Justice Dept. Won't Assess Possible Bias in Election Plans (The Washington Post)

    . a HANG, 
rs PRESS Maras. 

Lash Checkpoint § Charlie, 4 

lors’ lives. “As tong’ ‘as’ 
Rats, we cannot.-speaic.of - 

2 iiions” between: East and. 
niny, Ost said. 

mash through Creteakats 
+ ieavily traveled thorough | 
¢ 190-mile- long wall; lefta 
siatered wooden barriers~} 
and concrete debris or the 
tf Thoughr-bricks torn: 

‘| “nemic problem for the-coun 

+B *Strasaheim, chief? economists for sentative ClaytagYebtter struck an’ ? 

:} - Wyss, senior econamist:at Data Re=": 

Posie Bi 

- trade figures “offer almost no;signs.. i. 0NCe Drignt SpOg:it, te. u.o. urdue: 

“of hope: on-what is. the biggest. eco-: iy picture. Agricultural trade Cedar 
nly 
whey 

. 

    

    

“It suggestsi.that.. third-quarter is : d 

i |: growth i in the economy: is'not going 4% uous ‘monthly surpluses. Fi 

to be-any‘goad at all}; said: Donald 7 

ae Ay 
   

. Merrill; Lynch: EconomicsgisDavid 3; optimistici note: in thesionly. public; 

  

-ranking: official’ of the; Reagan =H . sources. Inc; predicted, that rithe:: highx : 
Seo TRADES AT, Cob Li: SHE 

wa 

gross national ek product would'grows: iY 
Ang Hi gE id cane ine ¥ i =~ i 

iss AG 4 

ts (1 ad. 
Nr . 3. 

b. Ea ilaigs 54 Yo PR Fre Sy $ 2 

“Fle = : Lon ( or “Pl; AL 1 f 

i 4 PRET ma riot 
: Syrian oy aia Aeris wr 2d, “3 pad: 

oot, 

  

  

Ipaideptnty 

: = dl ps CBA 

! Ties | Dey 1) 
-3 "id 

    
     

P
o
g
 

. 

ie
 

7
 
t
a
n
 

i
r
e
}
 

. [70 IRCET [CRY Bh Lak 

ition i 

1aS 111; 
AA Sugfs? wie ight: et 

Ang AY SHE ily 3218 

Tad a “saon, jublishy final re; iations 
oT By Howard Kurtz i all ie Dp! te Is 1 gy ‘lai Aare 
-£ Wamp Eye Seat Woes “allowing “it "to ear; election law. 

A 13 changes without ‘considering wheth- 

CE Assiotant, ‘Attorney: -Géneral' Wilk: er those changes, ‘result in discrim-- 4 

  

—
—
"
~
 
-
_
—
 

Ir
 

r
n
 

- 

   
   

  

    

—
 

  

  

          

-. The shift, hich be 

major ‘reversal in. Reagan adminis- and neither he nor any other official ; X 

“tration palicy, means that state and in the~ department's. Civil” Rights *~ 

local officials in affected states will™- - Division ‘was available for comment” 

“find it easier to-win-“preclearance”  .. yesterday. But’ his “remarks were - 

approval - from the Justice: ‘Depart-c-a described. :by.conference. partici-, 

“ment for: election: law. changes thats.’ pants.and the.new policy was con- i: 

currently could be rejected as “dis~ : firmed by administration‘ sources. To 

criminatory: i, The regulations:were drafted. tos: 
\ 
r 

  

Lar CE: lh he oi Sk FA ys 
Yop § ve * [AAR ~, 

a political 

re 
- 

sh 
¥ t4 

¥ forumr   
  

     
|; 

: ii bopdee had. been-re- + Reynolds told im me 
esl - here that, the. Justis Dipituad, i] AT : 

Li Je % 4 fi iy ai! 

—
 

~ 

Ai zens on 

FY
 

  

  

By Gary Ice 
wiagton Post Foreign Service 

1 y 

1 
OW, Aug. 29—A senior ° 
affioinl warned Soviet cit- 

issue: e Frist Wa Arning’ 

Chernobyl | Risk 

      1 i Sn £5 tty 
a 

CRI Ea 

| Fo 
— on 

en oo 
Set as Heat 
Takes Holiday 

  

BE ir tnd 

via vr oe 
Ape Te PI      

  

into the body from the air or ho eat- 

ing contaminated foods. “== ~ +, 

“The inner irradiation” may have | - 
' delayed consequences,” Grigoryev 
“said, including “different. diseases, . 

  

  

# a 

Ao By Sandra Evans_— 
Post Hall Writer |   - rE aon W, dng to 

v:comment-on.the; tradg: figures by a pe 

ie 

to ani litical "Science : Association; forum, 

its third: straight‘month.'of deficits®:: Hr 

res en id 4 Pint 

B
e
i
 1
 

1, 3 tne Rae. FOG 

3 

   
   

    

   

  

   
   
   

      

     
      

         

    

   

: hn Bradford: Reynolds: disclosed’: “ination against: blacks. and other mi~: A : 

“yesterday that the Justice: Depart-3:) norities., Nine; ‘states’ and "parts of .; 73. 

