n o r d e r t o p e r m i * t h e b u r d e n s o f d e s e g r e g a t i o n t o b e
f a i r l y d i s t r i b u t e d a m o n g s e c o n d a r y s t u d e n t s , t o g o i n t o e f f e c t
s c h o o l y e a r 1 9 7 9 - 8 0 . A n i n j u n c t i o n t h e r e f o r e s h o u x d i m m e d i a t e l y
| i s s u e t h a t :
T h e D e s e g r e g a t i o n P l a n f o r t h e A u s t i n I n d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l
j !j D i s t r i c t o f B l a c k P l a i n t i f f s - I n t e r v e n o r s D e d r a E s t e l l O v e r t o n ,
1 e t a l . . f i l e d o n J u l y 1 1 , 1 9 7 9 , i s a d o p t e d a n d o r d e r e d t o b e
il s c h o o l c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d r e n o v a t i o n p r o v i d e d f o r a t t h e s e c o n d a r y
i m p l e m e n t e d f o r s c h o o l y e a r 1 9 7 9 - 8 0 i n i t s e n t i r e t y ( e x c e p t f o r
l e v e l w h i c h s h o u l d b e c o m m e n c e d i m m e d i a t e l y a n d c o m p l e t e d
116
2
e x p e d i t i o u s l y " b u t n o l a t e r t h a n t h r e e ( 1 ) y e a r s i r o n t h i s d a t e ) .
D e f e n d a n t A u s t i n I n d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t s h a l l h a v e t h e o p t i o n
t o p r e p a r e , o b t a i n t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e p a r t i e s t o , a n d i m p l e m e n t
a n e q u a l l y e f f e c t i v e d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n w i t h i n t h e s a m e p e r i o d s
o f t i m e .
T h i s m o t i o n f o r a n i n j u n c t i o n s h o u l d b e g r a n t e d f o r t h e
r e a s o n s s e t f o r t h i n t h e a c c o m p a n y i n g m e m o r a n d u m i n s u p p o r t .
R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
S A M 0 3 L T . 3 I S C 0 ST o w e r B u i l d i n g , 2 1 s t F l o u r 1 9 0 7 3 1 m S t r e e t D a l l a s , T e x a s 7 5 2 0 1 ( 2 1 4 ) 7 4 4 - 1 4 4 4
J j l C X G R E E N B E R GB I L L L A N N L E EI L P 0 L 3 0 N B . W I L L I A M S , J R .1 0 C o l i m b u s C i r c l e S u i t e 2 0 3 0N e w T o r t , N e w Y o r k 1 0 0 1 9 ( 2 1 2 ) 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7
A t t o r n e y s f o r P l a i n t i i i u - I i t e r v e n o r s
117
I N T H E
U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
F O R T H E
W E S T E R N D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S
A U S T I N D I V I S I O N
T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , e t a l . ,
P l a i n t i f f s ,
D E D R A E S T S I L O V E R T O N , e t a l , , )
P l a i n t i f f s - I n t e r v e n o r s , ) c i v i l A c t i o n N o >
v .
T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y ( A u s t i n I n d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t ) , e t a l . ,
D e f e n d a n t s .
A - 7 0 - C A - 8 C
M E M O R A N D U M I N S U P P O R T O F
M O T I O N F O R A N I N J U N C T I O N
T h e m o t i o n f o r a n i n j u n c t i o n s h o u l d h e g r a n t e d f o r t h e
f o l l o w i n g r e a s o n s :
1 . O n N ' - o m b e r 2 1 , 1 9 7 7 , t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s f o r t h e F i f t h
C i r c u i t i s s u e d a m a n d a t e t h a t t h i s C o u r t h o l d a n e x p e d i t i o u s
h e a r i n g o n r e m e d y , 5 6 a F . 2 d 1 6 2 , 1 7 6 ( 5 t h C i r . 1 9 7 7 ) ( A u s t i n I I I ) .
c e r t , d e n i e d . N > . 7 8 - 8 9 7 ( J u l y 2 , 1 9 7 9 ) . I n N o v e m b e r 1 9 7 8 b l a c k
p l a h u c i f f s - i n t e r v e n o r s D e d r a E s t e l l O v e r t o n e t a l . f i l e d a m o t i o n
f o r a h e a r i n g oa r e m e d y a f t e r u n s u c c e s s f u l i n f o r m a l e f f o r t s t o
r e s o l v e t h e c o n t r o v e r s y . T h e m o t i o n w a s g r a n t e d , a n d . t h e h e a r i n g
b e g a n J u l y 1 1 , 1 9 7 9 . A t t h e c o m m e n c e m e n t o f t h e h e a r i n g , c o u n s e l
f o r b l a c k p l a i n t i f f s - i n t e r v e n o r s o r a l l y i n f o r m e d t h e C o u r t t h a t a
d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n f o r b l a c k s t u d e n t s h a d b e e n f i l e d a n d m o v e d
t h a t t h e C o u r t o r d e r d e f e n d a n t A I S D t o p r e p a r e a d e s e g r e g a t i o n
ij p l a n f o r b l a o x s t u d e n t s i m m e d i a t e l y . T h e m o t i o n h a s n o t b e e n
|| a c t e d u p o n .
ns
2
2 . A t t h e c o n c l u s i o n o f d e f e n d a n t s ' c a s e , i t i s o l e a r t h a t
t h e A u s t i n I n d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t h a s f a i l e d t o o r e p a r e a n y
| d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n f o r t h i s C o u r t t o c o n s i d e r t h a x w o u l d ( a ) " a e -
| s e g r e g a t e h l a c ' ; c s i n o t h e r ^ e l e m e n t a r y } g r a d e s t h a n t h e s i x t h
jj g r a d e , " 579 ? . 2 d 910, 916 ( 5 t h C i r . 1978), a n d ( b ) p r o v i d e a p p r o -
j| p r i a t e r e l i e f f o r t h e i l l e g a l , c l o s i n g o f t h e t w o a l l - b l a c k s e c o n d a r y
s c h o o l s , A n d e r s o n H i g h S c h o o l a n d H e a l i n g J u n i o r H i g h S c h o o l , i n
o r d e r t o p e r m i t t h e b u r d e n s o f d e s e g r e g a t i o n t o b e f a i r l y d i s t r i
b u t e d a m o n g s e c o n d a r y s t u d e n t s , t o g o i n t o e f f e c t s c h o o l y e a r 1 9 7 9 -
1 9 8 0 , 5 3 2 F . 2 d 3 8 0 , 3 9 5 ( 5 t h C i r . 1 9 7 6 ) ( A u s t i n I I ) . v a c a t e d o n
o t h e r g r o u n d s . 4 - 2 9 U . S . 9 9 0 ( 1 9 7 6 ) . T h e p l a n f i l e d b y b l a c k
p l a i n t i f f s - i n t e r v e n o r s w o u l d e f f e c t i v e l y a c c o m p l i s h t h e s e o b j e c t i v e s
a n d p e r m i t t h e f a s h i o n i n g o f a s u b s e q u e n t c o m p r e h e n s i v e t r i - e t h n i c !
d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n i n c l u d i n g M e x i c a n - A m e r i c a n s t u d e n t s . I n s t e a d
o f p r e p a r i n g a p l a n , A I S D i s a r g u i n g t h a t i t i s u n d e r n o o b l i g a t i o n
t o a c h i e v e a n y f u r t h e r d e s e g r e g a t i o n o f b l a c k s t u d e n t s .
3 . A t t h i s l i ^ c - r i n g o n r e m e d y , t h e o n l y i s s u e b e f o r e t h i s! j| C o u r t w i t h r e s p e c t t o b l a c k s t u d e n t s i s t h e f o r m i n g o f a d e s e g r e - |
g a t i o n p l a n t h a t w o u l d d i s c h a r g e t h e d u t y o f t h ° A I S D t o f u l l y
d i s m a n t l e t h e d u a l s c h o o l s y s t e m f o r m e r l y i m p o s e d b y l a w a n d
a c h i e v e u n i t a r y s t a b u s . T h i s C o u r t a n d t h e F i f t h C i r c u i t h a v e
f o u n d r e m a i n i n g v e s t i g e s o f t h e d u a l s y s t e m ; a s y s t e m w i d e r e m e d y j
t h e r e f o r e m u s t b e p r o v i d e d .
4 - . I n A u s t i n I I . t h e F i f t h C i r c u i t r e v e r s e d , i n t e r a l i a .
| t h e A I S D ’ s d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n f o r b l a c k s t u d e n t s a d o p t e d b y t h i s
C o u r t i n 1 9 7 3 . S p e c i f i c a l l y , A u s t i n I I h e l d t h a t " ( t ) h e A I S D ' s" js u b m i s s i o n o f a ' d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n ' t h a t w o u l d p r o v i d e a n i n t e g r a -
I t e d e d u c a t i o n f o r o n l y s i x t h - g r a d e s t u d e n t s s i m p l y d o e s n o t f u l f i l l
| t h e A I S D ' s d u t y t o r e m e d y t h a t d i s c r i m i n a t i o n " a n d t h a t t h e c l o s i n g
; o f A n d e r s o n H i g h S c h o o l a n d H e a l i n g J u n i o r H i g h S c h o o l m u s t b e
|| r e m e d i e d t o e q u a l i z e t h e b u r d e n o f d e s e g r e g a t i o n n o w c o m p l e t e l y
3
■ b o r n e b y b l a c k s e c o n d a r y s t u d e n t s . 5 3 2 7 . 2 d a t 3 9 3 - 9 5 . T h e
S u p r e m e C o u r t v a c a t e d a n d r e m a n d e d f o r r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n l i g h t
o f W a s h i n g t o n v . D a v i s . 4 2 6 T J . 3 . 2 2 9 ( 1 9 7 6 ) . 4 2 ? U . S . 9 9 0 ( 1 9 7 6 ) .
I n A u s t i n I I I , t h e P i f t h C i r c u i t f o u n d i t u n n e c e s s a r y t o r e c o n s i d e r
a n y o f i t s r u l i n g s a s t o b l a c k s t u d e n t s . T h e C o u r t w a s o f t h e v i e w
t h a t " o u r d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t t h e A I S D p r a c t i c e d i n t e n t i o n a l d i s
c r i m i n a t i o n a g a i n s t b l a c k s t u d e n t s i s n o t i n i s s u e , " t h a t " s t a t u t o r y
d u a l s c h o o l s y s t e m s a r e u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l p e r s e u n d e r B r o w n v .
B o a r d o f B d u c a t i o n , 1 9 5 4 , 3 4 7 U . S . 4 8 3 , " a n d t h a t " £ a } s c h o o l b o a r d
i s u n d e r a n a f f i r m a t i v e d u t y t o c o n v e r t a d u a l s c h o o l s y s t e m t o a
u n i t a r y s y s t e m . " 5 6 4 ? . 2 d a t 1 > 5 a n d n . 2 . W h i l e t h e P i f t h C i r c u i t
o r d e r e d t h a t a r e m e d y h e a r i n g b - s o r d e r e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e i n c r e
m e n t a l s e g r e g a t i v e e f f e c t s o f t h e A I S D ’ s d i s c r i m i n a t o r y a c t i o n s
a g a i n s t M e z i c a n - A m e r i c a n s , n o n e w a s o r d e r e d f o r d e t e r m i n i n g t h e
s c o p e o f r e l i e f f o r b l a c k s t u d e n t s . S e e 5 6 4 F . 2 d a t 1 7 4 - 7 6 .
5 . D e f e n d a n t A I S D f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f o r c e r t i o r a r i t o r e v i e w
A u s t i n I I I . A m o n g t h e q u e s t i o n * p r e s e n t e d w a s :
’W h e t h e r t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s e r r e d i n r e j e c t i n g a d e s e g r e g a t i o n p l a n i n w h i c h a l l s c h o o l s w i t h g r a d e s s i n t h r o u g h t w e l v e w e r e d e s e g r e g a t e d b u t b e c a u s e o f t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f i n d i n g , i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h S w a n n , t h a t f u r t h e r d e s e g r e g a t i o n o f c e r t a i n p r e d o m i n a n t l y b l a c k e l e m e n t a r y s c h o o l s c o u l d o n l y b e c a r r i e d o u t b y t h e u s e o f a d d i t i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p o s i n g o n e l e m e n t a r y a g e c h i l d r e n a r i s k t o u e a l t h a n d p r o b a b l e i m p i n g e m e n t o n t h e e d u c a t i o n a l p r o c e s s d e e m e d t o b e p r o h i b i t i v e , a d d i t i o n a l d e s e g r e g a t i o n w a s d e e m e d t o b e i m p o s s i b l e ?
A I S D P e t i t i o n f o r W r i t o f C e r t i o r a r i , p . 3 . T h e p e t i t i o n w a s i
denied July 2 , 1 9 7 9 . T h e outstanding rulings of the; Pifth
Circuit on relief for black students are therefore final and The
law of the case.
6 . A f o r m e r s t a t u t o r i l y i m p o s e d d u a l s y s t e m i s t h e c l a s s i c
c a s e o f a s y s t e m w i d e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l v i o l a t i o n . S u c h ? v i o l a t i o n
i s n e c e s s a r i l y s y s t e m w i d e i n : . t s e f f e c t s . T h e l a w o f t h e P i f t h
I
ii l l o
4
! C i r c u i t i s t h a t a n i n c r e m e n t a l s e g r e g a t i v e e f f e c t h e a r i n g s i m p l y
j|jj i s n o t r e q u i r e d w h e r e a d u a l s y s t e m o r i g i n a l l y i m p o s e d b y l a w
lj r e m a i n s s u b s t a n t i a l l y i n t a c t a n d u n i n t e r r u p t e d . ' J n i t e d S t a t e s v .
