Letter from Lani Guinier to David Ramage re Voting Rights Conference (page 1)
Correspondence
September 22, 1982

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to David Ramage re Voting Rights Conference (page 1), 1982. a878dec7-e392-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5bca1b24-22e4-46ca-be06-c45d276d356f/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-david-ramage-re-voting-rights-conference-page-1. Accessed April 29, 2025.
Copied!
egal 'efense .:'.,;lL,ri r,,hi,,a NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND 10 Columbus Circle, New York, EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC, N.Y, 10019 r (212) 586-83!,7 September 22,1932 Mr. Davtd Ramage, Jr. Execut,ive Director The New I{orId Foundatlon 100 Eas t B5th S treet, New York, N. Y. 10028 Dear Davld: The NAAC? Legal Defense Fund seeks support, for a Voting Rlghts Conference to discuss st,raLegies for litl gating cases under the new Voting RlghEs Act. We hope to hold thls meeting in New 0rleans ln Ehe FaIl- of 1982. We expect to {nvLte slxty Iawyers, twenty soclal s,clence .experts and schoLare and Ewenty representatlves of communlty orgarrj-zations. Ln June, CongresB extended for 25 years the opeclal provlelons of the 1965 Votlng RdghEs Act; tt smended Sectlon 2 of, the Acl to aIJ.ow challengers to dlscrlmlnatory votln!" practlces to prevall- wlthout havtng to.prove Lntent. Rather, they would have to show only that the practice j-n ques tion has a dis criminatory result. In addition, last. term Ehe Suprerne Court in Rogers v. Lodge announced a standard for proving discriminatory intent in voting dilution eases broughE under Ehe Constitution that appears to temper the rigorous evidentiary standard of City of MobiIe v. Bolden. This conference would give us a chance to talk with civil rlghts attorneys, scholars and activis ts about Ehese signifi- cant, changes in the Iaw. The goals of Ehe conference are t,hree- f oId: To insplre more attorneys to become involved in voting rights liEigation; we hope to involve conference Partici- pants in a voLing rights program on a continued basis and to establish a neu- work of voting rights lawyers. To help LDF and ptu"!ilioners analyze and undersLand the f"#slat,ive history of the I9B2 extensl.on,.p&rticularly the Contributions are deductiltle Jor U,S. incomc tots put'poses The NAACP LEGAL 0EFENSE & E0UCATI0NAL FUN0 is not part ol the National Association lor lhe Advancement of Colored People although il ..,--l^..-r^rxr.il-6r^x^,^^i)^^^aalt,i^^rr^^,r.,^l .i^hr- lnC!n^h^il^,^rr^,Olrr^^,.^d^^^,^hOarrd araaraa.l.ll ^fti^^n^,lh,,i^^r I. 2.