Plaintiff-Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Defendant-Intervenor Judge Wood
Public Court Documents
May 3, 1989
13 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiff-Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Defendant-Intervenor Judge Wood, 1989. 6f061c05-217c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4961f8e1-2b34-47c8-bd97-9a26bed91c57/plaintiff-intervenors-first-set-of-interrogatories-and-requests-for-production-to-defendant-intervenor-judge-wood. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
® National Office »
A A Suite 1600 °
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE 99 Hudson Street
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. New York, N.Y. 10013 (212) 219-1900 Fax: (212) 226-7592
May 3, 1989
J. Eugene Clements
Porter & Clements
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
Re: Lulac et al., v. Mattox, et al.
Dear Mr. Clements:
Enclosed please find Plaintiff-Intervenor Houston Lawyers’
Association First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Produc- tion of Documents to Defendant-Intervenor Wood.
I look forward to your timely response.
’
lyn A. Ifill
Counsel for Plaintiff-
incerely
Intervenors
SAI/dm
encls.
Regional Offices
! i i Suite 301 Suite 800 Contributions are The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is not part ;
deductible for U.S. of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 1275 K Lig 4 8 ping op a
income tax purposes. (NAACP) although LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares its Washington, 2 3 ris gsi
commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 30 years a separate (202) 682-1300 (213)
Board, program, staff, office and budget. 3 Fax: (202) 682-1312 Fax: (213) 624-0075
Rr
»
rn Wn SOIL LCL TNR ail OS WE LN, I Lt
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS,
(LULAC) ,
PLAINTIFF,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice Bonner,
Weldon Berry, Francis Williams, Rev. William
Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker, Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors
Ve ; No. MO-88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
DEFENDANTS.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD |
Pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, plaintiffs request that defendants answer fully in
writing and under oath each of the following interrogatores
within 30 days after service. These interrogatories shall be
deemed continuing to the extent required by Fed. r. Civ. 26 (e).
In answering each interrogatory, defendants are requested to
identify separately and in a manner suitable for use in a
subpoena all sources of information (whether human, documentary,
or other) and all records maintained by the defendants or by any
other person or organization on which the defendants relied in
answering the interrogatories.
For each request to produce, plaintiffs request that
defendants produce all requested documents at the law office of
Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas,
78701, within 15 days after service or at such time and place as
is mutually agreed upon by counsel for the parties.
Definitions
1. ”Identify” when referring to a fact or document, means state
the name and date of the fact or document, the type of document,
the identity of the author of the document, and the location of
the document or a copy of the document.
2. ”"Identify,” when referring to a person, means state the name,
race, home and business address and position with any defendant
or relation to any defendant, if any.
3. “Document” means the original or identical copy of ‘any
document (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts,
photographs, phonorecords, audio recordings, and other data
compilations from which information can be obtained, translated,
if necessary, by the Respondents through detection services into
reasonably usuable form) and any tangible things which constitute
or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26 (b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. "Relating to” a subject means containing, embodying,
referring to, comprising, reflecting, explaining, or having a
logical, factual or causal connection with the subject.
Ea
-
=
a
Paes
A SR Ta AN A va SN a oN aR I aS NR IOS Sl Nr Ar Sl AR, [Ra dnl LB Te ve T _ S Kw —— J - -
-
5. ”The Voting Rights Act” means the Voting Rights Act of 1965,
as amended, 42. U.S. C. §1973, et seq.
Interrogatories and Requests to Produce
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please identify by year, type of elective
office and term served, each and every elective office held by
defendant-intervenor Wood.
INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Please identify by year, type of election,
and type of office, each and every election in which defendant-
intervenor Wood has run for elective office in Harris County,
Texas, indicating whether or not she won that election.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Please identify each and every opposing
candidate for the elections indicated in answer to Interrogatory
No. 2 by ethnic race.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Please provide for inspection and
copying all documents related to elections in which Judge Wood
ran for elective office in Harris County, including, but not
limited to, campaign contribution reports, campaign expenditure
reports, election returns, campaign literature, written or
reported endorsements by public officials, civic groups, bar
associations, etc.
INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Please identify your political party
affiliation.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Please identify any professional
organizations, civic associations, or other political, social or
cultural organizations of which you are a member, or in which you
are an active participant.
INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Identify each expert which you have
consulted in preparation for the trial of this matter. For each,
give the subject matter on which the expert was consulted.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2: Please produce for inspection and
copying all documents you have directly or indirectly provided to
or rYeparsd for, each expert listed in response to Interrogatory
No. 6, and any documents prepared by each expert for the use of
defendant-intervencr Wood's participation in this case or which
relates to the claims or defenses of defendant-intervenor Wood.
INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Describe the "nonprotected Class," not
covered by Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, to
which defendant-intervenor Wood claims to belong.
INTERROGATORY NO. 8: Describe the current district in which
defendant-intervenor Wood currently serves as district judge,
including the number of the district, the approximate number of
cases on the docket each year in that district, the number of
district judges currently serving in that district, and the date
and year when each current judicial seat in that district was
created.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3: Please provide any and all
documents which support your answer to Interrogatory No. 8.
Of Counsel:
Matthews & Branscomb
A Professional Corpoation
May 4, 1989
Regpectfully submitted,
Hutt
J 4
vowed CHAMBERS
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
301 Congress Avenue
Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 320-5055
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association,
et al.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this a % of May, 1989, a Gite
and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff-intervenors Houston
Lawyers’ Association’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests
For Production to Defendant-intervenor Judge Sharolyn Wood was
mailed to counsel of record in this case by first class United
States mail, postage pre-paid, as follows:
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration
Education Project
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Edward B. Cloutman, III
Mullinax, Wells, Baab &
Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General’s Office
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
J. Eugene Clements
John E. O’Neill
Evelyn V. Keys
Porter & Clements
700 Louisiana, Suite .3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P.O. Box 1748
Austin, TX 78767
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
500 W. 7th St.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce.
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
Sherri)yn AX. Ifill]
Attor for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
CD ED GE SD GE Gh SD GND GED GD GED GED ED GED GED GE GED GED GE GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED GED CED GED GED GHD GED GED GHD CED CED CHD WED CED =
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS,
(LULAC) ,
PLAINTIFF,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice Bonner,
Weldon Berry, Francis Williams, Rev. William
Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker, Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors
Ve. No. MO-88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
DEFENDANTS.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION,TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD
Pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, plaintiffs request that defendants answer fully in
writing and under oath each of the following interrogatores
within 30 days after service. These interrogatories shall be
deemed continuing to the extent required by Fed. r. Civ. 26 (e).
In answering each interrogatory, defendants are requested to
identify separately and in a manner sultable for use in a
subpoena all sources of information (whether human, documentary,
or other) and all records maintained by the defendants or by any
other person or organization on which the defendants relied in
answering the interrogatories.
. —— > i < ¥ ip CRE ve ok FAG a, or nd & RES d thw a ne WT Den A Lo JAI DEAE Dk BIASING XD FE aA Sa CSA SE Sr Sa WARN ey ve Saden SE TERA NE SL Aa RBA TOD A Roti vi SH Fi AB SETA AY Al
For each request to produce, plaintiffs request that
defendants produce all requested documents at the law office of
Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas,
78701, within 15 days after service or at such time and place as
is mutually agreed upon by counsel for the parties.
Definitions
l. “Identify” when referring to a fact or document, means state
the name and date of the fact or document, the type of document,
the identity of the author of the document, and the location of
the document or a copy of the document.
2. “Identify,” when referring to a person, means state the name,
race, home and business address and position with any defendant
or relation to any defendant, if any.
3. Document” means the original or identical copy of any
document (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts,
photographs, phonorecords, audio recordings, and other data
compilations from which information can be obtained, translated,
if necessary, by the Respondents through detection services into
reasonably usuable form) and any tangible things which constitute
or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26 (b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. “Relating to” a subject means containing, embodying,
referring to, comprising, reflecting, explaining, or having a
logical, factual or causal connection with the subject.
er rr
FOF SER IRN A LAA EE EL ZS Ta FIER TA
5. "The Voting Rights Act” means the Voting Rights Act of 1965,
as amended, 42. U.S. C. §1973, et seq.
Interrogatories and Requests to Produce
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please identify by year, type of elective
office and term served, each and every elective office held by
defendant-intervenor Wood.
INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Please identify by year, type of election,
and type of office, each and every election in which defendant-
intervenor Wood has run for elective office in Harris County,
Texas, indicating whether or not she won that election.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Please identify each and every opposing
candidate for the elections indicated in answer to Interrogatory
No. 2 by ethnic race.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Please provide for inspection and
copying all documents related to elections in which Judge Wood
ran for elective office in Harris County, including, but not
limited to, campaign contribution reports, campaign expenditure
reports, election returns, campaign literature, written or
reported endorsements by public officials, civic groups, bar
associations, etc.
INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Please identify your political party
affiliation.
INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Please identify any professional
organizations, civic associations, or other political, social or
cultural organizations of which you are a member, or in which you
are an active participant.
INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Identify each expert which you have
consulted in preparation for the trial of this matter. For each,
give the subject matter on which the expert was consulted.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2: Please produce for inspection and
copying all documents you have directly or indirectly provided to
or prepared for, each expert listed in response to Interrogatory
No. 6, and any documents prepared by each expert for the use of
defendant-intervenor Wood’s participation in this case or which
relates to the claims or defenses of defendant-intervenor Wood.
INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Describe the "nonprotected class," not
covered by Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, to
which defendant-intervenor Wood claims to belong.
INTERROGATORY NO. 8: Describe the current district in which
defendant-intervenor Wood currently serves as district judge,
including the number of the district, the approximate number of
4
cases on the docket each year ‘in that district, the number of
district judges currently serving in that district, and the date
and year when each current judicial seat in that district was
created.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3: Please provide any and all
documents which support your answer to Interrogatory No. 8.
Reggpectfully submitted,
. 7 :
pss. CHAMBERS
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
Of Counsel: GABRIELLE K. MCDONALD
Matthews & Branscomb 301 Congress Avenue
A Professional Corpoation Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 320-5055
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association,
et al.
May 4, 1989
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
: rd
I hereby certify that on this 3 day of May, 1989, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff-intervenors Houston
Lawyers’ Association’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests
For Production to Defendant-intervenor Judge Sharolyn Wood was
mailed to counsel of record in this case by first class United
States mail, postage pre-paid, as follows:
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
Garrett, Thompson & Chang
8300 Douglas, Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
Rolando L. Rios
Southwest Voter Registration
Education Project
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Susan Finkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
201 N. St. Mary’s, Suite 521
San Antonio, TX 78205
Edward B. Cloutman, III
Mullinax, Wells, Baab &
Cloutman, P.C.
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General’s Office
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
J. Eugene Clements
John E. O0’Neill
Evelyn V. Keys
Porter & Clements
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P.O. Box 1748
Austin, TX 78767
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
600 W. 7th St.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
Hughes & Luce
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
Sherril}yn X. Ifill)
Attor for Plaintiff-Intervenors
Houston Lawyers’ Association