Correspondence from Caldwell to Roumell and Beer
Correspondence
February 4, 1972
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Caldwell to Roumell and Beer, 1972. 769b49cf-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5b8843c2-2daa-477a-8d5c-d9421aa7b24f/correspondence-from-caldwell-to-roumell-and-beer. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
RATNER, S U G A R M O N & LU C A S P H O N E (9 0 1 ) 5 2 5 - 0 6 0 !
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W
S U I T E 5 2 5
C O M M E R C E T I T L E B U I L D I N G
M A R V I N L. R A T N E R
R. B. S U G A R M O N , JR .
L O U I S R. L U C A S
WAL T ER L. BAILEY, JR.
IRVI N M. S A L K Y
M I C H A E L B- KAY
W I L L I A M E. C A L D W E L L
M E M PH IS , T E N N E S S E E 3 8 1 0 3
February 4, 1972 B E N L. H O O K S
O F C O U N S E L
George T. Roumell, Jr., Esq.
Louis D. Beer, Esq.
Riley & Roumell
7th Floor, Ford Building
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Gentlemen:
Mr. Lucas and I attempted, but were unable, to contact
both of you by telephone this day regarding the status of
the plan for Detroit which is being prepared at our request
pursuant to discovery procedures.
Dr. Foster met with Mr. Henrickson at the Board of
Education today and has informed us as to progress being
made on the subject plan. It appears from information
received by Dr. Foster from Mr. Henrickson that at least
two more weeks will be required for completion of the plan '
at the present rate of accomplishment. It further appears
that one of the reasons for this additional delay is the
fact that Mr. Henrickson has not been permitted by his
superiors to devote the necessary time and/or the necessary
assistance to have the plan timely prepared. As you will
recall, at the informal discovery discussion with Mr.
Henrickson on December 20, 1971, Mr. Henrickson indicated
that Feeder Plan C could be fleshed out, in about three
weeks. When Dr. Foster met with Mr. Henrickson on January 17,
1972, it was indicated that about three additional weeks
would be required to complete the plan. (See enclosed letter
dated January 21 from Dr. Foster to Mr. Henrickson). And
now further delay appears to be in the making.
We feel that if the proper commitment were made, the
plan could be completed by next Friday. We therefore request
that the plan be completed by Friday, February 11, 1972, for
RE: Bradley, et al. v. Milliken, et al
Civil Action No. 35257
2 February 4, 1972
George T. Roumell, Jr., Es q .
Louis D. Beer, Esq.
our presentation to the Court,
by then, we will be compelled to further relief.
If the plan is not completed
apply to the Court for
Very t ;uly yours,
RATNER, SUGARMON & LUCAS
William E. Caldwell
cc: Hon. Stephen J. Roth
Eugene Krasicky, Esq.
Theodore Sachs, Esq.
Alexander B. Ritchie, Esq.
Enclosure