Certification of Record on Appeal; Index; Specification of Errors
Public Court Documents
December 21, 1965
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Henry v. Clarksdale Hardbacks. Certification of Record on Appeal; Index; Specification of Errors, 1965. 656232b6-8418-f111-8342-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/52a3a071-a26e-482e-8a64-320ed9c5f921/certification-of-record-on-appeal-index-specification-of-errors. Accessed April 01, 2026.
Copied!
[||9217cb19-82f6-4d71-8c28-327b2d270dff||] Sut
g
=
»
8
5 2a —_— -
S4881881D
du
be
-
ates
o
&
nine
Circui
t
2
4
fre
oO
od
w
y
Q
fog
.
-
7
s
-
#
m
e
d
fot
\
el
»
4
=
2
hod
a
d
fa
.
8
H
:
r
R
D
i
fod
4
3
L
y
e
S
8
gd
SE
| *
y
o
d
¢
H
y
o
d
5
|
ord
hh]
3
k4
2
w
d
43
iid
.
4
LE
!
3
LY
3
ba
\
ped
.
as
a
“
=
:
—
3
¢
Fo
“
v
d
pot
+
>
“
iF |
seh
I. 2a
2
9
:
a.
gs
fh
2
5)
©
42
4d
bed
a
o
ry
a
tA
i
“
.
W
o
A
N
r
e
B
E
i
d
Q
f
u
=
e
i
]
L
O
V
d
;
oO
a
d
X
o®
1%
i
n
pt
r
o
d
.
E
E
=
w
=
“
Wi
w
d
o
L
L
3
for
4
L
D
3
“4
EI
r
d
:
or.
&
8
fy
o
d
4
1
]
od
2
3,
364
5)
f
b
f
o
d
3
4
os
0
©
;
3
"|
A
d
0
<
4
"
oly
G
lg
ai
5
na
a
e
-,
3
3
-
od
o
r
i
#4
wd
3
Oo
®
»
O
4
$4
w
d
oh)
5 §
®
o
e
bed
4
£4
d
o
d
bod
3
h
e
4
pe
ty
5
B
“
a
d
e
r
F
a
i
a
2
i
«
p
3
>
ol
i)
Cond
4
.
=
w
d
:
spd
ve]
-
®
r
d
+
=
2
2
)
. 4
oh
i
Su
-
v4 #
T
Vin
tn
">
fs
M
e
oO
i
m
4
|
0
ow |
red
e
d
3
D
4
3
i
D
A
Ad
r
l
a
w
y
-
an
0
4
Q
)
on
y
Plaintiffs-Appellants
Defendants-Appellees
\ppeal from the United States District Court
Pow Planes Kea uae > Yo cv wad wf MA coon creat vim for the Northern District of Mississippi
eS
(A Complaint, filed Apr. 22, -
i
Ef EE Er EE Tr EE CE ECT CECT TTT TTETETTEIETEETITETTTETYT
Motion for Fre eli minary i 4 injunction, filed APL» 2 1964 POGLORAEODSIOEBEB EEO
ummons (Leon Porter, Harvey Gresham, Paul Hunter, Graham Bramlett)....
Summons (Gycelle Tynes, Chester H. Curtis, Dr. William wilkins, Silly
- 1 ee Za Ean
+81 Fl dno shen sast ianisnrbessnssibtrsasternlnsborenssssss be
|
Fo
— I AYE Td cnpnne % "Tgp 4 A I'S Pn }
Quimer, wa ile Allen, of 1 EHS Humber, Me dis Kyle) sédeseonoe
gtion to # Lar e Time ior WMigwWers 5 fi led Ma kb} Oy 150%. eee ses PsORGGOERORS
4 - : “ oo. 9 . . % on}
for Preliminary Injunction, filed Hay ll, 190%.cscscss
§ #
Order bnlarging Time to Answer, entered May 11, LE ESE EEE REESE SE REE EE SB
otice of Dismissal of Action, as to certal rty-plaintiffs, 5/13/64.
school \nswer of Board of ifru: stees of the Clarks
District and Board of Trustees of the Coahoma Coun y School
Jigtrict, filed June 10, OM set 006s so sti ens neste sltsaneesssssesnss
sarate Answer of the Clarksdale Municipal Separate School Districts
#*
v ™ I i 4 ~ 1 us - 4 _ pa EL ™ Fil
the Board of Trustees; and Gycelle Tynes, Superintendent, 6/10/64.
~~ 3
Fi 1 Pefendants! Motion to Strike Para. 10 of Complaint, filed June 10, 1904
WUIGeTr 10 Ae LABLRATY injun ct [Ke ¢ JN entered “HNEe / % 19064, SP RCOBROLEODSBSE
" “ NN
ce of Order for freliminary Injunctions.sess
i t Plan of Clarksdale Municipal Separate
s¢hool AS A op § et % with Char 9 4 iled GULLY af 9 1964 ES SES RES EE EEE EE NE
Flan, with Notice, filed
ONE LR ae DN Be TY
No FRE on EF Bo ain Wn 2d Rl Tre 5 25% 2% ¥ | she ox rd £9 2 Po wey fa noes da EE iTS
@solution 1 3 as GL =] ugtees OX WE: ARSC 216 Hunicipal we ALA C8 School
Jistrict establishing Subdistriects and Attendance Zones, and Maps
Refle ¢ting ay filed AUEe 10, Jot ssvsssusnscotecesnsssssasnsese
+ 5 gp a a 4 pee - Pp
II, III, IV and V, are in separate envelope)
>
FACT 10 VOUI'Y naepol'te CO WALOAAGTAW CCI'Lalll BaP
Order for
& vide aS % " ) + &1 Tu 4
A050 FEEH] 1 213 ae LHe Qe
sri my so fe shams =r Yr »y - 3 semes BChool year, entered
2 wh £ " ove "
i : 3 LL a ABD oe Ad C&l Ww I FEI FIIETES § 2 “ve 8 | i Ye
> 4 er Wid SF ® hb Ste Ed. ade A Nr A en ANGE 3 sntel “ia ville “ay 4.4 FIER EE ER RE EEE
bod FP? $4 mw ‘ i a Tak she tof 210 3 C3
1 100LL3 OLi0% A i Wi LEICA nIBncy ve » ob LOL A 118 vile {9 196540
AGEY 10r LOUXrt HepOrter To widdiraw Ceriiln LEI DLLEg ADI e § JG scen
24 =
“ee Ay
> (3
o
a we
™ A
pe oY Sl
AVL =
* *
Subpoena (Mr. A. Isaacson) filed Apre 10; 1965 cscecsscsssscscssssasssse 106
Subpoena (Mr. Abe May) filed Apr. 10, 1905eesesccssnsssssscssnssssanosns 107
Subpoena (Yr. Hyman Kantor) filed Apr. 10; 1905.eesseccssscsescssssscse 108
Subpoena (Mr. J. W. McKellar) filed Apr. 10, 1905esssssssssvnsesssescsne 109
Subpoena (Hon. Hudson Bell) filed Apr. 10, 1905sscecsessssosssssssnsssns 110
Subpoena (Hon. W. S. Kincade) filed Apr. 10, 1905csssssssssssncescnssss 111
I+ Stipulation as to alteration of city boundaries, filed May 17, 1905esse 112 « 117
Memorandum Opinion, filed ARE» 11, 1965. SOPOT OINOBOSDBOOOEBOOIOBIS 116 - 101
Order for Permanent Injunction, entered Auge. ll, 1905cccsccsssnsccsscss 162 « 169
Wr Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Findings and Judgment, filed Aug. 20, 1905. 170 « 175
Memorandum and Order ™ entered Auge 31, 1965, CHOP BIODOERBOOBEVINOEOOES 176 - 177
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Further Relief, filed Sept. 24, 1965.esssessesss 178 « 181
Defendants! Response to Motion for Further Relief, filed Sept. 24%, 1965 182 « 190
Defendants' Revised Plan for Llementary Attendance Zones, filed 10/1/65 191 = 201
fdemorandum Opinion and Order on Motion for Further Relief, entered 10/2/65)202 « 207
Order Amending Order of Aug. 10, 19565, entered Oct. 2, 1905eeccsssonase 20
Order Amending Order for Permanent Injunction, entered Oct. 7, 19054e.s 209 - 210
Plaintiffs' Interrogatories (Nos. 1-11) to Defendants, filed 10/9/65... 211 « 216
Plaintiffs' Objections to Revised Plan, filed Oct. 25, 1965cscecesscsee 217 = 221
Defendants® Answers to Interrogatories, Neos. 1, 24 6, 7s 9, 10 & 11,
filed Oct. lo 1900 cessscrcsnsssssssssnssasssssssssssssosnossnseses C.
Defendants Objections to other Interrogatories and Hotion to Strike
e sane, fil 41 Jet. lg dO es 00s Fe ess EPP LCE T LIEN IESE ETAROETIOEES Cll w= Fl Ay |
Plaintiffs Objections to Defendants' Motion to Strike Interrogatories,
Defendants' Further Answer to Interrogatory No. 2, filed Nov. 24, 1965. 23% -
Order Sustaining Defendants' Objections to Interrogatories Nos. 3, 4 wr oF 9
5 and 83 and a portion of 9, entered Nov. 26, 1965ccsscssscssscnes 235 «= 236
Memorandum Opinion, filed Dec. 14, 1965. LAO UBD HAVE OB VERO EI RODEO ISBBES e537 - 2hl
k 5
Order Approving Defendants! Revised Plan, entered Dec. 14, 1965ccesscse 245 « 246 Ph & : 3
g ££ AR www.gta 2 J oo Then i S Cal “34
Hotice Ox Appea ° filed VEC 174 1000 coves ncsnssssssnsssanssessnsnsnsne 247
y 3 Fad ™ i 4a n £» $y oy, -
i
Sond for Vostis on Appeal, filed Dec. el 1965, POT AB ESI CIGD ROIOOEBENOEDO 248
Dezignation of Record on Appeal filed Dec. 21 1965. SE BODVOBBDEEBLEGEDS 240
{ o ands & £3 = ne Cle Ye pad
Certificate OL ’ Cl as 00 0000 css severe IB Itnbotossvsetesossssonsessnsse ag LW
“I
Ji Wn
{
"yy po PT -
hd
{ {
4
\
J
3
LE
{1
i ok
b
L™
1
FRA [1
»
or
he
o
h
&
(£3
a
Wil onform Lr AL)
3
I
= 5 SF > BF 5
en i
gd
FRE
av
foo
*
n
@
D
Va
V
n
See
(63)
NN
|
(®
Cr
3
Lo
oo po A
&
NY
Wit
» AS
serving white schools.
d. The Board continues a policy of school cone
e. The Clarksdale school system could be zoned to
£3
w
h
or
s
4
O
o
t
f
t
<
®
-
Z
~
<
pe
te
pt
e
d
®
W
w
Lg
&
c
t
D
classical school zone criteria;
tate po
de
f, Community conditions and pressures necess
a
h
~
o
t
H
£
5
p
t
e
«$
0 =
-
3
@
3
t
+
be
&
—
jo
de
0
y designed to disestablish
segregated schools.
3. Approving a stair-step desegregation
the absence of valid administrative factors justifying 0
on
~
~
Se
or
.
[5
5
bo
r
w
w
03
)
nd
5
D
wn
o
O
F
o
N
E
O
J
o
t
t
P
D
[64
]
|
a
e
~
<
b
t
™
3
+
oD
5
f
o
t
M4
«£
2
4
D
[@
]
r
™
om
L
-
J
por
.
a
5
P
o
s
4
oO
O
y
[
%
a
,
fo
st
ot
requisliie ior ©
:
immediate submission of a specific plan providing for the
nonracial hiring and assignment of teachers and other faculty
personnel.
the schools without violating [||9217cb19-82f6-4d71-8c28-327b2d270dff||]