Itemization of Costs
Public Court Documents
May 4, 1981
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Itemization of Costs, 1981. 2f2a43b2-722e-f111-88b4-7c1e526962fd. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/63d942b0-96b9-4e5e-9e0a-e03c6a7274a7/itemization-of-costs. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||70bb5c6d-e4c9-469a-b9b0-3b00fd95ec2c||] IN. THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
NO... 79-2393
DELORES NORWOOD, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
V.
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
ITEMIZATION OF COSTS
nr
This is to certify that the cost of printing appellees’
| brief in the above appeal on or about September 7, 1979, by in-
house Xeroxing was $78.45. This amount was figured based on a
run of 12 copies of 43 pages at 15¢ per page and 7 plastic covers
at 15¢ each. (Seven copies of the brief were filed with the
Court with plastic covers, 2 were for service, and 3 copies for
counsel and file. The length of the brief was 43 pages. The
cost of 15¢ per page is based on the average cost of machine,
paper and labor for the period in question.)
BILL LANN LEE
Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees
Q... States Court of Appeals ®
FIFTH CIRCUIT
TEL S04- 589-6514
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET
CLERK NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130
May 19, 1981
Mr. Norman L. Gillespie,Clerk
U. 8% District Court
P. O. Box-727
Oxford, MS 38655
No. 79-2393 - Delores Norwood, Etc., Et Al -vs-
-D.'L. Harrison, Sr., et.al
Dear Mr. Gillespie:
(X ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the
above case issued as and for the mandate.
( ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the Rule 21 Decision in the above
case issued as and for the mandate.
( ) The Court having denied the motion for stay of mandate, enclosed is
a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above case
issued as and for the mandate. See attached notice.
( ) Having received from the Clerk of the Supreme Court a copy of the
order of that Court denying certiorari, I enclose a certified copy
of the judgment of this Court in the above case, issued as and for
the mandate.
( ) We have received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court
denying certiorari in the above cause. This Court's. judgment as
mandate having already been issued to your office, no further
order will be forthcoming.
Enclosed herewith are the following additional documents:
Y Copy of the Court's opinion.
) Original record on appeal or review. (TO BE RETURNED LATER)
( ) Original exhibits.
Y Bill of Costs approved by this Court.
Sincerely,
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk
Encl. {Letter 5 Bill of Costs) x AL.
By » CN Nn 2
CC: Mr. Peter M. Sockett, Jr.
Mr. Bill Lann Lee
Mr. Jack Greenberg
Deputy Clerk
UNITED sta COURT OF APPEALS FOR THe@rr CIRCUIT
BILL OF COSTS NJ!
DELORES NORWOOD, et al., + OF Ai 3 Ah 7
Plaintiffs-Appellees, ~QV" APR. Er ATTA
O 5. Tog
versus © RECEIVED g, 79-2329U.8. COURT OF Appa
L — 3 oj
D. L. HARRISON, el al., | MAY 4 1981 / Fi L ED
Defendants-Appellanis. /
MAY 4198
GILBERT F. GANUCHE A , GANUCHEAU
The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against ..Defendants-Appellants. e eqq
Be
“Ne Ww Sn VW
———- AN #7 of
on
COURT COSTS TAXABLE UNDER RULE 39, FRAP REQUESTED ALLOWED
Docketing Fee Wkf.paid directly to the. Court. of. Appeals)
Cost of Printing Appendix or Record Excerpts
Cost of Printing Appellant's Brief
Cost of Printing Appellant’s Reply Brief
|
|
| |
Cost of Printing Appellee’s Brief $78 l45 0 2
TOTAL oni RSA | $78 |
;
State of New York SS:
County of New York
I, Bill Lan Lee, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the
services for which fees have been charged were incurred in this action and that
the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed.
THE PRINTER'S ITEMIZED STATEMENT SHOWING THE ACTUAL COSTS PER PAGE FOR THE APPENDIX
AND BRIEFS IS ATTACHED. (If commercial printer not used prepare and attach itemization
of copying costs.) A copy hereof was this day mailed to opposing counsel, with postage
fully prepaid thereon. This 29th day of ApPEPl 4) Moe 199
2 2. = iit” 3 py i /
a JA I ; ; FAY. 2 Ne
~~(Sfghatusé) {r
i \ Vv
Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Rh BRR RR Rah RR
Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $ ng. $s this /9H day
of A 3 198 / /
Y GILBERT F. GANUCHEAY
: LA Clerk 7 /
7 / / A ee apf ig
0 AN Lol AAT 7 , fd Fi fd er
fr! Deputy Clerk
/
NOTE: The Bill of Costs is due for filing in this office Within 14 days from the date
of the opinion, in accordance with Rule 39 F.R.A.P. If 4 bill of costs is not timely
filed in this office, processing can be accomplished only by the filing of a formal
motion for leave to file same out of time.
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES GOVERNING TAXATION OF COSTS.
#2 * »
nited States Court of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT
TEL 504-589-6514
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU OFFICE OF THE CLERK 600 CAMP STREET
CLERK NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130
May 19, 1981
Mr. Norman L. Gillespie,Clerk
Pe. S. District Court
P. OO. Box 727
Oxford, MS + 38655
No. 79-2393 - Delores Norwood, Etc., Et Al -vs-
D.:L. Harrison, Sr., et al
Dear Mr. Gillespie:
{ X ') Enclosed is a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the
above case issued as and for the mandate.
( ) Enclosed is a certified copy of the Rule 21 Decision in the above
case issued as and for the mandate.
( ) The Court having denied the motion for stay of mandate, enclosed is
a certified copy of the judgment of this Court in the above case
issued as and for the mandate. See attached notice.
( ) Having received from the Clerk of the Supreme Court a copy of the
order of that Court denying certiorari, I enclose a certified copy
of the judgment of this Court in the above case, issued as and for
the mandate.
( ) We have received a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court
denying certiorari in the above cause. This Court's judgment as
mandate having already been issued to your office, no further
order will be forthcoming.
Enclosed herewith are the following additional documents:
(X *) Copy Of the Court's opinion. :
( ) Original record on appeal or review. (TO BE RETURNED LATER)
( ) Original exhibits.
(+ ) Bill of Costs approved by this ‘Court, x
Sincerely,
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, Clerk
Encl. (Letter & Bill of Costs) ? 0
By # GC nn 2
CC: Mr. Peter M. Sockett, Jr.
Mr. Bill Lann Lee
Mr. Jack Greenberg
Deputy Clerk
UNITED sta COURT OF APPEALS FOR THEfFTH CIRCUIT
BILL OF COSTS NO!
DELORES NORWOOD, et al., aT OF 5 at
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Miah 0 Gi r7 id A ANS
Versus 4 RECEIVED Gg, hater s. COURT OF APPEALS j
D. L. HARRISON, ‘et al., | MAY 4 1981 / Fl L E 0
Defendants-Appellants. ’
Ww Af 1
- Sow opLemne AY 4 16814
GILBERT F. GANUCH
Defendants-Appellants. AN The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against __.
COURT COSTS TAXABLE UNDER RULE 39, FRAP REQUESTED ALLOWED
Docketing Fee @kf.paid directly to the Court of. Appeals) |
Cost of Printing Appendix or Record Excerpts
Cost of Printing Appellant’s Brief
Cost of Printing Appellee’s Brief $78 |45 ya]
Cost of Printing Appellant’s Reply Brief
TOTAL ciiiconn ee $78 145 | I 11s (
. /
State of New York Poe
County of New York
I, Bill Lann Lee, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the
services for which fees have been charged were incurred in this action and that
the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed.
THE PRINTER'S ITEMIZED STATEMENT SHOWING THE ACTUAL COSTS PER PAGE FOR THE APPENDIX
AND BRIEFS IS ATTACHED. (If commercial printer not used prepare and attach itemization
of copying costs.) A copy hereof was this day mailed to opposing counsel, with postage
fully prepaid thereon. This 29th, day of April i | Fo D. 1981
"2 J — \ / £7
TRAY LL Ne
Sao je L
Attorney for Eiainti Pie Anbullbdk,
oh Bik. Rok Roki Rk Rk
Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $ ng.45 this / 7 " day
of , 198.
Army GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU
: ).7 / Clerk 2 od 7 4 Jus
/ Lr
Cage ET A
/ / Pi / 7 / ow’ ”
By LoL. "de fe Villy Cro
/ 4
Deputy Clerk
/
NOTE: The Bill of Costs is due for filing in this office Within 14 days from the date
of the opinion, in accordance with Rule 39 F.R.A.P. If d bill of costs is not timely
filed in this office, processing can be accomplished only by the filing of a formal
motion for leave to file same out of time.
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES GOVERNING TAXATION OF COSTS. [||70bb5c6d-e4c9-469a-b9b0-3b00fd95ec2c||]