Certification of Record on Appeal; Index; Specification of Errors

Public Court Documents
December 21, 1965

Certification of Record on Appeal; Index; Specification of Errors preview

5 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Henry v. Clarksdale Hardbacks. Certification of Record on Appeal; Index; Specification of Errors, 1965. 656232b6-8418-f111-8342-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/52a3a071-a26e-482e-8a64-320ed9c5f921/certification-of-record-on-appeal-index-specification-of-errors. Accessed April 01, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||9217cb19-82f6-4d71-8c28-327b2d270dff||] Sut 
g 

=
 

» 

8 

5 2a —_— - 

S4881881D 

du 
be 

- 

ates 

o 

& 

nine 

Circui 

t 

2 

4
 

fre 
oO 

od 
w
y
 

Q
 

fog 
. 

-
 

7
s
 

- 
# 

m
e
d
 

fot 
\ 

el 

»
 

4
 

=
 

2
 

hod 
a
 

d 
fa 

. 

8 
H 

: 
r
R
 

D 
i 

fod 
4
3
 

L
y
 

e
S
 

8
 

gd 
SE 

| * 
y 

o
d
 

¢ 
H
y
 

o
d
 

5
 

|
 

ord 
hh] 

3 
k4 

2
 

w
d
 

43 
iid 

.
 

4 
LE 

! 
3 

LY 
3 

ba 
\ 

ped 
. 

as 
a 

“
 

=
 

: 
—
 

3 
¢ 

Fo 
“ 

v
d
 

pot 
+
 

> 
“
 

iF | 
seh 

I. 2a 
2 
9
 

: 
a. 

gs 
fh 

2
 

5) 
©
 

42 
4d 

bed 
a
 

o
 

ry 
a
 

tA 
i
 

“
.
 

W
o
 

A
N
 

r
e
 

B
E
 

i
d
 

Q
 

f
u
 

=
 

e
i
]
 

L
O
 

V
d
 

; 

oO 
a
d
 

X 
o® 

1% 
i
n
 

pt 
r
o
d
 

. 
E
E
 

=
 

w
=
 

“ 
Wi 

w
d
 

o 
L
L
 

3
 

for 
4
 

L
D
 

3 
“4 

EI 
r
d
 

: 
or. 

&
8
 

fy 
o
d
 

4
 

1 
]
 

od 
2 

3, 
364 

5) 
f 

b
f
 

o
d
 

3
 

4
 

os 
0 

©
 

; 
3 

"| 
A
d
 

0
 

<
4
 

"
 

oly 
G 

lg 

ai 

5 

na 

a
e
 

-, 
3
 

3 
-
 

od 
o
r
 

i 
#4 

wd 
3
 

Oo 
® 

» 
O
 

4 
$4 

w
d
 

oh) 
5 § 

® 
o
e
 

bed 
4
 

£4 

d 
o
d
 

bod 
3 

h
e
 4 

pe 
ty 

5 
B
 

“ 
a
 

d
e
r
 

F
a
 

i 
a
 

2
 

i
 

« 
p 

3
 

>
 

ol 
i) 

Cond 
4
 

. 
=
 

w
d
 

: 
spd 

ve] 
- 

®
 

r
d
 

+
 

=
 

2
 

2
)
 

. 4 
oh 

i 

Su 

- 

v4 # 

T 

Vin 

tn 

"> 
fs 

M
e
 

oO 
i
m
 

4
 

|
 

0
 

ow | 
red 

e
d
 

3
 

D
 

4
 

3
 

i
 

D
 

A
 

Ad 
r
l
 

a 
w
y
 

-
 

an 

0
 

4
 

Q
 

)
 

on 
y 



Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Defendants-Appellees 

\ppeal from the United States District Court 
Pow Planes Kea uae > Yo cv wad wf MA coon creat vim for the Northern District of Mississippi 

eS 

(A Complaint, filed Apr. 22, - 

i 
Ef EE Er EE Tr EE CE ECT CECT TTT TTETETTEIETEETITETTTETYT 

Motion for Fre eli minary i 4 injunction, filed APL» 2 1964 POGLORAEODSIOEBEB EEO 

ummons (Leon Porter, Harvey Gresham, Paul Hunter, Graham Bramlett).... 

Summons (Gycelle Tynes, Chester H. Curtis, Dr. William wilkins, Silly 
- 1 ee Za Ean 
+81 Fl dno shen sast ianisnrbessnssibtrsasternlnsborenssssss be

 | 

Fo
 

— I AYE Td cnpnne % "Tgp 4 A I'S Pn } 
Quimer, wa ile Allen, of 1 EHS Humber, Me dis Kyle) sédeseonoe 

gtion to # Lar e Time ior WMigwWers 5 fi led Ma kb} Oy 150%. eee ses PsORGGOERORS 

4 - : “ oo. 9 . . % on} 

for Preliminary Injunction, filed Hay ll, 190%.cscscss 

§ # 

Order bnlarging Time to Answer, entered May 11, LE ESE EEE REESE SE REE EE SB 

otice of Dismissal of Action, as to certal rty-plaintiffs, 5/13/64. 

school \nswer of Board of ifru: stees of the Clarks 

District and Board of Trustees of the Coahoma Coun y School 

Jigtrict, filed June 10, OM set 006s so sti ens neste sltsaneesssssesnss 

sarate Answer of the Clarksdale Municipal Separate School Districts 
#* 

v ™ I i 4 ~ 1 us - 4 _ pa EL ™ Fil 

the Board of Trustees; and Gycelle Tynes, Superintendent, 6/10/64. 
~~ 3 

Fi 1 Pefendants! Motion to Strike Para. 10 of Complaint, filed June 10, 1904 

WUIGeTr 10 Ae LABLRATY injun ct [Ke ¢ JN entered “HNEe / % 19064, SP RCOBROLEODSBSE 

" “ NN 

ce of Order for freliminary Injunctions.sess 

i t Plan of Clarksdale Municipal Separate 

s¢hool AS A op § et % with Char 9 4 iled GULLY af 9 1964 ES SES RES EE EEE EE NE 

Flan, with Notice, filed 

ONE LR ae DN Be TY 

No FRE on EF Bo ain Wn 2d Rl Tre 5 25% 2% ¥ | she ox rd £9 2 Po wey fa noes da EE iTS 
@solution 1 3 as GL =] ugtees OX WE: ARSC 216 Hunicipal we ALA C8 School 

Jistrict establishing Subdistriects and Attendance Zones, and Maps 

Refle ¢ting ay filed AUEe 10, Jot ssvsssusnscotecesnsssssasnsese 
+ 5 gp a a 4 pee - Pp 

II, III, IV and V, are in separate envelope) 

> 

FACT 10 VOUI'Y naepol'te CO WALOAAGTAW CCI'Lalll BaP 

Order for 
& vide aS % " ) + &1 Tu 4 
A050 FEEH] 1 213 ae LHe Qe 

sri my so fe shams =r Yr »y - 3 semes BChool year, entered 

2 wh £ " ove " 
i : 3 LL a ABD oe Ad C&l Ww I FEI FIIETES § 2 “ve 8 | i Ye 

> 4 er Wid SF ® hb Ste Ed. ade A Nr A en ANGE 3 sntel “ia ville “ay 4.4 FIER EE ER RE EEE 

bod FP? $4 mw ‘ i a Tak she tof 210 3 C3 
1 100LL3 OLi0% A i Wi LEICA nIBncy ve » ob LOL A 118 vile {9 196540 

AGEY 10r LOUXrt HepOrter To widdiraw Ceriiln LEI DLLEg ADI e § JG scen 

24 = 

“ee Ay 

> (3 

o 

a we 

™ A 

pe oY Sl 

AVL = 



* * 

Subpoena (Mr. A. Isaacson) filed Apre 10; 1965 cscecsscsssscscssssasssse 106 

Subpoena (Mr. Abe May) filed Apr. 10, 1905eesesccssnsssssscssnssssanosns 107 

Subpoena (Yr. Hyman Kantor) filed Apr. 10; 1905.eesseccssscsescssssscse 108 

Subpoena (Mr. J. W. McKellar) filed Apr. 10, 1905esssssssssvnsesssescsne 109 

Subpoena (Hon. Hudson Bell) filed Apr. 10, 1905sscecsessssosssssssnsssns 110 

Subpoena (Hon. W. S. Kincade) filed Apr. 10, 1905csssssssssssncescnssss 111 

I+ Stipulation as to alteration of city boundaries, filed May 17, 1905esse 112 « 117 

Memorandum Opinion, filed ARE» 11, 1965. SOPOT OINOBOSDBOOOEBOOIOBIS 116 - 101 

Order for Permanent Injunction, entered Auge. ll, 1905cccsccsssnsccsscss 162 « 169 

Wr Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Findings and Judgment, filed Aug. 20, 1905. 170 « 175 

Memorandum and Order ™ entered Auge 31, 1965, CHOP BIODOERBOOBEVINOEOOES 176 - 177 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Further Relief, filed Sept. 24, 1965.esssessesss 178 « 181 

Defendants! Response to Motion for Further Relief, filed Sept. 24%, 1965 182 « 190 

Defendants' Revised Plan for Llementary Attendance Zones, filed 10/1/65 191 = 201 

fdemorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Further Relief, entered 10/2/65)202 « 207 

Order Amending Order of Aug. 10, 19565, entered Oct. 2, 1905eeccsssonase 20 

Order Amending Order for Permanent Injunction, entered Oct. 7, 19054e.s 209 - 210 

Plaintiffs' Interrogatories (Nos. 1-11) to Defendants, filed 10/9/65... 211 « 216 

Plaintiffs' Objections to Revised Plan, filed Oct. 25, 1965cscecesscsee 217 = 221 

Defendants® Answers to Interrogatories, Neos. 1, 24 6, 7s 9, 10 & 11, 
filed Oct. lo 1900 cessscrcsnsssssssssnssasssssssssssssosnossnseses C. 

Defendants Objections to other Interrogatories and Hotion to Strike 

e sane, fil 41 Jet. lg dO es 00s Fe ess EPP LCE T LIEN IESE ETAROETIOEES Cll w= Fl Ay | 

Plaintiffs Objections to Defendants' Motion to Strike Interrogatories, 

Defendants' Further Answer to Interrogatory No. 2, filed Nov. 24, 1965. 23% - 

Order Sustaining Defendants' Objections to Interrogatories Nos. 3, 4 wr oF 9 

5 and 83 and a portion of 9, entered Nov. 26, 1965ccsscssscssscnes 235 «= 236 

Memorandum Opinion, filed Dec. 14, 1965. LAO UBD HAVE OB VERO EI RODEO ISBBES e537 - 2hl 

k 5 

Order Approving Defendants! Revised Plan, entered Dec. 14, 1965ccesscse 245 « 246 Ph & : 3 

g ££ AR www.gta 2 J oo Then i S Cal “34 
Hotice Ox Appea ° filed VEC 174 1000 coves ncsnssssssnsssanssessnsnsnsne 247 

y 3 Fad ™ i 4a n £» $y oy, - 
i 

Sond for Vostis on Appeal, filed Dec. el 1965, POT AB ESI CIGD ROIOOEBENOEDO 248 

Dezignation of Record on Appeal filed Dec. 21 1965. SE BODVOBBDEEBLEGEDS 240 

{ o ands & £3 = ne Cle Ye pad 
Certificate OL ’ Cl as 00 0000 css severe IB Itnbotossvsetesossssonsessnsse ag LW 



“I 

Ji Wn 
{ 

"yy po PT - 

hd 

{ { 
4 
\ 
J 

3 
LE 

{1 
i ok 

b 
L™ 

1 
FRA [1 

» 

or 
he 

o
h
 

&
 

(£3 

a
 

Wil onform Lr AL) 

3 
I 
= 5 SF > BF 5 

en i 
gd 
FRE 

av 
foo 

*
n
 

@
D
 

Va 

V
n
 

See 
(63) 
NN 
|
 

(® 

Cr 
3 
Lo 

oo po A 
& 

NY 
Wit 



» AS 

serving white schools. 

d. The Board continues a policy of school cone 

e. The Clarksdale school system could be zoned to 

£3
 

w
h
 

or
s 

4
 

O
 

o
t
 

f
t
 

<
 
®
 

-
Z
 

~
<
 

pe
te
 

pt
 

e
d
 

®
 

W
w
 

Lg
 
&
 

c
t
 

D
 

classical school zone criteria; 

tate po
de
 

f, Community conditions and pressures necess 

a
h
 

~
 

o
 

t
H
 

£
5
 

p
t
e
 

«$
0 =
 

-
3
 

@
 

3
 

t
+
 

be 
&
 
—
 

jo
de
 

0
 y designed to disestablish 

segregated schools. 

3. Approving a stair-step desegregation 

the absence of valid administrative factors justifying 0
 

on
 

~
~
 

Se
 

or
. 

[5
5 

bo
r 

w
w
 03
) 

nd
 
5
 

D
 

wn
 

o
O
 

F
o
 

N
E
 

O
 

J
o
t
t
 

P
D
 

[64
] 

|
 

a
e
 

~
<
 

b
t
 ™ 

3
 
+
 

oD
 

5
 

f
o
t
 

M4
 

«£
2 
4
 

D
 

[@
] 

r
 ™
 

om
 

L
-
 

J
 

por
. 

a
 
5 

P
o
s
 

4
 

oO
 

O
y
 

[
%
 

a
,
 

fo
st
 

ot
 

requisliie ior © 

: 
immediate submission of a specific plan providing for the 

nonracial hiring and assignment of teachers and other faculty 

personnel. 

the schools without violating [||9217cb19-82f6-4d71-8c28-327b2d270dff||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.