Mobile v. Bolden Judgment

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Fred L. Banks Jr.
Organizations
- LDF
- Banks & Nichols
Matter
- Norwood v. Harrison
Case
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 426f2b72-732e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4

Cite this item

Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Mobile v. Bolden Judgment, 1977. 426f2b72-732e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4778135c-ba61-4c59-bef4-a3327c59f695/mobile-v-bolden-judgment. Accessed July 18, 2026.

Copied!

     [||589e0ab0-460d-406b-9f78-e55246f068ad||] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILEY L. BOLDEN. REV. R. L. 
HOPE, CHARLES JOHNSON, JANET 
O. LeFLORE, JOHN L. LeFLORE, 
CHARLES MAXWELL, OSSIE B. 
PURIFOY, RAYMOND SCOTT, 
SHERMAN SMITH, OLLIE LEE 

TAYLOR, RODNEY O. TURNER, 
REV. ED WILLIAMS, SYLVESTER 

WILLIAMS and MRS. F. C. WILSON, 

CIVIL ACTION 
Plaintiffs, 

No. 75-297-P 
V. 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA: GARY A. 
GREENOUGH, ROBERT B. DOYLE, JR. 
and LAMBERT C. MIMS, individually 
and in their official capacities 
as Mobile City Commissioners, 

Defendants. 

N
e
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

o
F
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
S
 
N
F
 

N
S
 
N
N
N
 

N
N
 

N
S
 
N
S
 

- JUDGMENT 
  

Plaintiffs' counsel submitted to the court a motion 

for award of costs and attorney fees. 42 U.S.C. §1973 1(e) 

authorizes the court to award to the prevailing party, at its 

discretion, a "reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs." 

Plaintiffs are the prevailing party in this action. 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 

the defendents shall pay to plaintiffs' counsel $57,802.50 

in attorney fees and $7,237.54 as expenses, the sum of which 

is reduced by $750.00, for a total of $64,300.04. 

Costs are taxed against the defendants. 
lr 

Done, this the om day of June, 1977. [||589e0ab0-460d-406b-9f78-e55246f068ad||]

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Mobile v. Bolden Judgment

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in