The Distribution of Non-Whites in the Public Schools of Connecticut
Unannotated Secondary Research
May 24, 1966
56 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. The Distribution of Non-Whites in the Public Schools of Connecticut, 1966. a4768794-a146-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5f005185-10dc-4bef-a1cb-9071b5b560b5/the-distribution-of-non-whites-in-the-public-schools-of-connecticut. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
; Hae a : Ea eo Vi 4 oN A fa 4
he ICUT, STATE TEPARTENT, OF, meron |. CLE £8
1 Bi ith dk Hartford *' ay Cini
Bi 5) wha ~
Sep adak : di EF ger
CONNECTICUT (48380 a
SEALS ise v
3 5 |
4% hi
of ply v.
Fede RL 3 a oh
3 is Hp ps nl 7% 5 y :
H CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Bureau of Research,Statistics and Finance
THE DISTRIBUTION OF NON-WHITCS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF CONNECTICUT
(4
In late April, 1966, the State Department of Education asked local school
officials $0 provide information about the racial composition of classes in the
local public schools. Data were obtained for self-contained classes and for English
classes where the schools are departmentalized. Information was sought also about
Spanish speaking pupils. There is general recognition of the fact that in certain
parts of the state, particularly in urban areas, there have been increases in the
mmbers of non-white and Spanish speaking children in schools. There is need to
establish benchmarks so that in future years there may be accurate determination of
such things as the rate of change in the mmbers of such pupils, the rate ‘at which
they may be moving into or out of urban areas, the grades in which the children are 0
enroled, etce There are no school census figures on this basis; these data help to
define the problem and should be taken into siedunt in whatever actions are proposed.
No information was sought to explain the distribution of pupils. Same
local people pointed out that in same cases, concentration of non—whitcs wescousad by
housing patterns and neighborhood school policies; others pointed out that children
i similar learning problems or pupils who had chosen certain curricula or courses
+ were grouped togethers
o Most school systems of the state supplied the data as requested; a few
school systems did not wish to participate in the survey, In some cases, the data
arrived too late to be processed and included in this report.
Some towns or school districts report no non-whites or Spanish speaking
children enroled; these districts are listed first, in Table I.
Same towns have few non-whites; summary data for these towns are presented
separately in Teble II, These summaries show the mmber of schools, the numbers of
children enroled, the total mmber of classes, the number of classes ar grades which
have non-whites in Shem, and the mmber of non-whites in each class which has
non-whites in it.
-
a
-
® ®
2 -—d =
For larger towns, we present, in Table ITI, summary data for each grade; we
show the mumber of whites, the mmber of non-whites, the mmber of "don't knows" and
the mmber of Spanish speaking pend lc, "In this table combination classes have been
listed with She lowest grade included in the class.
"Biore detailed dots which present informsbion for cach class in each schosl
are on file in the Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance of the Connecticut State
Department of Education. The data are available for inspection and use by those who
hy be interesteds The anonymity of individual teachers will be maintained.
The covering letter and the survey form used are included in this bulletins
It is hoped that these data will be useful as citizens and educators consider the
problems of quality and equality in education far all children.
Maurice J. Ross, Chief
Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance
How to Read Table II
The name of the town is given.
The grades included in the district or town are shown in column G which has fardigits.
The first two digits indicate the lowest grade included; the last two digits indicate
the highest grade included, The digits or codes have the following meanings:
N « Pre-kindergarten
K « Kindergarten
Ol = Grade 1
’ 02 - Grade 2
03 - Grade 3
etc.
12 - Grade 12
U «= Special or unclassified sections
Column T indicates the total mmber of sections or classes reported by the school
district.
Colum B indicates the mumber of sections or classes which had one or more non-whites
in them.
Column W indicates total mmber of whites in all classes reported.
Column C indicates the total mmber of non-whites in all classes reported.
Column D indicates the total mumber of pupils reported as "Don't Know" in all classes.
% ib W
Column F indicates the total mmber of Spanish speaking pupils. These pupils are
included under Columns W, C, and/or D.
Colum S indicates the mmmber of sectiéns or classes each having the mumber of
non-whites shown in the carresponding row of Column N,
n [o3
)
a
= This town had 28 classes or sections each of which had 1 non-white in them,
[ 4
and 7 classes or sections each of which had Li nonwhites in them.
