Motion for Summary Judgment with Certification
Public Court Documents
July 8, 1991
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Summary Judgment with Certification, 1991. e6b59d84-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4a71e89f-46e9-49a7-b5eb-5a46e300ba73/motion-for-summary-judgment-with-certification. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
CV 89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al SUPERIOR COURT
J.D. HARTFORD/
Plaintiffs NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD
Vv.
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al
Defendants July 8, 1981
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to P.B. § 378 et. seq. the defendants move for
summary judgment in the above captioned case. The defendants
maintain that there is no dispute as to the material facts upon
which this motion is predicated and that judgment should be
entered as a matter of law in favor of the defendants and against
the plaintiffs because the state has not engaged in conduct which
violates the state constitution and because there is no judicial
remedy available to the plaintiffs. More specifically:
1. The plaintiffs rights under the constitution have not
been violated in that the conditions about which the plaintiffs
complain are not the products of state action.
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED (P.B. § 380);
NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED
2. The plaintiffs rights under the constitution have not been
violated in that the state has satisfied any affirmative
obligation which arises out of the constitution.
3. The question of how best to address the conditions about
which the plaintiffs complain is not justiciable.
WHEREFORE, the defendants seeks judgment in their favor and
against the plaintiffs.
FOR THE DEFENDANTS
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bernard F. MCGovern,
Assisgtan ya BY 2% a
By: \ 7
7
Joh" R. Whelan
Assistant Attorney General
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
Te ephone: 566-3606
[1% 7 Gud i) / li { Hs rs A
yeast W. Whitney
Assistant Attorney Genera
110 Sherman Street Sot
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
Telephone: 566-7173
ORDER
The foregoing motion for summary judgment is hereby:
GRANTED/DENIED
BY THE COURT
| ASSISTANT CLERK | CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed,
postage prepaid on aiyf, 1991 to the following counsel or
record:
John Brittain
University of Connecticut
School of Law
© 65 Elizabeth Street
| Hartford, CT 06105
11 Wilfred Rodriguez
\ Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1 1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
Philip Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
}
|
i
|
|
{
|
|
Wesley W. Horton
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C.
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Jenny Rivera, Esq.
Ruben Franco, Esq.
. Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
14th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Julius L. Chambers
Marianne Lado, Esq.
Ronald Ellis, Esq.
| NAACP Legal Defense Fund and
|! Educational Fund, Inc.
! 99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
i; John A. Powell
|! Helen Hershkoff
| American Civil Liberties Union
1 132 West 43rd Street
! New York, NY 10036 ZY
b ~S ; £4
£7
// £0
Pn 7 rd
~ Vd v ov ot
/ J¢hn R. Whelan
i ; Assistant Attorney General
/