Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Interrogatories and Request for Scheduling Conference

Public Court Documents
October 31, 1990

Cite this item

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Interrogatories and Request for Scheduling Conference preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Interrogatories Regarding Disclosure of Expert Witnesses and Joint Request for Scheduling Conference

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ecca1b4c-a346-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Interrogatories and Request for Scheduling Conference, 1990. ecca1b4c-a346-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/55611c21-1cd2-4057-8466-1786da1480c7/joint-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-interrogatories-and-request-for-scheduling-conference. Accessed July 29, 2025.

Copied!

    . 

ng 

Cv89-0360977S 

  

MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT 

Plaintiffs 

Ve. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN 
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD 

Defendants OCTOBER 31, 1990 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

  

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 
INTERROGATORIES REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT 

WITNESSES AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

  

  

  

Pursuant to Practice Book Sections 228 and 220(D), the 

parties stipulate and request that plaintiffs’ time for 

disclosing expert witnesses pursuant to Practice Book Section 

220(D) and pursuant to Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories 

(interrogatory numbers 18 and 19) be extended until such time as 

this Court has had the opportunity to enter a scheduling order 

governing the timing of such disclosure and other discovery 

matters. 

The parties in this case shall submit proposed motions or a 

joint motion for scheduling order within the next fourteen days, 

regarding disclosure of expert witnesses by both sides. 

  

 



      

The parties further request a scheduling conference after 

November 9, 1990 to determine a schedule for disclosure of 

experts, further discovery and commencement of trial. 

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS 

Y 3 
  

Philip D. Tegeler 
Martha Stone 
Connecticut Civil Liberties 

Union Foundation 

32 Grand Street 
Hartford, CT 06106 

Wesley W. Horton 
Moller, Horton, & Fineberg 
90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Julius L. Chambers 
Ron Ellis 
Marianne Lado 
NAACP Legal Defense & 

Educational Fund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 

john a. powell 
Helen Hershkoff 
Adam Cohen 

American Civil Liberties 
Union Foundation 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10036 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Wilfred Rodriguez 
Hispanic Advocacy Project 
Neighborhood Legal Services 
1229 Albany Avenue 
Hartford, CT 06112 

John Brittain 

University of Connecticut 
School of Law 

65 Elizabeth Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Jenny Rivera 
Puerto Rican Legal Defense 

and Education Fund 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 

  

 



      

FOR THE DEFENDANTS 

  

sgistant Attorney General 
cKenzie Hall 

10 Sherman Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Oboes 3(, 1990 
ORDER 

The motion is granted. 

By the Court, 

  

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been 

mailed postage prepaid to all counsel of record this 3" day of 

October, 1990. 

WL Tmzerc 
  

Philip D. Tegeler

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Interrogatories and Request for Scheduling Conference

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in