How to Read Table III
The name of the town is given.
Colums T, S, C, W, D, N, and F have the same meanings as in Table II; but for each
grade reported, The totals for the town are also shown.
“ili
TABLE I
tL J
TOWNS WHICH REPORT NO NON-WHITES OR SPANISH SPEAKING PUPILS
v
A
is
s
H
R
;
ti
,
h
r
e
¢
Andover
Barkhamsted
Beacon Falls
Bolton
Bograh
Burlington
Canterbury
Colebrook
Cornwall
Darien
East Lyme
Easton
Middlebury
New Fairfield
New Hartford
Oxford
Plainfield
Pomfret
Roxbury
Sherman
Sprague
Sterling
Thamaston
Thompson
Voluntown
Warren
Washington
Willington
Woodbury
Regional District #6
FAGE 5
TABLE HY
SUMMARY FOR TOWNS WHICH REPORT
FEX NON WHITES OR SPANISH
To SPEAKING PUPILS
ANSONI A
Te GR T S W CL L.p F
oE: 00 ‘agtiudSs Aes Z378 438% a 5
S N
1 15
1 14
1" 13
1 10
2 9
4 8
5 7
9 6
11 5
14 4
% 18 3
; 30 2
22 1
ASHFORD
GR T S _ AE F
00° 08 71 37 549 3
S N
3 1
PAGE. 's
AVON
GR T 5 W Ap F
of 12 70 244 74D 3 a
y S N
i 3 1
BERLIN
GR FY S W C.D F
00. 12 a8 9 2972 g. itp
S N
9 1
BETHANY
GR T S W CLD F
00 06 22 gli. gap die)
S N
7 1
; 2 2
BETHEL
G R T S W a | F
00 12 80 43 2041 60
S N
28 1
1.0 2
1 3
l 4
PAGE 7
BETHLEHEM
ER T S v on
ne os 16 1 zag 1
. S N
| 1 1
BRANFORD
GC R T S v Ail F
00 2 416% 42:3930 duly 3
S N
1 4 !
3 3
7 2
Ae) 1
BRIDGEWATER
: GR T S v clin F
00°: 08 9 2 BRI 3
: S N
1 1
1 2
BROOKFIELD
GR T S " Cen F
oo fay 59 1 1490 1
S N
1 1
GR
00 08
GR
01 32
GR
01 08
PAGE 8
BROOKL YW
T S W
23 1 64 4
S
1
CANAAN
T S W
6 3 119
S
2
3
CANTON
T S W
56 6 1333
S
6
CHAPLIN
Y S W
13 2 e552
S
2
F
e
B
h
HC
)
ly
)
»
iG R T s " cf F
60 172.1302
g 4320 8 ad 4
S
N
oi
1
CHESTER
G R T S W Ca F
00 06 17 2 L435 2
3
N
-
2
1
COLCHESTER
G R T S W Clif F
00 12 40 ian 140% 4 id 3
S
N-
;
22
1
.
1%
2
7
3
3
4
1
5
coLUMB 1A
G R T S W LR F
01 08 19 41 509 4
S
N
GR
CO i2
GR
00 06
GR
00 33
PAGE . 10
COVENTRY
T S w
75 4 1861
S
4
CROMWELL
T S w
73 2271631
S
2 4
8
DEEP RIVER
T S W
21 2 490
S
2
DERBY
T S Ww
74 19.1628
S
1
1
3
40
(LV
J
UY
I
1
PACE 11
EASTFORD
pg R T S v C Nn F
; 00 06 10 7 3187 8
S N
6 l
> 2
EAST HAMPTON
G R T S atid F
00 Tae 66 a9 187% 20. 3
| S N
18 1
1 2
EAST HARTFORD j
GR T 3 W ery F
". 00 13 420 8711216 145; 1 7
: S N
64 1
14 2
7 3
EAST HAVEN
GR T S W cap F
O00 ‘32 220: 15 5764 15 1
S N
1.5 3
PAGE 312
EAST WINDSOR
% GF T S ” c
01 12 80 + 34 1862 5 7
S N
16 1
S 2
4 3
1 5
1 6
ELLINGTON
GR 1 S W C
01 12 19 13 1919 15
S N
31 i
2 2
ENFIELD
GR T S W C
01 12 33% 56: 9218 6 4
S N
49 i
6 2
GR
00 i2
GR
00 12
GR
00 13
ESSEX
T S Ww
20 6 551
S
4
1
1
FAIRFIELD
T S Ww
452 46/10684
S
38
6
2
FARMINGTON
T S W
119 3 3234
S
2
GLASTONBURY
Y S w
189 12.4720
S
11
3
W
N
Z
Y
O
56
2
.
