Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile
Public Court Documents
July 9, 1976
14 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile, 1976. c3205a9f-cdcd-ef11-b8e8-7c1e520b5bae. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4b52fd85-0022-454a-bbed-c69ae511471a/letter-from-blacksher-to-judge-pittman-with-enclosed-plans-for-creation-of-single-member-districts-in-mobile. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES 8...
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
he
1407 DAVIS AVENUE
MOBILE, ALABAMA 3656603
VERNON Z. CRAWFORD TELEPHONE 432-1631
JAMES U. BLACKSHER AREA CODE {205}
MICHAEL A. FIGURES
W. CLINTON BROWN, JR.
GREGORY B.STEIN
LARRY T. MENEFEE
July 9, 1976
Honorable Virgil Pittman
United States District Court
United States District Court
213 Federal Building
Mobile, Alabama 36602
Re: Bolden, et al. v. City of Mobile, et al.
Civil Action No. 75-298-P
Dear Judge Pittman:
Pursuant to this Court's pretrial order plaintiffs herewith
submit plans for the creation of single-member districts in
the City of Mobile. Should Your Honor find that the present
at-large system is unconstitutional it is our understanding
that further hearings would likely be held to examine the
appropriate remedy more closely. The plans are submitted to
show that there are practical remedies.
Plaintiffs submit plans for three,nine and fourteen-member
districts. These districts are constructed along census lines
and 1970 census data. They might need some refinement to
conform to ward boundaries and population changes. However
the feasibility of single member districts as a remedy is shown.
Indeed the work done by the computer center at the University
of South Alabama demonstrates the essential point: housing
patterns are so tightly segregated it is impossible to construct
contiguous districts of nearly equal population without having
some districts where blacks would have the opportunity to elect
representatives of their choice.
Very respectfully,
CRAWEOAD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES & BROWN
(2/2 4®
U. Blacksher
v
JUB :bm
Enclosures cc: All Counsel/w-enclosures
7.01
7.02
8
39.01
39.02
43
TOTALS
9.02
9.03
13.01
13.02
14
15.01
15.02
24
TOTALS
TOTALS
PLAN FOR 9
Optimum size 21,114
DISTRICT ONE
DISTRICTS
% of
% optimum
Black district
Total Black
population population
2119 2117
533% 5268
4941 4818
block group 3 951 897
3653 3632
1683 © 780
224 31
1844 1839
2 0
72 8
blocks 114, 201 66 66
234 223
10 10
74 0
155 153
21367 19842
DISTRICT TWO
block groups 1 & 2 3014 2938
4572 4399
7815 7185
4180 4177
1256 1253
blocks 313, 401 131 13:
20968 20083
DISTRICT THREE
2527 29
1717 31
1298 806
377° 727
4209 3261
2232 1584
1850 934
block groups 1-5 3724 174
21336 7546
DISTRICT FOUR
297 109
2851 1985
3130 3114
3532 3525
20676 114
1794 205
3845 1401
3487 3332
21612 12785
92.86 101.20
95.78..99,31
35.37 101.05
63.78 102.36
% : hn » De?
PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS
Optimum size 21,114
DISTRICT FIVE
% of
Total Black % optimum
Tract population population Black district
24 block group 6 584 0
25.01 4545 4
25.02 3432 19
26 4273 1205
27 3428 1083
33.02 3643 158
34.01 1317 3
34.02 ED 52B, 58D 71 0
61 ED 3353 0 0
TOTALS 21293 2472 11.61 100.85
DISTRICT SIX
16 : 405 5
17 : 3109 273
18 2562 438 :
+=19.01 2307 217
39.02 2823 16
20: 1689 101
22 block groups 2-4 2212 ©
23.01 3071 50
23.02 2444 458
TOTALS 20622 1464 7.10 97.67
DISTRICT SEVEN
32.03 2743 0
less blocks 101, 209-211 (652) (0)
34.03 3120 16
34.04 2137 3
34.05 2503 0
34.06 2496 0
35 6593 13
61 ED 37B, 59C 0 0
ED 59B (southern portion) 0 0
34.02 2013 9
less ED 58B, 58D (71) (0)
TOTALS 20882 39 0.19 98.90
DISTRICT EIGHT
30 2567 31
less blocks 101, 105
129, 130 (632) (0)
31 4901 132
less Dilock group: 1 (960) (0)
less liocks 314-318 (220) (0)
32.02 3473 57
less blocks 120, 111, 113 (452) (0)
36.01 2029 27
36.02 3143 1540
356.03 1335 O
4 Fe ® Dv. 3
—
PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS
Optimum size 21,114
DISTRICT EIGHT (cont'd)
% of
Total Black % optimum
Tract population population Black district
37.01 2078 164
37.02 3122 169
68 0 0
TOTALS 20820 2120 10.18 98,61
DISTRICT NINE
21 4575 i;
22 block group 1 826 0
28 5491 0
29 3648 0
30 blocks 101, 105, 129,
130 632 0 :
31 block group 1 960 0
blocks 314-318 290 0
32.01 2185 . 4 :
32.02 “blocks 111, 113, 120 452 0
33.01 1415 0
32.03 blocks 101, 209-211 652 0
TOTALS 21126 5 0.02 100.05
: 3 & it wo. 56
LJ
+ a BAMA J
s § 5 ¢ 40
i 38.29. J.1 7 5 9
- Soi iene Sli orden etalon Bh Lo dd tlds -» - 5
3
’ 1 4
: H worTOH Chr,
‘ ’
M LJ
: H
: :
H 1]
. [3
M LJ
: p
: 7 54
: -» ~
M k™ po
' > x
; 5 38.02
» hs k
M * L
. re Fe . ud
: AE dmg NT
5 » rd SV ; \ cick 2%
:
. 61
s
- :
*
\
: > 53 5
: = 4
» 7 CHICKASAW i
3 sgn SUTHERLAN
: PRICHARD ~ / DR
p £EX 20D AVE ;
. 0% 3 Ni
™ i
® 1
. aris € nH wv
- © & : 2 oe. 50 : >
: %, »
» Co
: a
¥ a » «
-
s - <
: BARFORK 43 48 3) 47 z
RD of » = pe A, ; 5
2» Lorn, Us, 45 oN
; Tg 3 SEK < N&~
: Lem < & Terr 2
: «0 a
34.03 a hd 5 40 3 2p thm bo ' 3 CREER > ° 46 : “~2a 3801 = \=
i Cop 2 ¢ =! TELEGRAPH RD 2 ¥ re
H ?, oc 2.
: : & i 2 : 44 AY BROCE
H \ 3 : : y AS we Ng ’ %
E 3402 Trg : : 2 . 33.01 > f 2 A CH ow INAVE |
? = © C Ue CAE er ! = 34.01 IR, Fo om, 1201 _ 4 ] 5. : . > vg d 4%
=. 3 E 702, SA rE : 1 S o la NY
3 i Elo OVERLOOK moRIEFAT RD RETTS 4% #Q - - = Fe I — : n “%, EI $e o® =i2 wh &,
2 34.04 e 34.05 eis & Jie % an
3 d E 22215 3406 & 7.01 SEH
o == Ne PN Se Hea, vo SA, AE) 6 § = 4 &’
* 26160 en > owvp 58° ¢ = A. § FD \
3 3 «, g o ae 5 7 N 3
ZF «< Es a
5 ; 401 R22%Q ° MOBILE oF J / 3 MORGA CA 2
2 2
Sh Loe OL i
36.02 z+ 3601 33.02 so Le 2 Le KX "
o TLE INFIRMARY, = o
“ <i HOS? BDRY 901 ls 3 > Se :
3 a : ST MARYS LN X A < oo 8 4 35 SreinG MILLAVE | ised. \% 2% 5)
= ap © LOUISE LLE] ? AL 2\ %
z r a KENNET Ha DAUPHIN 108 Al % S
§ ; = So] DaLPMIN - — Zz bi= T\ Cana % 3 %, {ps a {
Les 603 Y 5 HS 2 : j qo ommor J 25001 ¢
2 R & LSA 9034 1002 B.4:
fo BLVD AIRPORT SLVD — Vs a VIRGINIA
pr ——
2 B - ary E VING 1s t
ob = SE Shao 7} 3208 5 z TR a RT Shao
#4 P= 74h 13.02 ad 29 § y - ED 32.01 FE ;
gle FAimwilY ealM frei
wip - & ar VAL ARLINGT d -y i - ws
: 2 , 0 7. > A &| EfnousTom FIELD
37.01 = - S z
» ¢ £5 < 2302 s/ 1soz
: 3202 5 gr 22 © uf : 2 “og wl ry $f z «ff = ©
e - wi O S «< 3 ey
i s pGE ZN 2 a 1501
2 os EE OB $i 3 oN
2 31 EN Be
; 2 21 of 2 1 3 « 2301
< BROOXLEY
DO Tas, HILL 3
= AIR FORCE BASE
» &
Es :
¥, : 16
» ¥
3702 g 30
=
-
hi
=
- s °
. ¥
&/ 20
&
EY 4.
% J Re pont §/ 5 eran wT ¥ i <, 3) ra
L =
i
<
CAL rr,
O00 e 2000 000 FELT
| ME, CE TR. 1 rmiend)
LJ
2
> PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS
Le]
INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY
®
- le
y
PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS
Optimum size 13,573
DISTRICT ONE
© oF
Total Black % optimum
Tract population population Black Qdistrict
158 405 5
13 3109 273
18 2562 438
19.01 2307 117
19.02 2823 16
20 1689 101
15.01 block groups 2-4 570 227
blocks 501-502 3 0
TOTALS 13468 11277 8.74 99.23
DISTRICT 'TWO
30 2567 31
31 4901 132
32.02 3479 57 Fk
except blocks 101-106 (415) 240)
37.02 3122 169
68 ; 0 0
TOTALS 13654 389 2.85 100.60
DISTRICT THREE
32.02 Dblocks 101-106 415 0
32.03 2743 0
35 ; 6593 il
36.03 1835 0
37.01 2078 164
TOTALS 13664 175 1.28 100.67
DISTRICT FOUR
34.03 3120 15
34.04 2137 3
34.05 2502 0
36.01 2029 27
36.02 3143 1540
61 except ED59B (n. part) 0 0
TOTALS 12932 1586 12.26 95.28
DISTRICT FPIVE
33.02 3479 57
34.01 1317 3
34.02 2013 9
34.06 2495 0
39.01 £180 £177
ol ED 59B (n. part) 0 0
TOTALS 13485 4246 31.49 99. 35
psi @® De 2
PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS
Optimum size 13,573
DISTRICT SIX
5 OF
Total Black % optimum
Tract population population Black district
21 £575 1
22 3038 6
29 3648 0
32.01 2185 4
TOTALS 13446 + 3 0.08 99.06
DISTRICT SEVEN
25.02 3432 19
27 3428 1083
28 5491 0
33.01 1415 0
TOTALS 13766 1102 8.0% 101.42
DISTRICT EIGHT
4.02 2119 2317
5 533° 5268
12.01 3653 3632
33.01 1844 1839
35.02 2 0
38.99 72 8
44 234 223
45 10 0
53 74 0
56 155 i153
43 blocks 114, 201 66 66
TOTALS 13568 13316 8.14 99.96
DISTRICT NINE
7.061 3965 3835
except blocks 305-308 (674) (629)
7.02 4572 43299
26 4273 1205
32.02 1256 1253
43 blocks 313, 401 131 131
TOTALS 13523 10194 75.38 99.63
DISTRICT TEN
6 4941 4818
7.01 blocks 305-308 674 629
8 7815 7815
TOTALS 13430 12632 94.06 98.95
v P.3
PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS
Optimum size 13,573
PISTRICT ELEVEN
% of
Total Black % optimum
Pract population population Black digtrict
1 297 1095
2 285] 1985
3 3130 3114
4.01 3532 3525
10.01 17%4 205
12.02 1683 780
12.99 224 31
TOTALS 13511 9749 v2.16 99.54
DISTRICT TWELVE
23.01 3071 50
23.02 2444 458 | :
24 4308 174
25.01 4545 4
TOTALS : 14368 686 4.77 105.86
DISTRICT THIRTEEN
1 blocks 501-508 254 249
block group 4 502 501
13.01 1298 806
13.02 : 3779 727
14 4209 3261
15.01 2232 1584
except block group 2-4 (570) (227)
except block 501-502 (3) (0)
15.02 1850 934
TOTALS . 13551 7835 57.82 99.84
DISTRICT FOURTEEN
9.01 2676 114
9.02 2527 29
9.03 1717 31
10.02 3845 1401
il 3487 3332
except blocks 501-508 (204) (249)
except block group 4 (502) (501)
TOTALS 13496 4157 30.80 99.43
INSET MAP - MubiLe anND VICINITY
38.02
x
4g
-— £ 1 -
pT RL, i ct ‘
| oy vl/
v criexh nl
61 :
?)
