Index to Hardback 13

Public Court Documents
January 12, 1990 - February 2, 1990

Index to Hardback 13 preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Index to Hardback 13, 1990. 38df77ca-267c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/493fb8ca-7172-438d-a2a3-a5d391f1820b/index-to-hardback-13. Accessed December 23, 2025.

    Copied!

    ¢ °F ® 

  

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#13   

Page 1 

Date No. 
  

  

1/22 Fed Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr Keyes w/Judge 
Wood’s Response to Pltfs’ Motion to 
Dismiss 1 

1/12 Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus 
Curiae (FRAP 29) on the Issue of 
Emergency Stay 2 

1/12 Ltr. to Rios fr G.K.McDonald stating 
you will be aasuming responsibility 
for filing the appellees’ brief 3 

1/12 FAX fr J.Hill to J.Chambers w/Emergency 
Motion to Amend Court’s 1/11/90 Order 
Granting Stay 4 

1/12 Ltr. to Mr. Vagner fr Seagal Wheatley 
w/amended Notice of Appeal of Bexar 
County, Texas State District Judges 5 

1/12 Certified Ltr. to Ganucheau w Form for 
Appearance of Counsel executed by Messrs. 
Mow and Godbey 6 

1/322 Order of Judges Gee, Davis and Jones 
motion of pltf-appellees and Dallas- 
pltf-intervenor-appelles to enjoin 
forthcoming judicial elections in Texas 7 

1/12 Ltr. to Clements fr Deputy Clerk Thompson 
that the appeal of the party has been 
docketed re: Judge Sharolyn Wood and 
docketing fee and filing fee must be 
paid to the Court Clerk w/Application 
for Leave to Appeal from an Interlocutory 
Order 8 

1/12 Ltr. to all counsel of record w/corrected 
orders - "Appeals from the United States 
District Court for the Western District 
of Texas instead Northern 9 

1/12 On Application for Leave to Appeal from 
an Interlocutory Order 10 

1/12 Ltr. to Clerk Fed. Ex. fr R.Hicks w/Motion 
for Refund of Appellate Filing Fee 11 

1/15 Ltr. to C.W. Vagner fr D.R. Philbin, Jr. 
w/ Designation of Record on Appeal (2) 12 

 



  

  

  

1/16 

1/16 

1/17 

1/18 

1/ 

1/18 

1/18 

1/19 

1/19 

1/22 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#13 
  

Notice of Appeal of Bexar County, Texas 
State District Judges 

Certified Mail to Clerk Ganucheau fr 
Godbey w/Dallas County District Judge 
F. harold Entz Motion for Establishment 
of Expedited Briefing Schedule 

Ltr Fed. EX. to Clerk Neil fr E.Keyes 
w/ copy of Transcript Order 

Emergency Motion to Amend Court’s 1/11/90 
Order Granting Stay 

Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus 
Curiae (FRAP 29) on the Issue of 
Emergency Stay; Brief of Amicus Curiae 
District Judges of Jefferson County, 
Texas on the Question of Emergency Stay 
(Conditionally filed, FRAP 29) 

Ltr. to R.Hicks fr Boudoin consolidated 
the above referenced appeal for briefing 

Brief of Amicus Curiae (27 incumbent 
Harris County Judges) on the Question 
of Emergency Stay (Conditionally filed, 
FRAP 29) 

Ltr. to Mattox and Hicks fr Deputy 
Clerk re docketing of case in 
Ct. of Appeals and fees 

Ltr. to Hicks fr Boudoin consolidation 
of the appeal for briefing and calendar 
purposes 

Ltr. to Counsel for Appellees fr Deputy 
Clerk motion for ruling on 1/26/90 
on Expedited Briefing Schedule 

Ltr. to Wheatley fr Deputy Clerk re 
Appealing Tom Rickhoff 

Fed. Ex. Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr 
A.Taylor w/ form of appearance of 
counsel 

Page 2 

No. 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

 



LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#13 
  

Fed. Ex. to Clerk Ganucheau fr R Hicks 
w/Motion to Certify State Law Question 
or, Alternatively, to Disqualify 
Counsel 

Ltr. to Ganacheau fr Finkelstein w/Pltf- 
Appellees’ Response to Entz’ Motion to 
Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule 

Ex Delivery to Ganacheau w/Dallas County 
Pltf/Intervenor’s Opposition to Deft/ 
Intervenor Dallas County Judge Entz’ 
Motion for Establishment of Expedited 
Briefing Schedule fr Kathy Patrick for 
Edward Cloutman 

Fed Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau att: Boudin 
fr A. Taylor w/ Sec of State G. Bayoud’s 
Response to motion to certify State Law 
Question or, Alternatively, to Disqualify 
Counsel 

Response in Opposition of Houston Lawyers 
Association, et al. to Motions of Appellants 
(Entz and Bayoud) for Establishment of 
Expedited Briefing Scheduling 

Ltr. Fed Ex. to Ganucheau fr R. Hicks w/ 
Response to Appellant Entz’ Motion for 
Establishment of Expedited Briefing 
Schedule 

To Counsel for Appellee Bayoud fr Deputy 
Clerk Mot. of appellant Atty Gen to 
Certify State law question, or alternative- 
ly to disqualify counsel 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr E.V.Keyes w/Harris 
County District Judge Sharolyn Wood’s 
Motion for Establishment of Expedited 
Briefing Schedule 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr Garrett w/Pltfs- 
Appellees Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc 

Fed. Ex. to Ganucheau fr R.Hicks w/Reply 
to Response to Motion to Certify 

Index of U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Cir.  



% » 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#13 

  

  

Page 4 

Date No.   

  

1/29 Fed Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr G.McDonald 
w/ Response in Opposition of Houston 
Lawyers’ Association, et al. to Motion 
of Appellant-Defendant-Intervenor Wood 
for Establishment of Expedited Briefing 
Scheduling 36 

1/29 Ltr. to Ganacheau fr S.Finkelstein w/ 
Pltf-Appellees’ Response to Bayoud and 
Wood’s Motion to Establish Expedited 
Briefing Schedule 37 

*1/30 Ltr. to R. Hicks fr E.C. Boudoin case 
manager of Clerk Ganucheau receipt 
acknowleding Attorney Gen. of Tex Mo. 
to certify state law question, or alter- 
natively to disqualify counsel; receipt 
is acknowledged of appellant George 
Bayoud'’s response to motion to certify 
state law question. 

1/31 Ltr. Clerk of Court of Appeals fr W.L. 
Irvin w/Motion for Leave to File a Brief 
Amicus Curiae 38 

2/2 Appearance of Counsel form lead counsel 
Rnea Hicks 39

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.