Plaintiffs' Interrogatories to Defendant Board of Education

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1971

Cite this item

Plaintiffs' Interrogatories to Defendant Board of Education preview

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 17948e86-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Interrogatories to Defendant Board of Education, 1971. 17948e86-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/43f26c6a-874c-41df-889d-91f736754927/plaintiffs-interrogatories-to-defendant-board-of-education. Accessed November 28, 2025.

Copied!

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RONALD BRADLEY, et al. , . )
Plaintiffs )

V. )

WILLIAM G-. MILLIKEN, et al., )

Defendants, )
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, ) 
LOCAL #231, AMERICAN FEDERATION 
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, )

Defendant-Intervenor, )
and )
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al., )

Defendants-Intervenor.)

CIVIL ACTION 
NO. 35257

PLAINTIFFS' INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT 
BOARD OF EDUCATION

Plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure, propound the following interrogatories for answer 
by the defendant, Detroit Board of Education:

1. Utilizing the approaches and concepts contained in
"Modified Feeder Pattern: Plan C" state a grade organization and
feeder pattern for each elementary, junior high and senior high 
school in the system necessary for complete desegregation of each 
school and each grade level in the system by the start of the 1972-73 
school year.

2. For the schools named in answer to Interrogatory No. 1 
state the projected enrollment by race for each grade level in each
such school.



K V*

3. For each school named in answer to Interrogatory No. 1
provide an elementary map overlay, a junior high map overlay, and 
a senior high map overlay reflecting the attendance boundaries and 
feeder pattern for each elementary, junior high and senior high
school.

RATNER, SUGARMON & LUCAS

By
Lours R. LucasLours
William E. Caldwell

525 Commerce Title Building 
Memphis, Tennessee 38103

Nathaniel Jones
General Counsel, N.A.A.C.P.
1790 Broadway
New York, New York 10019

E. Winther McCroom 
3234 Woodburn Avenue 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45207

J. Harold Flannery 
Paul R. Dimond 
Robert Pressman

Center for Law and Education 
38 Kirkland Street 
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Jack Greenberg 
James N. Nabritt, III 
Norman J. Chachkin 

10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Plaintiffs' Interrogatories to Defendant Board of Education

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in