OO
NN
+
2
N
N
OD
01
00
00
GR
GR
GR
12
2
12
PAGE 14
GOSHEN
T S W C
6 2 179 4
S N
2 e
GRANBY
T S W C
57 T1425 7
S N
7 1
CRISWOLD
| S Ww C
55 3.1842 3
S N
3 i
CUILFORD
T S w C
108 22 2481 24
S N
2 2
20 1
34
GR
00 06
‘GR
00 12
GR
00 12
HARTLAND
T Si W
11 1 262
S
2
HEBRON
T S v
is 3 5132
S
3
Ki LL INGLY
T S W
es 21 2498
S
13
6
LEBANON
T S W
3; 8 66 2
S
2
=
.
2
25
=
2
n
n
©
GR
00 i2
GR
01 06
GR
01 7/06
PAGE 16
Li TCHF I ELD
T S W
73 12 4690
S
22
MANCHESTER
T S w
396 38 8759
S
20
8
MANSFIELD
T S w
45 8 110}
S
6
2
MARLBOROUGH
T S w
14 4 319
S
4
46
PAGE" 17
e
v
MIDDLEFIELD
., GR T S W Cp F
01 09 38 6 886 6
: S N
6 1
MONROE
GR Th W rd F
oy 12 92 9 2248 10 1
S N
8 1
1 2
MONTVILLE
¢ R T S W cil p F
oo amt yes lies ua 851 Ah] 1
S N
36 1
.
6 2
3 3
1 4
MORRIS
¢ R oni? S W a F
00 06 10 1.238 1
S N
ge
PO. 12
GR
00 12
GR
00 “12
GR
O01 22
PAGE 18
NAUGATUCK
;
170
NEW
S w
20 4354
1S
CANAAN
MILFORD
S w
20 2291
S
16
4
0
18
0 12
GR
00 06
GR
00 12
GR
00 08
PAGE 169
NEWTOWN’
T S Ww C
116 321.2778 4.2
S N
10 4
1 2
NORFOLK
1 S W C
8 5 205 5
S N
3 1
.) 2
NORTH BRANFORD
T S W C
104 4 2703 4
S N
4 1
NORTH CANAAN
T S W C
20 1.28 "468 14
S N
10 ‘
2 2
PAGE: 290
NORTH HAVEN
_. GR 3 S W co 0 F
+ us
00 12. 246-62 558% 79: 5 6
. S N
: * 47 1
" 13 2
2 3
NO STONINGTON
GR T S W gle | F
01 12 43 3. 88% 3
S N
3 3
ORANGE
GR T S W Cs in) a
: 00 06. 187. +15 2080 15
S N
k 15 1
PLABNVY ILLE
GR T S W Ch F
00 12 147 72-3721 101 1 11
S N
1 5
> 3
1° 2
49 1
PAGE 21
tL J
PLYMOUTH
++ GR T S " cd F
00 as 98.18 2472 12
: S N
il 12 1
PORTLAND
GR T S W Ci F
00 18 775.39, 1709 98 iy 5
S N -
1 7
1 6
2 5
3 4
9 3
7 2
’ 16 1
PRESTON
GR T S ib Enh F
01 08 25 PEALE 7 619
S N
PUTNAM
§ S
RIDGEFIELD
GR 4 S Ww
00 12 149 18 3414
S
18
v
00
00
01
GR
GR
GR
08
O08
08
PAGE 23
ROCKY HILL
T S W C
78 c10. 1905 11
B N
9 1
1 2
SALEM
T S W C
9 4 ian 4
S N
