Supreme Court Motion to Supplement Record

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorney
- Norman J. Chachkin
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4873745d-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Supreme Court Motion to Supplement Record, 1974. 4873745d-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/499d472e-2697-41d8-b9e6-b6613c90cd68/supreme-court-motion-to-supplement-record. Accessed April 22, 2025.

Copied!

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 
OCTOBER TERM 1973 

NO. 73-434 
NO. 73-435 
NO. 73-436

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al.,
Petitioners,

—vs—
RONALD G. BRADLEY, et al.,

Respondents.
/

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD

Respondent Board of Education for the School District 
of the City of Detroit hereby respectfully moves this Court 
for inclusion in the record of the attached Report entitled 
"Public Schools of City of Detroit - Summary for Schools for 
Ethnic Racial Count" dated November 9, 1973. This Report con
tains the most recent information submitted by the Detroit 
School District to the State of Michigan on Form RA 4203, 
the Michigan State Aid Report. This Report is submitted to 
the State of Michigan pursuant to M.C.L.A. §388.1113.

IL
*

l The information contained in this Report will assist 
this Cou ;t in determining the current racial composition of the

s.
Detroit School District. The Grand Totals on Page 6 of this
ReDort indicate the following current percentages for.black

\



#

and white students in the Detroit School District:

185,359 black students _
265,578 total students 69.8% black
74,965 white students 

265,578 total students 28.2% white

WHEREFORE, Respondent Board of Education for the 
School District of the City of Detroit prays that this Court 
order that the record be supplemented with the above-described
Report and percentages.

Respectfully submitted,

BY: __
ge(5rgeT UMELL v, JR'

Counsel for Respondent Board of) 
Education for the School District of 
the City of Detroit 
720 Ford Building 
Detroit, Michigan 48226 
Telephone: (313) 962-8255

Dated: February 25, 1974.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Supreme Court Motion to Supplement Record

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorney

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in