Governmental Tort Liability (Reference Material)
Annotated Secondary Research
January 1, 1974
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Garner Working Files. Governmental Tort Liability (Reference Material), 1974. ef36e5f6-32a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/40fd0d98-faa5-4fc3-a131-463f1fe28101/governmental-tort-liability-reference-material. Accessed June 10, 2026.
Copied!
proceedings
m shall be valid or effectual I
o f a therein or exen»TioN.
ot a release or satisfactionF33«i.
counterclaim, demand or
le foregoing in the absencef
p ^h^Pter shL
f such hen. and the lien h o feos :
GOVERNMENTAL TORT LIABILITY
CH APTER 33— G O V E R N M E N T A L TORT L IA B IL IT Y
23-3302
c damages on account o f sa!
fo v e r from the one acceptii»^306.
. e ^ » ‘ >'=
acceptii'
----- -
lent and
.Ivor o f the lienholder
'ion o f the lien. Any acti<
_ ■ , , „ 3307.
maintenance. Sati33308.
in
Title.
Definitions.
Option to exempt from pro
visions of law — Applicable
dates.
Applicability of other laws.
Inverse condemnation not a f
fected.
Workmen’s compensation not
affected.
Immunity from suit.
Removal of immunity for in
jury from nejjlif^ent opera
tion of motor vehicles— Ex
ceptions.
I- court having jurisdiction Removal of immunity for in-Q Tr __ T J _ T t-t ̂ ̂ ̂ ̂̂ ̂ rm n .7
SECTION.
23-3316.
23-3317.
23-3318.
23-3319.
23-3320.
23-3321.
23-3322.
23-3323.
23-3324.
23-3325.
jury from unsafe streets and 23-3326.may be brought and mai , u i..
lien h o ld er FApfa lo ^ n highways— Exception.
• [A c t s 1970 (Alft3 3310. Removal of immunity for in
jury from dangerous struc-
lease a perfected lien as 4
lapter, the operator o f tb
certii
tures— Exception.
J3-3311. Removal of immunity for in
jury caused by negligent act
or omission of employees—
Exceptions.
13 3312. Construction of chapter— E f-
23-3327.
23-3328.
23-3329.
Claims— Time for filing notice
— Contents and form of no
tice.
Notice— Failure to comply.
23-3330.
23-3331.
Approval or denial of claim.
Denial of claim— Remedy.
Bond for costs or pauper’s
oath required.
Jurisdiction of circuit courts.
Venue of actions.
Settlement of actions.
Determinations by court —
Grounds for claims.
Judgment over limits of in
surance policy prohibited —
Exception.
Payment of claim— Source—
Manner.
Creation of reserve or special
fund.s— Purpose.
Authority to levy tax by gov
ernmental entities— Purpose.
Liability insurance— Purchase
authorized— Limits.
Liability insurance— Provision
for waiver of sovereign im
munity defense and for pay
ments.
Construction of liability in
surance policy not in com
pliance with law.
Liability insurance for em
ployees authorized.
Authorization for purchase of
insurance without bidding.
ptiid shs]! 6XGcutG n
such hnan.'+oi ̂ x ^Gfin fĝ j. g£ removal of immunity.
I 1 . fo r trGatmeni J3-3313. claim for injury— Notice.
•luJy paid or discharged aa ^ 3314. -
‘ noticG of hospital lien hai
■ease to be at the expenj 33 3315.
■nter upon the margin o f th
rtifi * niemoranduc' 23-3301. Title.— This shall be known and cited as the
uncate o f payment or dij Governmental Tort Liability Act.” [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 1.]
incate and entry shall con
Tk shall receive the
-27, § 5.]
on checks or drafts__Nt
aim, demand, or judgmer;
int under this chapter, ai'
ettle such claims, demands
S 6.J
provisions o f this chapter
-ital an independent righl'
I sustained by any persocf
r compromise o f a claiit’
luire the approval o f the
Compiler’s Note. Section 32, Acts 1973,
sum ol fh. 345 provided that this chapter be ef-
ffctive J a n u a ^ l, 1974 and aj)ply only to
claims or actions arising after that date.
law Reviews. SovereTgriThimunity and
tl'c Tennessee Governmental Tort Lia- /
tility Act (John C. Cook), 41 Tenn. L.
kev. 885.