4 1
T S W C
22 14 468 16
S N
12 1
2 2
SCOTLAND
C
155 2
N
l
bh”)
GR
00 O08
GR
00 12
PAGE 24
SEYMOUR
T S W
109 2 2795
S
2
SHARON
T S W
S
7
3
1
SHELTON
T S W
19% 15 47890
S
16
SIMSBURY
T S Ww
167 7: 7441 55
S
7
=
RN
G
ty
T
R
5
16
N
=
~J
(
[IY
.. GR
00
00
00
GR
GR
GR
12
13
12
iz
PAGE 25
SOMERS
y S W C
51 4 1317 4
S N
4 1
SOUTHBURY
T S CW C
49 3 1230 3
S N
3 1
SOUTHINGTON
T S W C
282. 25.7071 25
S N
25 1
SOUTH WINDSOR
T S W C
180 21.2268 2 4
S N
18 1
nN
a
o
O
O00
O01
GR
GR
GR
12
12
08
PAGE 27
TORRINGTON
T 8. W
204 45 B119
S
35
TRUMBULL
T S W
204 42 56869
S
1
S
2
1
56
HE
W
D
D
PP
Z
oO
o
F
O
N
T
A
N
i
n
PAGE 28
VERNON
+6 R T S W C D F
00 12 238 34.5699 35 1
Gr ¥ ig N |
; 27 1
4 2
WALLINGFORD
GR T S " Cis 0 F
oo po mez Hw7 wa79 AT. 5 104
s N
17 1
WATERFORD
GR T S W C n F
00 12 188 73.4333 8
. ; S
58
13
6 .
N
1
2
3
NE GR
80 12
GR
00 12
GR
GR
00 09
PAGE 29
WATERT-O¥N
T S Ww
149 £5 3865
17
WESTBROOK
T S W
32 713
WEST HARTFORD
T S
510 18/12731
S
17
1
WESTON
T S W
70 1- 1665
S
N
MH
C
N
R
2
0
NN
)
o
D
C
1
N
1
PAGE 30
WESTPORT
z EVE R T S Ww
ES
00 12 293 36 7043
WETHERSFIELD
GR T S Ww
00 iz 203 15 5171
S
14
WILTON
GR T S W
00 12 148 6 2980
S
6
WINCHESTER
GR T S w
OO 08 68 13 31704
S
21
2
M
T
O
ud
2
D
T
I
O
N
0)
C
S
N
3
2
PAGE 31
WINDSOR
T S w
199 123 4847
S
4 4
5
WINDSOR LOCKS
T S Ww
146 41 3740
S
3
9
51
WOLCOTT
T S Ww
312 12 3289
S
12
C
123
N
Or
5
Li
hy
3
JE
T
T
E
R
S
YC
EE
o
PAGE: 32
4 .
WOODSTOCK
Tg R T S W C D F
00 08 24 Ag 3 565 12 1
: S N
"5 Ve 10 1
3 e
HOUSATONIC HIGH
GR T S W cp F
09 a2 33 684 gio
S N
4 1
1 2
1 3
VALLEY HiGH
is GR Yaris W Cian F
. 07 ap 58 4 "91's 5
S N
3 1
1 2
GR
07 12
GR
0% 12
GR
09 12
PAGE 33
*@ .
AMITY HIGH
T S Ww
104 22 2603
S
16
3
NORTHWESTERN REG
T S W
32 1 70.1
S
2
RHAM HIGH
T S Ww
32 3 748
S
3
JOEL BARLOW
T S w
2 559
jo
b.
2
D
C
3 .
N
HI GH
1
N
3
PAGE 34
ad .