' i
cosa fi
@ 3
7 CHICKASAW | =
-— SUTHERLANTS
Ee, PRICHARD - a DR =
€x / 28D AVE CX
: 05% H ee '
1]
Be bret 4 <9 = w
& Ue 51 52
J RY x : S Ry < .
x
pA
r
= MN
>» L
i - »
oo Nd -
H 3
A £00
34.03 : —
i
‘
3
i
: 34.02
: =
«0 Se : =
:
SN0
val e
ar} «5 3404 =| 3405
r .
" 2 \LE slo
+ & mi
a «© >
® ze:GL|En J) SS
-t
. -d
E
—
w
J
3
{i 36.02 Z- 3601 s
©<
| : : oF -{
Oo td
% oLp 2 = 35 Pn 20 &
ji ENE rr ; .
H Ye, "
K . “, [=
2 Nz 2 28 Asp S Cad 3 PW, 36.03 5 330
ir = < ): AIRPORT 8LVD
a
2p 2
§
i b> x
-
: AZ <5 p os & 23 [=]
j © J ¥ z © AO 3 -
c = Bo) /% i =
at 2) - odd v 1 : A a SR BE } cl . = ¥ i
a,
:
= it g 3 2). 2f* Hp Pt
3 vd BROOXLEY
{ 5 Vd AIR FORCE BASE
i
id 8 WO Zz : s > pI ~
Ss 3 iy
J > 16 £
> - ¥ te | oP
4 3 30 AZ p - werd 53
: : 3702 2 adil £
7 « 0 17 Ey | 2 : “ 7
£8 H 4 v 4 nc | : 7 oy . > \, 5
= Aq, =~
x a &
Rive rl Xe
s/ i ait Eg! Lo
~ . ee &/
Tessa »allsg
: 19.02
CLUB HOUSY
oO
<
xr -
-000 ° 2000 «00 FLT 1% Loy
NRE : 3 To Ry
< 138.01
+]
IVER FOAEST DR
°
® PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS :
£3 Rp
o : 5
PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS
Optimum size 63,342
These three separate plans are constructed
using the districts from the nine member
plan in various combinations.
PLAN A
District A IX
Districts from Black % % of
Nine Member Plan Population Population Black Optimum
1 21367 19842
2 20968 20083
4 21612 13785
TOTALS 63947 53710 83.99 100.96
District A II
3 21336 7546
5 24203 2472
9 21126 5
TOTALS 63755 10023 15.72 100.65
District A I1X
6 20622 1464
7 20822 39
8 20820 2120
TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82. 98.30
PLAN B
District B I
1 21.367 19842
2 20968 20083
5 217293 2472
TOTALS 63628 42397 66.63 100.45
District B IX
3 21336 7546
4 21613 13785
6 20622 1464
TOTALS 63570 22795 35.86 100.35
District B II1
7 20822 39
8 20820 2120
9 21126 5
TOTALS 62768 2164 3.45 99.09
x
re
PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS
Optimum size 63,342
PLAN C
District.
% of
Districts from Total Black o optimum
Nine Member Plan population population Black distric
1 21367 19842
3 21336 7546
4 21612 13785
TOTALS ©4315 41173 04.02 101.54
District C II
2 20968 20083
5 21293 2472
9 21126 5
TOTALS 63387 22560 35.59 100.07
District C II}
6 20622 1464
7 20822 39
8 20820 2120
TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82 98.30
ar . B57 2% 56
SARA
5 » ’ Foy 6 oY 3.9% J. 7 55 v
a eis ee mS i i om AH - :
: : Ry
: H : H norTO¥ C207,
H :
: 1]
' :
. ’
: H
LJ
i a. 54 i
~
: > fl>
1] i. <
’ ; oe { 38.02
: \ {
: i, : Le ’ ”
' . ofr
: ae 5, ol J , \ ned? Y -n
pd Rl
H
: 61
:
1]
AJ
\
: E 53 2 ’ = 2
LJ
; " CHICKASAW :
oH : fain SUTHERLAN
£1, : PRICHARD - OR
: 0 €X A ND AVE ¢
. : & 3 NZ
1] J |
Ze . L133 \ k-3 . ~ bg) vw }
: $ Ne J 515 52 2)
: z eg 50.7%) : G)
3 &, \
: oO 2 {
¥ T
: . FR
: : BARFORK 43 48 sf 47 » [ 3 z
. & 2, - 7a, on—— ;
3, Loin, “ne 45 oN,
! i 0 & & E 2 hy % 2.4
H & ~ << AY (od {
: o v 3 Ie SY
: ~~ co
34.03 i ES 40 ¢ 46 S/BiRMINGHAM NO =
& > 3 23801 © \*
:
Cy < 1 TELEGRAPH RDI\Z * i /
& o BD ; % A, 42 44 Nm
H
- =
; z 413" ps 2s : Ra
: © < ’ PEL i 5 34.02 3901 > es : z </V 2% 43 iC GOW INA
1 ! = ©, o) S {Ye CAEEL = *
] wo _°C . ez L 34.01 oO oF S227 0, Xe Pug 12.01 £3 ,
u WT S 8 m7 702, OY “5% “ :
5 Cles.. HOlFFaT FH ~ BAR. cq 4, K pov} OVERLOOK ROT ue RD So. RETTS RC 7 ”
i l= > —— be) 24
: =i DENMARK 7%, TT S S “q * D
o rd, or? (a «)
Ri SF 34.06 & Bh _. 701. 6. al o “ o . Ziz = Rg, > "a : < Ly
% Eb # UNNAMED R Ne LL Coe J “> ol 6 & “, Coy ~ - z I) Step & wi’ *,<.\0 & re >.
™ ZEiGt en © & Swvp co « Np 26 / Li &, ” < . JOD
o| oS < 5, 2 " Sd 9 Z | < of oe 8 » Z
8 x I> «< = Lem
£ od . - > >i 402 -
5 »S . 3 4012 - b 2 0 - MOBILE «oF oo q = A ORGANS 2
¥ © oOo ’ R Ay, 2 > = i)
: 36.02 E 36.01 . 3302 Long, </d i hd Xe, 3 be YC AN
id o ane AMARY, $e < 3 od RAE : S : 27.7% ow sor]: go) ~% ran 1 = = 35 . ran” = ST MARYS L ? 32g, gS Sy 1
i, op 2 = > £/2502 SPRING MILL AVE En : 2\%
H Put = Ap © o i LOUSELLE” 4 AVENE c\ 2 3 D Baw, - $ Lo Zz
: oA No « KEWNETH pauewiR 10.01 ‘ East
a, : Sl DauPHIN ..—_~ MOBILE pl ae + ak ge CANAL .
3 A 2 eB oe0
} qd 3301 28.8 ami he 8 $= 02 = 2 & os 9.03 10 1
© BLVD AIRPORT BLVD art me ? »
Sas z GINA -~
a Oo
.
- yise, {
| > wi 2S FE 5 = 5 ;
SY 24 > a oz 120 M 3 - a 29% ge 1302
i i - : .: rawAY seaLY, Duvag Ta
k H ~ GT : e < x $ HOLST ATi .
§ ; pd So o DE x 4 - x 3 2 £5 z 2 &
oi] : le) - 3 ~ —
es = Re - 5 1501 % = 3 r ¥ 7
J E IS A NZ , : Cc v
K) Az SF 5 bo :
[al oO -
i 21 2f* (23m
$ < BROOKLEY
3 OT Tac, HILL 2
i - AIR FORCE BASE
© © “5,
we © 40 <
o HH > >
; = z
¢ & .
16
i? . 5 an p
4 = : : 3 3 — H . 37.02 = IE 17 ; g \, 2 ] + ; H
2 o rive, ~ %
a’, SunF Fe
\
PIVER 5% DALE Dg &, See)
- ~ 1 o “r0 TNF 52 5
ol +
ile < < nt ES
> h, WE 19.02 f
. CLUB =OUSS
: = <
Rr,
“An 18
0 ° OOO ®O00 FLLY Yi
1 2 1 1 J
°
e
eo PLAN A FOR THREE DISTRICTS
Pl
INSET MAP - MUBILE AND VICINITY RM PE RP
uf
® fh YER Sl
-
Jo
18.97 - 41% > = of 2.)
mm ee neem —— = .
: ' &
:
'
:
'
; :
: 1]
!
t
’
; :
t
[
: ..
:
~
H
pi
\
J
.
:
“
: 5 \
:
x
Bored,
:
’
:
; 61
:
\
3
-
: 2
: >
Ca
ay : P2CHARD %
¥
ex /
, 3 o& :
' .
