Itemization of Costs

Public Court Documents
May 4, 1981

Itemization of Costs preview

5 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Itemization of Costs, 1981. 2f2a43b2-722e-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/63d942b0-96b9-4e5e-9e0a-e03c6a7274a7/itemization-of-costs. Accessed July 18, 2026.

    Copied!

     [||70bb5c6d-e4c9-469a-b9b0-3b00fd95ec2c||] IN. THE 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

NO... 79-2393 

  

DELORES NORWOOD, et al., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

V. 

THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

  

ITEMIZATION OF COSTS 

nr 

This is to certify that the cost of printing appellees’ 

| brief in the above appeal on or about September 7, 1979, by in- 

house Xeroxing was $78.45. This amount was figured based on a 

run of 12 copies of 43 pages at 15¢ per page and 7 plastic covers 

at 15¢ each. (Seven copies of the brief were filed with the 

Court with plastic covers, 2 were for service, and 3 copies for 

counsel and file. The length of the brief was 43 pages. The 

cost of 15¢ per page is based on the average cost of machine, 

paper and labor for the period in question.) 

  

BILL LANN LEE 

Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees 

 



Q... States Court of Appeals ® 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

TEL S04- 589-6514 
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 

CLERK NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130 

May 19, 1981 

Mr. Norman L. Gillespie,Clerk 

U. 8% District Court 

P. O. Box-727 

Oxford, MS 38655 

No. 79-2393 - Delores Norwood, Etc., Et Al -vs- 

-D.'L. Harrison, Sr., et.al 

Dear Mr. Gillespie: 

(X ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the 
above case issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the Rule 21 Decision in the above 
case issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) The Court having denied the motion for stay of mandate, enclosed is 
a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above case 
issued as and for the mandate. See attached notice. 

  

( ) Having received from the Clerk of the Supreme Court a copy of the 
order of that Court denying certiorari, I enclose a certified copy 
of the judgment of this Court in the above case, issued as and for 
the mandate. 

( ) We have received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court 
denying certiorari in the above cause. This Court's. judgment as 
mandate having already been issued to your office, no further 
order will be forthcoming. 

Enclosed herewith are the following additional documents: 

Y Copy of the Court's opinion. 

) Original record on appeal or review. (TO BE RETURNED LATER) 

( ) Original exhibits. 

Y Bill of Costs approved by this Court. 

Sincerely, 

GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk 

Encl. {Letter 5 Bill of Costs) x AL. 
By » CN Nn 2 

CC: Mr. Peter M. Sockett, Jr. 
Mr. Bill Lann Lee 

Mr. Jack Greenberg 

  

Deputy Clerk 

 



UNITED sta COURT OF APPEALS FOR THe@rr CIRCUIT 

  

BILL OF COSTS NJ! 
  

  

DELORES NORWOOD, et al., + OF Ai 3 Ah 7 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, ~QV" APR. Er ATTA 
O 5. Tog 

versus © RECEIVED g, 79-2329U.8. COURT OF Appa 
L — 3 oj 

D. L. HARRISON, el al., | MAY 4 1981 / Fi L ED 

Defendants-Appellanis. / 

MAY 4198 

GILBERT F. GANUCHE A , GANUCHEAU 
The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against ..Defendants-Appellants. e eqq 

Be 
“Ne Ww Sn VW 
———- AN #7 of 

on 

  

COURT COSTS TAXABLE UNDER RULE 39, FRAP REQUESTED ALLOWED 
  

  

Docketing Fee Wkf.paid directly to the. Court. of. Appeals) 
  

  

Cost of Printing Appendix or Record Excerpts 

      

Cost of Printing Appellant's Brief 

  

  

Cost of Printing Appellant’s Reply Brief 

  
      

  
      

      

| 

| 

| | 

Cost of Printing Appellee’s Brief $78 l45 0 2 

TOTAL oni RSA | $78 | 
;     

  
  

State of New York SS: 
County of New York 

I, Bill Lan Lee, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the 
services for which fees have been charged were incurred in this action and that 
the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed. 
THE PRINTER'S ITEMIZED STATEMENT SHOWING THE ACTUAL COSTS PER PAGE FOR THE APPENDIX 

AND BRIEFS IS ATTACHED. (If commercial printer not used prepare and attach itemization 

of copying costs.) A copy hereof was this day mailed to opposing counsel, with postage 

  
  

  

fully prepaid thereon. This 29th day of ApPEPl 4) Moe 199 
2 2. = iit” 3 py i / 

a JA I ; ; FAY. 2 Ne 

~~(Sfghatusé) {r 
i \ Vv 

Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees. 
  

Rh BRR RR Rah RR 

Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $ ng. $s this /9H day 

of A 3 198 / / 

Y GILBERT F. GANUCHEAY 

: LA Clerk 7 / 

7 / / A ee apf ig 

0 AN Lol AAT 7 , fd Fi fd er 
  

fr! Deputy Clerk 
/ 

NOTE: The Bill of Costs is due for filing in this office Within 14 days from the date 
of the opinion, in accordance with Rule 39 F.R.A.P. If 4 bill of costs is not timely 
filed in this office, processing can be accomplished only by the filing of a formal 

motion for leave to file same out of time. 

  

  

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES GOVERNING TAXATION OF COSTS. 

   



  

#2 * » 
nited States Court of Appeals 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

TEL 504-589-6514 
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET 

CLERK NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130 

May 19, 1981 

Mr. Norman L. Gillespie,Clerk 

Pe. S. District Court 

P. OO. Box 727 

Oxford, MS + 38655 

No. 79-2393 - Delores Norwood, Etc., Et Al -vs- 

D.:L. Harrison, Sr., et al 

Dear Mr. Gillespie: 

{ X ') Enclosed is a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the 
above case issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the Rule 21 Decision in the above 
case issued as and for the mandate. 

( ) The Court having denied the motion for stay of mandate, enclosed is 
a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above case 
issued as and for the mandate. See attached notice. 

  

( ) Having received from the Clerk of the Supreme Court a copy of the 
order of that Court denying certiorari, I enclose a certified copy 
of the judgment of this Court in the above case, issued as and for 
the mandate. 

( ) We have received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court 
denying certiorari in the above cause. This Court's judgment as 
mandate having already been issued to your office, no further 
order will be forthcoming. 

Enclosed herewith are the following additional documents: 

(X *) Copy Of the Court's opinion. : 

( ) Original record on appeal or review. (TO BE RETURNED LATER) 

( ) Original exhibits. 

(+ ) Bill of Costs approved by this ‘Court, x 

Sincerely, 

GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk 

Encl. (Letter & Bill of Costs) ? 0 
By # GC nn 2 

CC: Mr. Peter M. Sockett, Jr. 
Mr. Bill Lann Lee 

Mr. Jack Greenberg 

  

Deputy Clerk 

 



UNITED sta COURT OF APPEALS FOR THEfFTH CIRCUIT 

  

BILL OF COSTS NO! 
  

  

DELORES NORWOOD, et al., aT OF 5 at 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Miah 0 Gi r7 id A ANS 

Versus 4 RECEIVED Gg, hater s. COURT OF APPEALS j 

D. L. HARRISON, ‘et al., | MAY 4 1981 / Fl L E 0 
Defendants-Appellants. ’ 

Ww Af 1 
- Sow opLemne AY 4 16814 

GILBERT F. GANUCH 
Defendants-Appellants. AN The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against __.   

COURT COSTS TAXABLE UNDER RULE 39, FRAP REQUESTED ALLOWED 
  

  

Docketing Fee @kf.paid directly to the Court of. Appeals) | 
  

  

Cost of Printing Appendix or Record Excerpts 
  

Cost of Printing Appellant’s Brief   
    
Cost of Printing Appellee’s Brief $78 |45 ya] 

    

Cost of Printing Appellant’s Reply Brief 

  
      
  

      
          TOTAL ciiiconn ee $78 145 | I 11s ( 

. / 

  
  

State of New York Poe 

County of New York 

I, Bill Lann Lee, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the 
services for which fees have been charged were incurred in this action and that 

the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed. 

THE PRINTER'S ITEMIZED STATEMENT SHOWING THE ACTUAL COSTS PER PAGE FOR THE APPENDIX 

AND BRIEFS IS ATTACHED. (If commercial printer not used prepare and attach itemization 

of copying costs.) A copy hereof was this day mailed to opposing counsel, with postage 

  
  

  

fully prepaid thereon. This 29th, day of April i | Fo D. 1981 

"2 J — \ / £7 

TRAY LL Ne 
Sao je L 

Attorney for Eiainti Pie Anbullbdk, 
  

oh Bik. Rok Roki Rk Rk 

Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $ ng.45 this / 7 " day 

of , 198. 
Army GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU 

: ).7 / Clerk 2 od 7 4 Jus 

/ Lr 
Cage ET A 

/ / Pi / 7 / ow’ ” 

By LoL. "de fe Villy Cro 
/ 4 

Deputy Clerk 
  

/ 
NOTE: The Bill of Costs is due for filing in this office Within 14 days from the date 
of the opinion, in accordance with Rule 39 F.R.A.P. If d bill of costs is not timely 
filed in this office, processing can be accomplished only by the filing of a formal 

motion for leave to file same out of time. 

  

  

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES GOVERNING TAXATION OF COSTS. [||70bb5c6d-e4c9-469a-b9b0-3b00fd95ec2c||] 

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.