Attorney Notes Pages 1325-1326, 1332-1333, 1335
Annotated Secondary Research
January 1, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes Pages 1325-1326, 1332-1333, 1335, 1982. e6b35ade-e092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/43aaa079-6008-41e0-8fc9-29683fffe66c/attorney-notes-pages-1325-1326-1332-1333-1335. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
4..n l'* I The House veralon of e€ctlon 2 wlsely dlsclalms any intentlon to enact a reglme of ethnlc or raclal proportlonallty 1n officeholdlng. But lf the',effects'. standard is i,ported lnto Bectlon 2, thl' nay be lmpoeelble to avoid. As we have seen, the effecte etandard under sec_ t10n 5 lnptles 60Ee concept of "dllutlon" of ninorlty votlng strength. Where, as in aection 5 casee, there is a change in electoral arrange_ nents, lt i6 at lea6t po.srbre to gauge wtrether a,.dilutlon,,will occur by forecaetlng the llkely lnpact of the electoral change and conparing lt to the atatua quo ante. If there are oore Dlnorlty of_ ficeholders before the change than are forecast for after, then a dllutlon can be found. Sectlon 2, however, appliee to existlng arrangeDenta as well as to changea. Wlthout a before and an after to coEpare, the neaning of a discrlnlnatory result 1e inpoasible to gauge, unlese lt neans repreaentatlon below the level nlnorlElea "ought to trave.'' And if one adn,te that such an obJectlve standard of repreBentetron exlat6 , deapt te 16 a 6hort Etep to ethnlc and of et hnl c proport ionaJ I ty In to nought .6 i t326 the ebsence of a before_and_after, l! raclaJ proportlonallty. The dlsclalmer the House emendDent mav u]tlnatelv come I /z tisz-}rf Yr,,s/ri,? O-Nondiscrimination is an important principle and nondiscrimina- tion. as I hope to show, means intent, volition A subs."antive effe.cts standard must imply either no theory at all or en underlying 1333 tl-y.:{ pme 1$qative, racsbased entitlements. In my opinion !l:1"_.1.r" been,,no principled.oppg.ition to the intent staniard; th;oppo.ltron really come8 on the basis of pragmatism, that id tlieproblem of prooi.o 4 ) J f- - |('' n)fYt' '1 O Basically, in conclusion it soems to me that the policy of f'ocusing on results assumes that racial bloc voting is an antidote to oldtime race discrimination. T?re assumption is that black districts will vote for blacks. I treat this as a cynical view. It perpetuates racial voting...It promotes the notion-of "fair share,n "a piece of the action." It reduces the incentives for interracial coalition forma- tion. I would commend to the members of the subcommittee the quo[e !n-_my statement from Justice Douglas's opinion in Wright v. Rockefelle,r.. _ rl^__^.:^^r :,.-+;G^orinn for a deviation