Order

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1319c8aa-e90e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Order, 1998. 1319c8aa-e90e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/60c2aa66-8a63-4a8b-b11e-8897c83dc69e/order. Accessed November 19, 2025.

Copied!

    APR-07-98 01:58PM BAER ee Ce +7043345654 » T-464 P.02/03 F-289 

IN TRE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 

EASTERN DIVISION FJ L E D 

Ne. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) 

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., SB 1998" 

Di¥iDw DANIEL, CLERK 
GU. S. DISTRICT COURT 

C DIST. NO. CAR 

Plaintiffs, 

Ve 

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in 

his cfficial capacity as 
Governor of the State of 
North Carzeclina, et al. 

Defendants. 

  

This matter is before the Court on Defendanta' Motion 

pursuant to Rule 62 of the Fedaral Rules of Civil Procedure for a 

Stay of its Order of April 3, 13398. 

In that Order the Court, fellowing a hearing, granted 

Plaintiffs’ Motien for Summary Judgment as to the Twelfth 

Congressional District and granted Plaintiffs’ Motian for a 

Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiffa' request for a Permanent 

Injunction. In the instant Motion, the Defsndants request that 

this Court stay the April 3 Order "so that the congressianal 

alections process which have [sic] already began [aic] may 

continue as acheduled." 

The Court how DENIES the Dafendants’ Motion for a fray. As 

gtated in the Court's previoue Order, a Memorandum and Opinion   
{11 be filed forthwith on the merita of ita Order filed at 3 

.m. on April 3, 1998, The Court filed an Order without a 

upporting Memorandum to afford the parties notice of tha Court's 

ruling and to avoid the unnecessary passage of time in the 

  
  

 



    APR=07-88 01:58PM EE +7043345654 T-464 P.03/03 F-289 

erafting of a remedy. 

This Order is entered into by a majority of the three-judge 

panel. Cireuit Judge Sam J. Ervin, III, dissents. 

S50 ORDERED. 

This eixth day of April, 1994. 

TERRENCE W. BOYLE 
Chief United States District Judge 
RICHARD L. VOORREES 
United States District Judge 

  

By 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICH/ JUDGE

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in