Motion for Supplemental Brief

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Educational Equity
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organization
- LDF
Matter
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
Case
- Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ba4f6078-d167-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665

Cite this item

Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Motion for Supplemental Brief, 1969. ba4f6078-d167-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/462ab08f-3c22-4c64-9ab6-d86d2db823ab/motion-for-supplemental-brief. Accessed October 08, 2025.

Copied!

    N THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 4
 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellants, 

yas NO. 28,042 

HINDS COUNTY BOARD OF 
EDUCATION, 

Appellees. 

BEATRICE ALEXANDER, et al., 

Appellants, 

VS. NO. 28,030 

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF 
EDUCATION, 

Appellees. 

MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF 
  

1. Upon information and belief, many of the defendant 

school districts have construed this court's order of 

November 7, 1969, and the appended H.E.W. plans of desegre- 

gation, to permit the reassignment of teachers and students 

to new school buildings without any requirement that class- 

rooms be integrated; defendants intend to maintain the ra- 

cial identity of individual classrooms within school build- 

ings. 

 



  

2. Upon information and belief, racial segregation 

within school buildings w. ' be achieved by: (1) reassign- 

ment of teachers and students as inviolate units from one 

school to another, or (2) reassignment of students on the 

basis of achievement test results obtained during past 

years. 

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs, in cases consolidated under 

Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, and private 
    

plaintiff intervenors in U.S. v. Wilkinson County Board of 
  

Education and U.S. v. North Pike County Consolidated School 
    

District, and the NAACP LEGAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEFENSE FUND, 
  

INC., as Amicus Curiae in cases consolidated under U.S. v. 
  

Hinds County Board of Education, move this Court to: 
  

1) order each defendant school district to respond 

to the allegations contained in this motion by December 18, 

1969; 

2) enter an order enjoining defendants and their 

agents from segregating students within school buildings 

and facilities by race; 

3) order that at any given school building within 

defendant school districts, the ratio of white to black 

students in each classroom approximate the ratio of white 

to black students in the school facility as a whole. 

December 12, 1969 Respectfully submitted, 

TSAR 
LVYNy R. LEVENTHAL 

REUBEN V. ANDERSON 
FRED 1. BANKS, JB. 

538% North Farish Street 
Jackson, Mississippi 39202 

  

JACK GREENBERG 
NORMAN CHACHKIN 
MELVYN ZARR 

Suite 2030 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion for Supplemental Brief

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in