■ D e S c t o P a r i s h S c h o o l B o a r d . e t a l . . 5 7 4 ? . 2 d 8 0 4 , 8 1 3 ( 5 t h C i r .
ij 1 9 7 8 ) , c e r t , d e n i e d 9 9 S . C t . 5 7 1 ( 1 9 7 9 ) ; L e e , e t a l . v . D e n o o o l i s
" C i t v S c h o o l S y s t e m , e t a l . . 5 5 7 F . 2 d 1 0 5 3 , 1 0 5 4 ( 5 t h C i r . 1 9 7 7 ) ,
c e r t , d e n i e d 4 3 4 T J . S . 1 0 1 4 ( 1 9 7 8 ) . A f o r t i o r i , " t h e m e a s u r e o f
I t h e p o s t - B r o w n c o n d u c t o f a s c h o o l b o a r d u n d e r a n u n s a t i s f i e d d u t y
I t o l i q u i d a t e a d u a l s y s t e m i s t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s , n o t t h e p u r p o s e ,
o f t h e a c t i o n s i n d e c r e a s i n g o r i n c r e a s i n g t h e s e g r e g a t i o n c a u s e d
b y t h e d u a l s v s t e m . " D a v t o n B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n v . B r i n k m a n . N o .
7 8 - 6 2 7 , s l i p o p i n i o n , p p . 1 0 - 1 1 ( J u l y 2 , 1 9 7 9 ) . I n t h e i n s t a n t
I c a s e , d e f e n d a n t ’ s E x h i b i t 1 5 9 l e a v e s n o d o u b t t h a t s u b s t a n t i a l
| c u r r e n t s e g r e g a t i o n o f b l a c k s t u d e n t s e x i s t s a n d t h a t t h e a c t i o n s
| o f t h e A I S D h a v e b e e n i n e f f e c t i v e i n e l i m i n a t i n g t h e d u a l s y s t e m .
, j A l l t h e K - 5 b l a c k E a s t A u s t i n e l e m e n t a r y s c h o o l s r e m a i n a l l b l a c k ;
|[ t h e o n l y d e s e g r e g a t i o n a t g r a d e s 6 - 1 2 l e v e l s i s a c h i e v e d b v t h e
j! o n e - w a y b u s i n g o f b l a c k s t u d e n t s . T h e c o n d i t i o n f o u n d u n c o n s t i t u -
|i t i o n a l b y t h e F i f t h C i r c u i t r e m a i n s .
7 . T h e o b l i g a t i o n o f t h e A I S D i s t o d e s e g r e g a t e i t s b l a c k
!|II s t u d e n t s ‘’ a t o n c e " a n d " n o w " p e n d i n g f u r t h e r l i t a g a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g
r e m a i n i n g c o n t e n t i o n s o f t h e p a r t i e s . A l e x a n d e r v . H o l m e s C o u n t y
: B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n . 3 9 6 U . S . 1 9 ( 1 9 6 9 ) ; G r e e n v . C o u n t y S c h o o l
; B o a r d . 3 9 1 U . S . 4 3 0 ( 1 9 6 8 ) .
8 . T h e d u t y o f t h e C o u r t i n t h e s e c i r c u m s t a n c e s i s c l e a r .
i " * l f s c h o o l a u t h o r i t i e s f a i l i n t h e i r a f f i r m a t i v e o b l i g a t i o n s
‘
: u n d e r t h o s e h o l d i n g s Q 3 r o w n v . 3 o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n I I . 3 4 9 U . S . 2 9 4
| 3 0 1 ( 1 9 5 ^ ) ; G r e e n v . C o u n t y S c h o o l B o a r d . 3 9 1 U . S . 4 3 0 , 4 3 7 - 3 8
( 1 9 6 8 ) j , - J u d i c i a l a u t h o r i t y m a y b e i n v o k e d . . . . I n d e f a u l t b y t h e
; s c h c o L a u t h o r i t i e s o f t h e i r o b l i g a t i o n t o p r o f f e r a c c e p t a o l e
ii
; |
1 ^ iX X x
• I
5
r e m e d i e s , a d i s t r i c t c o u r t h a s b r o a d p o w e r t o f ? o n i o n a r e m e d y
t h a t w i l l a s s u r e a u n i t a r y s c h o o l s y s t e m . ' " v . C h a r l o t t e -
M e c k l e r . b u r g B o a r d o f e d u c a t i o n . 4 0 2 U . S . 1 , 1 5 - 1 6 ( 1 9 7 1 ) , Q u o t e d
i n C o l ' m b u s B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n v . P e n i c : : . N o . 7 8 - 6 1 0 , s l i p o p i n i o n
p p . 8 - 9 ( J u l y 2 , 1 9 7 9 ) .
II C O N C L U S I O N
F o r t h e a b o v e r e a s o n s , t h e m o t i o n f o r a n i n j u n c t i o n s h o u l d ' b e
g r a n t e d
R e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d ,
S A M U E L T . 3 I S C 0 ET o w e r B u i l d i n g , 2 1 s t F l o o r 1 9 0 7 E l m S t r e e t D a l l a s , T e x a s 7 5 2 0 1 ( 2 1 4 ) 7 4 4 - 1 4 4 4 J A C K G R E E N B E R G B I L L L A N N L E E N A P O L E O N B . W I L L I A M S , J R .1 0 C o l u m b u s C i r c l e S u i t e 2 0 5 0N e w Y o r k , N e w Y o r k 1 0 0 1 9 ( 2 1 2 ) 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7
A t t o r n e y s f o r P l a i n t i f f s - I n t e r v e n o r s -
122
n l!
C e r t i f i c a t e o f S e r v i c e
I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t a c o p y o f t h e f o r e g o i n g P l a i n t i f f s -
I n t e r v e n o r s 1 M o t i o n f o r a n I n j u n c t i o n a n d M e m o r a n d u m i n S u p p o r t
o f P l a i n t i f f s - I n t e r v e n o r s * M o t i o n f o r a n I n j u n c t i o n h a s b e e n
s e r v e d o n a l l c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d b y d e l i v e r i n g s a m e b y h a n d a s
f o l l o w s :
J o s e p h D . R i c h D a v i d M . B i m b a u m D e p a r t m e n t o f J u s t i c e W a s h i n g t o n , D . C . 2 0 5 3 0
W i l l i a m H . B i n g h a mM c G i n n i s , L o c k r i d g e & K i l g o r e5 t h i l o o r , T e x a s S t a t e B a n k B u i l d i n g9 0 0 C o n g r e s s A v e n u eA u s t i n , T e x a s 7 8 7 0 1
G a b r i e l G u t i e r r e z A u s t i n N a t i o n a l B a n k T o w e r S u i t e 1 5 8 8A u s t i n , T e x a s 7 8 7 0 1
P e t e i R o o sM m r i r a n - A m e r i c a n L e g a l D e f e n s e a n d E d u c a t i o n a l F u n d 2 8 G e a r y S t r e e tS a n i r a n c i s c o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 1 0 8
I T h i s 2 0 t h d a y o f J u l y , 1 9 7 9 .
S a m u e l T . B i s c o e
FILED I
IN THE
/
UNITED STATES DISTRICT 03UKT
FOR THE
NESTEEN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
i”' % y
C H A R L E S W . V A G N E R , C lerk
^ J A A A A f . ^
' ’ t ,
THE nNi'i'FD STATES CF AMERICA, )
et al., )
Plaintiffs, )
)
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et al., )
Plaintiff-Infcervenars, )
)
v )
)
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCST (Austin )
Independent School District), )
et al., )
Defendants.)
Civ.ll Acticsi No. Sr-70-CA-8Q
ORDER DENYING MUITCN
The Court having considered the Motion far an Injunction
filed by black plaintiff-interveners Dedra Estell Overton, et al.
July 27, 1379, and the Court being of the opinion that the notion
should be denied for now, it is acoardingly,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that black plaintiff-in tervenor
Overton's nation far an_Injunction be, and hereby is, DEKLlcjj.
Entered this
Jll X U i . O U J-llJ U li
ris < 3 7 ^ 3 a y
124
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF .TEXAS /'
AUSTIN DIVISION
PILED
AUG ”
ii
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs,
DEDRA ESTELL OVERTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Intervenors,
v.
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY (Austin
Independent School District),
et al..
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. A-70-CA-80
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Notice is given that black plaintiffs-intervenors Dedra
Estel1 Overton, et al., hereby appeal to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the oral orders entered on
July 20, 1979, and July 2/, 1979, and the written order entered
on July 27 t 1979, by the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas, Austin Division, denying black plain
tif fs-intervenors ' Motion for an Injunction (filed July 20, 1979)
This 2nd day of August, 1979. --- -
Respect^ul]^, subjni/tted,
V (7
SAMUEL T. BISCOE
T^wer Building, 21st Floor
1*907 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
’ (214) 744-1444
125
JACK GREENBERG
oAMES M. NABRIT, III
BILL LANN LEE
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
(212) 586-8397
Attorneys for Black Plaintiffs-
Intervenors