Correspondence from Winner to Donaldson, Wallace, Horton, Hunter, and Heenan; Proposed Stipulations 2
Correspondence
May 23, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Affidavit (Exhibit A), 1981. 5ac50cea-d392-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6ca88973-917f-4d16-b845-6ae520667700/affidavit-exhibit-a. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Copied!
ta l ( t ,'... IIl.' , ir a |'. crvrL AeTroN NO. 81-803-CrV-5 IN IrHE UNTTED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OT NORTH CAROLINA NALEIGH DIVISION I I RALPH GINGLES, et al. ) Plaintlffs, I ) )V. ) RUFUS EDMISTEN, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) 'A1ex K. Brock, being duly shrorn, hereby deposes and says: 1. I, Alex K. Brockr 6rn Secretary-Director of the state Boarcl of Elections of North carolina, the offices of whlch are located at suite 801, Raleigh Brrild.inq, 5 west Hargett Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 276OLi 2- r have served in that capacity continuousry since August 5, 1965, and rrras, th'erefore, servLng in that capacity in L967 when the General Assenrbly of North CaroLina ratified chapter 640, session Laws of lgi7, which contained proposals for two arnendments to the constitution of North carolina; 3. Those two proposals were approved by vote of the people l.n November of 1958 and became Article If , &4(3) (presently Article rr, s3(3) ) and Article rr, s6(3) (presently Article rI 55 (3) ) of the Constitution of blorth Carolina; 4. Article If, 53(3) provides, inter alia, that the General Assembly of North Carolina is prohibited from dividing counties in forming the state senate electoral districts; Article ff , 55(3) provides, ipter alia, that the General Assernbly is prohlbtted from divlding counties Ln forming State Representative electoral dlstricts ? 5. As best f recall, f did not deem these amendments to the State Constitution to be subject to the submissLon requirements of 55 of the voting Rlghts Act of 19550 at the time of.their adoptlon, and, therefore, r did not submit the amendments to the Attorney General of +-he rlnLted States for approval or seek thelr approval by the Unlted States District Court for the District of Columbla i : qr&,t t n M 7 t a of the on the S,l*,, -2- 6, I have, however, now advlsed the Attorney General 1968 ConstLtutl.onal anendments, by way of correspondence dates of Septemlcer 22, 23, 24 and 28, 1981; 7. A copy of all of my corresPondence to the Attorney General, regardJ.ng in part the 1968 amendments Ls attached' hereto, along with pertl,nent attaehments to the corresPondence, excludLng coples of session laws, the corresPondenee and attach- ments beLng incorporated herein by reference; B. I have subnltted all information to the Attorney General which f deen to be of any inportance or sLglnificance to a determina- tion by him as to whether the amendments satisfy the reqgLrements of 55 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the determination be made as expedltiousJ.y as possLble; g. f have also submitted to the Attorney General, for his approval, copies of chapter 8oo, chapter 82L' and Chapter 87, Session Laws of 1981, these constituting, resPectivelyr North carolina's apportionment plans for the state House and senate, and state Congressional el'ectoral districtsi IO. f have subrnitted all other information deemed by rne to be pertinent to the apportionment p1ans, includinq all supplernental information requested by the Attorney General' 01-*H tsr,^L Alex K. Brock Secretary-DLrector North Carolina State Board of Elections AFFIANT Sworn to and subscribed before me this *e 6ill day of october' 1981. Commisslon ExPJ.res Q lroranv PUBLTC