Plaintiff-Intervenor HLA's Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission
Public Court Documents
August 21, 1989
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiff-Intervenor HLA's Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for Admission, 1989. 900ef34e-247c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5d1f1146-2be6-4177-bffa-5add6319233d/plaintiff-intervenor-hlas-motion-for-leave-of-court-to-file-in-excess-of-ten-requests-for-admission. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
FEDERAL EXPRESS
August 21, 1989
Hon. John Neil
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Courthouse
P.O. Box 10708
200 E. Wall, Room 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
LULAC, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et al.
Dear Mr. Neil:
A Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for
Admission in connection with the above named case, was mailed by
first class mail to your office on August 8, 1989, and copies
sent to all attorneys of record. Since you have advised that the
motion has not been received, I am enclosing another original and
one copy of Plaintiff-intervenors, Houston Lawyers' Association's
Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for
Admission, which I trust can now be properly filed with the
Court.
Sincerely,
Sonn Ctl go Sherrilyn A. Ifill
/dm
encl.
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR . (212) 219-1900 ° NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
FEDERAL EXPRESS
August 21, 1989
Hon. John Neil
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Courthouse
P.O. Box 10708
200 E. Wall, Room 316
Midland, Texas 79702
Re: Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
LULAC, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et al.
Dear Mr. Neil:
A Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for
Admission in connection with the above named case, was mailed by
first class mail to your office on August 8, 1989, and copies
sent to all attorneys of record. Since you have advised that the
motion has not been received, I am enclosing another original and
one copy of Plaintiff-intervenors, Houston Lawyers' Association's
Motion for Leave of Court to File in Excess of Ten Requests for
Admission, which I trust can now be properly filed with the
Court.
Sincerely,
Sherrilyn A. Ifill
/dm
encl.
NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET, 16th FLOOR u (212) 219-1900 ° NEW YORK, N.Y. 10013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Houston Lawyers’ Association, Alice
Bonner, Weldon Berry, Francis Williams,
Rev. William Lawson, Deloyd T. Parker,
Bennie McGinty,
Plaintiff-Intervenors,
vs. No. 88-CA-154
JAMES MATTOX, Attorney General of the
State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR HOUSTON LAWYERS’
MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE IN
EXCESS OF TEN REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
In accordance with Rule 300-6(f), plaintiff-intervenors seek
leave of this Court to suspend the operation of the local rule
limiting requests for admission for the pendency of this lawsuit.
This request is made with good cause.
On June 1, 1989, plaintiff-intervenors’ Houston Lawyers’
Association served upon State defendants in the above-captioned
case twenty Requests for Admission. On June 21, 1989, State
defendants objected and refused to answer the last ten requests
for admission on the ground that pursuant to Local Rule 300-6(f),
admissions are limited to only ten requests.
On March 1, 1989, this Court entered an order permitting
plaintiffs in this action to request more than ten admissions of
the State defendants. In light of the complex, and fact-
intensive nature of this case, and to facilitate productive
discovery, plaintiff-intervenors Houston Lawyers’ Association,
et al, similarly seek leave of this Court to request more than
ten admissions of the defendants.
For the aforementioned reasons which constitute good cause,
plaintiff-intervenors respectfully request that this Court
suspend the operation of Local Rule 300-6 (f) for the duration of
this lawsuit.
Respectfully submitted,
dis { : fet Sle
/JULIUS L. €HAMBERS V
SHERRILYN A. IFILL
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Of Counsel: GABRIELLE McDONALD
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB 301 Congress Avenue
A Professional Corporation Suite 2050
Austin, Texas 78701