LEWES 8S MiLLS HI
STE T s W OF
07 12 33 1 B29 1
; S N
pase 1 1
£ 0 8BMITH
GR T S W A F
07 12 42 3.998 3 1
S N
3 1
PAGE 35
TABLE 111]
DISTRIBUTION OF“ NON WHITES AND
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
xe
“on
Er te INC CCERT ALN TOWNS
BRIDGEPORY
£6994 16835
SPANISH
PACE "356
tag LE ak
DISTRIBUTION
OF “NON WHITES AND SPANISH
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
sk
Ha IN CERTAIN TOWNS
; BRISTOL
T S C W 0. N Sr
: N 3
18 18 |
K 4%. 516 20 1040 2 1062 8
01 AQ AS 91 975 996 5
02 36 Tag 14 879 893 3
03 14s 25 33 937 970 6
04 20.17 44.3 20 830 1 851 5
05 29 8 10 806 816 5
ial 2 YA SA TY 12 743 755 5
07 pei 411 27 703 740 2
08 25 5 10 658 668 1
09 31 5 6 783 789 :
- 10 28 . 9 732 7.41
13 31 4 4 741 2 747 4
: 12 25 4 6 625 631
TOT 435 "124 p02 10470 5 106717 42
DISTRIBUT
vg
TOT
SPE
T S
9 9
33 22
32 25
27 19
2:7 21
25 16
23 17
23 16
20 15
20 14
25 17
27 19
24 13
23 12
8 6
346 241
PAGE 37
TABLE
ION OF NON W
AKING PUPILS
JN CERTAIN
DANBURY
645
Ww
59
747
674
625
623
600
566
529
518
500
S565
590
521
530
72
793.7
HITES AND
BY GRADES
TOWNS
0
EG
7
‘u
d
19
SPANISH
N F
1237 12
811 o
74.7 11
681 7
684 19
0)
ne
3 0
pe
4
6
1
59 4 13
6
4
6
3
8381 115
PAGE 38
TABLE 4 41
DISTRIBUTION OF NON wdITES AND SPANISH
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
IN CERTAIN TOWNS
GREENWICH
C
21
16
1 1.7
16
i6
17
1 24
14
i0
i c 2
i>
S
9
7
e
S
S
7 1s
8
4
8
8
0
9
6 7
TOT
PAGE 39
TASLE | 1)
DISTRIBUTION OF --NON WHITES AND
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
or IN CERTAIN TOWNS
| GROTON
T S c W D
2 2 6 18
4g ion 78 979 7 1
20 31 8 3 892 .
36 26 6 6 842 4
za: in 69 750
29 23 6 7 722
BE 48 47 617 2
23 19 49 58 2
25 5 18 42 569 3
22 9 25 516
20 a4 35 465 i
21 15 30 406 iy
18 24 385 1
18 ap 17 323 1
7 5 12 72
248 650 8138 28 358
SPANISH
8816
H
A
N
D
N
n
=»
=
N
n
13
PAGE 40
TABLE 1 1
DIiSTRABUT ION "OF NON WHITES
‘ 53
~ -
-¢
TOT
221
SPL
16
10
22
SPANISH
AKINGE PUPILS BY GRADES
I'N CERTAIN TOWNS
HAMDEN
C ¥
12 19
22 814
28 739
33 728
33 743
29 643
38 E42
16 728
27 583
27 622
27 618
26 655
14 535
11 442
4 27
245 8538 6 8889
PAGE 41
YABLE 1 IY
CISIRIBUTION OF NON ‘WHITES AND SPANISH
& "SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
Sk
IN CERTAIN TOWNS
HARTFORD
769 10256
PAGE 42
TABLE #9)
DISTRIBUTION GF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
1 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
i IN CERTAIN TOWNS
MERIDEN
. T S C W D N F
: K 39 1'7 25 1045 3 1073 45
01 35017 36 Cl 848 46
8a. sould 26 739 4%. 766 33
03 Ch ER 32 822 854 30
04 28 iS 32 783 815 + 35
05 38 12 33 72% asa ti Pn
06 g6. 14 22 720 742 19
07 gy fR48 29 734 1 764 25
08 86: i410 18 719 § nzy 12
09 ge Hie 16 67:6 692 16
10 28 1% 17 627 fe 646 9
1 25 8 9 610 619 9
12 25 7 11 636 647 3
Toy 374 166 306 9644 | 7 9957 300
PAGE 43
TABLE V1
DISTRIBUTION OF "NON WHITES AND SPANISH
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
IN CERTAIN TOWNS
MIDDLETOWN
. T S c W D N F
) N 4 3 30 30 60 1
K 0 CE 55 560 615 4
01 25 1% 57 556 aR 1
02 PR TLR 46 522 568 3
03 19% 10 38 454 472 1
04 20. 12 43 453 1 497 2
05 16 6 33 396 429 3
