Responses of Judge Entz, Intervenor, to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories; Responses to Plaintiffs' First Requests for Production
Public Court Documents
May 5, 1989
9 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Responses of Judge Entz, Intervenor, to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories; Responses to Plaintiffs' First Requests for Production, 1989. 9bf9909c-1e7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5188c25b-304a-480d-8275-95520234c8e1/responses-of-judge-entz-intervenor-to-plaintiffs-first-set-of-interrogatories-responses-to-plaintiffs-first-requests-for-production. Accessed November 08, 2025.
Copied!
HUGHES & LUCE
2800 MOMENTUM PLACE
1717 MAIN STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 1500 FIRST STATE BANK BUILDING
400 WEST 15TH STREET
(214) 239-5500 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
TELECOPIER (214) 939-6100 (512) 482-6800
TELEX 730836 TELECOPIER (512) 474-4258
Direct Dial Number
(214) 939-5577
May 5, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
P-083-321-040
nkelstein
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
Mary's, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Re: "LULAC, eti:al., v. Mattox, et al.’
In the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas Midland-Odessa Division
No. MO-88-CA-154
Dear Ms. Finkelstein:
Enclosed please find the Responses of Honorable F. Harold
Entz, Intervenor, to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories
and to Plaintiffs' First Requests for Production of documents.
BMR:phl
Enclosures
cc: All counsel of record
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL NO. 4434, etal. §
§
Plaintiffs, §
§ CIVIL ACTION NO.
Vv. §
§ MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, etal. §
§
Defendants. §
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
TO: LULAC, by and through its attorney of record, Susan
Finkelstein, Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc., 201 N. St.
Mary's, Suite 600, San Antonio, Tx. 78205:
INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
Please identify by name, business and residential
address, telephone number, place of employment and job title
each of the persons known to you who has any knowledge
regarding the facts that base any claim or defense that you
plan to raise in this lawsuit.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
Judge FPF. Harold Entz ("Judge Entz") objects to this
interrogatory in that it is unreasonably broad.
Theoretically, every registered voter in Dallas County would
have some knowledge regarding the relevant facts in this
lawsuit. In fact, all district court judicial candidates in
Dallas County from 1980 forward have some knowledge of
relevant facts; also the various county and state offices that
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS" FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES - Page 1
keep voter registration and election statistics have some such
knowledge. Subject to the above objection, Judge Entz will
supplement this interrogatory with names of specific
individuals who have the most knowledge of relevant facts and
will also designate witnesses pursuant to any orders of the
Court.
INTERROGATORY NO. 2:
Please identify by name, business and residential
address, telephone number, place of employment and job title
each of the expert witnesses who you expect to call to testify
should this case go to trial and state the nature of the
testimony that you expect each expert witness to give.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 2:
Anthony Champagne, Professor of Political Economy and
Government and Politics in the School of Social Sciences,
University of Texas at Dallas, P. O. Box 830688, Richardson,
Texas 75083, (214) 690-2927.
Dr. Champagne will testify that voting for State District
Judges in Dallas County is not racially polarized resulting in
Blacks or Hispanics being denied equal access to elect
candidates of their choice. He may testify with regard to
other relevant factors under Section 2 and Judge Entz will
supplement his answer at the appropriate time. At this point,
Dr. Champagne is further expected to testify that there are
important policy reasons for maintaining the current system
for electing judges in Dallas County and that judicial
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES - Page 2
campaigns in Dallas County are not characteristically marked
with overt and/or subtle racial appeals.
Judge Entz also understands that the Attorney General may
designate certain other experts who may testify with respect
to Dallas County. 1f that is the. case, Judge Entz will
supplement this interrogatory to identify such person if,
indeed, he expects to call him/her as a witness when this case
goes to trial.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
Please state the nature of any claim or defense that you
intend to present at trial that does not arise out of facts
that took place, will take place or take place in Dallas
County.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3: ea
There are certain other legal claims that are set out in
the pleadings. Except in statistics that might be gathered
from sources outside Dallas County, and almanac or census-type
data, Judge Entz can think of nothing else "outside" Dallas
County.
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES - Page 3
INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Please identify by year, type of election (general,
Democratic/Republican primary, Democratic/Republican run off),
candidate and type of office each election that you claim is
relevant to your claims.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Judge Entz has not yet determined completely the "most
relevant" races, but he will supplement shortly in accordance
with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In general, most
races from 1980 and after are relevant in one way or another.
Respectfully submitted,
et : > A
2 [2 LL : A { (Bae
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
David C. Godbey
Bobby M. Rubarts
Esther R. Rosenblum
of HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
214/939-5500
ATTORNEYS FOR HONORABLE
JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ,
194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES - Page 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1 hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document was served on counsel of record on May 5,
1988.
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS® FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES - Page 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL NO. 4434, etal. §
S
Plaintiffs, §
§ CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. §
§ MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, etal §
S
Defendants. §
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
TO: LULAC, "by and: through its attorney of record, Susan
Finkelstein, Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. 201 N. St;
Mary's Suite, Suite 600, San Antonio, Tx. 78205
REQUEST NO. 1:
Please provide copies of all documents prepared by an
expert on your behalf in this case.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1:
Judge F. Harold Entz ("Judge Entz") assumes that this
request was intended to pertain to testifying experts as
opposed to experts who will not testify or who or
undiscoverable for other reasons. Therefore, Judge Entz will
produce such documents when they are available. As yet, no
such documents exist. To the extent, if any, that the request
was intended to call for documents prepared by nontestifying
and nondiscoverable experts, Judge Entz preserves his
objection.
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - Page 1
REQUEST NO. 2:
Please provide copies of all documents provided to an
expert on your behalf in this case.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2:
Judge Entz, as above, assumes that this request was
intended properly to pertain only to testifying experts.
Therefore, Judge Entz will produce such documents when they
are available. As yet, no such documents exist. To the
extent, if any, that the request was intended to call for
documents provided to nontestifying and nondiscoverable
experts, Judge Entz preserves his objection.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert HY Mbw, J Lis
David C. Godbey
Bobby M. Rubarts
Esther R. Rosenblum
of HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
214/939-5500
ATTORNEYS FOR DALLAS
COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
F. HAROLD ENTZ
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document was served on counsel of record on May 5,
1989.
52800010:53
RESPONSES OF HONORABLE F. HAROLD ENTZ, INTERVENOR,
TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - Page 3