Order and Reasons
Public Court Documents
December 11, 1997

15 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Chambers to Williams, Suitts, Kline, and Winner; Attorney Notes, 1981. a45fb94b-d892-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/daa7d0cf-6003-4278-b991-f098b6d50d36/correspondence-from-chambers-to-williams-suitts-kline-and-winner-attorney-notes. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS JAMES E. FERGUSON, II MELVIN L, WATT JONATHAN \.yALLAS KARL ADKINS JAMES C, FULLER. JR. C, YVONNE MIMS JOHN W, GRESHAM RONALD L. GIBSON GILDA F, GLAZER LESLIE J. WINNER .\ CHAMBERS, FERGUSON, WATT, WALLAS, ADKINS & FULLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 730 EAST INDEPENDENCE PLAZA 951 SOUTH INDEPENDENCE BOULEVA,RD CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLTNA 2A2O2 TELEPHONE (704) 375-a461 August 31, 1981 Mr. Napoleon B. Wi11iams, Jr. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. I'Ir. Steve Suitts Southern Regional Cor.rncil ['Ir. Richard Kline Legal Services of North Carol-ina Ms. Leslie trrlinner Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas, Adkins & Full-er, P.A. Re: North Carolina Reapportionment Suit Dear Gentlemen and Leslie: I met with the Department of Justice on August 26 and obtained a copy of the encl-osed submission by North carolina and the objections which have been filed. I do not have the Republicanobjection. It is being mail-ed to rne. r understand that Justice will ask for more information.r indicaled, however, that we would be filing objeetions on behalf of our clients shortly and would indicate that we areputting together some additional supporting data. Even if Justice asks for additional info:mation, r think we shouldget our objections on file. Tor_may _or- may not know that the three-judge court in Virginia declared the reapportionment of Virginia unconstitutionall The decision is based on the one-man, one-vote issue and since Mr. Napoleon B. Williams, Jr. Mr. Steve Suitts I"Ir. Richard Kline Ms. Leslie l{inner August 31, 1981 Page T\ro variances in North Carolina are at least equal to the variances decl-ared unconstitutional in Virginia, rf,e shoul-d have a good chance with respect to this issue. For reLief purposes,-however, we need to file the suit as soon as possible. Please l-et us have your conments about Lesl-ie's l-atest draft compl-aint. I understand that Steve is preparing the draft objection letter. We need to file the objections before September L4 and indicate that additional supporting data wiLL be submitted. I have spoken with Eddie WilLiams and with A:mand Derfner. A:mand is trying to identify a hisEorian for us. He has indicated that the Joint Center may be able to assist financially in covering the cost for the study. I zm to meet with .Armand again in the Ttre Lawyers' Cornmittee has expressed an interest in the case. I have fonsarded a copy of the draft compl-aint to them. The Lawyers' CornmiEtee has the experience from the Virginia case and may be of help to us. J-LC:md Enclosures ly yours, /,,-liY brih"- " \ 4l Ll '),rl -,61 uL (Wr^-*lf^'''.1. cr-.--'* f to- L (t, '"i'- ? *ar),rt'..-' Cr-"-', P C (S I ) - 5 7 J \\'p U\ ,*ntl- t o*_=,,f:2.,,.e: