The Distribution of Non-Whites in the Public Schools of Connecticut
Unannotated Secondary Research
May 24, 1966

56 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. The Distribution of Non-Whites in the Public Schools of Connecticut, 1966. a4768794-a146-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5f005185-10dc-4bef-a1cb-9071b5b560b5/the-distribution-of-non-whites-in-the-public-schools-of-connecticut. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
; Hae a : Ea eo Vi 4 oN A fa 4 he ICUT, STATE TEPARTENT, OF, meron |. CLE £8 1 Bi ith dk Hartford *' ay Cini Bi 5) wha ~ Sep adak : di EF ger CONNECTICUT (48380 a SEALS ise v 3 5 | 4% hi of ply v. Fede RL 3 a oh 3 is Hp ps nl 7% 5 y : H CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Bureau of Research,Statistics and Finance THE DISTRIBUTION OF NON-WHITCS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF CONNECTICUT (4 In late April, 1966, the State Department of Education asked local school officials $0 provide information about the racial composition of classes in the local public schools. Data were obtained for self-contained classes and for English classes where the schools are departmentalized. Information was sought also about Spanish speaking pupils. There is general recognition of the fact that in certain parts of the state, particularly in urban areas, there have been increases in the mmbers of non-white and Spanish speaking children in schools. There is need to establish benchmarks so that in future years there may be accurate determination of such things as the rate of change in the mmbers of such pupils, the rate ‘at which they may be moving into or out of urban areas, the grades in which the children are 0 enroled, etce There are no school census figures on this basis; these data help to define the problem and should be taken into siedunt in whatever actions are proposed. No information was sought to explain the distribution of pupils. Same local people pointed out that in same cases, concentration of non—whitcs wescousad by housing patterns and neighborhood school policies; others pointed out that children i similar learning problems or pupils who had chosen certain curricula or courses + were grouped togethers o Most school systems of the state supplied the data as requested; a few school systems did not wish to participate in the survey, In some cases, the data arrived too late to be processed and included in this report. Some towns or school districts report no non-whites or Spanish speaking children enroled; these districts are listed first, in Table I. Same towns have few non-whites; summary data for these towns are presented separately in Teble II, These summaries show the mmber of schools, the numbers of children enroled, the total mmber of classes, the number of classes ar grades which have non-whites in Shem, and the mmber of non-whites in each class which has non-whites in it. - a - ® ® 2 -—d = For larger towns, we present, in Table ITI, summary data for each grade; we show the mumber of whites, the mmber of non-whites, the mmber of "don't knows" and the mmber of Spanish speaking pend lc, "In this table combination classes have been listed with She lowest grade included in the class. "Biore detailed dots which present informsbion for cach class in each schosl are on file in the Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance of the Connecticut State Department of Education. The data are available for inspection and use by those who hy be interesteds The anonymity of individual teachers will be maintained. The covering letter and the survey form used are included in this bulletins It is hoped that these data will be useful as citizens and educators consider the problems of quality and equality in education far all children. Maurice J. Ross, Chief Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance How to Read Table II The name of the town is given. The grades included in the district or town are shown in column G which has fardigits. The first two digits indicate the lowest grade included; the last two digits indicate the highest grade included, The digits or codes have the following meanings: N « Pre-kindergarten K « Kindergarten Ol = Grade 1 ’ 02 - Grade 2 03 - Grade 3 etc. 12 - Grade 12 U «= Special or unclassified sections Column T indicates the total mmber of sections or classes reported by the school district. Colum B indicates the mumber of sections or classes which had one or more non-whites in them. Column W indicates total mmber of whites in all classes reported. Column C indicates the total mmber of non-whites in all classes reported. Column D indicates the total mumber of pupils reported as "Don't Know" in all classes. % ib W Column F indicates the total mmber of Spanish speaking pupils. These pupils are included under Columns W, C, and/or D. Colum S indicates the mmmber of sectiéns or classes each having the mumber of non-whites shown in the carresponding row of Column N, n [o3 ) a = This town had 28 classes or sections each of which had 1 non-white in them, [ 4 and 7 classes or sections each of which had Li nonwhites in them. How to Read Table III The name of the town is given. Colums T, S, C, W, D, N, and F have the same meanings as in Table II; but for each grade reported, The totals for the town are also shown. “ili TABLE I tL J TOWNS WHICH REPORT NO NON-WHITES OR SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS v A is s H R ; ti , h r e ¢ Andover Barkhamsted Beacon Falls Bolton Bograh Burlington Canterbury Colebrook Cornwall Darien East Lyme Easton Middlebury New Fairfield New Hartford Oxford Plainfield Pomfret Roxbury Sherman Sprague Sterling Thamaston Thompson Voluntown Warren Washington Willington Woodbury Regional District #6 FAGE 5 TABLE HY SUMMARY FOR TOWNS WHICH REPORT FEX NON WHITES OR SPANISH To SPEAKING PUPILS ANSONI A Te GR T S W CL L.p F oE: 00 ‘agtiudSs Aes Z378 438% a 5 S N 1 15 1 14 1" 13 1 10 2 9 4 8 5 7 9 6 11 5 14 4 % 18 3 ; 30 2 22 1 ASHFORD GR T S _ AE F 00° 08 71 37 549 3 S N 3 1 PAGE. 's AVON GR T 5 W Ap F of 12 70 244 74D 3 a y S N i 3 1 BERLIN GR FY S W C.D F 00. 12 a8 9 2972 g. itp S N 9 1 BETHANY GR T S W CLD F 00 06 22 gli. gap die) S N 7 1 ; 2 2 BETHEL G R T S W a | F 00 12 80 43 2041 60 S N 28 1 1.0 2 1 3 l 4 PAGE 7 BETHLEHEM ER T S v on ne os 16 1 zag 1 . S N | 1 1 BRANFORD GC R T S v Ail F 00 2 416% 42:3930 duly 3 S N 1 4 ! 3 3 7 2 Ae) 1 BRIDGEWATER : GR T S v clin F 00°: 08 9 2 BRI 3 : S N 1 1 1 2 BROOKFIELD GR T S " Cen F oo fay 59 1 1490 1 S N 1 1 GR 00 08 GR 01 32 GR 01 08 PAGE 8 BROOKL YW T S W 23 1 64 4 S 1 CANAAN T S W 6 3 119 S 2 3 CANTON T S W 56 6 1333 S 6 CHAPLIN Y S W 13 2 e552 S 2 F e B h HC ) ly ) » iG R T s " cf F 60 172.1302 g 4320 8 ad 4 S N oi 1 CHESTER G R T S W Ca F 00 06 17 2 L435 2 3 N - 2 1 COLCHESTER G R T S W Clif F 00 12 40 ian 140% 4 id 3 S N- ; 22 1 . 1% 2 7 3 3 4 1 5 coLUMB 1A G R T S W LR F 01 08 19 41 509 4 S N GR CO i2 GR 00 06 GR 00 33 PAGE . 10 COVENTRY T S w 75 4 1861 S 4 CROMWELL T S w 73 2271631 S 2 4 8 DEEP RIVER T S W 21 2 490 S 2 DERBY T S Ww 74 19.1628 S 1 1 3 40 (LV J UY I 1 PACE 11 EASTFORD pg R T S v C Nn F ; 00 06 10 7 3187 8 S N 6 l > 2 EAST HAMPTON G R T S atid F 00 Tae 66 a9 187% 20. 3 | S N 18 1 1 2 EAST HARTFORD j GR T 3 W ery F ". 00 13 420 8711216 145; 1 7 : S N 64 1 14 2 7 3 EAST HAVEN GR T S W cap F O00 ‘32 220: 15 5764 15 1 S N 1.5 3 PAGE 312 EAST WINDSOR % GF T S ” c 01 12 80 + 34 1862 5 7 S N 16 1 S 2 4 3 1 5 1 6 ELLINGTON GR 1 S W C 01 12 19 13 1919 15 S N 31 i 2 2 ENFIELD GR T S W C 01 12 33% 56: 9218 6 4 S N 49 i 6 2 GR 00 i2 GR 00 12 GR 00 13 ESSEX T S Ww 20 6 551 S 4 1 1 FAIRFIELD T S Ww 452 46/10684 S 38 6 2 FARMINGTON T S W 119 3 3234 S 2 GLASTONBURY Y S w 189 12.4720 S 11 3 W N Z Y O 56 2 . OO NN + 2 N N OD 01 00 00 GR GR GR 12 2 12 PAGE 14 GOSHEN T S W C 6 2 179 4 S N 2 e GRANBY T S W C 57 T1425 7 S N 7 1 CRISWOLD | S Ww C 55 3.1842 3 S N 3 i CUILFORD T S w C 108 22 2481 24 S N 2 2 20 1 34 GR 00 06 ‘GR 00 12 GR 00 12 HARTLAND T Si W 11 1 262 S 2 HEBRON T S v is 3 5132 S 3 Ki LL INGLY T S W es 21 2498 S 13 6 LEBANON T S W 3; 8 66 2 S 2 = . 2 25 = 2 n n © GR 00 i2 GR 01 06 GR 01 7/06 PAGE 16 Li TCHF I ELD T S W 73 12 4690 S 22 MANCHESTER T S w 396 38 8759 S 20 8 MANSFIELD T S w 45 8 110} S 6 2 MARLBOROUGH T S w 14 4 319 S 4 46 PAGE" 17 e v MIDDLEFIELD ., GR T S W Cp F 01 09 38 6 886 6 : S N 6 1 MONROE GR Th W rd F oy 12 92 9 2248 10 1 S N 8 1 1 2 MONTVILLE ¢ R T S W cil p F oo amt yes lies ua 851 Ah] 1 S N 36 1 . 6 2 3 3 1 4 MORRIS ¢ R oni? S W a F 00 06 10 1.238 1 S N ge PO. 12 GR 00 12 GR 00 “12 GR O01 22 PAGE 18 NAUGATUCK ; 170 NEW S w 20 4354 1S CANAAN MILFORD S w 20 2291 S 16 4 0 18 0 12 GR 00 06 GR 00 12 GR 00 08 PAGE 169 NEWTOWN’ T S Ww C 116 321.2778 4.2 S N 10 4 1 2 NORFOLK 1 S W C 8 5 205 5 S N 3 1 .) 2 NORTH BRANFORD T S W C 104 4 2703 4 S N 4 1 NORTH CANAAN T S W C 20 1.28 "468 14 S N 10 ‘ 2 2 PAGE: 290 NORTH HAVEN _. GR 3 S W co 0 F + us 00 12. 246-62 558% 79: 5 6 . S N : * 47 1 " 13 2 2 3 NO STONINGTON GR T S W gle | F 01 12 43 3. 88% 3 S N 3 3 ORANGE GR T S W Cs in) a : 00 06. 187. +15 2080 15 S N k 15 1 PLABNVY ILLE GR T S W Ch F 00 12 147 72-3721 101 1 11 S N 1 5 > 3 1° 2 49 1 PAGE 21 tL J PLYMOUTH ++ GR T S " cd F 00 as 98.18 2472 12 : S N il 12 1 PORTLAND GR T S W Ci F 00 18 775.39, 1709 98 iy 5 S N - 1 7 1 6 2 5 3 4 9 3 7 2 ’ 16 1 PRESTON GR T S ib Enh F 01 08 25 PEALE 7 619 S N PUTNAM § S RIDGEFIELD GR 4 S Ww 00 12 149 18 3414 S 18 v 00 00 01 GR GR GR 08 O08 08 PAGE 23 ROCKY HILL T S W C 78 c10. 1905 11 B N 9 1 1 2 SALEM T S W C 9 4 ian 4 S N 4 1 T S W C 22 14 468 16 S N 12 1 2 2 SCOTLAND C 155 2 N l bh”) GR 00 O08 GR 00 12 PAGE 24 SEYMOUR T S W 109 2 2795 S 2 SHARON T S W S 7 3 1 SHELTON T S W 19% 15 47890 S 16 SIMSBURY T S Ww 167 7: 7441 55 S 7 = RN G ty T R 5 16 N = ~J ( [IY .. GR 00 00 00 GR GR GR 12 13 12 iz PAGE 25 SOMERS y S W C 51 4 1317 4 S N 4 1 SOUTHBURY T S CW C 49 3 1230 3 S N 3 1 SOUTHINGTON T S W C 282. 25.7071 25 S N 25 1 SOUTH WINDSOR T S W C 180 21.2268 2 4 S N 18 1 nN a o O O00 O01 GR GR GR 12 12 08 PAGE 27 TORRINGTON T 8. W 204 45 B119 S 35 TRUMBULL T S W 204 42 56869 S 1 S 2 1 56 HE W D D PP Z oO o F O N T A N i n PAGE 28 VERNON +6 R T S W C D F 00 12 238 34.5699 35 1 Gr ¥ ig N | ; 27 1 4 2 WALLINGFORD GR T S " Cis 0 F oo po mez Hw7 wa79 AT. 5 104 s N 17 1 WATERFORD GR T S W C n F 00 12 188 73.4333 8 . ; S 58 13 6 . N 1 2 3 NE GR 80 12 GR 00 12 GR GR 00 09 PAGE 29 WATERT-O¥N T S Ww 149 £5 3865 17 WESTBROOK T S W 32 713 WEST HARTFORD T S 510 18/12731 S 17 1 WESTON T S W 70 1- 1665 S N MH C N R 2 0 NN ) o D C 1 N 1 PAGE 30 WESTPORT z EVE R T S Ww ES 00 12 293 36 7043 WETHERSFIELD GR T S Ww 00 iz 203 15 5171 S 14 WILTON GR T S W 00 12 148 6 2980 S 6 WINCHESTER GR T S w OO 08 68 13 31704 S 21 2 M T O ud 2 D T I O N 0) C S N 3 2 PAGE 31 WINDSOR T S w 199 123 4847 S 4 4 5 WINDSOR LOCKS T S Ww 146 41 3740 S 3 9 51 WOLCOTT T S Ww 312 12 3289 S 12 C 123 N Or 5 Li hy 3 JE T T E R S YC EE o PAGE: 32 4 . WOODSTOCK Tg R T S W C D F 00 08 24 Ag 3 565 12 1 : S N "5 Ve 10 1 3 e HOUSATONIC HIGH GR T S W cp F 09 a2 33 684 gio S N 4 1 1 2 1 3 VALLEY HiGH is GR Yaris W Cian F . 07 ap 58 4 "91's 5 S N 3 1 1 2 GR 07 12 GR 0% 12 GR 09 12 PAGE 33 *@ . AMITY HIGH T S Ww 104 22 2603 S 16 3 NORTHWESTERN REG T S W 32 1 70.1 S 2 RHAM HIGH T S Ww 32 3 748 S 3 JOEL BARLOW T S w 2 559 jo b. 2 D C 3 . N HI GH 1 N 3 PAGE 34 ad . LEWES 8S MiLLS HI STE T s W OF 07 12 33 1 B29 1 ; S N pase 1 1 £ 0 8BMITH GR T S W A F 07 12 42 3.998 3 1 S N 3 1 PAGE 35 TABLE 111] DISTRIBUTION OF“ NON WHITES AND SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES xe “on Er te INC CCERT ALN TOWNS BRIDGEPORY £6994 16835 SPANISH PACE "356 tag LE ak DISTRIBUTION OF “NON WHITES AND SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES sk Ha IN CERTAIN TOWNS ; BRISTOL T S C W 0. N Sr : N 3 18 18 | K 4%. 516 20 1040 2 1062 8 01 AQ AS 91 975 996 5 02 36 Tag 14 879 893 3 03 14s 25 33 937 970 6 04 20.17 44.3 20 830 1 851 5 05 29 8 10 806 816 5 ial 2 YA SA TY 12 743 755 5 07 pei 411 27 703 740 2 08 25 5 10 658 668 1 09 31 5 6 783 789 : - 10 28 . 9 732 7.41 13 31 4 4 741 2 747 4 : 12 25 4 6 625 631 TOT 435 "124 p02 10470 5 106717 42 DISTRIBUT vg TOT SPE T S 9 9 33 22 32 25 27 19 2:7 21 25 16 23 17 23 16 20 15 20 14 25 17 27 19 24 13 23 12 8 6 346 241 PAGE 37 TABLE ION OF NON W AKING PUPILS JN CERTAIN DANBURY 645 Ww 59 747 674 625 623 600 566 529 518 500 S565 590 521 530 72 793.7 HITES AND BY GRADES TOWNS 0 EG 7 ‘u d 19 SPANISH N F 1237 12 811 o 74.7 11 681 7 684 19 0) ne 3 0 pe 4 6 1 59 4 13 6 4 6 3 8381 115 PAGE 38 TABLE 4 41 DISTRIBUTION OF NON wdITES AND SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES IN CERTAIN TOWNS GREENWICH C 21 16 1 1.7 16 i6 17 1 24 14 i0 i c 2 i> S 9 7 e S S 7 1s 8 4 8 8 0 9 6 7 TOT PAGE 39 TASLE | 1) DISTRIBUTION OF --NON WHITES AND SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES or IN CERTAIN TOWNS | GROTON T S c W D 2 2 6 18 4g ion 78 979 7 1 20 31 8 3 892 . 36 26 6 6 842 4 za: in 69 750 29 23 6 7 722 BE 48 47 617 2 23 19 49 58 2 25 5 18 42 569 3 22 9 25 516 20 a4 35 465 i 21 15 30 406 iy 18 24 385 1 18 ap 17 323 1 7 5 12 72 248 650 8138 28 358 SPANISH 8816 H A N D N n =» = N n 13 PAGE 40 TABLE 1 1 DIiSTRABUT ION "OF NON WHITES ‘ 53 ~ - -¢ TOT 221 SPL 16 10 22 SPANISH AKINGE PUPILS BY GRADES I'N CERTAIN TOWNS HAMDEN C ¥ 12 19 22 814 28 739 33 728 33 743 29 643 38 E42 16 728 27 583 27 622 27 618 26 655 14 535 11 442 4 27 245 8538 6 8889 PAGE 41 YABLE 1 IY CISIRIBUTION OF NON ‘WHITES AND SPANISH & "SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES Sk IN CERTAIN TOWNS HARTFORD 769 10256 PAGE 42 TABLE #9) DISTRIBUTION GF NON WHITES AND SPANISH 1 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES i IN CERTAIN TOWNS MERIDEN . T S C W D N F : K 39 1'7 25 1045 3 1073 45 01 35017 36 Cl 848 46 8a. sould 26 739 4%. 766 33 03 Ch ER 32 822 854 30 04 28 iS 32 783 815 + 35 05 38 12 33 72% asa ti Pn 06 g6. 14 22 720 742 19 07 gy fR48 29 734 1 764 25 08 86: i410 18 719 § nzy 12 09 ge Hie 16 67:6 692 16 10 28 1% 17 627 fe 646 9 1 25 8 9 610 619 9 12 25 7 11 636 647 3 Toy 374 166 306 9644 | 7 9957 300 PAGE 43 TABLE V1 DISTRIBUTION OF "NON WHITES AND SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES IN CERTAIN TOWNS MIDDLETOWN . T S c W D N F ) N 4 3 30 30 60 1 K 0 CE 55 560 615 4 01 25 1% 57 556 aR 1 02 PR TLR 46 522 568 3 03 19% 10 38 454 472 1 04 20. 12 43 453 1 497 2 05 16 6 33 396 429 3 08 . a3" 40 30 372 1 403 2 07 16 “15 40 350 390 oe 3 650122 36 357 393 1 09 17 ian 32 301 333 1 iyo 18 13 34 340 | 374 2 11 po ie 4 24 353 377 1 Te ag 26 8 12 465 477 u 5 4 0 40 49 107 B63 16% S29 855289 2 6060 2 2 PAGE 44 TABLE 111 DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH 5 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES ich IN CERTAIN TOWNS go MILFORD ju T S c " D N aE K 50 8 11 10858 1 1070 1 01 47 6 781003 1 1101 3 02 41 8 11 1086 | 1077 03 39 7 8 98 3 991 04 39 7 8 1002 1010 05 37 6 7 95 3 960 06 38 i313 14 890 904 1 07 37 6 7 947 954 08 32 7 9 855 864 1 09 35 2 2 870 872 3 10 33 6 7 715 722 1 LE 29 5 6 632 1 639 12 26 6 6 602 1 6009 3 TOT 483 85 aD3 11666 Re] 1319773 33 PACE 45 TASLE 1th DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH I SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES pe IN CERTAIN TOWNS NEW BRITAIN Fs T S C W D N F N 4 2 3 23 26 3 K £5 4 39 153 «21403 3 1559 87 01 61+ 40 146° 1301 5 1452 69 02 50 . 38 BO" 11809 10 1258 60 03 46 28 87 1127 6 1220 45 04 46 28 96 1128 2 1234 40 05 441 Zé $1. a189 1 1251 36 06 39° "20 172041 3 1115 23 07 39.32 80 016 996 36 08 35.27 66 789 855 2 4 09 33 2 4 61 800 : 861 go . 10 431% 0 48 834 2 8-8 4 15 ) 14 35:20 36 827 2 865 4 12 3p P18 34 804 1 839 4 TOT 570 35387 1061 :1330¢% 35 14405 468 TOT PAGE 46 VABLE: | 4) DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND & SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES i 4 IN CERTAIN TOWNS NEW HAVEN T S C W D 2 1 23 7 7a Ase 943 3207 14 2 3° .88 A343 1084 23 2 T4464 930 91 3 14 1 seins 750 879 10 1 £0 1.80 740 760 12 1 58 080 622 800 5 A 45°28 502 670 1 5248 593 710 A 49 40 568 698 1 58° "4p 491 715 1 52 21 577 848 1 1 53 5854 332 751 3 1 425 38 217 755 25. By 171 152 1 704 693 B08 10957 80 19645 SPANISH N F 30 1 164 81 459 104 857 56 639 42 512 34 427 30 1782 21 303 26 266 1 20 4 20 22 6 11 084 5 972 1 330 2 445 PAGE 47 TABLE 1 11 DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES iN. CERTAIN TOWNS NEW LONDON SPANISH PAGE 4B TABLE 41) DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH or SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES <8 IN CERTAIN TOWNS fie) NORWALK Bi T S C W 0 N i N 9 8 81 37 118 7 K "84.39 216 1418 5 1636 40 01 6857 279 + 1318 3 1600 33 02 54 49 807 i192 3 1431 29 03 48 545 195 1385 3 1583 40 04 35 JaBS tiae 958 1119 19 05 38 35 2171 ‘1558 1789 23 06 19. 27 75 522 597 3 07 69 50 307 1297 1604 37 08 35 24 8 0 820 900 3 09 34.27 4 7 744 ; 794 6 : . 10 44052 119 770 3 892 2 v 13 378 pe 93 77e 865 5 12 37." 24 74 68 5 759 u 8 B 32 56 88 3 TOY SBE 462 | 2177 13558 17 185788 250 ® i» PAGE 49 TABLE 11 DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES Lig IN CERTAIN TOWNS : NORWICH b T S c W D N F K 28 13 35 750 785 bhi 01 25 wid 3g 688 726 02 gd ing 38 66S 1 704 03 22 8 25 633 658 0 4 22 9 21 581 602 05 pi 1 37 59 4 1 632 06 28) 10 2 4 601 3 628 1 07 23 a4 26 571 597 1 06 23 Ty 18 554 572 s 7 5 3 4 76 80 JOT 213 105 266 5713 S 5984 6 PAGE 50 TABLE 1 || DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES bd . IN CERTAIN TOWNS STAMFORD ¢ 2946 15732 40 TOT PB 2. i 378 SPE 11 il 149 PAGE y AKING 51 ABLE 1 PUPILS DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH BY GRADES EN CERTAIN TOWNS STRAT F S562 ORD 8856 S 9427 = DD ND 2 On 14 PAGE 52 TABLE V1 CISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH “3 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES a” IN CERTAIN TOWNS - WATERBURY T S C Ww D N F ii N 3 3 3'3 49 62 1 K 49 24 284 1511 2 1797 70 01 2.2 40 380 1257 1637 81 02 61 34 312 1179 1 1492 68 03 67 35 349 121.5 2 1566 8 4 04 58 38 2817 1092 13 1390 62 05 54 28 288 1139 1 1428 51 06 50 24 228 1069 i 1298 42 07 54 22 218 1050 2 1270 34 08 49 22 160 1023 1183 18 09 53 42 172 11585 5 1332 14 - 1.0 4 4 36 139 1004 1 1144 9 ; 1.1 39 31 91 945 2 1038 12 4 1:2 38 24 67 859 1 927 / TOT 692 403 2988 14547 29 17564 5853 PAGE 53 TABLE 14} DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH E+ SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES ‘> IN CERTAIN TOWNS WEST HAVEN C 4 2 65 47 50 38 34 F 3 e 2 2 2 2 1 50 40 25 4 8 rg 14 13 DISTRIBUTION O TOT 156 SPEAKING O F : W W u t a . n o O n O n l 52 PAGE 54 TABLE | F*" NON WHITES PUPILS J'N CERTAAN WINDHAM C O y Wl I h C a y 0 O T T O N M N 68 2521 TOWNS SPANISH GRADES 2590 30 36 90 J «4 Vv J - CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Hartford April 15, 1966 Series 1965-66 “ Cir. -Istter 0-12 T0: _Smperintendents of Schools rea rr Tks FROM: William J. Sanders Commissioner of Education RE: Race Survey of Connecticut Schools At the request of the Connecticut Civil Rights Cammission, a study of the radial composition of public school classes in the state is being conducted. Because infor- mation is desired on the basis of classrooms, the enclosed forms are designed for use by teachers of self-contained classes, including kindergartens, and for teachers of English in departmentalized schools and parts of schools. The superintendent's office will provide the information necessary to code the upper part of the form. The superintendent will announce that the count is as of April 22, 1966 or the closest prior date. Assigned town, county and school code num- bers are on the enclosed State list. A teacher number should be assigned to each teacher involved in this survey by numbering the teacher of a self-contained class and/or English class, The class sections for each teacher should be numbered con- secutively beginning with one. A copy of this master list should be returned to this office with the completed forms. Be sure the master list shows the name of the town, name of the school, name and number assigned to each teacher of a self-contain- ed and/or English class, and the number for each class section taught by each teacher. No teacher will be identified by name in any report; the identifying data are merely to enable us to ask questions if any data appear to be inaccurate, incomplete or inconsistent. It may be necessary for the teachers to use their judgment in classifying pupils as white or non-white, or, as primarily Spanish speaking. Take extreme care to follow instructions. Fill in the appropriate baxes and matching columns below each bax. Optical scanning equipment, which reads the column entries, will reject the form if there is no mark or more than one mark in any column. Please ask the teachers to check the forms after completion to be sure there is one, and only one mark in each column. Mark zeros for data that do not apply. Please see that forms are neither folded nor stapled. The forms are to be collected by the principal of each school, checked for complete- ness and obvious errors and then forwarded to the office of the superintendent of schools. The superintendent's office should ascertain that all forms for each school have been returned to hie office. Keep the forms for each school together. Send all forms in one package to the Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance, Connecti- cut State Department of Education, Bax 2219, Hartford, Connecticut 06115, before April 29, 1966. Thank you for your cooperation. WJS:rb STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION STAT-70 (3-46) TOWN RACE SURVEY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOBRS™™ "wer _ (Taken In cooperation with Connecticut Civil Rights Commission) SCHOOL 4 2 DIRECTIONS: Use @ #2 pencil to make entries. Erese errors thoroughly. Plate @ number or seve In Lo each bex, and All in the corresponding marking location In the there Is @ number er zere in each bex; end thet ene, and enly ene, hos @ merk In it, @s shewn in the exemple at left. Make ne stray merke elf CODE FOR CLASS: Pre-K=90, K=00, 1=01, 2=02, 3=03, otc. Por YS these codes In the first we columns and enter 1erees In the second twe wloiion. EXAMPLE: Grade 1 Is entered @s 0100. For multi-grade classes, enter the lowest grade in the first twe columns end the highest grade in the d twe col EXAMPLE: A class containing grades 1-3 ls entered @s 0103, SECTION: Boch teacher will number her classes for this survey in the erder in which they eccwr dur ing the week, and will enter this number in the first column under “Section.” In the second cel woe ee win won umn, enter 1 for a self-contained class, and 2 for an English class. EXAMPLES: If the class ls the lg tigi hil giigiigil third English class of the week, It will ba entered @s 32. Mest self-contained do will be en- tered os 11; a second self-contained class eg. Kindergarten weuld be entered 21. ENS 6: 6.6 4 x3 16:66 é 6:66 PUPIL COUNT: Use membership as of dete anneunced by Superintendent. include pupils sheent on thet ole al day. Count each pupil ence enly, either @s white, nenwhite, or “den’t knew.” Check your tetels. ‘ 1" The count of Spanish-speaking pupils is separate frem the racial count. Pupils in this group ere alse included in the white, nenwhite, and “‘den’t knew’ categeries and in the tetal enreliment. RACIAL CLASSIFICATION: Classy oll pupils possible es white er nenwhite, keeping “don’t knew” te @ minimum, Ceunt Sp peaking en basis of language used, te best of your knowledge, at heme or with peers. TOTAL ENROLLMENT (White, Non-wite, and Don’t Know) SPANISH SPEAKING (Already included in columns at left) “" ’ [1 " " " ’ |] " " " " ey 04 i" " " " " [] [J [] " " fell | Hell | lied Hell | Hell | Hel Heli | lie Hef fell | Hell | Helffliedt | lef | Hed i "od "4 TE ii Fe ll if TP. Heh} oH no oulu uo bod i. gol Hof | Hoh $f | fof | Hof Gold 1 Bed | Bodied | Ge HefiBed | feR } Hof lu IE BE LY a} oy FR : NE LE PE a itldia Bcd TT : HL HL el Eadl Hef iE ih he i TR BTR He i Hed) ie Ee if ei : " ( “" ' ’ " " [od - C 7 Heil wre [1] LL | TOTAL NON- WHITE {iin GIRLS TOTAL DON'T KNOW BOYS GIRLS he H He il TOTAL GIRLS TOTAL 1 34 BOYS ar gh Tom Ho ii fol Ho il Holl | Holl | Hof Holl | Holl | Holllied | Holl | leiililed fol lo il "oon oon "oo HEH HH LPR Hyon HIN HEE IH ) TNETE II HI fh i HAR HLH HAI HLH HL HR HAI HH HAE RIL HA HAH IH HAH HA HI HH HI HH Hal HI HI HI TONE [A HI 1 Be HIN i i HE HE HE I HE HE HE I HEI HE HEI IHR HE HEHE IE Ha HEH HI HI HEH HP HH TR HY TIT HIE [I tog Habit) He 1g i HR Bt HE HEH HEH HEB HEI HEH HEH HEHE SHE HE pI nd HEIR HE RY | 4