Amendment, Correction or Clarification of Order of February 5, 1970
Public Court Documents
March 3, 1970
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Working Files. Amendment, Correction or Clarification of Order of February 5, 1970, 1970. c7f591eb-3134-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4800d978-8773-4700-bbec-57be01b098a3/amendment-correction-or-clarification-of-order-of-february-5-1970. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||38b0499b-7ded-4636-ac42-d3db4e6b2b8c||] IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte Division
Civil Action No. 1974
JAMES E. SWANN, et al,
Plaintiffs, AMENDMENT, CORRECTION OR
CLARIFICATION OF ORDER OF
FEBRUARY 5, 1970.
ys
CHARLOTTE~MECKLENBURG BOARD OF
EDUCATION, et al,
Q
e
”
a
?
N
d
”
S
i
”
a
i
”
N
u
”
N
u
S
N
”
Defendants.
Paragraph 7 of the February 5, 1970, order read in part as
follows:
"7. That transportation be offered on a uniform
non-racial "basis to all children whose attendance in
any school is necessary to bring about the reduction
of segregation, and who live farther from the school
to which they are assigned than the Board determines
to be walking distance. Estimates of the number of
children who may have to be transported have run as
high as 10,000 or more.”
Since February 5, estimates have been made by defendants
that paragraph 7 would require transporting more than 23,000
pupils rather than 10,000 to 14,000, as estimated at the hearing.
Upon reviewing the evidence introduced since that hearing, it
appears that these higher estimates may be based on construing
3 the above language of paragraph 7 sO as to require an offer of
transportation to all children who live more than 1-1/2 miles
| from their school, including city children who are not now
: entitled to transportation. These, according to the testimony,
may number as many as 13,000.
! The court regrets any lack of clarity in the order which
: may have given rise to this interpretation. Paragraph 7 was
1 never intended to require transportation bovond that now plro-
A
R
S
A
R
E
Sb
e
T
B
e
A
Rs
S
p
hg
ik
e
3
RE eS ME Lr, A TE NR NOP Ii A APART YR PSR ANTC I RMR RR OTR TA oe SE RN TA SS TE EINER TT RE I RE AY YE
&
y
w
i
s
”
pe
vided by law for city children who are not reassigned, nor for
those whose reassignments are not required by the desegregation
program.
Accordingly, paragraph 7 of the February 5, 1970 order is
amended by deleiing the words "attendance in any school" and
inserting the words "reassignment to any school,” in the first
sentence.
This the 3rd_day of March,
4 27 yy
/ 770) / 4 44
Kad 7L <A =, JU 7 és rliA lL, Yipee
/ James B. McMillan
United States District Judge
NE fr CE hy Sa de Ss ord
nn je to a
rp PT A Ree A roel ¥ [||38b0499b-7ded-4636-ac42-d3db4e6b2b8c||]