Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgement
Public Court Documents
June 21, 1991

6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, 1991. 177155cc-5c40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/43c28be7-4cb4-4518-a2e1-07bed6968c0a/plaintiffs-statement-of-undisputed-material-facts-in-support-of-motion-for-partial-summary-judgement. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
JOEL R. REYNOL4 JACQUELINE WARNS NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL 617 S. Olive Street, Suite 1210 Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213) 892-1500 JANE PERKINS NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM 2639 S. La Cienega Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90034 (213) 204-6010 SUSAN SPELLETICH KIM CARD LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY 1440 Broadway, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94612 (415) 451-9261 BILL LANN LEE KEVIN S. REED NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 315 W. 9th Street, Suite 208 Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 624-2405 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional counsel on following page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIKA MATTHEWS; et al., Civ. No. C-90-3620 EFL Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION vs. PLAINTIFFS’ STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENNETH KIZER, Defendant. Date: June 21, 1991 Time: 10:00 a.m. N a ” Va s” N m ” Nu t? mi ” at ” w i ? “a wl “g at w i “o ut “m it t “o wa t¥ MARK D. ROSE UM ACLU FOUNDAT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA % 633 South Shatto Place Los Angeles, CA 90005 (213) 487-1720 EDWARD M. CHEN ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1663 Mission Street, Suite 460 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 621-2493 ruc to Local Rule 220-7, plgatiffs hereby submit the following statement of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment: l. In 1965, Congress enacted Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 8S .1396-1396u, establishing a cooperative federal-state medical assistance program designed to provide necessary medical services to poor people. Known as "Medicaid," the program is administered by the state and federal governments, subject to mandatory federal statutory and regulatory guidelines.’ Proof: Complaint § 16; Answer § 9. 2. Federal Medicaid law requires states, including California, to provide a range of "mandatory" health care benefits to poor persons, including Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services to children under age 21. Lead blood level assessments are a mandatory part of the EPSDT program, 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(1). Proof: Complaint ¥ 18; Answer § 10. 3. At the federal level, the Medicaid program is implemented by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). HCFA issues mandatory, controlling guidelines to the states through regulations and the State Medicaid Manual. Proof: Complaint §¥ 20; Answer § 12. 4. The State Medicaid Manual is controlling. Proof: Range Depo., at 34-35, 46 (Exh. J); Gregory Depo., at 62-64 (Exh. K). 5. $ State of California has | Na to participate in the Medicaid program and established the California Medical Assistance Program, commonly called "Medi-Cal." In California, the EPSDT Program is also referred to as the Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) Program. Proof: Complaint ¢ 16; Answer §¥ 9. 5. Defendant Kenneth Kizer is the duly appointed Director of the State Department of Health Services (DHS). DHS is the state agency responsible for administration of the Medi- Cal EPSDT/CHDP Program. Defendant Kizer’s duties include supervision and control of the Medi-Cal program so as to secure full compliance with the governing laws. Proof: Complaint ¥ 12; Answer 9g 7. 6. During the last six months of 1990, 117 lead blood tests were administered to Medi-Cal eligible children aged 1- DS. During fiscal year 1989-90, 283 lead blood tests were provided to Medi-Cal eligible children under age five. Proof: DHS Statewide Data FY 1989-90 (Exh. E); DHS Statewide Data July 1990-January 1991 (Exh. F). y There are at least 570,000 Medi-Cal eligible children below the age of 5 living in California. Proof: DHS Medical Care Statistics 1989 (Exh. G). 8. During fiscal year 1989-90, two lead blood tests were provided to two African-American children below age five living in Los Angeles County. Proof: DHS LA County Data 1989-90 (Exh. I). 9. Los Angeles County has the greatest concentration of atrican-andlon residents in the Statgef California. Proof: DHS Medical Care Statistics 1989 (Exh. G). 10. Defendant Kizer has stated that lead poisoning is the number one environmental hazard facing children in California today. Defendant Kizer admits that insufficient consideration is being given to lead poisoning during EPSDT evaluations. Proof: CHDP Info. Notice #91-6 (Exh. C). 11. Lead is pervasive in our society -- in paint, gasoline, drinking-water pipes, printing inks, pigments used in toys, fertilizers, food cans, soil, and dirt. Proof: Rosen Dec. at 1 5 (Exh. A). 12. Poor and minority children are disproportionately affected by lead because they are more likely to live or visit in older homes and homes with peeling paint, live with an adult who is exposed to lead, or live near industry likely to release lead. Proof: Rosen Dec. at € 5 (Exh. A); Needleman Dec. at ¥ 3 (Exh. B). 13. Early lead toxicity is potentially reversible. Proof: Rosen Dec. at § 6-7 (Exh. A); Needleman Dec. at § 4-7 (Exh. B). 14. Lead exposure can cause coma, convulsions, and death. It can adversely affect the central nervous system, kidneys, reproductive system and blood system, and cause decreased intelligence. Proof: Rosen Dec. at ¥ 6-7 (Exh. A); Needleman Dec. at ¢ 4-7 (Exh). 15, Children, especially young children, often exhibit no overt symptoms during the early stages of lead poisoning. Proof: Rosen Dec. at { 5 (Exh. A); Needleman Dec. at ¥ 3 «(Exh B). 16. A lead blood level assessment is the only accurate and reliable method of screening for lead exposure. Proof: Rosen Dec. at § 8 (Exh. A.); Needleman Dec. at € 7 (Exh. B); Gregory Depo., at 32, 43, 46-47 (Exh. K); Range Depo., at 36-37 (Exh. J). Dated: May 23, 1991 Respectfully submitted, Natural Resources Defense Council National Health Law Program Legal Aid Society of Alameda Co. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund ACLU Foundation of Southern California ACLU Foundation of Northern California By: Sn LATE 3ans Perkins Attorneys for Plaintiffs