Gillman v. State Court Opinion

Working File
January 1, 1910 - January 1, 1910

Gillman v. State Court Opinion preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Affidavit of Alex K. Brock, 1981. 7126252e-e292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/71bcb289-eb8a-4250-8b66-6a24ab365609/affidavit-of-alex-k-brock. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    ta
(
,

I
r

,

,

a

qr&,t* e
RALEIGH DIVISION

I
I

)
)

CTVTL AETION
no. 81-803-crv-5

RALPH GINGI.PS, et aI. )

Plaintlffs, I

v.

rN THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT COURq
POR THE EASTERN DTSTRICT OF NORTH CAROLTNA

)
RUFUS EDMISTEN, et al. )

)
Defendants. )

Alex X. Brock, being duly srdorn, hereby deposes and

says:

1. l, Alex K. Brockr Brn Secretary-Dlrector of the
state Boarcl of Elections of North carolina, the offices of
whlch are located at suite Bo1, Raleigh Brrild.inq, 5 west
Hargett Street, Raleigh, North Caroll-na 276Oli

2- r have served in that capacity continuously since
August 5, L965, and was, therefore, servlng in that capacity
in 1967 when the General Assembly of North Carolina ratified
chapter 640, Session Laws of L967, which contained proposals
for two amendments to the constitution of North carolina;

3. Those two proposals hrere approved by vote of the
peopre in November of 1968 and became Article rr, s4(3)
(presently Article ff, 53(3)) and Article ff, SG(3) (presently
Article rf 55 (3) ) of the ConstitutLon of Dlorth Carolina;

4. ArticLe ff, 53(3) provides, inter alia, that the
General Assembly of North Carolina is prohibited from dividing
counties in forming the state senate electoral districts;
Artlcle ff , 55(3) provides, iptgr a1la, that the General Asserqbly

is prohibtted from dividing counties ln forming State Representative
electoral dLstricts ?

5. As best f recalI, f did not deem these amendments to
the State ConstitutLon to be subject to the submissl.on requirements
of 55 of the voting Rtghts Act of 1965, at the time of.their
adoptLon, and, therefore, r did not submit the amend.ments to the
Attorney General of the Unlted States for approval or seek thelr
approval by the Unlted States District Court for the District of
Columbla i

.



of

on

:

r
I
k

l6
!!tbs".

t ""orn*issLon ExpLres 1* qfo

-2-

6. I have, however, now advl.sed the Attorney General

the 1g5g co'rstLtutional alrendments, by way of correspondence

the dates of Septerober 22, 23, 24 and 28, 1981;

7. A copy of all of my corresPondence to the Attorney

General, regardlng J.n part the 1958 amendments Ls attached'

hereto, along with pertlnent attachments to the corresPondenee,

excluding copLes of sessLon laws, the eorresPondence and attach-

ments belng incorporated herein by reference:

8. I have subnLtted all information to the Attorney General

whl-ch f deerc to be of any Lrlportance or significance to a determina-

tion by him as to whether the amendments satisfy the reggirements

of s5 of the ltoting Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the

determLnation be made as expedltiously as possible;

g. f have also submitted to the Attorney General, for his

approval, copies of chapter 8oo, chapter 82L, and Chapter 87,

Session Laws of 1981, these constituting, resPectively, North

Carolina's apportionment plans for the state House and Senate'

and state Congressional electoral districts ?

l0.Ihavesubrnittedallotherinformationdeemedbyrne

to be pertinent to the apportionment plans, includinq aII

supplernental information requested by the Attorney General'

01,*H tsr,^L
Alex K. Brock
Secretary-Dl-rector
North Carolina State

Board of Elections

AFFIANT

Sworn to and subscribed before me

this *" 6fu daY of october, 1981.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top