Response to Request for Admissions
Public Court Documents
February 26, 1986

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Response to Request for Admissions, 1986. 12eea624-b9d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/49704b1c-37f8-4c33-8450-82cdb7e9975e/response-to-request-for-admissions. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
Von XO V IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOHN DILLARD, ET AL., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N VS. CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA, ET AL., Defendants. RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Defendant, Escambia County and the individual defendants residing therein respond to plaintiffs' request for admissions as follows: These defendants object to the questions submitted as to the record of the State of Alabama in that such record does not have any relevance or bearing on the ‘actions taken by Escambia County voters or Escambia County Commission nor does it have any relevance on the issues of this case. The State of Alabama is not a party: to this action, nor are any counties other than the seven named in.2 the amendment. Escambia county is a political subdivision of the State of Alabama, however, it does not carry the sovereignty nor immunity of the State of" Alabama. It is a public body corporate possessing only those powers and duties granted to it by the Legislature of Alabama or necessarily implied from those statutes passed by the Legislature. It has no authority of law to bind the State of Alabama by ““1ts actions nor does a judgment against Escambia County constitute a judgment against the State of Alabama. In the case of documents mentioned. in ‘the interrogatories, defendants further object on the grounds that the documents would speak for themselves and that the very most that said defendants could possibly do would be to admit that the documents referred to stated what the documents purported to state but without specific knowledge defendants could not admit or deny the subject matter to which the documents referred. Code Sections and opinions by Courts are subject to interpretation and such documents would speak for themselves. Newspaper articles might state a particular thing which may or may not be true. For these and other reasons defendants object to admission requests numbered 1 through and including number 11, number 13 through and including number 78, number 82 through and including number 93. 12. Admitted. 79. Admitted. 80. We admit that the democratic party uses a run off primary for County Commission, however, the republican party has not used a primary in Escambia County to the best of our knowedge and belief. 81. Denied. Oh, "In years past such may have been a tenuous state policy, however, on information and belief all counties operated under local acts passed separately and usually by local courtesy in the state legislature. According to our information and belief, approximately one-half of the counties operated on the district system. 95. We possess insufficient information to either admit or deny. 96. Answer to number 94 is hereby adopted. Escambia County operated under the district system during the period in question until 1963. 97. We possess insufficient information to either admit or deny, the statement as to Escambia, however, is denied. 08, Denied. 99, Denied. 100. Denied. 101. Denied. Aol LL il SS A 4 LAA (AA TTS JAMES W. WEBB ! Attorney for Escambia County OF COUNSEL: WEBB, CRUMPTON, McGREGOR, SCHMAELING & WILSON 166 Commerce Street, P.O. Box 238 Montgomery, Alabama 36101 (205) 834-3176 OTTS & MOORE P.O. Box 467 Brewton, Alabama 36427 (205) 867-7724 CERTIFICATE O VIC I hereby certify that. copies of. the foregoing response to interrogatories by defendant, Timothy A. Hawsey have been mailed to Larry T. Menefee, Esquire, James U, Blacksher, Esquire and Wanda ‘J. Cochran, Esquire, Blacksher, Menefee & Stein, 405 Van Antwerp Building, P.O. Boxé 1057, “Mobile,. Alabama 36633, Terry :G. Davis, Esquire, Seay + &. Davis, . 732 «Carter Hill" Road, P.O. "Box 6125, Montgomery, Alabama 36106, Deborah Fins, Esquire. and Julius LL. Chambers, Esquire, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor, New York, New York, 10013, Jack Floyd, Esquire, Floyd, Kenner & Cusimano, 816 Chestnut Street, Gadsden, Alabama 35999, Alton Turner, Esquire, Turner & Jones, P.O. Box 207, Luverne, Alabama 36049, D.L. Martin, Esquire, 215 S. Main Street, Moulton, Alabama 35650, David R. Boyd, Esquire, Balch & Bingham, P.O. Box 78, Montgomery, Alabama 36101, W.0." Kirk, =Jr., Esquire, .-Corry & Kirk, “Phoenix "Avenue Carrollton, Alabama 35447, Barry D. Vaughn, Esquire, Proctor & Vaughn, 121 N. Norton Avenue, Sylacauga, Alabama 35150, H.R. Burnham, Esquire, Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, 401 SouthTrust Bank Building, ‘P.O. Box 1618, = Anniston, "Alabama 36202, Varren Rowe; Esquire, Rowe, Rowe & Sawyer, P.O. Box 150, Enterprise, Alabama 36331, Edward Still, Esquire, T14 South 29th Street, Birmingham, Alabama 35233-2810, Reo Kirkland, Jr., Esquire, P.O. Box 646, Brewton, Alabama 36427, and all defendants not represented by counsel by placing copies of the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid this the 2EIVA day of February, 1986. fly 8 1 o 74 y 7 / J 4 / a /. LAS yds Jal W.- Webb vf