Correspondence from Caldwell to Roumell and Beer
Correspondence
February 4, 1972

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Caldwell to Roumell and Beer, 1972. 769b49cf-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5b8843c2-2daa-477a-8d5c-d9421aa7b24f/correspondence-from-caldwell-to-roumell-and-beer. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
RATNER, S U G A R M O N & LU C A S P H O N E (9 0 1 ) 5 2 5 - 0 6 0 ! A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W S U I T E 5 2 5 C O M M E R C E T I T L E B U I L D I N G M A R V I N L. R A T N E R R. B. S U G A R M O N , JR . L O U I S R. L U C A S WAL T ER L. BAILEY, JR. IRVI N M. S A L K Y M I C H A E L B- KAY W I L L I A M E. C A L D W E L L M E M PH IS , T E N N E S S E E 3 8 1 0 3 February 4, 1972 B E N L. H O O K S O F C O U N S E L George T. Roumell, Jr., Esq. Louis D. Beer, Esq. Riley & Roumell 7th Floor, Ford Building Detroit, Michigan 48226 Gentlemen: Mr. Lucas and I attempted, but were unable, to contact both of you by telephone this day regarding the status of the plan for Detroit which is being prepared at our request pursuant to discovery procedures. Dr. Foster met with Mr. Henrickson at the Board of Education today and has informed us as to progress being made on the subject plan. It appears from information received by Dr. Foster from Mr. Henrickson that at least two more weeks will be required for completion of the plan ' at the present rate of accomplishment. It further appears that one of the reasons for this additional delay is the fact that Mr. Henrickson has not been permitted by his superiors to devote the necessary time and/or the necessary assistance to have the plan timely prepared. As you will recall, at the informal discovery discussion with Mr. Henrickson on December 20, 1971, Mr. Henrickson indicated that Feeder Plan C could be fleshed out, in about three weeks. When Dr. Foster met with Mr. Henrickson on January 17, 1972, it was indicated that about three additional weeks would be required to complete the plan. (See enclosed letter dated January 21 from Dr. Foster to Mr. Henrickson). And now further delay appears to be in the making. We feel that if the proper commitment were made, the plan could be completed by next Friday. We therefore request that the plan be completed by Friday, February 11, 1972, for RE: Bradley, et al. v. Milliken, et al Civil Action No. 35257 2 February 4, 1972 George T. Roumell, Jr., Es q . Louis D. Beer, Esq. our presentation to the Court, by then, we will be compelled to further relief. If the plan is not completed apply to the Court for Very t ;uly yours, RATNER, SUGARMON & LUCAS William E. Caldwell cc: Hon. Stephen J. Roth Eugene Krasicky, Esq. Theodore Sachs, Esq. Alexander B. Ritchie, Esq. Enclosure