Tennessee Civil Disabilities: A Sys-
t-.mic Approach (Ne il P. Cohen), 41
Tenn. L. Rev. 253.
Comparative Legislation. Governmen
tal tort liability:
Alaska. Stat., §§ 09.50.250-09.50.300.
Cal. Deering’s Codes, Government
Cole, §? 810-996.6.
Hawaii. Rev. Stat., §§ 662-1— 662-15.
Ida.Ho. Code 1947, §§ 6-901— 6-928.
Iowa. Code 1966, §§ 25A.1-25A.20.
.Minn. Slat. 1965, §§ 466.01-466.15.
‘Tennessee
; 23-2401— 23-Nebr. Rev. Stat. 1943,
2420, 81-8,209— 81-8,239.
N. J. Stat. Ann., §§ 59:1-1— 59:12-3.
N. Y. McKinney’s Consol. Laws, Judi
ciary— Court of Claims, § 8 .
N. Car. Gen. Stat., §§ 143-291— 143- <-,3 5 € A
300.1. //<.-'5
Okla. Stat. 1961, tit. 11, §§ 1751-1766.
Utah. Code Ann. 1953, §§ 63-30-1— 03-
30-34.
Cited: Memphis v. Bettis (1974), —
Tenn. — , 512 S. W . 2d 270; Johnson v.
Oman Constr. Co. (1975), — Tenn. — ,
519 S. W . 2d 782.
Collateral References. Attorney’s mis
take or neglect as excuse for failing to
file timely notice of tort claim against
state or local governmental unit. 55
A. L. R. (3d) 930.
ipply to any charges for
incurred prior to March'
23-3302. Delinitions.— As used in this chapter:
(1) The words “ governmental entity” shall mean any political
Mibdivision of the state of Tennessee including, but not limited to, any
municipality, metropolitan government, county, utility district, or
f o r ^nyOJot^,e^ SO'COi f
C!i (̂/7irf\/ ^ //7 fJi£ ^ O (Jr$ WCl C > f s>n'̂ lcû nŷ /̂Oi
r CM I i V v T i <T'/- /iV^b//)'-('-J —
0-041 t,irvs. r - m u n ICII*AL CORPORATIONS 4«
IVhe.ne^v'er^ c m ^
■hiv:)
•19
county sheriff and his deputies or any employee member of a fire or
police department of a municipal corporation or olher polilical subdivi
sion of the state of Tennessee shall be sued for damakms arisiiifr out of
tho performance of his oflicial duties and wliile enjjaKod in the course
of his employment by such tmvernmental agency, such governmental
agency shall be authorized and required to provide defense counsel for
such employee in such suit and to indemnify him from any judgment
rendered against him in such suit; provided, however, that such in
demnity shall not extend to any judgment for punitive damages or for
damages arising out of any willful wrongdoing by said employee and;
provided, further, that such municipal corporation or other political
subdivision shall have notice of such suit.