08 . a3" 40 30 372 1 403 2
07 16 “15 40 350 390
oe 3 650122 36 357 393 1
09 17 ian 32 301 333 1
iyo 18 13 34 340 | 374 2
11 po ie 4 24 353 377 1
Te ag 26 8 12 465 477
u 5 4 0 40 49
107 B63 16% S29 855289 2 6060 2 2
PAGE 44
TABLE 111
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
5 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
ich IN CERTAIN TOWNS
go MILFORD
ju T S c " D N aE
K 50 8 11 10858 1 1070 1
01 47 6 781003 1 1101 3
02 41 8 11 1086 | 1077
03 39 7 8 98 3 991
04 39 7 8 1002 1010
05 37 6 7 95 3 960
06 38 i313 14 890 904 1
07 37 6 7 947 954
08 32 7 9 855 864 1
09 35 2 2 870 872 3
10 33 6 7 715 722 1
LE 29 5 6 632 1 639
12 26 6 6 602 1 6009 3
TOT 483 85 aD3 11666 Re] 1319773 33
PACE 45
TASLE 1th
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
I SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
pe IN CERTAIN TOWNS
NEW BRITAIN
Fs T S C W D N F
N 4 2 3 23 26 3
K £5 4 39 153 «21403 3 1559 87
01 61+ 40 146° 1301 5 1452 69
02 50 . 38 BO" 11809 10 1258 60
03 46 28 87 1127 6 1220 45
04 46 28 96 1128 2 1234 40
05 441 Zé $1. a189 1 1251 36
06 39° "20 172041 3 1115 23
07 39.32 80 016 996 36
08 35.27 66 789 855 2 4
09 33 2 4 61 800 : 861 go
. 10 431% 0 48 834 2 8-8 4 15
) 14 35:20 36 827 2 865 4
12 3p P18 34 804 1 839 4
TOT 570 35387 1061 :1330¢% 35 14405 468
TOT
PAGE 46
VABLE: | 4)
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND
& SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
i 4 IN CERTAIN TOWNS
NEW HAVEN
T S C W D
2 1 23 7
7a Ase 943 3207 14 2
3° .88 A343 1084 23 2
T4464 930 91 3 14 1
seins 750 879 10 1
£0 1.80 740 760 12 1
58 080 622 800 5 A
45°28 502 670 1
5248 593 710 A
49 40 568 698 1
58° "4p 491 715 1
52 21 577 848 1 1
53 5854 332 751 3 1
425 38 217 755
25. By 171 152 1
704 693 B08 10957 80 19645
SPANISH
N F
30 1
164 81
459 104
857 56
639 42
512 34
427 30
1782 21
303 26
266 1
20 4 20
22 6 11
084 5
972 1
330 2
445
PAGE 47
TABLE 1 11
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
iN. CERTAIN TOWNS
NEW LONDON
SPANISH
PAGE 4B
TABLE 41)
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
or SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
<8 IN CERTAIN TOWNS
fie) NORWALK
Bi T S C W 0 N i
N 9 8 81 37 118 7
K "84.39 216 1418 5 1636 40
01 6857 279 + 1318 3 1600 33
02 54 49 807 i192 3 1431 29
03 48 545 195 1385 3 1583 40
04 35 JaBS tiae 958 1119 19
05 38 35 2171 ‘1558 1789 23
06 19. 27 75 522 597 3
07 69 50 307 1297 1604 37
08 35 24 8 0 820 900 3
09 34.27 4 7 744 ; 794 6 :
. 10 44052 119 770 3 892 2
v 13 378 pe 93 77e 865 5
12 37." 24 74 68 5 759
u 8 B 32 56 88 3
TOY SBE 462 | 2177 13558 17 185788 250
® i»
PAGE 49
TABLE 11
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
Lig IN CERTAIN TOWNS
: NORWICH
b T S c W D N F
K 28 13 35 750 785 bhi
01 25 wid 3g 688 726
02 gd ing 38 66S 1 704
03 22 8 25 633 658
0 4 22 9 21 581 602
05 pi 1 37 59 4 1 632
06 28) 10 2 4 601 3 628 1
07 23 a4 26 571 597 1
06 23 Ty 18 554 572 s
7 5 3 4 76 80
JOT 213 105 266 5713 S 5984 6
PAGE 50
TABLE 1 ||
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
bd . IN CERTAIN TOWNS
STAMFORD
¢
2946 15732
40
TOT
PB
2.