:
:
1] Pe, : ie 3
: Ey No
. < o
H
LJ
o 3
: vl :
; = : - 49
: : BEARFORK
4
RD
!
; £/C opp
<<
i i
«0 ah
34.03 } 5 ; \ 46 Sh
: =i CREE
s ~
| TELEGRAPH AD
N
1]
1
: z 2 34.02
: z
’ =
*0,. Cis 2 al 34.01
vy. ot 5 < o
L c 2 MOIEEAT £
Zig : OVERLOOK ROT RD &
: =iz —
i 3404 =| 3405 Eis
= ¥ : 2azl3 34.06 -
- Il LL 3 57 "
? Ey re Rene c vO Leo >
J) &/ 2 8p 58° ; 2a
= <
" SE z
-
w
hd
3 ©
RN
| 3302
E ~ =. |
: OLD 8 : Z 35
——EL = : Rp © :
Ky x -:
> a, Of DAUPHIN
Oo 2 S
8 z E
g 33.01 5
[=]
—
-
i
oS BLVD AIRPORT BLVD in
- oO
z =
-t
: > 32.03 x
"- &
£ 3 32.01 S| soLTOw 3 .
= a RAN E
: m C ae A ©
; 3 We° > <
37.01 o = 2
3 - | 3202
oN £ <7 will
.
~ GE I's
J zl oO
i cl
: " 31
©
o
i 5
h «©
: 30 | 3702 5
Firemen ry RJ
>s NF 3 5
>/ A
o salle 4 / wite
000 ° 3000 «000 FEET
1 1 ; ne 3 3
®
" ‘PLAN B FOR THREE DISTRICTS
o
AAvNaldau a Aas na .OBILE AND VICINITY
BROOXLEY
AIR FORCE BASE
|
88
16
: 3 ® A 13.8 22r0, 56
, fray » iy
Sn IRS 3 SE 2 4 55 ¢?
nN ; : 38.02
61
\z 53
oo >
= 3
7 CHICKASAW Z|
ia SUTHERLAND
PRICHARD
F777 3
A &
L™
EARFORK
k
Cio B
: 2
: ] «
«0 7 3403 | n
5 : Es CREEK
3 i
.
) i
:
E : z
: 5 34.02
? =
a0 Cu : 3 n 34.01
a; GS
or. 0 o
bose i
~ pot
aR
z . «1 3404 =| 340s B15 o
=] uf Slo’ NFrzio 3406 S
i 2 oi UNNAMED R oe AY AT” 5
; yg = JO SIG » TI $o -~
: .
2 ER © S LvD S Ey Ap
>
© £ ¥ X 2
i
[vg §
<
36.02 2 36.01 ; 33.02 2 es HiLF &, 2 Avg xs A
ul” MOBILE INFIRMARY Cy < = > Rs
27 $ HOSP BDRY 9.01 2p s
35 . ’ Ss ST MARYS LN ’ SPR mer < 1
. £2502 SPRING HILL AVE ny = 2 z\ >
S z LOUSELLE : AVR o\ a
Davey pov ©, 2 IN © KENNET Hy DAUPHIN 10.01 i Ga
al oavery MOBILE ig “di % F; tr ANAL Z
= 3 902 8 28 3 -.
3301 oO 2501 %
= & -_ 03 3 1002 11 -
AT BLVD . € ! e
AIRPO = ov z VIRGINA 3
i v YVIRGin [|
w L, % js
” TR
gl 7 : 2 14 S/1301
£ 24 sno 13.02 § © 29 5 3 - o : A
FAIR wf Duvar i + =
_—-
x 2 ARLINGT
: e > z & 1 Aah
37.01
- w S . 2 x :
= : <5 2 230283 If 1502 4 2 3
2 > 22 3 o 5% §
g > z 33% 3
i E AL A 2 = 1501"
: ¥& 32 X=
o \2 hg £ GOL
2 x ~d Frm = - <
21 = (2am [A
= BROOXLEY
OT Tac, MILL
3
AIR FORCE BASE
5 L >
3
ad
© 16
# 2
3702 g
<
-
-
=
1
o
A
3
~~
J
<
/ > sf
CrEFR Alls
pee
“-«
O
3
O00 LJ 000 O00 FEET
4 1 PY 31 1 J
®
]
) oi
oe ‘PLAN C FOR THREE DISTRICTS
»
INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY