Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile

Public Court Documents
July 9, 1976

Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile preview

14 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Letter From Blacksher to Judge Pittman with Enclosed Plans for Creation of Single-Member Districts in Mobile, 1976. c3205a9f-cdcd-ef11-b8e8-7c1e520b5bae. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4b52fd85-0022-454a-bbed-c69ae511471a/letter-from-blacksher-to-judge-pittman-with-enclosed-plans-for-creation-of-single-member-districts-in-mobile. Accessed April 28, 2025.

    Copied!

    CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES 8... 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

he 

  

1407 DAVIS AVENUE 

MOBILE, ALABAMA 3656603 

VERNON Z. CRAWFORD TELEPHONE 432-1631 

JAMES U. BLACKSHER AREA CODE {205} 

MICHAEL A. FIGURES 

W. CLINTON BROWN, JR. 

  

GREGORY B.STEIN 

LARRY T. MENEFEE 

July 9, 1976 

Honorable Virgil Pittman 
United States District Court 
United States District Court 
213 Federal Building 
Mobile, Alabama 36602 

Re: Bolden, et al. v. City of Mobile, et al. 
Civil Action No. 75-298-P 
  

Dear Judge Pittman: 

Pursuant to this Court's pretrial order plaintiffs herewith 
submit plans for the creation of single-member districts in 
the City of Mobile. Should Your Honor find that the present 
at-large system is unconstitutional it is our understanding 
that further hearings would likely be held to examine the 
appropriate remedy more closely. The plans are submitted to 
show that there are practical remedies. 

Plaintiffs submit plans for three,nine and fourteen-member 
districts. These districts are constructed along census lines 
and 1970 census data. They might need some refinement to 
conform to ward boundaries and population changes. However 
the feasibility of single member districts as a remedy is shown. 
Indeed the work done by the computer center at the University 
of South Alabama demonstrates the essential point: housing 
patterns are so tightly segregated it is impossible to construct 
contiguous districts of nearly equal population without having 
some districts where blacks would have the opportunity to elect 
representatives of their choice. 

Very respectfully, 

CRAWEOAD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES & BROWN 

(2/2 4® 
U. Blacksher 

    

v 
JUB :bm 

Enclosures cc: All Counsel/w-enclosures 

 



    

7.01 
7.02 
8 
39.01 
39.02 
43 

TOTALS 

9.02 
9.03 
13.01 
13.02 
14 
15.01 
15.02 

24 

TOTALS 

TOTALS 

PLAN FOR 9 

Optimum size 21,114 

DISTRICT ONE 

DISTRICTS 

% of 

% optimum 
Black district 

  

Total Black 
population population 

2119 2117 
533% 5268 
4941 4818 

block group 3 951 897 

3653 3632 
1683 © 780 
224 31 

1844 1839 
2 0 

72 8 

blocks 114, 201 66 66 
234 223 
10 10 
74 0 

155 153 

21367 19842 

DISTRICT TWO 

block groups 1 & 2 3014 2938 

4572 4399 
7815 7185 
4180 4177 
1256 1253 

blocks 313, 401 131 13: 

20968 20083 

DISTRICT THREE 

2527 29 
1717 31 
1298 806 
377° 727 
4209 3261 
2232 1584 
1850 934 

block groups 1-5 3724 174 

21336 7546 

DISTRICT FOUR 

297 109 
2851 1985 
3130 3114 
3532 3525 
20676 114 

1794 205 
3845 1401 
3487 3332 

21612 12785 

  

92.86 101.20 

95.78..99,31 

35.37 101.05 

63.78 102.36 

 



% : hn » De? 

PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS 

Optimum size 21,114 

  

DISTRICT FIVE 

  
  

% of 

Total Black % optimum 
Tract population population Black district 

24 block group 6 584 0 
25.01 4545 4 
25.02 3432 19 

26 4273 1205 
27 3428 1083 

33.02 3643 158 
34.01 1317 3 
34.02 ED 52B, 58D 71 0 
61 ED 3353 0 0 
TOTALS 21293 2472 11.61 100.85 

DISTRICT SIX 

16 : 405 5 
17 : 3109 273 
18 2562 438 : 

+=19.01 2307 217 
39.02 2823 16 
20: 1689 101 

22 block groups 2-4 2212 © 
23.01 3071 50 
23.02 2444 458 

TOTALS 20622 1464 7.10 97.67 

DISTRICT SEVEN 

32.03 2743 0 
less blocks 101, 209-211 (652) (0) 

34.03 3120 16 
34.04 2137 3 
34.05 2503 0 
34.06 2496 0 
35 6593 13 
61 ED 37B, 59C 0 0 

ED 59B (southern portion) 0 0 
34.02 2013 9 

less ED 58B, 58D (71) (0) 

TOTALS 20882 39 0.19 98.90 

DISTRICT EIGHT 

30 2567 31 

less blocks 101, 105 

129, 130 (632) (0) 

31 4901 132 

less Dilock group: 1 (960) (0) 
less liocks 314-318 (220) (0) 

32.02 3473 57 

less blocks 120, 111, 113 (452) (0) 
36.01 2029 27 
36.02 3143 1540 
356.03 1335 O 

 



4 Fe ® Dv. 3 

— 

PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS 

  

Optimum size 21,114 

DISTRICT EIGHT (cont'd) 

  

    

% of 
Total Black % optimum 

Tract population population Black district 

37.01 2078 164 
37.02 3122 169 
68 0 0 

TOTALS 20820 2120 10.18 98,61 

DISTRICT NINE 

21 4575 i; 

22 block group 1 826 0 
28 5491 0 
29 3648 0 

30 blocks 101, 105, 129, 

130 632 0 : 

31 block group 1 960 0 
blocks 314-318 290 0 

32.01 2185 . 4 : 

32.02 “blocks 111, 113, 120 452 0 

33.01 1415 0 

32.03 blocks 101, 209-211 652 0 

TOTALS 21126 5 0.02 100.05 

 



  

  

    

  

  

  

        

    

      

  

      

    

  
      

  

  

        

  

  

          

  
  

  

  

: 3 & it wo. 56 
LJ 

+ a BAMA J 
s § 5 ¢ 40 

i 38.29. J.1 7 5 9 
- Soi iene Sli orden etalon Bh Lo dd tlds -» - 5 

3 
’ 1 4 
: H worTOH Chr, 
‘ ’ 
M LJ 

: H 
: : 
H 1] 

. [3 
M LJ 

: p 
: 7 54 
: -» ~ 

M k™ po 
' > x 

; 5 38.02 
» hs k 
M * L 

. re Fe . ud 

: AE dmg NT 
5 » rd SV ; \ cick 2% 

: 
. 61 
s 
- : 
* 

\ 
: > 53 5 

: = 4 
» 7 CHICKASAW i 
3 sgn SUTHERLAN 

: PRICHARD ~ / DR 

p £EX 20D AVE ; 
. 0% 3 Ni 
™ i 
® 1 

. aris € nH wv 

- © & : 2 oe. 50 : > 
: %, » 
» Co 

: a 
¥ a » « 
- 

s - < 

: BARFORK 43 48 3) 47 z 
RD of » = pe A, ; 5 

2» Lorn, Us, 45 oN 
; Tg 3 SEK < N&~ 
: Lem < & Terr 2 
: «0 a 

34.03 a hd 5 40 3 2p thm bo ' 3 CREER > ° 46 : “~2a 3801 = \= 
i Cop 2 ¢ =! TELEGRAPH RD 2 ¥ re 

H ?, oc 2. 
: : & i 2 : 44 AY BROCE 

H \ 3 : : y AS we Ng ’ % 
E 3402 Trg : : 2 . 33.01 > f 2 A CH ow INAVE | 

? = © C Ue CAE er ! = 34.01 IR, Fo om, 1201 _ 4 ] 5. : . > vg  d 4% 
=. 3 E 702, SA rE : 1 S o la NY 

3 i Elo OVERLOOK moRIEFAT RD RETTS 4% #Q - - = Fe I — : n “%, EI $e o® =i2 wh &, 
2 34.04 e 34.05 eis & Jie % an 

3 d E 22215 3406 & 7.01 SEH 
o == Ne PN Se Hea, vo SA, AE) 6 § = 4 &’ 

* 26160 en > owvp 58° ¢ = A. § FD \ 
3 3 «, g o ae 5 7 N 3 

ZF «< Es a 

5 ; 401 R22%Q ° MOBILE oF J / 3 MORGA CA 2 

2 2 
Sh Loe OL i 

36.02 z+ 3601 33.02 so Le 2 Le KX " 
o TLE INFIRMARY, = o 

“ <i HOS? BDRY 901 ls 3 > Se : 
3 a : ST MARYS LN X A < oo 8 4 35 SreinG MILLAVE | ised. \% 2% 5) 

= ap © LOUISE LLE] ? AL 2\ % 
z r a KENNET Ha DAUPHIN 108 Al % S 

§ ; = So] DaLPMIN - — Zz bi= T\ Cana % 3 %, {ps a { 
Les 603 Y 5 HS 2 : j qo ommor J 25001 ¢ 

2 R & LSA 9034 1002 B.4: 
fo BLVD AIRPORT SLVD — Vs a VIRGINIA 

pr —— 

2 B - ary E VING 1s t 

ob = SE Shao 7} 3208 5 z TR a RT Shao 
#4 P= 74h 13.02 ad 29 § y - ED 32.01 FE ; 
gle FAimwilY ealM frei 

wip - & ar VAL ARLINGT d -y i - ws 
: 2 , 0 7. > A &|  EfnousTom FIELD 
37.01 = - S z 

» ¢ £5 < 2302 s/ 1soz 
: 3202 5 gr 22 © uf : 2 “og wl ry $f z «ff = © 

e - wi O S «< 3 ey 

i s pGE ZN 2 a 1501 
2 os EE OB $i 3 oN 

2 31 EN Be 
; 2 21 of 2 1 3 « 2301 

< BROOXLEY 

DO Tas, HILL 3 
= AIR FORCE BASE 

» & 

Es : 
¥, : 16 

» ¥ 

3702 g 30 
= 
- 
hi 

= 

- s ° 
. ¥ 

&/ 20 
& 

EY 4. 
% J Re pont §/ 5 eran wT ¥ i <, 3) ra 

L = 

i 
< 

CAL rr, 

O00 e 2000 000 FELT 

| ME, CE TR. 1 rmiend) 

LJ 

2 

> PLAN FOR 9 DISTRICTS 

Le] 

INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY  



® 
- le 

y 

PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS 

  

Optimum size 13,573 

DISTRICT ONE 

  

    

© oF 

Total Black % optimum 

Tract population population Black Qdistrict 

158 405 5 

13 3109 273 

18 2562 438 

19.01 2307 117 

19.02 2823 16 

20 1689 101 

15.01 block groups 2-4 570 227 
blocks 501-502 3 0 

TOTALS 13468 11277 8.74 99.23 

DISTRICT 'TWO 

30 2567 31 

31 4901 132 

32.02 3479 57 Fk 

except blocks 101-106 (415) 240) 
37.02 3122 169 

68 ; 0 0 

TOTALS 13654 389 2.85 100.60 

DISTRICT THREE 

32.02 Dblocks 101-106 415 0 

32.03 2743 0 

35 ; 6593 il 

36.03 1835 0 

37.01 2078 164 

TOTALS 13664 175 1.28 100.67 

DISTRICT FOUR 

34.03 3120 15 

34.04 2137 3 

34.05 2502 0 

36.01 2029 27 

36.02 3143 1540 

61 except ED59B (n. part) 0 0 

TOTALS 12932 1586 12.26 95.28 

DISTRICT FPIVE 

33.02 3479 57 

34.01 1317 3 

34.02 2013 9 

34.06 2495 0 

39.01 £180 £177 

ol ED 59B (n. part) 0 0 

TOTALS 13485 4246 31.49 99. 35 

 



psi @® De 2 

PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS 

  

Optimum size 13,573 

DISTRICT SIX 

    

5 OF 

Total Black % optimum 
Tract population population Black district 

21 £575 1 

22 3038 6 

29 3648 0 

32.01 2185 4 

TOTALS 13446 + 3 0.08 99.06 

DISTRICT SEVEN 

25.02 3432 19 

27 3428 1083 

28 5491 0 

33.01 1415 0 

TOTALS 13766 1102 8.0% 101.42 

DISTRICT EIGHT 

4.02 2119 2317 

5 533° 5268 

12.01 3653 3632 

33.01 1844 1839 

35.02 2 0 

38.99 72 8 

44 234 223 

45 10 0 

53 74 0 

56 155 i153 

43 blocks 114, 201 66 66 

TOTALS 13568 13316 8.14 99.96 

DISTRICT NINE 

7.061 3965 3835 

except blocks 305-308 (674) (629) 
7.02 4572 43299 

26 4273 1205 

32.02 1256 1253 

43 blocks 313, 401 131 131 

TOTALS 13523 10194 75.38 99.63 

DISTRICT TEN 

6 4941 4818 

7.01 blocks 305-308 674 629 

8 7815 7815 

TOTALS 13430 12632 94.06 98.95 

 



  

  
  

v P.3 

PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS 

Optimum size 13,573 

PISTRICT ELEVEN 

% of 
Total Black % optimum 

Pract population population Black digtrict 

1 297 1095 

2 285] 1985 
3 3130 3114 
4.01 3532 3525 
10.01 17%4 205 

12.02 1683 780 
12.99 224 31 

TOTALS 13511 9749 v2.16 99.54 

DISTRICT TWELVE 

23.01 3071 50 
23.02 2444 458 | : 
24 4308 174 
25.01 4545 4 

TOTALS : 14368 686 4.77 105.86 

DISTRICT THIRTEEN 

1 blocks 501-508 254 249 
block group 4 502 501 

13.01 1298 806 
13.02 : 3779 727 
14 4209 3261 
15.01 2232 1584 

except block group 2-4 (570) (227) 
except block 501-502 (3) (0) 

15.02 1850 934 

TOTALS . 13551 7835 57.82 99.84 

DISTRICT FOURTEEN 

9.01 2676 114 

9.02 2527 29 
9.03 1717 31 
10.02 3845 1401 

il 3487 3332 

except blocks 501-508 (204) (249) 
except block group 4 (502) (501) 

TOTALS 13496 4157 30.80 99.43 

 



    

  

    

  

  
  

  

   

   

    

  

    
  

  

  

  

  
  

     
            
  

    
  

  

  

  

  

    INSET MAP - MubiLe anND VICINITY 

38.02 

   

     
    

   

    
    
    

     

         

   

  
    

  

  

  
  

  

  

x 
4g 

-— £ 1 - 
pT RL, i ct ‘ 

| oy vl/ 
v criexh nl 

61 : 
?) 

' i 

cosa fi 
@ 3 

7 CHICKASAW | = 
-— SUTHERLANTS 

Ee, PRICHARD - a DR = 
€x / 28D AVE CX 

: 05% H ee ' 
1] 

Be bret 4 <9 = w 

& Ue 51 52 
J RY x : S Ry < . 

x 

pA 
r 

= MN 

>» L 
i - » 

oo Nd - 
H 3 

A £00 

34.03 : — 
i 
‘ 

3 
i 

: 34.02 
: = 

«0 Se : = 
: 

SN0 

val e 
ar} «5 3404 =| 3405 

r . 

" 2 \LE slo 
+ & mi 

a «© > 
® ze:GL|En J) SS 

-t 
. -d 

E 
— 
w 
J 

3 
{i 36.02 Z- 3601 s 

©< 

| : : oF -{ 
Oo td 

% oLp 2 = 35 Pn 20 & 
ji ENE rr ; . 
H Ye, " 
K . “, [= 

2 Nz 2 28 Asp S Cad 3 PW, 36.03 5 330 
ir = < ): AIRPORT 8LVD 

a 

2p 2 
§ 
i b> x 

- 

: AZ <5 p os & 23 [=] 
j © J ¥ z © AO 3 - 

c = Bo) /% i = 
at 2) - odd v 1 : A a SR BE } cl . = ¥ i 

a, 
: 

= it g 3 2). 2f* Hp Pt 
3 vd BROOXLEY 

{ 5 Vd AIR FORCE BASE 
i 

id 8 WO Zz : s > pI ~ 
Ss 3 iy 

J > 16 £ 
> - ¥ te | oP 

4 3 30 AZ p - werd 53 
: : 3702 2 adil £ 
7 « 0 17 Ey | 2 : “ 7 

£8 H 4 v 4 nc | : 7 oy . > \, 5 

= Aq, =~ 
x a & 

Rive rl Xe 

s/ i ait Eg! Lo 
~ . ee &/ 

Tessa »allsg 

: 19.02 
CLUB HOUSY 

oO 
< 

xr - 

-000 ° 2000 «00 FLT 1% Loy 

NRE : 3 To Ry 
< 138.01 

+] 
IVER FOAEST DR 

° 

® PLAN FOR 14 DISTRICTS : 
£3 Rp 

o : 5



  

PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS 

Optimum size 63,342 

These three separate plans are constructed 
using the districts from the nine member 
plan in various combinations. 

PLAN A 

District A IX 

Districts from Black % % of 
Nine Member Plan Population Population Black Optimum 
    

1 21367 19842 
2 20968 20083 
4 21612 13785 

TOTALS 63947 53710 83.99 100.96 

District A II 

3 21336 7546 
5 24203 2472 
9 21126 5 

TOTALS 63755 10023 15.72 100.65 

District A I1X 

6 20622 1464 
7 20822 39 
8 20820 2120 

TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82. 98.30 

PLAN B 

District B I 

1 21.367 19842 
2 20968 20083 
5 217293 2472 

TOTALS 63628 42397 66.63 100.45 

District B IX 

3 21336 7546 
4 21613 13785 
6 20622 1464 

TOTALS 63570 22795 35.86 100.35 

District B II1 

7 20822 39 
8 20820 2120 
9 21126 5 

TOTALS 62768 2164 3.45 99.09 

 



x 
re 

PLANS FOR THREE DISTRICTS 

Optimum size 63,342 

  

  

  

PLAN C 

District. 

% of 
Districts from Total Black o optimum 
Nine Member Plan population population Black distric 

1 21367 19842 
3 21336 7546 
4 21612 13785 

TOTALS ©4315 41173 04.02 101.54 

District C II 

2 20968 20083 
5 21293 2472 
9 21126 5 

TOTALS 63387 22560 35.59 100.07 

District C II} 

6 20622 1464 
7 20822 39 
8 20820 2120 

TOTALS 62264 3623 5.82 98.30 

 



  
  

    

  

    

    
  

  

     

    

   

    
  
  

  

    

  

       
  

  
  

    
   

  

  

ar . B57 2% 56 
SARA 

5 » ’ Foy 6 oY 3.9% J. 7 55 v 
a eis ee mS i i om AH - : 
: : Ry 
: H : H norTO¥ C207, 
H : 
: 1] 

' : 

. ’ 

: H 
LJ 

i a. 54 i 
~ 

: > fl> 
1] i. < 

’ ; oe { 38.02 
: \ { 
: i, : Le ’ ” 
' . ofr 

: ae 5, ol J , \ ned? Y -n 
pd Rl 

H 
: 61 
: 
1] 

AJ 

\ 

: E 53 2 ’ = 2 

LJ 

; " CHICKASAW : 
oH : fain SUTHERLAN 

£1, : PRICHARD - OR 
: 0 €X A ND AVE ¢ 

. : & 3 NZ 
1] J | 

Ze . L133 \ k-3 . ~ bg) vw } 

: $ Ne J 515 52 2) 
: z eg 50.7%) : G) 
3 &, \ 
: oO 2 { 

¥ T 
: . FR 

: : BARFORK 43 48 sf 47 » [ 3 z 

. & 2, - 7a, on—— ; 
3, Loin, “ne 45 oN, 

! i 0 & & E 2 hy % 2.4 
H & ~ << AY (od { 
: o v 3 Ie SY 
: ~~ co 

34.03 i ES 40 ¢ 46 S/BiRMINGHAM NO = 

& > 3 23801 © \* 
: 

Cy < 1 TELEGRAPH RDI\Z * i / 

& o BD ; % A, 42 44 Nm 
H 

- = 

; z 413" ps 2s : Ra 
: © < ’ PEL i 5 34.02 3901 > es : z </V 2% 43 iC GOW INA 

1 ! = ©, o) S {Ye CAEEL = * 
] wo _°C . ez L 34.01 oO oF S227 0, Xe Pug 12.01 £3 , 

u WT S 8 m7 702, OY “5% “ : 

5 Cles.. HOlFFaT FH ~ BAR. cq 4, K pov} OVERLOOK ROT ue RD So. RETTS RC 7 ” 
i l= > —— be) 24 
: =i DENMARK 7%, TT S S “q * D 

o rd, or? (a «) 

Ri SF 34.06 & Bh _. 701. 6. al o “ o . Ziz = Rg, > "a : < Ly 

% Eb # UNNAMED R Ne LL Coe J “> ol 6 & “, Coy ~ - z I) Step & wi’ *,<.\0 & re >. 

™ ZEiGt en © & Swvp co « Np 26 / Li &, ” < . JOD 
o| oS < 5, 2 " Sd 9 Z | < of oe 8 » Z 

8 x I> «< = Lem 
£ od . - > >i 402 - 

5 »S . 3 4012 - b 2 0 - MOBILE «oF oo q = A ORGANS 2 
¥ © oOo ’ R Ay, 2 > = i) 

: 36.02 E 36.01 . 3302 Long, </d i hd Xe, 3 be YC AN 
id o ane AMARY, $e < 3 od RAE : S : 27.7% ow sor]: go) ~% ran 1 = = 35 . ran” = ST MARYS L ? 32g, gS Sy 1 
i, op 2 = > £/2502 SPRING MILL AVE En :  2\% 
H Put = Ap © o i LOUSELLE” 4 AVENE c\ 2 3 D Baw, - $ Lo Zz 
: oA No « KEWNETH  pauewiR 10.01 ‘ East 

a, : Sl DauPHIN ..—_~ MOBILE pl ae + ak ge CANAL . 

3 A 2 eB oe0 
} qd 3301 28.8 ami he 8 $= 02 = 2 & os 9.03 10 1 

© BLVD AIRPORT BLVD art me ? » 

Sas z GINA -~ 

a Oo 
. 

- yise, { 
| > wi 2S FE 5 = 5 ; 

SY 24 > a oz 120 M 3 - a 29% ge 1302 
i i - : .: rawAY seaLY, Duvag Ta 

k H ~ GT : e < x $ HOLST ATi . 

§ ; pd So o DE x 4 - x 3 2 £5 z 2 & 
oi] : le) - 3 ~ — 
es = Re - 5 1501 % = 3 r ¥ 7 

J E IS A NZ , : Cc v 

K) Az SF 5 bo : 
[al oO - 

i 21 2f* (23m 
$ < BROOKLEY 
3 OT Tac, HILL 2 

i - AIR FORCE BASE 
© © “5, 
we © 40 < 

o HH > > 
; = z 
¢ & . 

16 
i? . 5 an p 

4 = : : 3 3 — H . 37.02 = IE 17 ; g \, 2 ] + ; H 

2 o rive, ~ % 

a’, SunF Fe 
\ 

PIVER 5% DALE Dg &, See) 

- ~ 1 o “r0 TNF 52 5 
ol + 

ile < < nt ES 

> h, WE 19.02 f 
. CLUB =OUSS 

: = < 

Rr, 

“An 18 
0 ° OOO ®O00 FLLY Yi 

1 2 1 1 J 

° 

e 

eo PLAN A FOR THREE DISTRICTS 

Pl 

INSET MAP - MUBILE AND VICINITY   RM PE RP



  

uf 

  

® fh YER Sl 

    

      

    

  

     

  

  

  

  
  

  

    
    

  

    

  

   
  

  

  
    

  

   

    

   
      

  

      

  

    

  

  

- 
Jo 

18.97 - 41% > = of 2.) 
mm ee neem —— = . 

: ' & 

: 
' 

: 
' 

; : 
: 1] 

! 
t 

’ 

; : 

t 
[ 

: .. 

: 

~ 

H 
pi 

\ 

J 

. 

: 
“ 

: 5 \ 
: 

x 

Bored, 
: 

’ 

: 

; 61 

: 
\ 

3 

- 

: 2 
: > 

Ca 

ay : P2CHARD % 

¥ 

ex / 

, 3 o& : 
' . 

: 

: 
1] Pe, : ie 3 

: Ey No 

. < o 

H 
LJ 

o 3 

: vl : 
; = : - 49 
: : BEARFORK 

4 
RD 

! 
; £/C opp 

<< 

i i 
«0 ah 

34.03 } 5 ; \ 46 Sh 

: =i CREE 
s ~ 

| TELEGRAPH AD 

N 
1] 
1 

: z 2 34.02 
: z 
’ = 

*0,. Cis 2 al 34.01 
vy. ot 5 < o 

L c 2 MOIEEAT £ 

Zig : OVERLOOK ROT RD & 

: =iz — 
i 3404 =| 3405 Eis 

= ¥ : 2azl3 34.06 - 

- Il LL 3 57 " 

? Ey re Rene c vO Leo > 

J) &/ 2 8p 58° ; 2a 
= < 

" SE z 
- 
w 
hd 

3 © 
RN 

| 3302 
E ~ =. | 

: OLD 8 : Z 35 
——EL = : Rp © : 

Ky x -: 

> a, Of DAUPHIN 
Oo 2 S 

8 z E 

g 33.01 5 
[=] 

— 
- 

i 

oS BLVD AIRPORT BLVD in 

- oO 
z = 
-t 

: > 32.03 x 
"- & 

£ 3 32.01 S| soLTOw 3 . 
= a RAN E 

: m C ae A © 

; 3 We° > < 

37.01 o = 2 

3 - | 3202 
oN £ <7 will 

. 
~ GE I's 

J zl oO 
i cl 

: " 31 
© 

  

  
     

    

  

  

o 

i 5 
h «© 

: 30 | 3702 5 

Firemen ry RJ 

>s NF 3 5 
>/ A 

o salle 4 / wite 

000 ° 3000 «000 FEET 

1 1 ; ne 3 3 

® 

" ‘PLAN B FOR THREE DISTRICTS 
o 

AAvNaldau a     Aas na .OBILE AND VICINITY 

  

  

       

    

  

   

   

  

BROOXLEY 

AIR FORCE BASE 

| 
88
 

16   

 



: 3 ® A 13.8 22r0, 56 
, fray » iy 

Sn IRS 3 SE 2 4 55 ¢? 

nN ; : 38.02 

61 

\z 53 

      

  

    
    

    

  

    
    

  
         

    

  

   

      
  

   

  

      
  

  

        
  

  

      

  

  

oo > 

= 3 
7 CHICKASAW Z| 

ia SUTHERLAND 
PRICHARD 

F777 3 
A & 

L™ 

EARFORK 
k 

Cio B 

: 2 
: ] « 

«0 7 3403 | n 
5 : Es CREEK 
3 i 

. 

) i 
: 
E : z 

: 5 34.02 

? = 
a0 Cu : 3 n 34.01 

a; GS 
or. 0 o 

bose i 
~ pot 

aR 
z . «1 3404 =| 340s B15 o 

=] uf Slo’ NFrzio 3406 S 

i 2 oi UNNAMED R oe AY AT” 5 
; yg = JO SIG » TI $o -~ 

: . 
2 ER © S LvD S Ey Ap 

> 

© £ ¥ X 2 

i 
[vg § 

< 

36.02 2 36.01 ; 33.02 2 es HiLF &, 2 Avg xs A 

ul” MOBILE INFIRMARY Cy < = > Rs 

27 $ HOSP BDRY 9.01 2p s 

35 . ’ Ss ST MARYS LN ’ SPR mer < 1 

. £2502 SPRING HILL AVE ny = 2 z\ > 

S z LOUSELLE : AVR o\ a 
Davey pov ©, 2 IN © KENNET Hy DAUPHIN 10.01 i Ga 

al oavery MOBILE ig “di % F; tr ANAL Z 

= 3 902 8 28 3 -. 
3301 oO 2501 % 

= & -_ 03 3 1002 11 - 
AT BLVD . € ! e 

AIRPO = ov z VIRGINA 3 

i v YVIRGin [| 
w L, % js 

” TR 

gl 7 : 2 14 S/1301 
£ 24 sno 13.02 § © 29 5 3 - o : A 

FAIR wf Duvar i + = 
_—- 

x 2 ARLINGT 

: e > z & 1 Aah 

37.01 
- w S . 2 x : 

= : <5 2 230283 If 1502 4 2 3 

2 > 22 3 o 5% § 
g > z 33% 3 

i E AL A 2 = 1501" 

: ¥& 32 X= 
o \2 hg £ GOL 

2 x ~d Frm = - < 
21 = (2am [A 

= BROOXLEY 
OT Tac, MILL 

3 

AIR FORCE BASE 

5 L > 
3 

ad 

© 16 
# 2 

3702 g 
< 
- 
- 
= 
1 

o 

A 

3 
~~ 
J 

< 

/ > sf 
CrEFR Alls 
pee 

“-« 

O 
3 

O00 LJ 000 O00 FEET 

4 1 PY 31 1 J 

® 

] 
) oi 

oe ‘PLAN C FOR THREE DISTRICTS 

» 

INSET MAP - MOBILE AND VICINITY

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top