Order to Amend Previous Memorandum Opinion and Order
Public Court Documents
November 27, 1989
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order to Amend Previous Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1989. 261d3674-257c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5d40dc6e-0d5f-43b1-83a8-7818b3cadccf/order-to-amend-previous-memorandum-opinion-and-order. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
7:88—cv—-00154
Sherrilyn Ifill, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
16th Floor
99 Hudson St.
New York, NY 10013
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV 27 1983
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS V. 5. DISTRICT COU
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION CLERK'S, OFFICE
BY.....% JW... . DEPUTY
LEAGUE OFUNITED LATIN AMERICANS
CITIZENS (LULAC), COUNCIL #4434S§
et al. [S
Plaintiffs, §
AND S
HOUSTON LAWYERS ASSOCIATION §
et al. §
Plaintiff-Intervenors §
§
VV. § MO-88-CA-154
§
JIM MATTOX, et al. §
State Defendants §
AND §
JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD AND §
JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ §
ORDER
BEFORE THIS COURT is the State Defendants’ Motion to alter
or Amend this Court'’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of November 8,
1989 in the above-captioned cause. After this Court’s Order was
signed and entered, it was brought to the attention of the Court
that there were some clerical errors and omissions in this Court's
Order. This Court is of the opinion that the State Defendants’
Motion should be granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this Court’s previous Memorandum Opinion
and Order be amended in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the items telephonically
communicated to this Court by Plaintiffs’ Counsel be amended as
follows:
1. The top of page 13 just before Finding of Fact number
four be amended to reflect the following:
Plaintiff-Intervenors from Dallas County include Joan Winn
White, Fred Tinsley and Jesse Oliver.
2. The last line of the second paragraph of Finding of Fact
number eight on page 17 is amended to read, " ... greater than
fifty percent (50%) Hispanic voting age population were possible."
3. The second sentence cof the first full paragraph on page
21 is amended to read, "Minority residents are concentrated largely
in the Northeastern, East Central and Southeastern sections of
Midland County."
4. Conclusion of Law number 16, as continued at the top of
page 90, line one, is amended to include "Hispanic" after "Black"
and the appropriate comma.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that items 1-3, 6 & 11 of the State
Defendants’ Motion are hereby GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED in connection with item 5 of the State
Defendants’ Motion that Finding of Fact 20.a. on page 49 is amended
as follows:
Dr. Brischetto analyzed three (3) 1988 countywide judicial
elections in Travis County. All three elections analyzed were
County Court at Law Primary Elections.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in connection with item 9 State
Defendants’ request is GRANTED IN PART to reflect that it was the
1986 Democratic Primary that was being discussed, rather than the
Runoff Election. Item 9 is DENIED in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that items 4, 7, 8 & 10 of the State
Defendants’ Motion are hereby DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court's Memorandum opinion
and Order remains unchanged in al other gespects.
. A
SIGNED AND ENTERED this the es day of November, 1989.
_— . 77
Are ) i
7 a ss iF FAA >.
LUCIUS D. BUNTON
Chief Judge