Correspondence from Stevas to McDonald

Public Court Documents
April 4, 1983

Correspondence from Stevas to McDonald preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order of February 8, 1982, Signed by F.T. Dupree, Jr., U.S.D.J., 1982. a3d37006-d392-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e58cf8c3-9b55-42b7-9088-01fc8dde8e10/order-of-february-8-1982-signed-by-ft-dupree-jr-usdj. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    \Err&

INT
FOR THE

RALPH GINGLES, et aI

Plai

VS.

RUFUS EDI{ISTEN, €t a

Defe

ALAN V. PUGH, €t al.,

VS.

JAIVIES B. HUNT, JR. ,

De fe

These two acti

plans adopted by the

19 B0 census. Numero

and defendants have

in each case have co

Gingles is curr

consisting of Judge

has recently been re

judge court has been

the three-judge cou

It appearing th

actions of the defen

1965, it is

Hunt and of the appli

therein

for the

with 28

judge as

action.

be given to
Fourth Circui

u. s. c. s 2284

members of

It appearin

E UNITED STATES DTSTRICT
ASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH

RALEIGH DIVISION

i ffs

NO. B1.BO 3-CIV-5

i. ilr',-

. ,, . l r,iii(
' r , i1.Jtl'I

' i'''l' t-,''ii'

,

ants

COURT
CAROLINA

Plai i ffs

DERED that noti-ce of

ation for injunctive

t.i,
li.,;_r

i,'

the pendency of Pugh v.

and declaratory relief
States Court of Appeals

NO. B1-1066-CrV-5

et aI.,

ants

ORDER

challenge the legality of the redistrictj_ng
orth Carolina General Assembly following the

common questions of 1aw and fact are presented,

ed to consolidate the actions. Plaintiffs
ented to the consolidation.

tly pending before a three-judge district court

iI1ips, Judge Britt and.the undersigned. pugh

ved to this court from state court and no three-

esignated. Defendants in Pugh have requested

designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 2284.

plaintiffs in Pugh have challenged specific
nts as violative of the Voting Rights Act of

e Chief Judge, United

, in order that he may designate in accordance

two other judges to sit with the undersigned

is court for hearing and determination of this
to the undersigned that consoliciation of the



{*" i, 
.,

I

two actions would be

requested to give c

hear Pugh as has bee

The Clerk is di

the Honorable Harri

Court of Appea1s, Ba

February 8, 1982.

-i

ppropriate, the Chief Judge is respectfully

ideration to designating the same panel to

designated to hear Gingl-es.

cted to mail a certified copy of this order

n L. Winter, Chief Judge of the United States

timore, Maryland, jud to counsel of rer/
74

UNITED
DUPREE, JR.

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

,l''m'Ml#,m*I.*,.{:P-ffiHEa;ffiX,:--*offi{ffid**
:,?,;i;$ro_oi&U

Page 2

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top