Order
Public Court Documents
December 7, 1983
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order, 1983. 016ddfb3-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5fb26841-c7f3-49c6-af9c-97b42094e0ac/order. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
R:JI:VEBJ
UEU 7 EE3
.:1,'"T:iti, ff ' il }"i i.l'rh IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALETGH DIVISION
RALPH GINGLES, €t aI.,
Plaintiffs
VS.
RUFUS EDMfSTEN, €t dI.,
Defendants
J. iirC. ; : r:'-)l\1.^,r'ii-i, :. l.--,ii(
Ll. Sl. '. i :.r'r:rllJ- ll).-: iiT
f. ::iSl-. i,:O. CAn.
NO.81-803-Crv-5
ORDER
Presently before the court is the plaintiffs' motion to con-
sider additional evidence filed November 22, 1983 to which plain-
tiffs have attached proposed new exhibits 90, 91 and 92. Plaintiffs
also ask leave to file additional exhibits relating to post-trial
elections recently held in jurisdictions other than Mecklenburg
County. In a response to this motion defendants have stated that
they have no objection to the courtrs consideration of plaintiffs'
proposed exhibits 90, 91 and 92 but do strenuously resist the
introduction of further evidence by the plaintiffs relating to
other post-trial elections. Defendants have attached to their
response defendantsr proposed exhibits 65, 66 and 67.
Upon consideration of plaintiffsr motion and defendants'
response the court has concluded to allow the filing of plaintiffsr
exhibits 90, 91 and 92 and defendants' exhibits 65, 66 and 67.
The court will consider these exhibits to the extent that they
are found to be relevant and otherwise admissible in evidence.
The motion of plaintiffs for leave to file additional exhibits
.t_
post-tria1 elections
County is denied.
held in jurisdictions other thanrelating to
Mecklenburg
December 5, 1983.
""
o:."t.
,:. -o.g.i'-.{\
-rr;:d.'w'
r. T. DUPREE,
UNITED STATES
Paoe 2