Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin et al Re: Massive Disruption of Metropolitan Detroit

Correspondence
January 31, 1972

Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin et al Re: Massive Disruption of Metropolitan Detroit preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Caldwell to Chachkin et al Re: Massive Disruption of Metropolitan Detroit, 1972. 0df1407a-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5eed8202-539b-4e65-8d68-95edf21fef5a/correspondence-from-caldwell-to-chachkin-et-al-re-massive-disruption-of-metropolitan-detroit. Accessed October 10, 2025.

    Copied!

    BRADLEYRonald

G. MILLIKENWilliam

pSSj

SSI



P H O N E  (SOI ; .  5 2 5 - 0 6 0

M A R V I N  L. R A T N E R  

R.  B S U G A R M O N ,  J R .  

L O U I S  R L U C A S  
W A L T E R  L. B A I L E Y ,  J R .  

I R V I N  M S A L K Y  

M I C H A E L  B .  K A Y  

W I L L I A M  E .  C A L D W E L L

RATNER, S U G A R M O N  & L U C A S
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

S U I T E  5 2 5

C O M M E R C E  T ITL E  B U I L D I N G

MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38103

January 31, 1972
OF C O U N S E L

Norman Chachkin, Esq.
Paul Dimond, Esq.
Mr. William Penn 
Dr. Gordon Foster

RE: Massive Disruption of Metropolitan
Detroit

Gentlemen:
Mr. Ritchie has amended his motion to join the 

suburbs in Detroit by filing a proposed plan for metro­
politan desegregation, which I have just received and 
which I am enclosing for your information. I have not 
read the proposed plan, but, from thumbing through the 
pages, it looks interesting. It will be interesting to 
see how* the State Board's submissions compare with 
Ritchie's plan.

I am also enclosing, for Norman, Paul and Bill, 
a copy of Gordon's letter to Merle Henrickson, which will 
bring you up-to-day on the status of our proposed plan for 
Detroit.

Very truly yours,

William E. Caldwell f * * * '

WEC:pw
Enclosure

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.