Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile
Public Court Documents
July 9, 1976

14 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile, 1976. c3205a9f-cdcd-ef11-b8e8-7c1e520b5bae. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4b52fd85-0022-454a-bbed-c69ae511471a/letter-from-blacksher-to-judge-pittman-with-enclosed-plans-for-creation-of-single-member-districts-in-mobile. Accessed April 28, 2025.
Copied!
CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES 8... ATTORNEYS AT LAW he 1407 DAVIS AVENUE MOBILE, ALABAMA 3656603 VERNON Z. CRAWFORD TELEPHONE 432-1631 JAMES U. BLACKSHER AREA CODE {205} MICHAEL A. FIGURES W. CLINTON BROWN, JR. GREGORY B.STEIN LARRY T. MENEFEE July 9, 1976 Honorable Virgil Pittman United States District Court United States District Court 213 Federal Building Mobile, Alabama 36602 Re: Bolden, et al. v. City of Mobile, et al. Civil Action No. 75-298-P Dear Judge Pittman: Pursuant to this Court's pretrial order plaintiffs herewith submit plans for the creation of single-member districts in the City of Mobile. Should Your Honor find that the present at-large system is unconstitutional it is our understanding that further hearings would likely be held to examine the appropriate remedy more closely. The plans are submitted to show that there are practical remedies. Plaintiffs submit plans for three,nine and fourteen-member districts. These districts are constructed along census lines and 1970 census data. They might need some refinement to conform to ward boundaries and population changes. However the feasibility of single member districts as a remedy is shown. Indeed the work done by the computer center at the University of South Alabama demonstrates the essential point: housing patterns are so tightly segregated it is impossible to construct contiguous districts of nearly equal population without having some districts where blacks would have the opportunity to elect representatives of their choice. Very respectfully, CRAWEOAD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES & BROWN (2/2 4® U. Blacksher v JUB :bm Enclosures cc: All Counsel/w-enclosures 7.01 7.02 8 39.01 39.02 43 TOTALS 9.02 9.03 13.01 13.02 14 15.01 15.02 24 TOTALS TOTALS PLAN FOR 9 Optimum size 21,114 DISTRICT ONE DISTRICTS % of % optimum Black district Total Black population population 2119 2117 533% 5268 4941 4818 block group 3 951 897 3653 3632 1683 © 780 224 31 1844 1839 2 0 72 8 blocks 114, 201 66 66 234 223 10 10 74 0 155 153 21367 19842 DISTRICT TWO block groups 1 & 2 3014 2938 4572 4399 7815 7185 4180 4177 1256 1253 blocks 313, 401 131 13: 20968 20083 DISTRICT THREE 2527 29 1717 31 1298 806 377° 727 4209 3261 2232 1584 1850 934 block groups 1-5 3724 174 21336 7546 DISTRICT FOUR 297 109 2851 1985 3130 3114 3532 3525 20676 114 1794 205 3845 1401 3487 3332 21612 12785 92.86 101.20 95.78..99,31 35.37 101.05 63.78 102.36 % : hn » De? PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS Optimum size 21,114 DISTRICT FIVE % of Total Black % optimum Tract population population Black district 24 block group 6 584 0 25.01 4545 4 25.02 3432 19 26 4273 1205 27 3428 1083 33.02 3643 158 34.01 1317 3 34.02 ED 52B, 58D 71 0 61 ED 3353 0 0 TOTALS 21293 2472 11.61 100.85 DISTRICT SIX 16 : 405 5 17 : 3109 273 18 2562 438 : +=19.01 2307 217 39.02 2823 16 20: 1689 101 22 block groups 2-4 2212 © 23.01 3071 50 23.02 2444 458 TOTALS 20622 1464 7.10 97.67 DISTRICT SEVEN 32.03 2743 0 less blocks 101, 209-211 (652) (0) 34.03 3120 16 34.04 2137 3 34.05 2503 0 34.06 2496 0 35 6593 13 61 ED 37B, 59C 0 0 ED 59B (southern portion) 0 0 34.02 2013 9 less ED 58B, 58D (71) (0) TOTALS 20882 39 0.19 98.90 DISTRICT EIGHT 30 2567 31 less blocks 101, 105 129, 130 (632) (0) 31 4901 132 less Dilock group: 1 (960) (0) less liocks 314-318 (220) (0) 32.02 3473 57 less blocks 120, 111, 113 (452) (0) 36.01 2029 27 36.02 3143 1540 356.03 1335 O 4 Fe ® Dv. 3 — PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS Optimum size 21,114 DISTRICT EIGHT (cont'd) % of Total Black % optimum Tract population population Black district 37.01 2078 164 37.02 3122 169 68 0 0 TOTALS 20820 2120 10.18 98,61 DISTRICT NINE 21 4575 i; 22 block group 1 826 0 28 5491 0 29 3648 0 30 blocks 101, 105, 129, 130 632 0 : 31 block group 1 960 0 blocks 314-318 290 0 32.01 2185 . 4 : 32.02 “blocks 111, 113, 120 452 0 33.01 1415 0 32.03 blocks 101, 209-211 652 0 TOTALS 21126 5 0.02 100.05 : 3 & it wo. 56 LJ + a BAMA J s § 5 ¢ 40 i 38.29. J.1 7 5 9 - Soi iene Sli orden etalon Bh Lo dd tlds -» - 5 3 ’ 1 4 : H worTOH Chr, ‘ ’ M LJ : H : : H 1] . [3 M LJ : p : 7 54 : -» ~ M k™ po ' > x ; 5 38.02 » hs k M * L . re Fe . ud : AE dmg NT 5 » rd SV ; \ cick 2% : . 61 s - : * \ : > 53 5 : = 4 » 7 CHICKASAW i 3 sgn SUTHERLAN : PRICHARD ~ / DR p £EX 20D AVE ; . 0% 3 Ni ™ i ® 1 . aris € nH wv - © & : 2 oe. 50 : > : %, » » Co : a ¥ a » « - s - < : BARFORK 43 48 3) 47 z RD of » = pe A, ; 5 2» Lorn, Us, 45 oN ; Tg 3 SEK < N&~ : Lem < & Terr 2 : «0 a 34.03 a hd 5 40 3 2p thm bo ' 3 CREER > ° 46 : “~2a 3801 = \= i Cop 2 ¢ =! TELEGRAPH RD 2 ¥ re H ?, oc 2. : : & i 2 : 44 AY BROCE H \ 3 : : y AS we Ng ’ % E 3402 Trg : : 2 . 33.01 > f 2 A CH ow INAVE | ? = © C Ue CAE er ! = 34.01 IR, Fo om, 1201 _ 4 ] 5. : . > vg d 4% =. 3 E 702, SA rE : 1 S o la NY 3 i Elo OVERLOOK moRIEFAT RD RETTS 4% #Q - - = Fe I — : n “%, EI $e o® =i2 wh &, 2 34.04 e 34.05 eis & Jie % an 3 d E 22215 3406 & 7.01 SEH o == Ne PN Se Hea, vo SA, AE) 6 § = 4 &’ * 26160 en > owvp 58° ¢ = A. § FD \ 3 3 «, g o ae 5 7 N 3 ZF «< Es a 5 ; 401 R22%Q ° MOBILE oF J / 3 MORGA CA 2 2 2 Sh Loe OL i 36.02 z+ 3601 33.02 so Le 2 Le KX " o TLE INFIRMARY, = o “ <i HOS? BDRY 901 ls 3 > Se : 3 a : ST MARYS LN X A < oo 8 4 35 SreinG MILLAVE | ised. \% 2% 5) = ap © LOUISE LLE] ? AL 2\ % z r a KENNET Ha DAUPHIN 108 Al % S § ; = So] DaLPMIN - — Zz bi= T\ Cana % 3 %, {ps a { Les 603 Y 5 HS 2 : j qo ommor J 25001 ¢ 2 R & LSA 9034 1002 B.4: fo BLVD AIRPORT SLVD — Vs a VIRGINIA pr —— 2 B - ary E VING 1s t ob = SE Shao 7} 3208 5 z TR a RT Shao #4 P= 74h 13.02 ad 29 § y - ED 32.01 FE ; gle FAimwilY ealM frei wip - & ar VAL ARLINGT d -y i - ws : 2 , 0 7. > A &| EfnousTom FIELD 37.01 = - S z » ¢ £5 < 2302 s/ 1soz : 3202 5 gr 22 © uf : 2 “og wl ry $f z «ff = © e - wi O S «< 3 ey i s pGE ZN 2 a 1501 2 os EE OB $i 3 oN 2 31 EN Be ; 2 21 of 2 1 3 « 2301 < BROOXLEY DO Tas, HILL 3 = AIR FORCE BASE » & Es : ¥, : 16 » ¥ 3702 g 30 = - hi = - s ° . ¥ &/ 20 & EY 4. % J Re pont §/ 5 eran wT ¥ i <, 3) ra L = i < CAL rr, O00 e 2000 000 FELT | ME, CE TR. 1 rmiend) LJ 2 > PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS Le] INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY ® - le y PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS Optimum size 13,573 DISTRICT ONE © oF Total Black % optimum Tract population population Black Qdistrict 158 405 5 13 3109 273 18 2562 438 19.01 2307 117 19.02 2823 16 20 1689 101 15.01 block groups 2-4 570 227 blocks 501-502 3 0 TOTALS 13468 11277 8.74 99.23 DISTRICT 'TWO 30 2567 31 31 4901 132 32.02 3479 57 Fk except blocks 101-106 (415) 240) 37.02 3122 169 68 ; 0 0 TOTALS 13654 389 2.85 100.60 DISTRICT THREE 32.02 Dblocks 101-106 415 0 32.03 2743 0 35 ; 6593 il 36.03 1835 0 37.01 2078 164 TOTALS 13664 175 1.28 100.67 DISTRICT FOUR 34.03 3120 15 34.04 2137 3 34.05 2502 0 36.01 2029 27 36.02 3143 1540 61 except ED59B (n. part) 0 0 TOTALS 12932 1586 12.26 95.28 DISTRICT FPIVE 33.02 3479 57 34.01 1317 3 34.02 2013 9 34.06 2495 0 39.01 £180 £177 ol ED 59B (n. part) 0 0 TOTALS 13485 4246 31.49 99. 35 psi @® De 2 PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS Optimum size 13,573 DISTRICT SIX 5 OF Total Black % optimum Tract population population Black district 21 £575 1 22 3038 6 29 3648 0 32.01 2185 4 TOTALS 13446 + 3 0.08 99.06 DISTRICT SEVEN 25.02 3432 19 27 3428 1083 28 5491 0 33.01 1415 0 TOTALS 13766 1102 8.0% 101.42 DISTRICT EIGHT 4.02 2119 2317 5 533° 5268 12.01 3653 3632 33.01 1844 1839 35.02 2 0 38.99 72 8 44 234 223 45 10 0 53 74 0 56 155 i153 43 blocks 114, 201 66 66 TOTALS 13568 13316 8.14 99.96 DISTRICT NINE 7.061 3965 3835 except blocks 305-308 (674) (629) 7.02 4572 43299 26 4273 1205 32.02 1256 1253 43 blocks 313, 401 131 131 TOTALS 13523 10194 75.38 99.63 DISTRICT TEN 6 4941 4818 7.01 blocks 305-308 674 629 8 7815 7815 TOTALS 13430 12632 94.06 98.95 v P.3 PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS Optimum size 13,573 PISTRICT ELEVEN % of Total Black % optimum Pract population population Black digtrict 1 297 1095 2 285] 1985 3 3130 3114 4.01 3532 3525 10.01 17%4 205 12.02 1683 780 12.99 224 31 TOTALS 13511 9749 v2.16 99.54 DISTRICT TWELVE 23.01 3071 50 23.02 2444 458 | : 24 4308 174 25.01 4545 4 TOTALS : 14368 686 4.77 105.86 DISTRICT THIRTEEN 1 blocks 501-508 254 249 block group 4 502 501 13.01 1298 806 13.02 : 3779 727 14 4209 3261 15.01 2232 1584 except block group 2-4 (570) (227) except block 501-502 (3) (0) 15.02 1850 934 TOTALS . 13551 7835 57.82 99.84 DISTRICT FOURTEEN 9.01 2676 114 9.02 2527 29 9.03 1717 31 10.02 3845 1401 il 3487 3332 except blocks 501-508 (204) (249) except block group 4 (502) (501) TOTALS 13496 4157 30.80 99.43 INSET MAP - MubiLe anND VICINITY 38.02 x 4g -— £ 1 - pT RL, i ct ‘ | oy vl/ v criexh nl 61 : ?) ' i cosa fi @ 3 7 CHICKASAW | = -— SUTHERLANTS Ee, PRICHARD - a DR = €x / 28D AVE CX : 05% H ee ' 1] Be bret 4 <9 = w & Ue 51 52 J RY x : S Ry < . x pA r = MN >» L i - » oo Nd - H 3 A £00 34.03 : — i ‘ 3 i : 34.02 : = «0 Se : = : SN0 val e ar} «5 3404 =| 3405 r . " 2 \LE slo + & mi a «© > ® ze:GL|En J) SS -t . -d E — w J 3 {i 36.02 Z- 3601 s ©< | : : oF -{ Oo td % oLp 2 = 35 Pn 20 & ji ENE rr ; . H Ye, " K . “, [= 2 Nz 2 28 Asp S Cad 3 PW, 36.03 5 330 ir = < ): AIRPORT 8LVD a 2p 2 § i b> x - : AZ <5 p os & 23 [=] j © J ¥ z © AO 3 - c = Bo) /% i = at 2) - odd v 1 : A a SR BE } cl . = ¥ i a, : = it g 3 2). 2f* Hp Pt 3 vd BROOXLEY { 5 Vd AIR FORCE BASE i id 8 WO Zz : s > pI ~ Ss 3 iy J > 16 £ > - ¥ te | oP 4 3 30 AZ p - werd 53 : : 3702 2 adil £ 7 « 0 17 Ey | 2 : “ 7 £8 H 4 v 4 nc | : 7 oy . > \, 5 = Aq, =~ x a & Rive rl Xe s/ i ait Eg! Lo ~ . ee &/ Tessa »allsg : 19.02 CLUB HOUSY oO < xr - -000 ° 2000 «00 FLT 1% Loy NRE : 3 To Ry < 138.01 +] IVER FOAEST DR ° ® PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS : £3 Rp o : 5 PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS Optimum size 63,342 These three separate plans are constructed using the districts from the nine member plan in various combinations. PLAN A District A IX Districts from Black % % of Nine Member Plan Population Population Black Optimum 1 21367 19842 2 20968 20083 4 21612 13785 TOTALS 63947 53710 83.99 100.96 District A II 3 21336 7546 5 24203 2472 9 21126 5 TOTALS 63755 10023 15.72 100.65 District A I1X 6 20622 1464 7 20822 39 8 20820 2120 TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82. 98.30 PLAN B District B I 1 21.367 19842 2 20968 20083 5 217293 2472 TOTALS 63628 42397 66.63 100.45 District B IX 3 21336 7546 4 21613 13785 6 20622 1464 TOTALS 63570 22795 35.86 100.35 District B II1 7 20822 39 8 20820 2120 9 21126 5 TOTALS 62768 2164 3.45 99.09 x re PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS Optimum size 63,342 PLAN C District. % of Districts from Total Black o optimum Nine Member Plan population population Black distric 1 21367 19842 3 21336 7546 4 21612 13785 TOTALS ©4315 41173 04.02 101.54 District C II 2 20968 20083 5 21293 2472 9 21126 5 TOTALS 63387 22560 35.59 100.07 District C II} 6 20622 1464 7 20822 39 8 20820 2120 TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82 98.30 ar . B57 2% 56 SARA 5 » ’ Foy 6 oY 3.9% J. 7 55 v a eis ee mS i i om AH - : : : Ry : H : H norTO¥ C207, H : : 1] ' : . ’ : H LJ i a. 54 i ~ : > fl> 1] i. < ’ ; oe { 38.02 : \ { : i, : Le ’ ” ' . ofr : ae 5, ol J , \ ned? Y -n pd Rl H : 61 : 1] AJ \ : E 53 2 ’ = 2 LJ ; " CHICKASAW : oH : fain SUTHERLAN £1, : PRICHARD - OR : 0 €X A ND AVE ¢ . : & 3 NZ 1] J | Ze . L133 \ k-3 . ~ bg) vw } : $ Ne J 515 52 2) : z eg 50.7%) : G) 3 &, \ : oO 2 { ¥ T : . FR : : BARFORK 43 48 sf 47 » [ 3 z . & 2, - 7a, on—— ; 3, Loin, “ne 45 oN, ! i 0 & & E 2 hy % 2.4 H & ~ << AY (od { : o v 3 Ie SY : ~~ co 34.03 i ES 40 ¢ 46 S/BiRMINGHAM NO = & > 3 23801 © \* : Cy < 1 TELEGRAPH RDI\Z * i / & o BD ; % A, 42 44 Nm H - = ; z 413" ps 2s : Ra : © < ’ PEL i 5 34.02 3901 > es : z </V 2% 43 iC GOW INA 1 ! = ©, o) S {Ye CAEEL = * ] wo _°C . ez L 34.01 oO oF S227 0, Xe Pug 12.01 £3 , u WT S 8 m7 702, OY “5% “ : 5 Cles.. HOlFFaT FH ~ BAR. cq 4, K pov} OVERLOOK ROT ue RD So. RETTS RC 7 ” i l= > —— be) 24 : =i DENMARK 7%, TT S S “q * D o rd, or? (a «) Ri SF 34.06 & Bh _. 701. 6. al o “ o . Ziz = Rg, > "a : < Ly % Eb # UNNAMED R Ne LL Coe J “> ol 6 & “, Coy ~ - z I) Step & wi’ *,<.\0 & re >. ™ ZEiGt en © & Swvp co « Np 26 / Li &, ” < . JOD o| oS < 5, 2 " Sd 9 Z | < of oe 8 » Z 8 x I> «< = Lem £ od . - > >i 402 - 5 »S . 3 4012 - b 2 0 - MOBILE «oF oo q = A ORGANS 2 ¥ © oOo ’ R Ay, 2 > = i) : 36.02 E 36.01 . 3302 Long, </d i hd Xe, 3 be YC AN id o ane AMARY, $e < 3 od RAE : S : 27.7% ow sor]: go) ~% ran 1 = = 35 . ran” = ST MARYS L ? 32g, gS Sy 1 i, op 2 = > £/2502 SPRING MILL AVE En : 2\% H Put = Ap © o i LOUSELLE” 4 AVENE c\ 2 3 D Baw, - $ Lo Zz : oA No « KEWNETH pauewiR 10.01 ‘ East a, : Sl DauPHIN ..—_~ MOBILE pl ae + ak ge CANAL . 3 A 2 eB oe0 } qd 3301 28.8 ami he 8 $= 02 = 2 & os 9.03 10 1 © BLVD AIRPORT BLVD art me ? » Sas z GINA -~ a Oo . - yise, { | > wi 2S FE 5 = 5 ; SY 24 > a oz 120 M 3 - a 29% ge 1302 i i - : .: rawAY seaLY, Duvag Ta k H ~ GT : e < x $ HOLST ATi . § ; pd So o DE x 4 - x 3 2 £5 z 2 & oi] : le) - 3 ~ — es = Re - 5 1501 % = 3 r ¥ 7 J E IS A NZ , : Cc v K) Az SF 5 bo : [al oO - i 21 2f* (23m $ < BROOKLEY 3 OT Tac, HILL 2 i - AIR FORCE BASE © © “5, we © 40 < o HH > > ; = z ¢ & . 16 i? . 5 an p 4 = : : 3 3 — H . 37.02 = IE 17 ; g \, 2 ] + ; H 2 o rive, ~ % a’, SunF Fe \ PIVER 5% DALE Dg &, See) - ~ 1 o “r0 TNF 52 5 ol + ile < < nt ES > h, WE 19.02 f . CLUB =OUSS : = < Rr, “An 18 0 ° OOO ®O00 FLLY Yi 1 2 1 1 J ° e eo PLAN A FOR THREE DISTRICTS Pl INSET MAP - MUBILE AND VICINITY RM PE RP uf ® fh YER Sl - Jo 18.97 - 41% > = of 2.) mm ee neem —— = . : ' & : ' : ' ; : : 1] ! t ’ ; : t [ : .. : ~ H pi \ J . : “ : 5 \ : x Bored, : ’ : ; 61 : \ 3 - : 2 : > Ca ay : P2CHARD % ¥ ex / , 3 o& : ' . : : 1] Pe, : ie 3 : Ey No . < o H LJ o 3 : vl : ; = : - 49 : : BEARFORK 4 RD ! ; £/C opp << i i «0 ah 34.03 } 5 ; \ 46 Sh : =i CREE s ~ | TELEGRAPH AD N 1] 1 : z 2 34.02 : z ’ = *0,. Cis 2 al 34.01 vy. ot 5 < o L c 2 MOIEEAT £ Zig : OVERLOOK ROT RD & : =iz — i 3404 =| 3405 Eis = ¥ : 2azl3 34.06 - - Il LL 3 57 " ? Ey re Rene c vO Leo > J) &/ 2 8p 58° ; 2a = < " SE z - w hd 3 © RN | 3302 E ~ =. | : OLD 8 : Z 35 ——EL = : Rp © : Ky x -: > a, Of DAUPHIN Oo 2 S 8 z E g 33.01 5 [=] — - i oS BLVD AIRPORT BLVD in - oO z = -t : > 32.03 x "- & £ 3 32.01 S| soLTOw 3 . = a RAN E : m C ae A © ; 3 We° > < 37.01 o = 2 3 - | 3202 oN £ <7 will . ~ GE I's J zl oO i cl : " 31 © o i 5 h «© : 30 | 3702 5 Firemen ry RJ >s NF 3 5 >/ A o salle 4 / wite 000 ° 3000 «000 FEET 1 1 ; ne 3 3 ® " ‘PLAN B FOR THREE DISTRICTS o AAvNaldau a Aas na .OBILE AND VICINITY BROOXLEY AIR FORCE BASE | 88 16 : 3 ® A 13.8 22r0, 56 , fray » iy Sn IRS 3 SE 2 4 55 ¢? nN ; : 38.02 61 \z 53 oo > = 3 7 CHICKASAW Z| ia SUTHERLAND PRICHARD F777 3 A & L™ EARFORK k Cio B : 2 : ] « «0 7 3403 | n 5 : Es CREEK 3 i . ) i : E : z : 5 34.02 ? = a0 Cu : 3 n 34.01 a; GS or. 0 o bose i ~ pot aR z . «1 3404 =| 340s B15 o =] uf Slo’ NFrzio 3406 S i 2 oi UNNAMED R oe AY AT” 5 ; yg = JO SIG » TI $o -~ : . 2 ER © S LvD S Ey Ap > © £ ¥ X 2 i [vg § < 36.02 2 36.01 ; 33.02 2 es HiLF &, 2 Avg xs A ul” MOBILE INFIRMARY Cy < = > Rs 27 $ HOSP BDRY 9.01 2p s 35 . ’ Ss ST MARYS LN ’ SPR mer < 1 . £2502 SPRING HILL AVE ny = 2 z\ > S z LOUSELLE : AVR o\ a Davey pov ©, 2 IN © KENNET Hy DAUPHIN 10.01 i Ga al oavery MOBILE ig “di % F; tr ANAL Z = 3 902 8 28 3 -. 3301 oO 2501 % = & -_ 03 3 1002 11 - AT BLVD . € ! e AIRPO = ov z VIRGINA 3 i v YVIRGin [| w L, % js ” TR gl 7 : 2 14 S/1301 £ 24 sno 13.02 § © 29 5 3 - o : A FAIR wf Duvar i + = _—- x 2 ARLINGT : e > z & 1 Aah 37.01 - w S . 2 x : = : <5 2 230283 If 1502 4 2 3 2 > 22 3 o 5% § g > z 33% 3 i E AL A 2 = 1501" : ¥& 32 X= o \2 hg £ GOL 2 x ~d Frm = - < 21 = (2am [A = BROOXLEY OT Tac, MILL 3 AIR FORCE BASE 5 L > 3 ad © 16 # 2 3702 g < - - = 1 o A 3 ~~ J < / > sf CrEFR Alls pee “-« O 3 O00 LJ 000 O00 FEET 4 1 PY 31 1 J ® ] ) oi oe ‘PLAN C FOR THREE DISTRICTS » INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY