Bailey v. Patterson Motion of the Appellee Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi to Dismiss or Affirm
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1961
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Bailey v. Patterson Motion of the Appellee Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi to Dismiss or Affirm, 1961. fb78a68b-ba9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4f2603e0-a1ea-44da-976f-72c2aa461c9a/bailey-v-patterson-motion-of-the-appellee-joe-t-patterson-attorney-general-of-the-state-of-mississippi-to-dismiss-or-affirm. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
No. 643
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1961
SAMUEL BAILEY, ET AT,,
v.
JOE T. PATTERSON, ET AL.,
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON DIVISION
MOTION OF THE APPELLEE,
JOE T. PATTERSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
TO DISMISS OR AFFIRM
DUGAS SHANDS, Assistant Attorney General
of the State of Mississippi
New Capitol, Jackson, Mississippi
Counsel for Appellee, Joe T. Patterson,
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
EDWARD L. CATES, Assistant Attorney
General of the State of Mississippi
CHARLES CLARK, Special Assistant
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
PETER M. STOCKETT, JR., Special
Assistant Attorney General of the State of
Mississippi
New Capitol, Jackson, Mississippi
Of Counsel for Appellee, Joe T. Patterson,
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1961
No. 643
SAMUEL BAILEY, ET AL.,
v.
JOE T. PATTERSON, ET AL.,
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON DIVISION
MOTION OF THE APPELLEE,
JOE T. PATTERSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
TO DISMISS OR AFFIRM
Now comes the Appellee, Joe T. Patterson, Attorney
General of the State of Mississippi, pursuant to Rule
16 of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the
United States, and on the basis of this Motion and Brief
filed contemporaneously herewith and in support hereof,
moves that the appeal be dismissed and/or that the
judgment of the District Court comprised of three
Judges in and for the Southern District of the State of
Mississippi be affirmed on the grounds that the appeal
is not within the jurisdiction of this Court; and that it
is manifest that the questions on which the decision of
the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need
further argument.
It is therefore respectfully submitted that the appeal
should be dismissed and/or that the judgment of the
United States District Court in and for the Southern
District of Mississippi should be affirmed.
DUGAS SHANDS, Assistant Attorney General
of the State of Mississippi
Counsel for Appellee, Joe T. Patterson,
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi