Response to Request for Admissions
Public Court Documents
February 26, 1986
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Response to Request for Admissions, 1986. 12eea624-b9d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/49704b1c-37f8-4c33-8450-82cdb7e9975e/response-to-request-for-admissions. Accessed November 30, 2025.
Copied!
Von XO V
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DILLARD, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N VS.
CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
Defendant, Escambia County and the individual defendants residing
therein respond to plaintiffs' request for admissions as follows:
These defendants object to the questions submitted as to the
record of the State of Alabama in that such record does not have
any relevance or bearing on the ‘actions taken by Escambia County
voters or Escambia County Commission nor does it have any relevance on
the issues of this case. The State of Alabama is not a party: to this
action, nor are any counties other than the seven named in.2 the
amendment. Escambia county is a political subdivision of the State of
Alabama, however, it does not carry the sovereignty nor immunity of
the State of" Alabama. It is a public body corporate possessing only
those powers and duties granted to it by the Legislature of Alabama or
necessarily implied from those statutes passed by the Legislature. It
has no authority of law to bind the State of Alabama by ““1ts actions
nor does a judgment against Escambia County constitute a judgment
against the State of Alabama.
In the case of documents mentioned. in ‘the interrogatories,
defendants further object on the grounds that the documents would
speak for themselves and that the very most that said defendants could
possibly do would be to admit that the documents referred to stated
what the documents purported to state but without specific knowledge
defendants could not admit or deny the subject matter to which the
documents referred. Code Sections and opinions by Courts are subject
to interpretation and such documents would speak for themselves.
Newspaper articles might state a particular thing which may or may not
be true.
For these and other reasons defendants object to admission
requests numbered 1 through and including number 11, number 13 through
and including number 78, number 82 through and including number 93.
12. Admitted.
79. Admitted.
80. We admit that the democratic party uses a run off primary
for County Commission, however, the republican party has not used a
primary in Escambia County to the best of our knowedge and belief.
81. Denied.
Oh, "In years past such may have been a tenuous state
policy, however, on information and belief all counties operated under
local acts passed separately and usually by local courtesy in the
state legislature. According to our information and belief,
approximately one-half of the counties operated on the district
system.
95. We possess insufficient information to either admit or deny.
96. Answer to number 94 is hereby adopted. Escambia County
operated under the district system during the period in question until
1963.
97. We possess insufficient information to either admit or deny,
the statement as to Escambia, however, is denied.
08, Denied.
99, Denied.
100. Denied.
101. Denied.
Aol LL il SS A 4
LAA (AA TTS
JAMES W. WEBB !
Attorney for Escambia County
OF COUNSEL:
WEBB, CRUMPTON, McGREGOR, SCHMAELING & WILSON
166 Commerce Street, P.O. Box 238
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
(205) 834-3176
OTTS & MOORE
P.O. Box 467
Brewton, Alabama 36427
(205) 867-7724
CERTIFICATE O VIC
I hereby certify that. copies of. the foregoing response
to interrogatories by defendant, Timothy A. Hawsey have been mailed to
Larry T. Menefee, Esquire, James U, Blacksher, Esquire and Wanda ‘J.
Cochran, Esquire, Blacksher, Menefee & Stein, 405 Van Antwerp
Building, P.O. Boxé 1057, “Mobile,. Alabama 36633, Terry :G. Davis,
Esquire, Seay + &. Davis, . 732 «Carter Hill" Road, P.O. "Box 6125,
Montgomery, Alabama 36106, Deborah Fins, Esquire. and Julius LL.
Chambers, Esquire, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 99 Hudson Street, 16th
Floor, New York, New York, 10013, Jack Floyd, Esquire, Floyd, Kenner &
Cusimano, 816 Chestnut Street, Gadsden, Alabama 35999, Alton Turner,
Esquire, Turner & Jones, P.O. Box 207, Luverne, Alabama 36049, D.L.
Martin, Esquire, 215 S. Main Street, Moulton, Alabama 35650, David R.
Boyd, Esquire, Balch & Bingham, P.O. Box 78, Montgomery, Alabama
36101, W.0." Kirk, =Jr., Esquire, .-Corry & Kirk, “Phoenix "Avenue
Carrollton, Alabama 35447, Barry D. Vaughn, Esquire, Proctor & Vaughn,
121 N. Norton Avenue, Sylacauga, Alabama 35150, H.R. Burnham, Esquire,
Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, 401 SouthTrust Bank
Building, ‘P.O. Box 1618, = Anniston, "Alabama 36202, Varren Rowe;
Esquire, Rowe, Rowe & Sawyer, P.O. Box 150, Enterprise, Alabama 36331,
Edward Still, Esquire, T14 South 29th Street, Birmingham, Alabama
35233-2810, Reo Kirkland, Jr., Esquire, P.O. Box 646, Brewton, Alabama
36427, and all defendants not represented by counsel by placing copies
of the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid this the 2EIVA
day of February, 1986.
fly 8 1
o 74 y
7
/ J 4 /
a /. LAS yds
Jal W.- Webb vf