Order Denying Defendant-Intervenor Entz' Motion to Dismiss (LULAC)
Public Court Documents
September 15, 1989
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order Denying Defendant-Intervenor Entz' Motion to Dismiss (LULAC), 1989. 0e06e281-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/50727a6b-bb70-4511-aecc-f983fcbb9af0/order-denying-defendant-intervenor-entz-motion-to-dismiss-lulac. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
20
FEL ED
SEP 1: 19893
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BY. TE ol
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
NO. MO-88-CA-154 vs.
MATTOX, et al.,
*
%
*
*
*
*
*
¥
*
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR ENTZ'’
MOTION TO DISMISS (LULAC)
Upon consideration of all matters of record, the Court has
determined that the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant-intervenor Entz
does not have merit. THEREFORE, it is DENIED. Plaintiff League
of Latin American Citizens (LULAC) has standing to represent the
interests of its Dallas County Black members who are eligible to
Be 0% State, Done this /. day of 5 , 1989 in Midland,
Texas.
ff STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7:88—cv—-00154
Sherrilyn Ifill, Esq. Sm
NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
99 Hudson St.
16th Floor
New York, NY 10013
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 10708
MIDLAND, TEXAS 79702
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
POSTAGE AND FEES PAID
UNITED STATES COURTS
USC 426