Letter to All Counsel RE: Enclosed Motion for Extension of Time with Certification

Public Court Documents
August 29, 1991

Cite this item

Letter to All Counsel RE: Enclosed Motion for Extension of Time with Certification preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 982838bd-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Letter to All Counsel RE: Enclosed Motion for Extension of Time with Certification, 1991. 982838bd-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5c9248b7-aa11-4806-b1b8-e8a7532e49e9/letter-to-all-counsel-re-enclosed-motion-for-extension-of-time-with-certification. Accessed November 02, 2025.

Copied!

    MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P. CC 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

90 GILLETT STREET 

HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 

WILLIAM R. MOLLERA 
TELEPHONE 

WESLEY W. HORTON 
(203) 522-8338 

DAVID L. FINEBERC* 
TELECOPIER 

CHARLES M. RICE, JR 
(203) 728-040I 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS 

ROBERT M. SHIELDS, JR. 

SUSAN M. CORMIER August 29, 1991 

KIMBERLY A. KNOX 

JEFFREY A. HOBERMAN 

*ALSO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA 

AALSO ADMITTED IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Honorable Harry Hammer 
P.O. Box 325 

Rockville, CT 06066 

Re: Sheff v. O'Neill 

Dear Judge Hammer: 

Enclosed is the motion for extension of time for filing our 

response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. 

Very truly yours, 

Wesley W. Horton 

WWH:jt 
All Counsel of Record cc? 

 



e 
A
T
T
O
R
N
E
Y
S
 

AT
 
L
A
W
 

M
O
L
L
E
R
,
 
H
O
R
T
O
N
 

& 
F
I
N
E
B
E
R
G
,
 

P.
 

C.
 

90
 
GI
LL
ET
T 

ST
RE
ET
 

¢ 
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
 

CT
 
06
10
5 

= 
(2
03
) 

5
2
2
-
8
3
3
8
 

= 
J
U
R
I
S
 

NO
. 

3
8
4
7
8
 

  

  

  

| WILLIAM A. O/NEILL, ET AL 

  
    

      
  

CcvV89-0360977S 

MILO SHEFF, ET AL 
SUPERIOR COURT 

VS. ne
 JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/ 

NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD 

AUGUST 29, 1991 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 
  

The plaintiffs move for a further extension of time until 

September 20, 1991 in order to respond to the defendants’ Motion for 

summary Judgment. The reason for this motion is the need to prepare a 

proper response to the voluminous papers filed by the defendants, and 

to accommodate the vacation schedules of some of the attorneys for the 

plaintiffs. 

PLAINTIFFS, MILO SHEFF, ET AL 

       By     

Wesley. Horton 

MOLLER, HORTON & FINEBERG, P.C. 

90 Gillett Street 

Hartford, CT 06105 

The Defendants consent to 

the granting of this motion. 

[re 

  

  

0nd Whelan, Asst. Attorney General 

  

    

  

            
 



  

| ORDER 

| For good cause shown the foregoing is hereby GRANTED/DENIED. 

By the Court, 

      
CERTIFICATION | 

| 

2 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the | 

< following counsel of record on August 29, 1991: | 

pe. 
0 John R. Whelan John Brittain | 

= Diane W. Whitney UCONN LAW SCHOOL 

= Asst. Attorney Generals 65 Elizabeth Street | 

xX 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 

Hartford, CT 06105   
| 

| Wilfred Rodriguez Martha Stone 

| NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES Philip Tegeler 

1229 Albany Avenue CCLU 

Hartford, CT 906112 32 Grand Street 

Hartford, CT 06106 

M
O
L
L
E
R
,
 
H
O
R
T
O
N
 

& 
F
I
N
E
B
E
R
G
,
 

P.
 

C.
 

90
 
GI
LL
ET
T 

ST
RE
ET
 

+ 
H
A
R
T
F
O
R
D
,
 

CT
 
06

10
5 

+ 
(2

03
) 

52
2-
83
38
 

+ 
JU

RI
S 

NO
. 

38
47

8 

Julius L. Chambers Jenny Rivera 

Marianne Lado 3 Ruben Franco 

Ronald Ellis PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street 

99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 

New York, NY 10013 

Helen Hershkoff 

Adam Cohen 

John A. Powell 

ACLU 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10013 

AAA 
  

Wes¥ey W. Horton

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter to All Counsel RE: Enclosed Motion for Extension of Time with Certification

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in