Motion to Amend Judgment

4 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Fred L. Banks Jr.
Organizations
- LDF
- Banks & Nichols
Matter
- Norwood v. Harrison
Case
U.S. state
- Mississippi
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- c882bbab-722e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4

Cite this item

Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Motion to Amend Judgment, 1978. c882bbab-722e-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5d4df280-ab40-4ba6-b6d7-478ff2443c58/motion-to-amend-judgment. Accessed July 18, 2026.

Copied!

     [||91b480ac-8627-413e-8473-238b7a34cdb2||] ATTACHMENT 1 ; 
  

IN TEE URITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MIS3ISSIPPI 

WESTERN DIVISION 

  

Ld WE
 

O + ( nn
 

“i
 Oo Md Oo O OJ ® 8
 

(W
) 
=
 

  

MOTION MAT TTI MT ATT 
Lr i TON TO AMEND of Ulan iN 
  

  

Sa | i -~ <> 1 OD J v4 ~ - ny yp fe + Rules of Civil Procadure, respectfully move the Court for an 

order amending its judgment of January 3, 1978 ia the folliow=- 

ing respects: 

1 Ce A Aa Ls gata geil 1 oar TT 2m = X- ne Court's opinion of March 2, 1974 and Judgment oF 

: 
T vex r CY 0 uy cy eg am lp oy iv oo = Cy 1Y SN ~ rg is Janugry 3,1 pi@award faes ab Tares Of 320.,.8330., 7835. and 

rer ill 1 o A + > Le i = dw 
lon] 13 1 iS 530. an hour. 410, P,.8upn. at 142, n.l0. Plaintiffs respect- QE JS 

rtd STIS le SOE Dede Ce ier ER DR WE RT a te TR TS RR I CS i 
Ladi ly radquest That The award 2g ancreassd ag TolLiows 

lL.e2venthal 
dd Sat WV Nut bd Cpa bh ne 

114 5 ap AL os RW 
115.35 Z >. - PT, Odie & 

GaN Cr ro om NS 10 r oy 5 HEE i a Cl ig S6,090. ' 

1.1} - » 0% 7 2X20 
LS Leds POV. wiv 331, 2 WALL GK 

1 = 3 2 ' TH S00 3) 315. x 100. - 1.,.500, 44,204 

a bY 

Naprit 

(9
S)

 

wn
 

os 02
3 

| oO
 

oD
 

LJ 

| Ur
 

w
 

wn
 

oO
 

oD
 

7
 

J
 

w
n
 

Co
 

  

  

  

2. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the award re 

increased to reflect time expended by plaintiffs' counsel, 

 



  

subsequent to the filing of their August,1974 affidavits, as 

Date 

October 4 - 11,1974 

February 20,1975- 
March 33,1975 

May 28,29,1975 

October 1-3, 

{March 2,1976 

April 286, 127% 

May 19, 1975 

August 13,1976 

August 6-13, 1976 

October 5-6, 1° 

October 

October 16:18,1977 

November 23-24,1977 

January 5-6, 1978 

Work Performed by MRL 
  

Memorandum in Support of Counsel Fees 
& Letter to the Court. 

Telephone conferenceswith Ellis 
Griffith, Esq. & drafting of stipula- 
tion for Presbyterian Day School of 
Cleveland. 

Letter to Judge Keady (2 

0)
 

0]
 c H ct
 

wn
 Memorandum in Response to 

Letter Inquiry. 
Court's Opitiion] 

ignating Record on Appeal & 
Defendants' Designation. 

to Counsel Opposite 

to Ccunsel Opposite 
= 
ct
 1 (©
 

pt I
 Ho 

Hh
 

0 F o ral Argument & Oral 

Travel to and from Oral Argument 
Mississippi 

Pifth Circuit dascision, 

alternatives. 

Motion to Amend 

in Support. 

Supplemental Award Requested: 

74.25 x $100 = 

follows: 

Eours 

Expended 
  

16 

  

 



  

3. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the award 

OF costs be increased to reflect: 

(a) costs awarded by the Court of Appeals 

  

and included in the mandate ... cece $120.00 

(b) expenses incurred by plaintiffs’ 
counsel travelling to and from 
Jackson, Mississippi for oral 

OIE nan aw niin vs olnin nis niu eerieiniaiee $220.48 

Total : $410.10 

Respectfully submitted, 

I — i 

‘ ’ { 

JACK GREENBERG 

MELVYN R. LEVENTHAL 

10 Columbus Circle 

Suite 203 
Mew York, ¥.¥.100l1% 

Attorneys for PlaintifZ 

Sworn and subscribed to in 

New York, New York before me 

  

   



  

for Defendants by United States mail, postage prepaid, 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

The undersigned certifies that copies of the 

going Motion to Amend Judgment was served 

d ay of Janu ary, 1978, as follows: 

Pater M. Stockett, ‘Esg. 

Assistant Attorney General 
Department of Justice 
Office of the Attorney General 
Jackson, Mississippi 39205 

on counsel 

  

iad IN 4 
We oa ~ 1 

— 3 \ <7 T>1 [ 
Sor TRE Sel MWR IEL ps 1 
MELVYN R. LEVENTHAL 

\ 

A 
-_— Le — [||91b480ac-8627-413e-8473-238b7a34cdb2||]

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion to Amend Judgment

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in