‘ ment will no longer consider: wheth-= eights others. must; seek. such ad=" 46 7 4: 4 

er election. plans, have. iscrimisa’ ve VancexepUESYAL: “under “thi “Voting dhs fl 

“tory results when it approves, thous:  RightsjAct; Tes LAER AA Fy rhs, Et 

YL. | sands ‘of such’ plans. under; the: Vot:, dF Si Reyiiolds Fi ‘pot. ‘speak. from’ aly: iy. 

“ing Rights Act. - ri il kh prepared. text atthe: American Po? 4% 1 

  
1 

  
      

 



    H i 

| -         2 ie 

  

-— 

— Tig Wasinncroy p 

‘—e 

    t 

wi 3 ey Vas of Rg OST 11d Tiny oddity . Te" aie 

  

   
    
   

   
y : 

¥ »”" 

wl... 
- ~   i 

——— VOTING, From Al ~ 
the Voting Rights Act. The amend- 5 broadened the law's use of 3 % Its test” by outlawing election [rmanges that have the practical ef- fect of discriminating against mj- | ugrities by diluting thejr voting : strength, Under this test, an at. large election System in a city with [2 large black Population and no . [black elected officials can be viewed \ i fas discriminatory, 

| Part of the Voting Rights Act had . [Previously required proof that local : officials deliberately intended to ‘discriminate against min rities, a [standard that” iyi] rights Sctivis argued was difficult to meet, often Because the responsible officials . had beglt dead for years, Ri i "oposeq change drew’ an response from Rep, Don Ed- 

  

  

      

  

    8. 
! S— 

wards (D-Calif) 
House Judiciar 

ights Act by 
ment.” He said 

A Justice Dept. Won't Weigh | |: Possible Election P lan Bias 

ave “been 
able success of the Voting Rights Act. If this new 

Mr. Reynolds = * approve discriminatory vot- ing changes.” ° bo 1, ® Frank R. Parker of the Joint Cen- ter for Political Studies, whq' at- 
ference, called Reyn- 
“a dramatic retreat 

Justice Depart- 
ementing since 

; chairman“ of the 
y subcommittee op civil and constitutional rights, which said in a bipartis 

that using the re 
preclearance reviews “is a pe interpretation of the legislative his. tory of the 1982 3 Edwards called the move “an out i WR ot r 
rageous retreat op the Voting : I" elr eat on the Jolin forum for 

R the Justice Depart. WE Ri the department's , 

1982, It’s i flaunting of the intent + OF Congress. It would mean the Jus. tice Department would be approy- ing a large number of racially dis. Crlmingtory voting law changes that .. Would violate the Voting Rights id i Och nde mL “One federal officia familiar with the Issye said the change would mean that more disputed election on the plans would receive the. gQvern= . cording -ment’s “Stamp of approval," Tpe ] 

. results 

or 

  

a preclea 
«J | Under Apii 8 : 

hg A 

+: 

: get—loca 

ap- Proved official. said, .adding “that this was unlikely because the . department hag filed {i The nin few such law- | i ;because of “The proposal reverses the prac. ition are A] ~ lice the Justice Department has Georgia, followed in several caseg since >South C 

L] 

  

   

Reynolds r 
~ that the ( 

* ‘around and 

Said such 

‘rejected for 
ithey had a d 

+ left minorities worse , {were previously, 

‘ichanges; require 

arolina, Texas 

LR 

test should paye « 

to 

range review, : HEY = the *. Proposal—which 
* Sources said has been approved by 

$ Tid 2 Rep. Don Edwards (D-Calif) + ‘the Office of Management and Bud- | election plans could be Preclearance “only” jf iscriminatory intent or 
off than they 

e ils ‘Whose ' election 
federal “approval 

a history of discrimina- abama, Alaska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi; 
and Virginia, 

    
   

    

   

   

| the 
no jmpget preclearance Process," ac- pie participant's notes. 

eportedly acknowledged 
partment might ‘tury 
se a jurisdiction whose election plan it had just cleared, but i a spit would be 3 better 

pursuing the charges than 

  

     

      

    

    

    

    

   
   

  

MAY Liibay, ALuLy JU, LYup 

   

  

   

    

   
   
   
   

    

   
     

    

  

            

        

   

  

   

   

    

    
   
    

   
   
      

   

  

   

      

   

   

  

    
     

  

H
R
N
 

A
Y
,
 

fs
 

. 
La
s 

N
a
i
 

— 
h
a
 

=,
 

3.
8 

S
y
 
L
E
N
 

3 
3-
2 

= 
3 

~ 
RL 

; 
D
4
 

A
 

Y
 

o
Y
 

an
i 

Co 
i
 

        
    

   

      

       

  

     

   

  

   

       

   

     

   
   

    

i RE mes “ries 
i=. fads te Ae ye safe | 

5%, i 
a | RR roe i | oN 1 0 inten ERE lee LEN HC VW, raat i 

So ar 3 ery a 1 4 ay at our 2 AR olay, 5) ; 
1 . A We walk ; 

2 a iOffice ™* ak AE : 
: at 30 LP Tysons Corner Le    

  

   

  

   
iandmark e Fqr Oaks’, x. 
H EH Lr - ‘ att Ee » g 

  

    

  

    

  
ity girls have fun in 

ht & LS wane, 

  

          

pagan. 

  

       
igh kag 4 [3 - Mp ate 3 RE ILL OT TMG dey. 

»,