i
378
SPE
11
il
149
PAGE
y
AKING
51
ABLE 1
PUPILS
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
BY GRADES
EN CERTAIN TOWNS
STRAT F
S562
ORD
8856 S 9427
=
DD
ND
2
On
14
PAGE 52
TABLE V1
CISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
“3 SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
a” IN CERTAIN TOWNS
- WATERBURY
T S C Ww D N F
ii N 3 3 3'3 49 62 1
K 49 24 284 1511 2 1797 70
01 2.2 40 380 1257 1637 81
02 61 34 312 1179 1 1492 68
03 67 35 349 121.5 2 1566 8 4
04 58 38 2817 1092 13 1390 62
05 54 28 288 1139 1 1428 51
06 50 24 228 1069 i 1298 42
07 54 22 218 1050 2 1270 34
08 49 22 160 1023 1183 18
09 53 42 172 11585 5 1332 14
- 1.0 4 4 36 139 1004 1 1144 9
; 1.1 39 31 91 945 2 1038 12
4 1:2 38 24 67 859 1 927 /
TOT 692 403 2988 14547 29 17564 5853
PAGE 53
TABLE 14}
DISTRIBUTION OF NON WHITES AND SPANISH
E+ SPEAKING PUPILS BY GRADES
‘>
IN CERTAIN TOWNS
WEST HAVEN
C
4 2
65
47
50
38
34
F
3
e
2
2
2
2
1 50
40
25
4 8
rg
14
13
DISTRIBUTION O
TOT
156
SPEAKING
O
F
:
W
W
u
t
a
.
n
o
O
n
O
n
l
52
PAGE 54
TABLE |
F*" NON WHITES
PUPILS
J'N CERTAAN
WINDHAM
C
O
y
Wl
I
h
C
a
y
0
O
T
T
O
N
M
N
68 2521
TOWNS
SPANISH
GRADES
2590
30
36
90
J
«4 Vv
J
- CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION
Hartford
April 15, 1966
Series 1965-66 “
Cir. -Istter 0-12
T0: _Smperintendents of Schools
rea rr
Tks
FROM: William J. Sanders
Commissioner of Education
RE: Race Survey of Connecticut Schools
At the request of the Connecticut Civil Rights Cammission, a study of the radial
composition of public school classes in the state is being conducted. Because infor-
mation is desired on the basis of classrooms, the enclosed forms are designed for use
by teachers of self-contained classes, including kindergartens, and for teachers of
English in departmentalized schools and parts of schools.
The superintendent's office will provide the information necessary to code the upper
part of the form. The superintendent will announce that the count is as of
April 22, 1966 or the closest prior date. Assigned town, county and school code num-
bers are on the enclosed State list. A teacher number should be assigned to each
teacher involved in this survey by numbering the teacher of a self-contained class
and/or English class, The class sections for each teacher should be numbered con-
secutively beginning with one. A copy of this master list should be returned to
this office with the completed forms. Be sure the master list shows the name of the
town, name of the school, name and number assigned to each teacher of a self-contain-
ed and/or English class, and the number for each class section taught by each teacher.
No teacher will be identified by name in any report; the identifying data are merely
to enable us to ask questions if any data appear to be inaccurate, incomplete or
inconsistent.
It may be necessary for the teachers to use their judgment in classifying pupils as
white or non-white, or, as primarily Spanish speaking.
Take extreme care to follow instructions. Fill in the appropriate baxes and matching
columns below each bax. Optical scanning equipment, which reads the column entries,
will reject the form if there is no mark or more than one mark in any column. Please
ask the teachers to check the forms after completion to be sure there is one, and
only one mark in each column. Mark zeros for data that do not apply. Please see
that forms are neither folded nor stapled.
The forms are to be collected by the principal of each school, checked for complete-
ness and obvious errors and then forwarded to the office of the superintendent of
schools. The superintendent's office should ascertain that all forms for each school
have been returned to hie office. Keep the forms for each school together. Send
all forms in one package to the Bureau of Research, Statistics and Finance, Connecti-
cut State Department of Education, Bax 2219, Hartford, Connecticut 06115, before
April 29, 1966.
Thank you for your cooperation.
WJS:rb
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION
STAT-70 (3-46)
TOWN
RACE SURVEY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOBRS™™ "wer _
(Taken In cooperation with Connecticut Civil Rights Commission)
SCHOOL 4
2
DIRECTIONS: Use @ #2 pencil to make entries. Erese errors thoroughly. Plate @ number or seve In Lo
each bex, and All in the corresponding marking location In the
there Is @ number er zere in each bex; end thet ene, and enly ene,
hos @ merk In it, @s shewn in the exemple at left. Make ne stray merke elf
CODE FOR CLASS: Pre-K=90, K=00, 1=01, 2=02, 3=03, otc. Por YS
these codes In the first we columns and enter 1erees In the second twe wloiion. EXAMPLE: Grade 1
Is entered @s 0100. For multi-grade classes, enter the lowest grade in the first twe columns end
the highest grade in the d twe col EXAMPLE: A class containing grades 1-3 ls entered @s 0103,
SECTION: Boch teacher will number her classes for this survey in the erder in which they eccwr dur
ing the week, and will enter this number in the first column under “Section.” In the second cel
woe ee win won umn, enter 1 for a self-contained class, and 2 for an English class. EXAMPLES: If the class ls the
lg tigi hil giigiigil third English class of the week, It will ba entered @s 32. Mest self-contained do will be en-
tered os 11; a second self-contained class eg. Kindergarten weuld be entered 21.
ENS
6: 6.6 4 x3 16:66 é 6:66 PUPIL COUNT: Use membership as of dete anneunced by Superintendent. include pupils sheent on thet
ole al day. Count each pupil ence enly, either @s white, nenwhite, or “den’t knew.” Check your tetels.
‘ 1" The count of Spanish-speaking pupils is separate frem the racial count. Pupils in this group ere
alse included in the white, nenwhite, and “‘den’t knew’ categeries and in the tetal enreliment.
RACIAL CLASSIFICATION: Classy oll pupils possible es white er nenwhite, keeping “don’t knew”
te @ minimum, Ceunt Sp peaking en basis of language used, te best of your knowledge, at heme
or with peers.
TOTAL ENROLLMENT (White,
Non-wite, and Don’t Know)
SPANISH SPEAKING (Already
included in columns at left)
“" ’ [1 " " " ’ |] " " " " ey 04 i" " " " " [] [J [] " "
fell | Hell | lied Hell | Hell | Hel Heli | lie Hef fell | Hell | Helffliedt | lef | Hed
i "od "4 TE ii Fe ll if TP. Heh} oH no oulu uo bod i.
gol Hof | Hoh $f | fof | Hof Gold 1 Bed | Bodied | Ge HefiBed | feR } Hof
lu IE BE LY a} oy FR : NE LE PE a itldia Bcd TT
: HL HL el Eadl Hef iE ih he i TR BTR He i Hed) ie Ee if ei
:
" ( “" ' ’ " "
[od
-
C 7
Heil
wre [1] LL |
TOTAL
NON-
WHITE {iin
GIRLS TOTAL
DON'T
KNOW
BOYS GIRLS
he H He il
TOTAL
GIRLS
TOTAL
1 34
BOYS
ar gh
Tom
Ho ii fol Ho il Holl | Holl | Hof Holl | Holl | Holllied | Holl | leiililed fol lo il
"oon oon "oo HEH HH LPR Hyon HIN HEE IH ) TNETE II HI fh i
HAR HLH HAI HLH HL HR HAI HH HAE RIL HA HAH IH HAH HA
HI HH HI HH Hal HI HI HI TONE [A HI 1 Be HIN i i
HE HE HE I HE HE HE I HEI HE HEI IHR HE HEHE IE Ha HEH
HI HI HEH HP HH TR HY TIT HIE [I tog Habit) He 1g i
HR Bt HE HEH HEH HEB HEI HEH HEH HEHE SHE HE pI nd HEIR HE
RY | 4