Index to Hardback 21

Public Court Documents
December 5, 1990 - September 23, 1991

Index to Hardback 21 preview

5 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Index to Hardback 21, 1990. 78e583fc-217c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/56c2d120-afe8-4b27-8c9e-a4128c818f9e/index-to-hardback-21. Accessed November 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    12/13 

12/14 

12/17 

12/18 

12/19 

12/20 

12/22 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#21 
  

Ltr. to M.Gross fr S.Ifill stating 
she would like to talk to him and 
enclosing cert. pet. 

Ltr. to Ganucheau, Clerk Ct. of Appeals 
fr Kathy Patrick for E.Cloutman w/Notice 
of Change of firm affiliation; also Ltr. 
to Clerk J.D. Neil of U.S. Dist. Ct. 
w/ Notice of Change of firm affiliation 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr S.Finkelstein and 
Ltr. to Neil stating office has moved 
and the new suite number with a 
direct telephonen number 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr R.Hicks stating 
Secretary of State has dismissed 
Mr. Hill ans his law firm as independent 
counsel 

Ltr. to R. Hicks fr G. Bayoud and Ltr. 
to J.Hill fr G. Bayoud discussing 
Judge Hill'’s removal as counsel and 
ltr. to Judge Hill stating that he 
turned case around and Texans should 
be proud of him, even if he is removed 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr R. Hicks stating 
Mr. George stated that the eight members 
of Texas Judicial Board no longer 
maintain relationship as independent 
counsel 

Ltr. to J.L. Hill fr Case Manager for 
Clerk Ganucheau stating that his name 
has been dismissed as independent counsel 
and he has ten days in which to respond 

Ltr. to Bayoud fr R. Hicks disagreeing 
to factual premise 

Page 1 

No. 

 



  

  

1/28 

1/29 

1/29 

2/20 

2/25 

2/25 

2/27 

6/19 

3/14 

3/15 

4/8 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#21   

Ltr. Clerk Ganucheau fr J.Eugene Clements 
as Supplement the Memorandum in Support of 
her Motion for Attorneys’ Fees 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr R.Hicks stating 
she will note additional references and 
January 2nd ltr. is not a Rule 28(j) 
supplementary memorandum 

Ltr. to S.Ifill fr L.McDonald extending 
services as amicus in case and requesting 
cert. petitions 

Ltr. to McDonald fr S.Ifill enclosing 
the relevant briefs as requested 

Memo fr Deputy Clerk of U.S. Ct. of Appeals 
to all counsel w/copy of opinion-order 

Recorded Opinion of League of United 
Latin Amer. Citizens v. Clements, pages 
2313-2316 

LDF Staff meeting notes of S.Ifill 

Ltr. fr Colette R. Knisely for payment 
of $65.60 

Dallas County District Judge F. Harold 
Entz’s Original Answer 

Fax fr R.L. Rios re: Jurisdiction and 

Plaintiffs 

Ct. of Appeals, 5th Cir. schedule for 
Argument 

Ltr. to C.S. Ralston fr R. Labasky (FAX) 
re: filing an amicus brief 

Ltr. to R.Labasky fr C.Ralston consent 
to file his amicus brief 

fr Cockle Printing Co. w/attached schedule 
list 

Page 2 

No. 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

 



LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#21   

Ltr. to S.Ifill via Telecopy fr R.Hicks 
with Exhibit A 

Ltr. to Bunton fr R.L. Rios w/Unopposed 
Motion for Interim Fees, Order on Interim 
Fees (2) 

Ltr. to Dr. Engstrom w/exhibit 

Ltrs. (2) to Clerk Ganucheau fr R.Hicks 
w/ Memo to S.Ralston fr Rios w/ Texas’s 
Motion for Supplemental Briefing and 
Establishment of Schedule for Briefing 
and Argument 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr S.Ralston 

w/ (2) Motion of Plaintiffs-Appellees and 
Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees for 
Remand to District Court 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr R.Hicks 
w/Texas’s Response in Opposition to 
Motion of Plaintiffs-Appellees and 
Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees for 
Remand to District Court 

Fed. Ex. ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr 
Godbey w/Dallas County District Judge 
F. Harold Entz’s Response in Opposition 
to Motion for Demand 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr E.V. Keyes 
w/Harris County District Judge Sharolyn 
Woods Opposition to Motion of Plaintiffs/ 
Appellees and Plaintiffs/Intervenors/ 
Appellees for Remand to District Court 

Ltr. to All Counsel of Record fr 

R.E. Windhorst, Jr. Chief Deputy 
Clerk re: questions to be answered 
and due date for all briefs 

Ltr. to Rios fr G.A. Alonzo, Senate 
Hispanic Caucus re: Senate Concurrent 
Resolution  



LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#21 
  

Ltr. to All Counsel of Record fr 
Windhorst re: assignment for oral 
argument on 11/4/91 

Copy of acknolwedgement of Ltr to all 
Counsel of Record re: assignment for 
oral argument 11/4/91 acknowledged by 
R.H.Mow, Jr. 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr R.Hicks re: 

Substitution motion 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr S.V. Wheatley 
w/copy of acknowledgement of assignment 
of case 

Ltr. to S.Ifill fr R.Hicks re more 
argument on the case 

Ltr-Memo to all Counsel fr Deputy 
Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals w/Order 
re: substitution of parties 

Ltr. to Clerk Ganucheau fr D.R. Richards 
w/ Motions re pending case of Rangel 
Vv. Mattox scheduled for argument on 
11/4/91 along with LULAC 

Order re: following Motions dismissed 
as moot (16 motion) 

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr R.Hicks w/Response 
in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate 
for Submission and Argument, or Alterna- 
tively to Schedule for Argument 

Ltr. to G.McDonald fr S.Ifill confirming 
her present move to law offfice of Arthur 
L. Walker, Jr. 

Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr Hicks 
w/State Defts-Appellants Brief on Remand 

Certified Ltr. to Ganucheau fr D.C. Godbey 
stating brief of Appellant Dallas County 
District Judge F. Harold Entz  



  

  

  

9/12 

9/23 

LULAC V. MATTOX -0844-02 HB#21 
  

Ltr. to Ganucheau fr E.V. Keyes stating 
Appellant Defendant-Intervenor Harris 
County District Judge Sharolyn Wood’s 
Brief on Remand 

Fed. Ex. Ltr. to Ganucheau fr S.Wheatley 
w/ Briefs of Judges Entz and Wood 

Ltr. to Z.Burney requesting her to 
organize clients to discuss case 
with G.McGowen 

Page 5 

No. 

Ad 

45 

46

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.