Letter to Fuhrman from Roumell RE Proposed Brief

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
- Norman J. Chachkin
- Jack Greenberg
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 6378c469-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Letter to Fuhrman from Roumell RE Proposed Brief, 1974. 6378c469-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/50f430be-f3b3-4808-bd7c-d39d34d64805/letter-to-fuhrman-from-roumell-re-proposed-brief. Accessed October 09, 2025.

Copied!

    ACy I L
t i * ! \ t - O

W A L L A C E  D .  R I L E Y  
G E O R G E  T.  R O U M E L L ,  J R .  
D O R O T H Y  C O M S T O C K  R I L E Y  
J A N E  K E L L E R  S O U R I S  
E M M E T  E .  T R A C Y .  J R .  
T H O M A S  M . J .  H A T H A W A Y  
P A T R I C K  H.  M c C O L L O U G H  
J O H N  F. B R A D Y  
G R E G O R Y  P. T H E O K A S  
W I L L I A M  F.  D E N N I S  
S T A N L E Y  C .  M O O R E , m

R i l e y  a n d  R o u m e l l
A T T O R N E Y S  A N D  C O U N S E L O R S  A T  LAW 

7 t h  F L O O R  F O R D  B U I L D I N G  

D E T R O I T ,  M I C H  I G A N  4 8 2 2 6

January 24, 1974

T E L E P H O N E  

(3 1 3 ) 9 6 2 - 8 2 5 5

Harold H. Fuhrman, Esq.
Wickert & Fuhrman 
The Brown Deer Bank Building 
4455 West Bradley Road 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223

Re: Bradley v. Milliken, 484 f.2d 215;
Professional Personnel of VanDyke 
v. Milliken, 484 F.2d 959; Docket 
#73-434, 73-435, and 73-436, Supreme 
Court of the United States

Dear Mr. Fuhrman:
I have your letter of January 21, 1974 in the 

above matter. Representing one of the Respondents, the 
Detroit Board of Education, I not only will not consent 
but I will forthwith file a motion to dismiss any 
brief that you file on the grounds that the brief is 
not timely filed. Any brief that you had intended to 
file was due on January 3, 1974. An attempt on your 
part to file a brief at this time would be prejudicial 
to my client as we have not had the opportunity to 
review the brief during the thirty-day period that we 
were permitted to file the reply briefs. Therefore, you 
can expect no consent from us, and you can expect a 
motion to dismiss because your brief is untimely.

Very truly yours,

GTR:pg
cc: Jack Greenberg, Esq.

Louis R. Lucas, Esq. 
Paul Dimond, Esq.

George T. Roumell

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter to Fuhrman from Roumell RE Proposed Brief

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in