Provided, however, that liability on behalf of any municipal corpora-
tion or political subdivision affected by §§ 6-640, 6-641 shall be limited
to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each person injured or property
damaged from any one (1) accident and one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000) for all injuries and all property damage resulting from any
one (1) accident. Provided, further, that in the event said municipal
corporation or political subdivision is unable to purchase insurance to
cover its obligation hereunder, except through the assigned risk pool
then the limit of liability hereunder shall be limited to ten thousand
dollars ($10,000) for injuries to any one (1) person resulting from one
(1) accident and twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for all injuries
resulting from one (1) accident and five thousand dollars ($5 000) for
property damage resulting from any one (1) accident if said insurance
18 actually purchased. I f insurance is not purchased through assigned
nsk pool then lower limits provided for herein do not applv (Acts 1967
ch. 374, § 1; 1972 (Adj. S.), ch. 782, § 1.] ^
Section to Section Reference. This sec- Wroncr (W illiam H lYavissl 1
tion is referred to in §§ 23-3303, 23-3304. State U L Rev 362 ̂ “ emphu
Law Reviews. Municipal Tort Liabil- SovereiRii Immunity ami The Tenues-
ity in Tennessee: The King Can Do see Governmental Tort Liability Act
(.John C. Cook), 41 Tcnn. L. Rev. 885.
6-648.
Coe ;
T*»n
righu,
6-6.5
Herea*
law or
in the
in the
partmi
of said
said of]
thereof
with s.t
when s
ch. 101
Cross '
•lure to
four’s 01
NOTES TO
2 . Construction.
Term “ indemnify” as used in this sec
tion meant to secure against hurt, loss
or damage or to make compensation for
incurred hurt, loss or damage. Cunning
ham V. Metropolitan Government '
Davidson County (1972), — Tenn.
476 S. W . (2d) 641.
DECISIONS
~ ~ S. W.(2d) 641.
6-6-3
of act
meratt
and ta
in §6
accide
as a r(
believe
violate
metroj
tions I
able g
volveti
of any
1969, c
&
3. Persons to be Benefited.
The indemnity relationship created by
this section was for the sole benefit of
policemen and firemen. Cunningham v.
Metropolitan Government & Davidson
4. Damages.
Where estate of deceased police officer
was insolvent so that it sustained no
actual loss because of judgments against
it as a result of suits brought by per
sons injured in accident in which officer
was killed, county was under no duty to
indemnify estate fo r amount of judg
ments rendered against estate. Cunning
ham V. Metropolitan Government
Davidson County (1972), — Tenn.
472 S. W . (2d) 641.
6-641. Liability insurance for employee protection.
Section to Swtion Reference. This sec- Cited: Cunningham v. Metropolitan
tion is referred to in §§ 23-3303, 23-3304. Government & Davidson County (1972)
— Tenn. — , 472 S. W. (2d) 641.
6-658
Definiti'
requires
(a)
provisio
or polic(
retirenii
(b)
emidoyo
nicipalil
i.s receiv
his servi
(c) ‘
system
this chapter. Every policy or contract of insurance purchased by ̂
governmental entity as authorized by this chapter shall provide:
(a) Minimum limits of not less than twenty thousand dollars (?20
000) for bodily injury or death of any one person in any one (1) acc;
dent and not less than forty thousand dollars ($40,000) for bodil;.
injury or death of any two (2) or more persons in any one (1) acc;
dent provided, however, that in cases arising out of the ownership
maintenance, and use of automobiles, the minimum limit shall be re
less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for property damage o:
because of bodily injury or death of one (1) person in any one (b
accident, and to a limit of not less than three hundred thousand dollar
($300,000) because of bodily injury or death of two (2) or mor
persons in any one (1) accident. Provided further, that in the ever,
said governmental entity is unable to purchase insurance to cover it
obligations hereunder, except through an assigned risk pool, then fo
purposes of §23-3323 the limits of liability shall be ten thousanc
dollars ($10,000) for injury to any one (1) person resulting from one
(1) accident and twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for all injuries
resulting from one (1) accident with a limit of five thousand dollar;
($5,000) for property damages resulting from any one (1) accident.
I f insurance is not purchased through an assigned risk pool then the
greater limits above apply.
(b) Minimum limits of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000),
except as provided above, for injury to or destruction of property of
others in any one (1) accident.
(c) Any governmental entity electing to self-insure its liability
shall have the same limits of liability as if insurance had been pur
chased. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 24.]
23-3328. Liability insurance— Provision for waiver of sovereign im
munity defense and for payments.— Every contract or policy of insurance
purchased under the terms of this chapter shall include a provision or
indorsement by which the insurer agrees not to assert the defense of
sovereign immunity and to pay all sums for which it would otherwise
be liable under its contract or policy of insurance. [Acts 1973, ch. 345.
§25.]
Section to Section Reference. This sec
tion is referred to in §§ 23-3322, 23-3323.
23-3329. Construction of liability insurance policy not in compliance
with law.—Any insurance policy, rider or indorsement purchased to
insure against any risk w'hich may arise as a result of the application
of this chapter and which contains any condition or provisions not in
compliance with the terms of this chapter, shall not be rendered in
valid, but shall be construed and applied in accordance wdth the in
tention of this chapter. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 26.]
23-3330. Liability insurance for employees authorized.— A govern
mental entity may insure any or all of its employees against all or any
-4- their liability for injury or damage resulting from a negligent
^rt of expenditure for such insurance is herewith
'27.]
Section to Section Reference This sec-
'Jon is referred to in § 23-3326.
23.3331. AulhorizaUonJor purchase a“ £ S
h"thirc^aMer without the necessity of public bidding, as required by
L publk or private act or charter restriction, if such insurance is pur-
S ^ ^ th rou gh a plan authorized and approved by
gSvemmentafentities representing cities and counties. [Acts 1974 (A j.
S.),ch. 780, §2.]
Effective Date. Acts 1974
Se;s ), ch.780,§3. April 4, 1974.
(Adj.
CHAPTER 34— M ED IC A L M ALPR AC T IC E REV
SICTION.
23-3401.
23-3402.
23-3403.
23-3404.
23-3405.
23-3406.
23-3407.
23-3408.
23-3409.
23-3410.
Title.
Definitions.
Establishment of board
Claims — Notice — I ro-
cedure — Statute of limita
tion.
Board location — Rules com
mittee.
Executive secretary.
Composition of boards.
Master panels — Selection —
Terms.
Calendar— Submission o f w rit
ten evidence._ _ .
Hearing — Majority and mi
nority reports— Judge.
Mandatory counsel or appear
ance.
SECTION.
23-3411.
23-3412.
23-3413.
23-3414.
23-3415.
23-3416.
23-3417.
23-3418.
23-3419.
23-3420.
23-3421.
lE W BOARD A N D C LAIM S
Order— Rehearing.
Compensation of board mem
bers.
Changes in master panel.
Claimant’s burden — Expert
testimony— Presumption of
negligence — Jury instruc
tions.
Statute of limitations — Ex
ceptions.
Inadmissible infornmtion.
Restrictions on issues and
testimony.
Damages.
Attorneys’ fees.
Litigation in progress.
Fee assessment — Failure to
pay.
23.3401. T itle.-Th is chapter shall be known and may bo «ted^as
the Medical Malpractice Review Board and Claims Act of
1975, ch. 299, § 1.]
Cross-References. Malpractice insur
ance, § 56-218.
23-3402. Definitions.-As used in this chapter, unless the context
otherwise requires:
(1) “Medical malpractice action” means an action for damages or
personal Ljury or death as a result of any alleged iiosteuoo or nodical
malpractice by a health care provider, whether based upon tort or
contract law.
KEIIEIUES a .VD special PEOCEEDINGS 1 ̂ OOVEENMENTAL TORT LIABILITY 23-3J27
“ ‘ r “ ^ 1 - a«..d maY act exceed the applicable limits provided in the
arises. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 15.] cause of act: policy. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 28.]
-i n to Section Reference. This
P*" P‘i«P er ’s oath required.— At the timp §23-3327.
oath^requireVby ? 20 IGoT^^ f̂ shall file a bond for costs or pauper y 3324 Payment of claim—Source— Manner.— Any claim approved
equiied by § 20-1601 et sequitur. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 19.] . by a governmental entity or any final judgment obtained
23 3310 T • 1- (• a B-overnmental entity shall be paid from funds appropriated
23 3090 Vo c S hLr interest at six per cent (6% ) per annum on the unpaid
brouehf in , actions -S u its filed under this chapter must 1 face The provisions of this section shall be discretionary with
A gOTernme^!fni“ “ ?V' governmental entity is locate ̂ ^ court of original jurisdiction and the said court is hereby au-
d êS êd t o T 1. t operating in more than one county shS b ^^onTd in its ̂d̂^̂^̂ ̂ to order a lump sum payment of any fina
[Acts 1973, ch 3 45^17 ] P^'ocipal office is founc udgement. All judgements below five, C540, § i/.j .̂ uK ̂ instalment and must be paid as other tort judge
ments. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 21.]
23-3321. Settlement of actions.—An officer or bodv
he pverning body of any governmental entitv mavgovernmental entity"m a7'"subSrto^li?f ->3 3325 Creation of reserve or special funds—Purpose.—Any gov-
PP ted and to have such power. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, §18 ] *Lities w h en ^ ey become payable pursuant to this chapter, or for
of nurchasing liability insurance to protect the cooperating
b e fo r f Court-Grounds for claim s-T h e court ?overnmental entities from any or all risks created by this chapter.
and the proximate cause of plaintiff’s in'ifrv PP 9i qqoc Aufhoritv to levy tax by governmental entities— Purpose.
employees acted'lv^hTnThe s c Z of h T f oT’ the employee or or charter to the contrary all
f a c t lT V exceptions listed in §23-3311 are a^ficabTe^fo the jovinmental entities having the power to tax shall have authority
s before the court. No claim ma3’’ be broueht ao-̂ n’-ncif o i 'o lew an annual property tax in the amount necessary to P^y
or judgment entered against an employee for dar^SIf^n f f cL^s settlements or jud^ents secured pursuant to the provisions
governmental entity is liable under ?his chSter unlss fb t Z f o fto parthe costs to defend against same, or for the purpose
ouTr§^2?S fJ^ e x c t d f t L “ tin1m^Sm“ ^ : maintaining a reserve or ® fout in 9 23-3328 or the amount of i n c , _____ ui_amiLs_set ___ ̂ coi-fipmpnfs. or ludement as may be reasonaoiy
c e S = : v r u S ! , ” ' : ; '“ d r
entity may exceed the minimum amounts of S suS tt governmental
3 '2 ? gSiaa' ’ ' nabStY ”p“ ifled“ ta 's S ''3o28, unless such governmental entity has secured insnr^^ ^
ni excess of said minimum requirements, in "w hU "event th "T d | -
«T " e tu " o f su7h iev^the mlximum levy as otherwise restricted by
L irex teded IherebYI provided that, in ^ X u T a ted
derived therefrom be used for any other purpose than those stipulated
herein. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 23.]
Section to Section Reference. This sec
tion is referred to in § 23-3330.
23 3327 T iability insurance—Purchase authorized— Limits. — Any
governmental entity may purchase insurance to cover its liability under
23-3303
r e m e d i e s a n d s p e c i a l p r o c e e d in g s
by .n y one on „ 'o T fo i “ he ? e r S f C " d “£ , ‘’^
or by an act Of the general assembly; governmental enti;
(2) The word “emnlovpp” aLoii
whether elected or appofnted, officer em^Jo^pp''”
ber of any board, agency or corĴ ’n f ;^ ^ f or any me-
e n ^ ; L « S
b y T i ' c h S "
private person inflicteVby’-
~ A n y governmental entity n ̂ from provisions of law-Applicable dale-
6-1012, sĥ all a p p ;y % "o "';t'to ? e ™ ™ ;;L ? :L r-^ ''-^
the provisions of this chapter Anv exempting itself fror
‘ tself from the provisions of th^ c h a 2 r T a ° 1
governing body elect at anv time tn T ’̂esolution of it-
chapter, provided thaAhffcha^ter woffid onTv ̂ Provisions of thi.-
arising after the effective date of such reSution
e n u S f r S S L S ' " e S “ t S ^ r C t S f a r t ' - ' - t\“
entities exempting themselves as nmviVio^ r governmenta.
graph, this chapter will only ’apply to chum ^V" P^'eceding para-
January 1 , 1976. [Acts 1973, ch L s S 31 f
1975, ch. 252, § 1 ] ’ S ’ 19^4 (Adj. S . ) , ch. 780 § 1
Il5 GOVERNMENTAL TORT LIABILITY 23-3310
add^ThlTecond s^iftence^amendment
Ihe 1970 amendment added the second paragraph.
c h ^ 7 ? o !t^ ^ (Adj. S.l |
Acts 1975, ch. 252, § 2 . 'May 28, 197',
23-3304. Applicability of other Iaw« cir, +•
and 6-1012, and all other acts or s t a t ic ?
sions of this chapter shall only be apffi^^^^ the proti-
exercising their right not to come u S r t h p ?°^e™mental entities
as provided for by § 23-3303. [Acts m j c h 3 4 r r 3 o T '
apply to any action in "eminent* domaffi^S chapter shall not
§§23-1423 and 23-1424 nor be constmed
statutes. [Act.= 1973. ch. .34.5, s .5.] ^ ^ Jmphedly repeal those
23-3306. Workmen’s compensation not affected.— This chapter shall
,ot apply to any action brought by an employee under the workmen’s
^mpensation laws of Tennessee. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 6.]
23-3307. Immunity from suit.—Except as may be otherwise pro-
cded in this chapter, all governmental entities shall he immune from
(flit for any injury which may result from the activities of said goy-
jmmental entities wherein said governmental entities are engaged m
•Jie exercise and discharge or any of their functions, govemmental or
proprietary. When immunitj' is removed by this chapter any claim
damages must be brought in strict compliance with the terms
jfthis chapter. [Acts 1973, ch. 345, § 3.]
23-3308. Removal of immunity for injury from negligent operation
of motor vehicles— Exceptions.— Immunity from suit of all govern
mental entities is removed for injuries resulting from the negligent
operation by any employee of a motor vehicle or other equipment while
in the scope of his employment; provided however, that this section
shall not act as a repeal of §§ 59-801, 59-808, or 59-832, and the immuni
ties provided by these sections are hereby expressly continued. [Acts
1973, ch. 345, § 7.]
Cited- Memphis v. Bettis (1974), — file timely notice of tort claim a p m st
Tenn. — , 512 S W . 2d 270. . state or local governmental unit. 55
Collateral References. Attorney’s mis- A. L. K. (dU) 9du.
take or neglect as excuse for failing to
23-3309. Removal of immunity for injury from unsafe streets and
highways— Exception.— Immunity from suit of a governmental entity
is removed for any injury caused by a defective, unsafe, or dangerous
condition of any street, alley, sidewalk or highway; owned and con
trolled by such governmental entity, provided, however, that this sec
tion shall not apply unless constructive and/or actual notice ̂ to the
governmental entity of such condition be alleged and proved in addi
tion to the procedural notice required by § 23-3314. [Acts 1973, ch. 345,
§8.]
Collateral References. Attorney’s mis- state or local governmental unit. 55
take or neglect as excuse for failing to A. L. R. (3d) 930.
file timely notice of tort claim against
23-3310. Removal of immunity for injury from dangerous structures
—Exception.— Immunity from suit of a governmental entity is re
moved for any injury caused by the dangerous or defective condition
of any public building, structure, dam, reservoir or other public im
provement owned and controlled by such governmental entity Im
munity is not removed for latent defective conditions, nor shall this
• section apply unless constructive and/or actual notice to the govern
mental entity of such condition be alleged and proved in addition to