Richmond v JA Croson Company Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Appellant

Public Court Documents
April 21, 1988

Richmond v JA Croson Company Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Appellant preview

26 pages

City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Company Brief of Amici Curiae Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), NAACP, and Women's Legal Defense Fund in Support of Appellant.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Hardback 26 Index, 1995. b1df0dac-a146-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/838ed620-cb79-4290-8b90-ab8ec3ac3f45/hardback-26-index. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    5/26 

6/1 

6/2 

6/6 

6/7 

6/13 

6/20 

6/27 

6/29 

SHEFF v. O'NEILL 

LDF File # 2207-02 

Hardback # 1B 

Contents No. 

  

  

  

State of Connecticut "Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings 
hu Ge TR ST ERIN ET SR Re a Ma 34. 

i HR SR CERES TY SF aE EY a SERIE Cs Cr 35. 

State of Connecticut "Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ 
Stipulation OF Bact. Fr. % di. oh vi Fie ce a a semi a a 36. 

State of Connecticut "Milo Sheff et al. v. William A. 
ONeill et al. hs sleiains vielen sil 0s vin gine eile ere ni i ne 37. 

State of Connecticut "Milo Sheff et al. v. William A. 
RTT RR Te eR NEN. Eh GREE Sa Re CL Ce i TE 38. 

Court’s (Judge Hammer’s) revision of p. 71 of 
Gialnunnlnn lag TL I ONIN SEI AE SN SNe EERIE EC 39. 

ADDEATANCE ME ally. coil Shes + wivhe vie sain tin sain ny + aFnme ae a 40. 

Plaintiffs’: Revised Proposed Findings of Fact. ........ ...... av. 41. 

Plaintiffs’ and Defendants Revised Stipulations of Fact ........... 42. 

Defendants’ Revised Proposed Findings of Fact ................ 43. 

Copics of the Replacement Pages’... o'r vol clvv vinta id ol vais owiehe s 44. 

Letter filed with defendants’ revised proposed findings 
OF ACE, ie + vi ale. al ih a a BEE aia we ale ee 45. 

OFAC. hl tind lL Lis les she wn his ra eA WA 46 

Letter from the Office of the Attorney General 
State OF CONNECHOWL lo leini sa vi 27e a ihe a 0 + "ns 2 ialabnivin tin £ abuince os 47. 

tiny pt Re NR Se TORIES Cal RA SC A 48. 

Letter from Moller, Hotorn & Shields, P.C., . .....c.iiiivinwn eens 49. 

 



  

SHEFF v. O°’NEILL 

LDF File # 2207-02 

Hardback #1B 

  

  

  

  

DATE DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION NO. 

1995 

7/20 Letter from Westley W. Horton to Julie Webb ... ............ 50. 

Record. el lei hs ee er aa aie he a A 0 

7/25 Motion for Extension. of Tne .... 5 05 vn vies an daa vba wie, 52. 

Letter from Westley W. Horton to Michele Angers, 
DepulyChief Clerk. ob. a i a Ww vmninins 53. 

Supreme court of the St. of CT Record Supreme 
COU ING. SC AS28S oe eit ie iis via nmin ae oii hain 54.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top